-
American Journal of Cardiovascular... Sep 2023Aficamten is a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor that has demonstrated its ability to safely lower left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients and improve heart failure... (Review)
Review
Aficamten is a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor that has demonstrated its ability to safely lower left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients and improve heart failure symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Based on the REDWOOD-HCM open label extension (OLE) study, participants receiving aficamten had significantly reduced resting and Valsalva LVOT gradient within 2 weeks after initiating treatment, with ongoing improvements over 24 weeks, and recent evidence suggests effects can sustain up to 48 weeks. While beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide have shown some benefits in managing HCM, they have limited direct impact on the underlying disease process in patients with obstructive HCM. Aficamten achieves its therapeutic effect by reducing hypercontractility and improving diastolic function in obstructive HCM. Mavacamten was the first cardiac myosin inhibitor approved for symptomatic obstructive HCM. However, aficamten has a shorter human half-life (t) and fewer drug-drug interactions, making it a preferable treatment option. This review evaluates the long-term clinical value and safety of aficamten in patients with obstructive HCM based on available data from completed and ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, the molecular basis of sarcomere-targeted therapy in reducing LVOT gradients is explored, and its potential in managing obstructive HCM is discussed.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Calcium Channel Blockers; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Cardiac Myosins
PubMed: 37526885
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00599-0 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition with abnormal hypertrophy of the left ventricle in the absence of common causes. The most common form involves the basal... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition with abnormal hypertrophy of the left ventricle in the absence of common causes. The most common form involves the basal septum and can lead to obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. Patients can experience exertional symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea and syncope. Traditional treatment has included beta blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with second-line therapy being disopyramide. Recently, mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor, has demonstrated improvement in quantitative measures of obstruction and symptom relief to such a degree that patients were able to defer invasive management of the disease. This review focuses on the pharmacology of mavacamten, its clinical trial data and guidance on how to incorporate this drug into clinical practice. Furthermore, it discusses emerging therapies currently being investigated for HCM.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Benzylamines; Calcium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 37064432
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S368590 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2019Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation often recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been...
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation often recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence. This is an update of a review previously published in 2006, 2012 and 2015.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke, drug adverse effects and recurrence of atrial fibrillation in people who had recovered sinus rhythm after having atrial fibrillation.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase in January 2019, and ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP in February 2019. We checked the reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Two authors independently selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antiarrhythmic drug with a control (no treatment, placebo, drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic drug in adults who had atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored, spontaneously or by any intervention. We excluded postoperative atrial fibrillation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We pooled studies, if appropriate, using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up or the nearest time point.
MAIN RESULTS
This update included one new study (100 participants) and excluded one previously included study because of double publication. Finally, we included 59 RCTs comprising 20,981 participants studying quinidine, disopyramide, propafenone, flecainide, metoprolol, amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone and sotalol. Overall, mean follow-up was 10.2 months.All-cause mortalityHigh-certainty evidence from five RCTs indicated that treatment with sotalol was associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.81; participants = 1882). The number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) for sotalol was 102 participants treated for one year to have one additional death. Low-certainty evidence from six RCTs suggested that risk of mortality may be higher in people taking quinidine (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 4.77; participants = 1646). Moderate-certainty evidence showed increased RR for mortality but with very wide CIs for metoprolol (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.37 to 11.05, 2 RCTs, participants = 562) and amiodarone (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.99, 2 RCTs, participants = 444), compared with placebo.We found little or no difference in mortality with dofetilide (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence) or dronedarone (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; high-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/no treatment. There were few data on mortality for disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, making impossible a reliable estimation for those drugs.Withdrawals due to adverse eventsAll analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse effects compared to placebo or no treatment (quinidine: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.78; disopyramide: RR 3.68, 95% CI 0.95 to 14.24; propafenone: RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.46; flecainide: RR 15.41, 95% CI 0.91 to 260.19; metoprolol: RR 3.47, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.15; amiodarone: RR 6.70, 95% CI 1.91 to 23.45; dofetilide: RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.18; dronedarone: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.85; sotalol: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.11). Certainty of the evidence for this outcome was low for disopyramide, amiodarone, dofetilide and flecainide; moderate to high for the remaining drugs.ProarrhythmiaVirtually all studied antiarrhythmics showed increased proarrhythmic effects (counting both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias attributable to treatment) (quinidine: RR 2.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 4.41; disopyramide: no data; flecainide: RR 4.