-
Minerva Anestesiologica Dec 2019Intranasal dexmedetomidine, although still off-label, recently boasted an increasing consensus for different uses, namely, in diagnostic non-painful procedures, in... (Review)
Review
Intranasal dexmedetomidine, although still off-label, recently boasted an increasing consensus for different uses, namely, in diagnostic non-painful procedures, in painful procedures and in surgical premedication. However, at present, there is no consensus regarding indications, dosage and timing for administration. This article aims to provide a comprehensive literature analysis and summarize the more recent evidence of research on pediatric intranasal dexmedetomidine, in the effort to better delineate usefulness and limits for each specific indication. In summary, available pediatric evidence confirms efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for intranasal administration. Pharmacological profile for the various pediatric ages and procedures still needs quality studies and pharmacokinetic in-depth analysis.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Child; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31630510
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13820-5 -
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Jan 2021Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a significant clinical issue that is associated with increased mortality and cost of health care. Dexmedetomidine, an α2...
Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a significant clinical issue that is associated with increased mortality and cost of health care. Dexmedetomidine, an α2 adrenoceptor agonist that is used to provide sedation, has been shown to induce neuroprotection under various conditions. This study was designed to determine whether dexmedetomidine protects against SAE and whether α2 adrenoceptor plays a role in this protection. Six- to eight-week old CD-1 male mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). They were treated with intraperitoneal injection of dexmedetomidine in the presence or absence of α2 adrenoceptor antagonists, atipamezole or yohimbine, or an α2A adrenoceptor antagonist, BRL-44408. Hippocampus and blood were harvested for measuring cytokines. Mice were subjected to Barnes maze and fear conditioning 14 days after CLP to evaluate their learning and memory. CLP significantly increased the proinflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β in the blood and hippocampus. CLP also increased the permeability of blood-brain barrier (BBB) and impaired learning and memory. These CLP detrimental effects were attenuated by dexmedetomidine. Intracerebroventricular application of atipamezole, yohimbine or BRL-44408 blocked the protection of dexmedetomidine on the brain but not on the systemic inflammation. Astrocytes but not microglia expressed α2A adrenoceptors. Microglial depletion did not abolish the protective effects of dexmedetomidine. These results suggest that dexmedetomidine reduces systemic inflammation, neuroinflammation, injury of BBB and cognitive dysfunction in septic mice. The protective effects of dexmedetomidine on the brain may be mediated by α2A adrenoceptors in the astrocytes.
Topics: Animals; Brain Diseases; Dexmedetomidine; Inflammation; Male; Mice; Receptors, Adrenergic; Sepsis
PubMed: 33039659
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.10.008 -
Current Pain and Headache Reports Apr 2020Effective acute pain management has evolved considerably in recent years and is a primary area of focus in attempts to defend against the opioid epidemic. Persistent... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Effective acute pain management has evolved considerably in recent years and is a primary area of focus in attempts to defend against the opioid epidemic. Persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) has an incidence of up to 30-50% and has negative outcome of quality of life and negative burden on individuals, family, and society. The 2016 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines states that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) forms an integral part of Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) and is now recommended to use a multimodal opioid-sparing approach for management of postoperative pain. As such, dexmedetomidine is now being used as part of ERAS protocols along with regional nerve blocks and other medications, to create a satisfactory postoperative outcome with reduced opioid consumption in the Post anesthesia care unit (PACU).
RECENT FINDINGS
Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha agonist, possesses analgesic effects and has a different mechanism of action when compared with opioids. When dexmedetomidine is initiated at the end of a procedure, it has a better hemodynamic stability and pain response than ropivacaine. Dexmedetomidine can be used as an adjuvant in epidurals with local anesthetic sparing effects. Its use during nerve blocks results in reduced postoperative pain. Also, local infiltration of IV dexmedetomidine is associated with earlier discharge from PACU. Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine has significantly improved postoperative outcomes when used as part of ERAS protocols. An in-depth review of the use of dexmedetomidine in ERAS protocols is presented for clinical anesthesiologists.
Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Dexmedetomidine; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Humans; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 32240402
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00853-z -
Anaesthesia Mar 2023The effects of dexmedetomidine in adults undergoing cardiac surgery are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the effects of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effects of dexmedetomidine in adults undergoing cardiac surgery are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the effects of peri-operative dexmedetomidine in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We searched MEDLINE via Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane for relevant randomised controlled trials between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2022. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology checklist to assess study quality and the GRADE approach to certainty of evidence. We assessed the sensitivity of results to false data. We used random-effects meta-analyses to analyse the primary outcomes: durations of intensive care and tracheal intubation. We included 48 trials of 6273 participants. Dexmedetomidine reduced the mean (95%CI) duration of intensive care by 5.0 (2.2-7.7) h, p = 0.001, and tracheal intubation by 1.6 (0.6-2.7) h, p = 0.003. The relative risk (95%CI) for postoperative delirium was 0.58 (0.43-0.78), p = 0.001; 0.76 (0.61-0.95) for atrial fibrillation, p = 0.015; and 0.49 (0.25-0.97) for short-term mortality, p = 0.041. Bradycardia and hypotension were not significantly affected. Trial sequential analysis was consistent with the primary meta-analysis. Adjustments for possible false data reduced the mean (95%CI) reduction in duration of intensive care and tracheal intubation by dexmedetomidine to 3.6 (1.8-5.4) h and 0.8 (0.2-1.4) h, respectively. Binary adjustment for methodological quality at a Joanna Briggs Institute score threshold of 10 did not alter the results significantly. In summary, peri-operative dexmedetomidine reduced the durations of intensive care and tracheal intubation and the incidence of short-term mortality after adult cardiac surgery. The reductions in intensive care stay and tracheal intubation may or may not be considered clinically useful, particularly after adjustment for possible false data.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Emergence Delirium; Critical Care; Bradycardia
PubMed: 36535747
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15947 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Mar 2021Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in older patients. Dexmedetomidine might be effective in decreasing the incidence of POD. We hypothesised that... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in older patients. Dexmedetomidine might be effective in decreasing the incidence of POD. We hypothesised that adding low-dose rate dexmedetomidine infusion to a propofol sedation regimen would have fewer side-effects and would counteract the possible delirium producing properties of propofol, resulting in a lower risk of POD than propofol with placebo.
METHODS
In this double-blind placebo-controlled trial, patients ≥60 yr old undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were randomised 1:1 to the following postoperative sedative regimens: a propofol infusion and dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg kg h) or a propofol infusion and saline 0.9% (placebo group). The study drug was started at chest closure and continued for 10 h. The primary endpoint was in-hospital POD, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method and chart review method.
RESULTS
POD over the course of hospital stay occurred in 31/177 (18%) and 33/172 (19%) patients in the dexmedetomidine and placebo arm, respectively (P=0.687; odds ratio=0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.54). The incidence of POD in the intensive care alone, or on the ward alone, was also not significantly different between the groups. Subjects in the dexmedetomidine group spent less median time in a delirious state (P=0.026). Median administered postoperative norepinephrine was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group (P<0.001). One patient in the dexmedetomidine group and 10 patients in the placebo group died in the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS
Adding low-dose rate dexmedetomidine to a sedative regimen based on propofol did not result in a different risk of in-hospital delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. With a suggestion of both harm and benefit in secondary outcomes, supplementing postoperative propofol with dexmedetomidine cannot be recommended based on this study.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT03388541.
Topics: Aged; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Postoperative Complications; Propofol; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33358336
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.041 -
Science (New York, N.Y.) Sep 2022Because nonopioid analgesics are much sought after, we computationally docked more than 301 million virtual molecules against a validated pain target, the α-adrenergic...
