-
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jul 2023Modification of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) implants may be necessary in selected patients with substantial anatomic bone deformity or those undergoing revision...
BACKGROUND
Modification of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) implants may be necessary in selected patients with substantial anatomic bone deformity or those undergoing revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and consequences of implant modifications during TEA at our institution. We hypothesized that TEA implant modification would be more common in revisions than in primary replacements, and that it would not be associated with worse clinical outcomes or increased rates of radiographic or surgical complications directly related to the implant modification.
METHODS
Elbows that had undergone TEA by any of 3 surgeons at our institution with use of intraoperative implant modification between January 1992 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the type of modification and complications. Complications were classified as definitely related, probably related, possibly related, or nonrelated to the implant's modification according to the consensus review by the 3 senior surgeons. A survey was sent out to surgeons outside of our institution to investigate whether intraoperative modification to TEA implants is a common clinical practice.
RESULTS
A total of 106 implant components were modified during 94 of 731 TEA procedures (13%) in 84 of 560 patients. Implant modifications were performed in 60 of 285 revision cases (21%) compared with 34 of 446 (8%) primary cases (P < .0001). These included shortening the stem in 40 (44%), bending the stem in 16 (15%), notching the stem in 16 (15%), tapering the stem in 9 (9%), and a combination of 2 or more of these modifications in 19 implants (17%). Among the 55 index surgeries available for complication analysis, 40 complications occurred in 28 index surgeries (11 primary and 17 revisions; 25 patients), making the overall complication rate 51%. Of these 40 complications, 23 were considered independent of any implant modification. Of the remaining 17 complications, 9 were considered nonrelated to the implant modification, 6 were possibly related, and 2 were probably related to the implant modification. Therefore, the complication rate possibly related or probably related to implant modification was 15% (8 of 55). No complication was classified as definitely related to the implant modification. No implant breakage or malfunction occurred after any modification. A total of 442 survey responses were received representing 29 countries, of which 144 surgeons (39%) performed modification to implants during TEA procedures.
DISCUSSION
This study confirmed our hypothesis that modification of TEA implants is not uncommon at our institution, particularly in revision arthroplasty. Surgeons should keep in mind that complications possibly related or probably related to implant modification were at minimum 15% and could have been as high as 30% if the patients lost to follow-up had all had complications. Implant modification may be necessary in some cases but should be exercised with thoughtful consideration and caution.
Topics: Humans; Elbow; Retrospective Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow; Elbow Joint; Joint Prosthesis; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome; Prosthesis Failure
PubMed: 36918118
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.124 -
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Sep 2022Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are the third most common fracture in humans and the incidence is increasing. There are basically three treatment strategies:... (Review)
Review
Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are the third most common fracture in humans and the incidence is increasing. There are basically three treatment strategies: conservative, joint-preserving reconstructive or joint-replacing procedures. In addition to fracture morphology, patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors are particularly important when deciding on treatment. The experience and training of the surgeon also play a decisive role. In the case of joint-preserving treatment, the risk of osteosynthesis failure and of sequelae of the fracture must always be assessed. If conservative or reconstructive treatment methods are not promising, the joint-replacing procedure is the treatment of choice. The anatomical fracture prosthesis is only indicated, if at all, for young patients with a destroyed humeral head with a preserved rotator cuff and large fragments of the tuberosities. In advanced age, the implantation of a reverse endoprosthesis is increasingly used for dislocated, multifragmentary PHF. In both procedures, the anatomical healing of the tuberosities has a significant impact on the functional outcome.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Humeral Head; Joint Prosthesis; Shoulder Fractures
PubMed: 35833976
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-022-01213-9 -
Der Orthopade Jan 2020Notwithstanding the contributions of soft tissue restraints on postoperative kinematics and long-term survival after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an emerging... (Review)
Review
Notwithstanding the contributions of soft tissue restraints on postoperative kinematics and long-term survival after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an emerging consensus that the underlying anatomy, especially the posterior inclination of the tibial plateau in the sagittal plane (tibial slope), might just have a comparable impact. However, this has not been fully elucidated as yet. Therefore, a thorough literature search, analysis and presentation of current scientific data was conducted. The tibial slope has been shown to relate linearly to the postoperative range of motion and function of the extensor mechanism. Furthermore, it impacts wear of the tibial insert and loosening, as well as instability of the TKA. As no consensus has been reached on the ideal tibial slope, recommendations range from 0° to 10°. Notably, more recent studies favor reconstructing the native, preoperative tibial slope, and the majority of authors advocate that knowledge of this is crucial for optimal TKA surgery.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Biomechanical Phenomena; Knee Joint; Knee Prosthesis; Range of Motion, Articular; Tibia
PubMed: 31270557
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-019-03777-8 -
The Journal of Arthroplasty Sep 2023Understanding mark-up ratios (MRs), the ratio between a healthcare institution's submitted charge and the Medicare payment received, for high-volume orthopaedic...