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 17.77; metoprolol: RR 18.14, 95% CI 2.42 to 135.66; amiodarone: RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.71 to 6.96; dofetilide: RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.33 to 22.76; dronedarone: RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 4.98; sotalol: RR 3.55, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.83); with the exception of propafenone (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.47) for which the certainty of evidence was very low and we were uncertain about the effect. Certainty of the evidence for this outcome for the other drugs was moderate to high.StrokeEleven studies reported stroke outcomes with quinidine, disopyramide, flecainide, amiodarone, dronedarone and sotalol. High-certainty evidence from two RCTs suggested that dronedarone may be associated with reduced risk of stroke (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; participants = 5872). This result is attributed to one study dominating the meta-analysis and has yet to be reproduced in other studies. There was no apparent effect on stroke rates with the other antiarrhythmics.Recurrence of atrial fibrillationModerate- to high-certainty evidence, with the exception of disopyramide which was low-certainty evidence, showed that all analysed drugs, including metoprolol, reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (quinidine: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; disopyramide: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; propafenone: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74; flecainide: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77; metoprolol: RR 0.83 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02; amiodarone: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.58; dofetilide: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; dronedarone: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91; sotalol: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87). Despite this reduction, atrial fibrillation still recurred in 43% to 67% of people treated with antiarrhythmics.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is high-certainty evidence of increased mortality associated with sotalol treatment, and low-certainty evidence suggesting increased mortality with quinidine, when used for maintaining sinus rhythm in people with atrial fibrillation. We found few data on mortality in people taking disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, so it was not possible to make a reliable estimation of the mortality risk for these drugs. However, we did find moderate-certainty evidence of marked increases in proarrhythmia and adverse effects with flecainide.Overall, there is evidence showing that antiarrhythmic drugs increase adverse events, increase proarrhythmic events and some antiarrhythmics may increase mortality. Conversely, although they reduce recurrences of atrial fibrillation, there is no evidence of any benefit on other clinical outcomes, compared with placebo or no treatment.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 31483500
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5 -
Hospital Practice (1995) Feb 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant inherited condition defined by left ventricular wall thickness greater than 15 mm in the absence of other... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant inherited condition defined by left ventricular wall thickness greater than 15 mm in the absence of other conditions that could explain that degree of hypertrophy. Obstructive HCM associated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is defined by an intraventricular systolic pressure gradient greater than or equal to 30 mm Hg. Over the past couple of decades, there has been an expansion of both invasive and pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with HCM, with recent guidelines calling for a melody of invasive and non-invasive treatment strategies. There are several invasive therapies including proven therapies such as alcohol septal ablation and septal myectomy. Novel invasive therapies such as MitraClip, radiofrequency septal ablation and SESAME procedure have more recently been promoted. Pharmacological therapy has also dramatically evolved and includes conventional medications such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide. Mavacamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, may significantly change management. Other myosin inhibitors and modulators are also being developed and tested in large clinical trials. Given significant phenotypical variability in patients with HCM, clinical management can be challenging, and often requires an individualized approach with a combination of invasive and non-invasive options.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36598161
DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2162297 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology May 2023The pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is primarily comprised of dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, mitral regurgitation, and diastolic... (Review)
Review
The pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is primarily comprised of dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, mitral regurgitation, and diastolic dysfunction. Symptoms such as dyspnea, angina, or syncope can occur because of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and reduced LV cavity size. Currently, focus on symptom relief through optimizing LV preload and reducing inotropy is the mainstay of therapy through the use of β-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide. Mavacamten is a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mavacamten normalizes myosin and actin cross-bridging to decrease contractility and ultimately reduce LV outflow tract gradients to maximize cardiac output. In this review, we report on the mechanism of action of mavacamten, safety profile, and phase 2 and 3 clinical trial data. Because of the risk of heart failure resulting from systolic dysfunction, careful patient selection and close monitoring are key for implementing this therapy into cardiovascular practice.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Benzylamines; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
PubMed: 36878205
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001416 -
Future Cardiology Oct 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a phenotypically heterogeneous disease with a genetic basis and variable penetrance. The hallmarks of HCM include dynamic left... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a phenotypically heterogeneous disease with a genetic basis and variable penetrance. The hallmarks of HCM include dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, typically caused by asymmetric septal hypertrophy. However, abnormal papillary muscle placement, abnormal mitral valve and subvalvular apparatus and apical hypertrophic forms have also been described. Typical medical treatment has been stagnant for decades, although there have been significant advances in surgical treatment of patients with obstructive HCM. Herein, we describe a new class of drugs targeting the specific pathophysiology of HCM.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Familial; Heart Valve Diseases; Ventricular Outflow Obstruction, Left
PubMed: 37933625
DOI: 10.2217/fca-2023-0056