Because nonopioid analgesics are much sought after, we computationally docked more than 301 million virtual molecules against a validated pain target, the α-adrenergic receptor (αAR), seeking new αAR agonists chemotypes that lack the sedation conferred by known αAR drugs, such as dexmedetomidine. We identified 17 ligands with potencies as low as 12 nanomolar, many with partial agonism and preferential G and G signaling. Experimental structures of αAR complexed with two of these agonists confirmed the docking predictions and templated further optimization. Several compounds, including the initial docking hit '9087 [mean effective concentration (EC) of 52 nanomolar] and two analogs, '7075 and PS75 (EC 4.1 and 4.8 nanomolar), exerted on-target analgesic activity in multiple in vivo pain models without sedation. These newly discovered agonists are interesting as therapeutic leads that lack the liabilities of opioids and the sedation of dexmedetomidine.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Dexmedetomidine; Drug Design; Drug Discovery; Humans; Ligands; Mice; Molecular Docking Simulation; Pain; Pain Management; Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 36173843
DOI: 10.1126/science.abn7065 -
JAMA Network Open Jun 2023Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in people who have experienced trauma, especially those hospitalized for surgery. Dexmedetomidine may reduce or reverse... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in people who have experienced trauma, especially those hospitalized for surgery. Dexmedetomidine may reduce or reverse the early consolidation and formation of conditioned fear memory and prevent the occurrence of postoperative PTSD.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effects of intraoperative and postoperative low-dose intravenous pumping dexmedetomidine on PTSD among patients with trauma undergoing emergency surgery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 22 to October 20, 2022, with follow-up 1 month postoperatively, in patients with trauma undergoing emergency surgery at 4 hospital centers in Jiangsu Province, China. A total of 477 participants were screened. The observers were blinded to patient groupings, particularly for subjective measurements.
INTERVENTIONS
Dexmedetomidine or placebo (normal saline) was administered at a maintenance dose of 0.1 μg/kg hourly from the start of anesthesia until the end of surgery and at the same rate after surgery from 9 pm to 7 am on days 1 to 3.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the difference in the incidence of PTSD 1 month after surgery in the 2 groups. This outcome was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (CAPS-5). The secondary outcomes were the pain score within 48 hours and 1 month postoperatively; incidence of postoperative delirium, nausea, and pruritus; subjective sleep quality; anxiety; and occurrence of adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 310 patients (154 in the normal saline group and 156 in the dexmedetomidine group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 40.2 [10.3] years; 179 men [57.7%]). The incidence of PTSD was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group 1 month postoperatively (14.1% vs 24.0%; P = .03). The participants in the dexmedetomidine group had a significantly lower CAPS-5 score than those in the control group (17.3 [5.3] vs 18.9 [6.6]; mean difference, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.31-2.99; P = .02). After adjusting for potential confounders, the patients in the dexmedetomidine group were less likely to develop PTSD than those in the control group 1 month postoperatively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94; P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this randomized clinical trial, the administration of intraoperative and postoperative dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of PTSD among patients with trauma. The findings of this trial support the use of dexmedetomidine in emergency trauma surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2200056162.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Dexmedetomidine; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Saline Solution; Emergence Delirium; Administration, Intravenous
PubMed: 37326991
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18611 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Aug 2023Patients often experience severe pain after scoliosis correction surgery. Esketamine and dexmedetomidine each improves analgesia but can produce side-effects. We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients often experience severe pain after scoliosis correction surgery. Esketamine and dexmedetomidine each improves analgesia but can produce side-effects. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improves analgesia.
METHODS
Two hundred male and female adults having scoliosis correction surgery were randomised to patient-controlled sufentanil analgesia (4 μg kg in normal saline) with either a combined supplement (esketamine 0.25 mg ml and dexmedetomidine 1 μg ml) or placebo. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 72 h, defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS: 0=no pain and 10=worst pain) score ≥4 at any of seven time points. Amongst secondary outcomes, subjective sleep quality was assessed with an NRS score (0=best sleep and 10=worst sleep) for the first five postoperative nights.
RESULTS
There were 199 subjects included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean infusion rates were 5.5 μg kg h for esketamine and 0.02 μg kg h for dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome incidence was lower with the combined supplement (65.7% [65/99]) than with placebo (86.0% [86/100]; relative risk 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90; P=0.001). Subjects given the combined supplement had lower pain intensity at rest at five time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.005), lower pain intensity with movement at six time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.001), and better subjective sleep quality for the first 5 postoperative nights (median difference -2 to -1 points; P<0.001). Adverse events did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improved analgesia and subjective sleep quality after scoliosis correction surgery.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04791059.