BACKGROUND
Understanding mark-up ratios (MRs), the ratio between a healthcare institution's submitted charge and the Medicare payment received, for high-volume orthopaedic procedures is imperative to inform policy about price transparency and reducing surprise billing. This analysis examined the MRs for primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) services to Medicare beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019 across healthcare settings and geographic regions.
METHODS
A large dataset was queried for all THA and TKA procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons between 2013 and 2019, using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes for the most frequently used services. Yearly MRs, service counts, average submitted charges, average allowed payments, and average Medicare payments were analyzed. Trends in MRs were assessed. We evaluated 9 THA HCPCS codes, averaging 159,297 procedures a year provided by a mean of 5,330 surgeons. We evaluated 6 TKA HCPCS codes, averaging 290,244 procedures a year provided by a mean of 7,308 surgeons.
RESULTS
For knee arthroplasty procedures, a decrease was noted for HCPCS code 27438 (patellar arthroplasty with prosthesis) over the study period (8.30 to 6.62; P = .016) and HCPCS code 27447 (TKA) had the highest median (interquartile range [IQR]) MR (4.73 [3.64 to 6.30]). For revision knee procedures, the highest median (IQR) MR was for HCPCS code 27488 (removal of knee prosthesis; 6.12 [3.83-8.22]). While no trends were noted for both primary and revision hip arthroplasty, median (IQR) MRs in 2019 for primary hip procedures ranged from 3.83 (hemiarthroplasty) to 5.06 (conversion of previous hip surgery to THA) and HCPCS code 27130 (total hip arthroplasty) had a median (IQR) MR of 4.66 (3.58-6.44). For revision hip procedures, MRs ranged from 3.79 (open treatment of femoral fracture or prosthetic arthroplasty) to 6.10 (revision of THA femoral component). Wisconsin had the highest median MR by state (>9) for primary knee, revision knee, and primary hip procedures.
CONCLUSION
The MRs for primary and revision THA and TKA procedures were strikingly high, as compared to nonorthopaedic procedures. These findings represent high levels of excess charges billed, which may pose serious financial burdens to patients and must be taken into consideration in future policy discussions to avoid price inflation.
Topics: Aged; Humans; United States; Medicare; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Knee Joint; Knee Prosthesis; Reoperation
PubMed: 36972856
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.058 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Mar 2022Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) can be used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. The authors of this...
Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) can be used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. The authors of this study sought to investigate the outcomes of MCP SRA in patients with RA. Retrospective review of medical records and an institutional joint registry were used to gather data on 80 MCP SRAs performed in 27 patients with RA. Data collected included demographics, SRA revisions, reoperations, complications, pain, and MCP arc of motion. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.5 years (range, 2.1-20.5 years), with all SRAs achieving at least 2 years of follow-up. Thirteen digits (16%) underwent revision arthroplasty, and 29 (36%) required reoperation. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year rates of survival from implant revision were 95%, 85%, 80%, and 69%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year rates of survival from overall reoperation were 80%, 65%, 55%, and 46%, respectively. Metacarpophalangeal joint arc of motion, grip strength, and pain levels significantly improved following surgery. Metacarpophalangeal SRA can offer benefit to patients with RA for improvement in function and pain. High overall reoperation rates remain concerning; however, most do not involve arthroplasty revision.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Metacarpophalangeal Joint; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 32486855
DOI: 10.1177/1558944720926631 -
Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie,... Feb 2021Osteoarthritic changes in the finger joints are common, especially in the elderly population. Without adequate treatment, these changes can lead to pain, joint... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritic changes in the finger joints are common, especially in the elderly population. Without adequate treatment, these changes can lead to pain, joint deformity, instability or impaired motion. Operative treatment options can be divided into prosthetic joint replacement, joint fusion and denervation.
PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHOD
During the last decades, various prosthetic implant designs have appeared on the market. This article provides an overview of implant evolution, current implants, clinical results and promising technical novelties.
RESULTS
Due to favourable clinical long-term results, low revision rates and low costs, the proven silicone spacer has been the gold standard since the 1960 s. In the index and middle finger, lateral stability is crucial to providing a counter bearing to the thumb for a strong key pinch. Medullary-anchored prostheses and modular surface replacement designs have a higher intrinsic stability and may thus be advantageous in the index and middle finger. These implants show promising clinical medium-term results.
CONCLUSION
In the past, technical novelties from big joint replacements could not automatically be translated to the finger joints and other parts of the hand. However, new trends such as customised or 3D-printed prosthetic implants are slowly beginning to gain importance in hand surgery.
Topics: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Metacarpophalangeal Joint; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 33316829
DOI: 10.1055/a-1268-8190 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery Jun 2020Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand is commonly treated using implant arthroplasty. Despite the increasing prevalence of hand OA, population-based evidence regarding the...
PURPOSE
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand is commonly treated using implant arthroplasty. Despite the increasing prevalence of hand OA, population-based evidence regarding the complication profile and associated cost for patients undergoing proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the complication profiles and variation in cost of care for patients undergoing PIP and MCP joint arthroplasty.
METHODS
We analyzed insurance claims from 2009 to 2016 using the Truven MarketScan Databases for adult patients undergoing a PIP and MCP joint arthroplasty following OA or post-traumatic arthritis diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the association of patient-level factors and complications at 2 years after surgery. Cumulative direct cost, defined as the cost of the index surgery and 2-year postoperative episode, and patient-level characteristics were examined.
RESULTS
We analyzed a total of 2,859 patients who underwent MCP joint arthroplasty (36%) or PIP joint arthroplasty (64%). On average, these procedures have a 35% complication rate. However, patients undergoing PIP joint arthroplasty were more likely to suffer a prosthetic fracture than patients undergoing MCP joint arthroplasty (3.4% vs 1.5%, respectively). Each complication resulted in an additional cost of $1,076.
CONCLUSIONS
This nationwide analysis provides a population estimate of the complication profile and associated costs of MCP and PIP joint arthroplasty for hand OA and post-traumatic arthritis. Minimizing postoperative complications after MCP and PIP joint arthroplasty is one avenue to decrease health care costs.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic II.
Topics: Adult; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Postoperative Complications; Prevalence; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 31924436
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.11.002 -
JBJS Reviews Mar 2020Numerous studies have reported the use of laboratory multistation joint simulators to successfully predict wear performance and functionality of hip and knee...
BACKGROUND
Numerous studies have reported the use of laboratory multistation joint simulators to successfully predict wear performance and functionality of hip and knee replacements. In contrast, few studies in the peer-reviewed literature have used joint simulation to quantify the wear performance and functionality of ankle replacements. We performed a systematic review of the literature on joint simulator studies that quantified polyethylene wear in total ankle arthroplasty. In addition to the quantified wear results, the load and motion parameters were identified and compared among the studies.
METHODS
A search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify articles reporting total ankle replacement polyethylene wear using joint simulators.
