-
International Journal of Cardiology May 2022To evaluate the role of bisoprolol to control symptoms and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in a consecutive cohort of adults with hypertrophic...
AIMS
To evaluate the role of bisoprolol to control symptoms and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in a consecutive cohort of adults with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
METHODS AND RESULTS
In this retrospective study, patients with HCM with an LVOT gradient ≥50 mmHg after Valsalva manoeuvre and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III symptoms were assigned to receive bisoprolol (starting at 1.25 mg daily). The initial dose was increased every two weeks to achieve the target in LVOT gradient <30 mmHg or the maximum tolerated dose. The primary endpoint was the achievement of a LVOT gradient <30 mmHg and ≥ 1 NYHA class improvement. The secondary endpoints were proportion of patients with LVOT gradient <30 mmHg or < 50 mmHg, proportion of patients with ≥1 NYHA class improvement, and change from baseline in LVOT gradient. Between December 2001 and December 2020, 92 patients were enrolled into the study. Sixteen (17%) patients on bisoprolol met the primary endpoint. Bisoprolol reduced the LVOT gradient to less than 30 mmHg in 33 (36%) patients, to less than 50 mmHg in 57 (62%), and improved NYHA class in 30 (33%). The mean reduction of LVOT gradient on bisoprolol was 28 (±14) mmHg and the percentage reduction was 42 (±21) %. In 35 (38%) patients, bisoprolol did not reduce the gradient to less than 50 mmHg requiring disopyramide and/or myectomy to achieve this goal.
CONCLUSION
Treatment with bisoprolol was well-tolerated and effective in relieving obstruction and improving symptoms in a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM.
Topics: Adult; Bisoprolol; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Disopyramide; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
PubMed: 35278578
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.013 -
Molecular Psychiatry Jul 2023Anxiety disorders are increasingly prevalent, affect people's ability to do things, and decrease quality of life. Due to lack of objective tests, they are underdiagnosed...
Anxiety disorders are increasingly prevalent, affect people's ability to do things, and decrease quality of life. Due to lack of objective tests, they are underdiagnosed and sub-optimally treated, resulting in adverse life events and/or addictions. We endeavored to discover blood biomarkers for anxiety, using a four-step approach. First, we used a longitudinal within-subject design in individuals with psychiatric disorders to discover blood gene expression changes between self-reported low anxiety and high anxiety states. Second, we prioritized the list of candidate biomarkers with a Convergent Functional Genomics approach using other evidence in the field. Third, we validated our top biomarkers from discovery and prioritization in an independent cohort of psychiatric subjects with clinically severe anxiety. Fourth, we tested these candidate biomarkers for clinical utility, i.e. ability to predict anxiety severity state, and future clinical worsening (hospitalizations with anxiety as a contributory cause), in another independent cohort of psychiatric subjects. We showed increased accuracy of individual biomarkers with a personalized approach, by gender and diagnosis, particularly in women. The biomarkers with the best overall evidence were GAD1, NTRK3, ADRA2A, FZD10, GRK4, and SLC6A4. Finally, we identified which of our biomarkers are targets of existing drugs (such as a valproate, omega-3 fatty acids, fluoxetine, lithium, sertraline, benzodiazepines, and ketamine), and thus can be used to match patients to medications and measure response to treatment. We also used our biomarker gene expression signature to identify drugs that could be repurposed for treating anxiety, such as estradiol, pirenperone, loperamide, and disopyramide. Given the detrimental impact of untreated anxiety, the current lack of objective measures to guide treatment, and the addiction potential of existing benzodiazepines-based anxiety medications, there is a urgent need for more precise and personalized approaches like the one we developed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Precision Medicine; Pharmacogenetics; Quality of Life; Anxiety Disorders; Biomarkers; Risk Assessment; Benzodiazepines; Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
PubMed: 36878964
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-01998-0 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy May 2024Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous genetic heart disease with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 0.2% to 0.6%. Clinically, HCM can... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous genetic heart disease with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 0.2% to 0.6%. Clinically, HCM can range from no symptoms to severe symptoms such as heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Currently, the management of HCM involves lifestyle modifications, familial screening, genetic counseling, pharmacotherapy to manage symptoms, sudden cardiac death risk assessment, septal reduction therapy, and heart transplantation for specific patients. Multicenter randomized controlled trials have only recently explored the potential of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) such as mavacamten as a directed pharmacological approach for managing HCM.
AREAS COVERED
We will assess the existing medical treatments for HCM: beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, disopyramide, and different CMIs. We will also discuss future HCM pharmacotherapy guidelines and underline this patient population's unfulfilled needs.