Topics: Humans; Ketamine; Dexmedetomidine; Analgesia; Pain, Postoperative; Scoliosis; Double-Blind Method; Male; Female; Adult
PubMed: 37302963
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.001 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2023Excessive oxygen free radicals and toxic substances are generated in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) process. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a common anesthetic and sedative...
Excessive oxygen free radicals and toxic substances are generated in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) process. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a common anesthetic and sedative drug, can considerably boost glutathione (GSH), which has anti-copper influx effects. Focusing on cuproptosis, the mechanism of DEX in the I/R was revealed. Using the I/R rat model, the effects of DEX and the copper chelator D-penicillamine on cerebral infarct volume, copper levels, mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential, GSH content, and enrichment of cuproptosis functional proteins were examined. The involvement of ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) in the DEX regulatory pathway was verified by overexpressing FDX1 . DEX could significantly reduce cerebral infarction in rats, reduce copper levels, maintain mitochondrial functions, increase GSH, and reduce the content of key proteins related to cuproptosis. These aspects were replicated and revealed that FDX1 overexpression partially reversed the impacts of DEX. Together, cuproptosis occurs in the brain I/R process and DEX can enhance cell survival by blocking the primary pathway mediated by FDX1.KEY MESSAGESDexmedetomidine reduces cerebral infarction in the I/R rat models.Dexmedetomidine reduces cuproptosis in the I/R rat models.FDX1, an upstream of protein fatty acylation, mediates regulation of Dexmedetomidine.
Topics: Animals; Rats; Apoptosis; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Infarction; Dexmedetomidine; Ferredoxins; Homeostasis; Reperfusion; Reperfusion Injury
PubMed: 37162502
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2209735 -
JAMA Network Open Jan 2024Postpartum depression (PPD) is emerging as a major public health problem worldwide. Although the particular period and context in which PPD occurs provides an... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Postpartum depression (PPD) is emerging as a major public health problem worldwide. Although the particular period and context in which PPD occurs provides an opportunity for preventive interventions, there is still a lack of pharmacologic prevention strategies for PPD.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for prevention of PPD among women with prenatal depression undergoing cesarean delivery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This randomized clinical trial enrolled 338 women who screened positive for prenatal depression at 2 hospitals in Hunan, China from March 28, 2022, to April 16, 2023. Women with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9 who were 18 years of age or older and were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were eligible.
INTERVENTIONS
Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the dexmedetomidine group or the control group via centrally computer-generated group randomization. Dexmedetomidine, 0.5 μg/kg and 0.9% saline were intravenously infused for 10 minutes after delivery in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. After infusion, sufentanil or dexmedetomidine plus sufentanil was administered via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for 48 hours in the control group and dexmedetomidine group, respectively.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was positive PPD screening results at 7 and 42 days post partum, defined as a postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.
RESULTS
All 338 participants were female, with a mean (SD) age of 31.5 (4.1) years. Positive PPD screening incidence at 7 and 42 days post partum in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group was significantly decreased (day 7, 21 of 167 [12.6%] vs 53 of 165 [32.1%]; risk ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.25-0.62]; P < .001; day 42, 19 of 167 [11.4%] vs 50 of 165 [30.3%]; risk ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.23-0.61]; P < .001). The dexmedetomidine group showed no significant difference in adverse events vs the control group (46 of 169 [27.2%] vs 33 of 169 [19.5%]; P = .10), but the incidence of hypotension increased (31 of 169 [18.3%] vs 16 of 169 [9.5%]; risk ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.13-4.10]; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Dexmedetomidine administration in the early postpartum period significantly reduced the incidence of a positive PPD screening and maintained a favorable safety profile.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200057213.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Administration, Intravenous; Depression, Postpartum; Dexmedetomidine; Sufentanil
PubMed: 38270949
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53252