RESULTS
Nine studies that used joint simulators and 1 study that used a computer simulation were found. Although all studies used physiological multidirectional motions (i.e., internal/external rotation, plantar flexion/dorsiflexion, anterior/posterior translation), there was large variability among the studies in the magnitudes of these motions. Among these studies, mean non-cross-linked polyethylene wear ranged from 3.3 ± 0.4 to 25.8 ± 3.1 mm per million cycles. In contrast, mean highly cross-linked polyethylene wear ranged from 2.1 ± 0.3 to 3.3 ± 0.4 mm per million cycles. The wide distribution in wear rates was attributable to the highly inconsistent kinematic parameters and loads applied as well as differences in implant design and materials.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a severe lack of clinically applicable data on wear performance of total ankle replacements in the peer-reviewed literature. No universal set of kinematic load parameters has been established. Furthermore, only 2 of the published studies have validated their findings using independently derived data, such as retrieval analysis. These shortcomings make it difficult to compare findings as a function of design parameters and materials, or to draw clinically relevant conclusions from these simulations. More work is required to enhance the predictive capability of in vitro simulations of total ankle replacements.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The results of joint wear simulator studies may not accurately represent in vivo wear of total ankle replacements. Joint simulator studies should establish that they are accurately replicating in vivo wear, thus enabling use of their predictive capabilities for new materials and designs.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Humans; Joint Prosthesis
PubMed: 32149932
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00091 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Research :... Sep 2022Reverse shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics can be improved by modifying the placement of prosthesis. Biomechanical studies have quantified the impact of placement...
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics can be improved by modifying the placement of prosthesis. Biomechanical studies have quantified the impact of placement modifications on the mobility and stability of the reverse shoulder. While these studies have provided detailed insights, direct comparisons between their finding are obfuscated by their use of differing methodologies. The aim of our study was to develop an assessment framework which used musculoskeletal simulations to consistently evaluate the biomechanics of various placement modifications. We conducted musculoskeletal simulations of humeral elevations and rotations using 15 reverse shoulder models. For each model, these simulations were conducted for a reference configuration of the prosthesis, established using surgical guidelines, and 34 modified configurations, which were based on commonplace adaptations to the placement of the glenosphere and humeral tray. The effect of each modified configuration on deltoid elongation, deltoid moment arm (DMA), joint stability, and impingement-free range of motion (IFROM) was determined relative to the reference configuration. We found that 16 of the 34 modified placements had an overall beneficial impact on reverse shoulder biomechanics. Within this subset, we identified two biomechanical trade-offs. First, there is an antagonistic relationship between IFROM and both the DMA and joint stability. Second, functional requirements differ between humeral elevations and rotations. Furthermore, we found that posteromedial translation of the humeral tray had the most beneficial impact on joint stability and inferior translation of the glenosphere had the most beneficial impact on IFROM and DMA.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Biomechanical Phenomena; Humerus; Prosthesis Design; Range of Motion, Articular; Shoulder Joint; Shoulder Prosthesis
PubMed: 34878675
DOI: 10.1002/jor.25238 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2023Slightly more than 20 years after its first clinical use, highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been widely adopted. Despite initial concerns about oxidation and... (Review)
Review
Slightly more than 20 years after its first clinical use, highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been widely adopted. Despite initial concerns about oxidation and lack of fatigue resistance, first generation HXLPE, with 15 years of follow-up and widespread use, continues to provide excellent results, even in a young, active population. Remelted HXLPE might have a lower wear rate than annealed HXLPE and will no doubt have a better resistance to oxidation. Second generation materials, consisting of polyethylene (PE) that is sequentially irradiated then annealed and PE that is infused with antioxidants, also have provided encouraging short- and medium-term results. Data from national joint registers confirm data from clinical trials. Even in more challenging cases (dual mobility, hip resurfacing, revision surgery and thin liners), HXLPE has generated promising results. However, failures (rim fractures) have been documented, including for all the latest HXLPE generations. Consequently, certain precautions must be taken during its use and close patient monitoring is necessary.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Polyethylene; Hip Prosthesis; Prosthesis Failure; Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 36302450
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103457