EXPERT OPINION
Mavacamten is the first-in-class CMI approved by the FDA to target HCM pathophysiology specifically. Mavacamten should be incorporated into the standard therapy for oHCM in case of symptom persistence despite using maximally tolerated beta blockers and/or calcium channel blockers. Potential drug-drug interactions should be assessed before initiating this drug. More studies are needed on the use of CMIs in patients with kidney and/or liver failure and pregnant/breastfeeding patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Benzylamines; Cardiac Myosins; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Drug Interactions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uracil
PubMed: 38813944
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2362902 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2022Background: Disopyramide is a class Ia antiarrhythmic drug that has been used for the second-line treatment of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy...
Background: Disopyramide is a class Ia antiarrhythmic drug that has been used for the second-line treatment of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). The aim of the study was to assess the impact of short-acting disopyramide in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Methods: This prospective study included patients with HOCM on chronic treatment with short-acting disopyramide. Two sequential comprehensive echocardiographic examinations were performed: after temporary disopyramide suspension and 2.5 h after disopyramide intake. Results: 19 patients were included in the study. The effect of disopyramide on the left ventricle was not uniform. After the intake of disopyramide, the mean global strain peak was −17 ± 2% before disopyramide intake and −14 ± 2% after (p < 0.0001). There was a significant reduction in strain in the basal septal (p = 0.015), basal inferior (p = 0.019), basal posterior (p = 0.05), apical anterior (p = 0.0001), and apical lateral segments (p = 0.021). In all other segments, there was no significant change. Disopyramide also caused a significant accentuation of the base-apex strain gradients (p = 0.036). No change was noted in circumferential and left atrial strain. While the left ventricular ejection fraction and outflow gradients did not change, the significant reduction in global and segmental longitudinal strain demonstrated the acute negative inotropic effect of disopyramide on the myocardium in patients with HOCM. Conclusion: A strain analysis may be a useful tool to assess the negative inotropic effect of cardiovascular medication on the left ventricle in patients with HOCM.
PubMed: 36555940
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247325 -
European Journal of Preventive... Aug 2022Several studies have reported excess female mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but the cause is unknown.
BACKGROUND
Several studies have reported excess female mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but the cause is unknown.
AIMS
To compare risk-factors for disease-related death in both sexes in a geographical cohort of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM).
METHODS AND RESULTS
Data-bases in all ten hospitals within West Götaland Region yielded 250 oHCM-patients (123 females, 127 males). Mean follow-up was 18.1 y. Risk-factors for disease-related death were evaluated by Cox-hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier survival-curves, with sex-comparisons of distribution of risk-factors and therapy in total and age-matched (n = 166) groups. At diagnosis females were older, median 62 y vs. 51 y, (P < 0.001), but not different in outflow-gradients and median NYHA-class. However, septal hypertrophy was more advanced: 10.6 [IQR = 3.2] vs. 9.6 [2.5] mm/m2 BSA; P = 0.002. Females had higher disease-related mortality than males (P = <0.001), with annual mortality 2.9% vs. 1.5% in age-matched groups (P = 0.010 log-rank). For each risk-category identified (NYHA-class ≥ III, outflow-gradient ≥50 mmHg), a higher proportion of females died (P = 0.0004; P = 0.001). Calcium-blocker therapy was a risk-factor (P = 0.005) and was used more frequently in females (P = 0.034). A beta-blocker dose above cohort-median reduced risk for disease-related death in both males (HR = 0.32; P = 0.0040) and in females (HR = 0.49; P = 0.020). Excess female deaths occurred in chronic heart-failure (P = 0.001) and acute myocardial infarctions (P = 0.015). Fewer females received beta-blocker therapy after diagnosis (64% vs. 78%, P = 0.018), in a smaller dose (P = 0.007), and less frequently combined with disopyramide (7% vs. 16%, P = 0.048).
CONCLUSION
Addressing sex-disparities in the timing of diagnosis and pharmacological therapy has the potential to improve the care of females with oHCM.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Treatment Outcome; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Echocardiography; Risk Factors; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic
PubMed: 35512246
DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac078 -
Drugs Jun 2022Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare disease has hampered the design and conduct of large, randomized trials in the last 50 years, and most of the indications in the current guidelines are derived from small non-randomized studies, case series, or simply from the consensus of experts. Guideline-directed therapy of HCM includes non-selective drugs such as disopyramide, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or β-adrenergic receptor blockers, mainly used in patients with symptomatic obstruction of the outflow tract. Following promising preclinical studies, several drugs acting on potential HCM-specific targets were tested in patients. Despite the huge efforts, none of these studies was able to change clinical practice for HCM patients, because tested drugs were proven to be scarcely effective or hardly tolerated in patients. However, novel compounds have been developed in recent years specifically for HCM, addressing myocardial hypercontractility and altered energetics in a direct manner, through allosteric inhibition of myosin. In this paper, we will critically review the use of different classes of drugs in HCM patients, starting from "old" established agents up to novel selective drugs that have been recently trialed in patients.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Humans
PubMed: 35696053
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01728-w -
Pharmacotherapy Dec 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder for which first-line treatments for obstructive HCM (oHCM) include beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium...
BACKGROUND
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder for which first-line treatments for obstructive HCM (oHCM) include beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide for refractory cases. Mavacamten, a selective cardiac myosin inhibitor, is indicated for symptomatic oHCM to improve functional capacity and symptoms. Use of disopyramide and mavacamten together is not recommended due to concerns of additive negative inotropic effects. Transitioning from disopyramide to mavacamten may be preferred to avoid adverse effects and frequent administration, however, the best approach for making the transition has not been established.
CASES
We present a series of seven patients with oHCM who transitioned from disopyramide to mavacamten and underwent echocardiograms mandated by a Risk Evaluation and Mitigations Strategies program. Two methods were employed. The first approach, involving washout of disopyramide before starting mavacamten, resulted in worsening of heart failure symptoms in the first two cases. The second approach, involving tapering disopyramide when starting mavacamten, was successfully implemented in the last five cases, with no adverse effects or worsening of systolic dysfunction.
CONCLUSION
Our method of tapering disopyramide when starting mavacamten using a stepwise approach is feasible and safe. Our report fulfills an unmet need by serving as a guide for other clinicians who seek to transition their patients from disopyramide to mavacamten.
Topics: Humans; Disopyramide; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Benzylamines; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 37688422
DOI: 10.1002/phar.2874 -
JACC. Basic To Translational Science Nov 2019Disopyramide is effective and safe in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its cellular and molecular mechanisms of action are unknown. We...
Disopyramide is effective and safe in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, its cellular and molecular mechanisms of action are unknown. We tested disopyramide in cardiomyocytes from the septum of surgical myectomy patients: disopyramide inhibits multiple ion channels, leading to lower Ca transients and force, and shortens action potentials, thus reducing cellular arrhythmias. The electrophysiological profile of disopyramide explains the efficient reduction of outflow gradients but also the limited prolongation of the QT interval and the absence of arrhythmic side effects observed in 39 disopyramide-treated patients. In conclusion, our results support the idea that disopyramide is safe for outpatient use in obstructive patients.
PubMed: 31998849
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.06.004 -
JACC. Advances Oct 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-both obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) subtypes-is the most common... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-both obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) subtypes-is the most common monogenic cardiomyopathy. Its structural hallmarks are abnormal thickening of the myocardium and hyperdynamic contractility, while its hemodynamic consequences are left ventricular outflow tract or intracavitary obstruction (in oHCM) and diastolic dysfunction (in both oHCM and nHCM). Several medical therapies are routinely used to improve these abnormalities with the goal to decrease symptom burden in patients with HCM. Current guidelines recommend nonvasodilating beta blockers as first-line and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers followed by disopyramide as second- and third-line medical therapies for symptomatic oHCM and give weaker recommendations for beta blockers and calcium channel blockers in nHCM. These recommendations are based on small studies-mostly nonrandomized-and expert opinion. Our review will summarize the available data on the effectiveness of commonly prescribed medications used in oHCM and nHCM to uncover knowledge gaps, but also new data on cardiac myosin inhibitors.
PubMed: 38938334
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100622 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the presence of electrical strom (ES) and its management still debated.
BACKGROUND
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the presence of electrical strom (ES) and its management still debated.
OBJECTIVES
We present the outcome and management of 44 BrS patients suffering from ES.
METHODS
A systematic literature review and pooled analysis Through database review including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Libary and Cinahl studies were analyzed. Evidence from 7 reports of 808 BrS patients was identified.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients suffering from ES was 34 ± 9.5 months (94.7% males, 65.8% spontaneous BrS type I). Using electrophysiological study ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were inducible in 12/23 (52.2%). Recurrence of ES was documented in 6.1%. Death from ES was 8.2% after a follow-up of 83.5 ± 53.4. In up to 27 ES resolved without treatment. External shock was required in 35.6%, internal ICD shock in 13.3%, Overdrive pacing, left cardiac sympathetic block and atropin in 2.2%. Short-term antiarrhythmic management was as the following: Isopreterenol or Isopreterenol in combination with quinidine 35.5%, orciprenaline in 2.2%, quinidine 2.2%, disopyramide 2.2% or denopamide 2.2%. However, lidocaine, magensium sulfate, mexiletine and propanolol failed to control ES.
CONCLUSION
Although ES is rare in BrS, this entity challenges physicians. Despite its high mortality rate, spontaneous termination is possible. Short-term management using Isoproterenol and/or quinidine might be safe. Prospective studies on management of ES are warranted.
PubMed: 36386327
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.981715