-
Internal Medicine Journal Oct 2021The gut microbiota has a key role in the maintenance of good health, and in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases. These conditions include the inflammatory... (Review)
Review
The gut microbiota has a key role in the maintenance of good health, and in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases. These conditions include the inflammatory bowel diseases, colorectal cancer, coeliac disease and metabolic liver disease. Although the nature of the microbial disturbance in these conditions has not been fully characterised, this has not prevented the development of microbially based therapies. Microbial-changing therapies may address newly recognised pathophysiological contributors of disease and have the potential to replace or supplement standard therapies. Antibiotics play a role in initial Clostridiodes difficile disease and some specific inflammatory disorders. Probiotics have a more limited proven role. Faecal microbiota transplantation is of proven therapeutic benefit in recurrent C. difficile disease and ulcerative colitis. We review the current literature for microbiota-targeted therapies in gut disorders.
Topics: Clostridioides difficile; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Microbiota; Probiotics
PubMed: 34664371
DOI: 10.1111/imj.15520 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jun 2021Mitochondrial DNA depletion and multiple deletions syndromes (MDDS) constitute a group of mitochondrial diseases defined by dysfunctional mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)... (Review)
Review
Mitochondrial DNA depletion and multiple deletions syndromes (MDDS) constitute a group of mitochondrial diseases defined by dysfunctional mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication and maintenance. As is the case for many other mitochondrial diseases, the options for the treatment of these disorders are rather limited today. Some aggressive treatments such as liver transplantation or allogeneic stem cell transplantation are among the few available options for patients with some forms of MDDS. However, in recent years, significant advances in our knowledge of the biochemical pathomechanisms accounting for dysfunctional mtDNA replication have been achieved, which has opened new prospects for the treatment of these often fatal diseases. Current strategies under investigation to treat MDDS range from small molecule substrate enhancement approaches to more complex treatments, such as lentiviral or adenoassociated vector-mediated gene therapy. Some of these experimental therapies have already reached the clinical phase with very promising results, however, they are hampered by the fact that these are all rare disorders and so the patient recruitment potential for clinical trials is very limited.
Topics: Animals; Combined Modality Therapy; DNA Replication; DNA, Mitochondrial; Disease Management; Disease Susceptibility; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Diseases; Mitochondrial Proteins; Mutation
PubMed: 34208592
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126447 -
American Society of Clinical Oncology... Apr 2022Historically, multiple myeloma has been considered an incurable disease, mainly because of its recurrence after transient control. However, the landscape of multiple...
Historically, multiple myeloma has been considered an incurable disease, mainly because of its recurrence after transient control. However, the landscape of multiple myeloma therapeutics has significantly changed over the last 2 decades, with disease remissions lasting much longer. The advent of modern-day induction regimens, usage of high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, and well-tolerated maintenance regimens has resulted in deeper and durable responses, with less frequent disease recurrences, and patients are living much longer. Moreover, the conventional testing for response assessments in multiple myeloma was developed at least 60 years earlier, and there was a clear need for more sensitive diagnostics to test measurable residual disease at deeper levels. Next-generation sequencing and next-generation flow cytometry are highly sensitive techniques that were refined over the last decade and have a sensitivity of 10 to 10 (1 cell per 100,000/1 million). More recently, immunotherapy strategies-including the cellular therapies-have allowed us to expand our ability to achieve and maintain measurable residual disease negativity even in the refractory setting. These advances have brought us much closer to a cure for multiple myeloma; clearly, it has become more realistically achievable, challenging the dogma of multiple myeloma as an incurable disease.
Topics: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm, Residual; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 35623025
DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_349603 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jan 2020Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been the mainstay of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment for approximately 30 years. Although the continuous introduction... (Review)
Review
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been the mainstay of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment for approximately 30 years. Although the continuous introduction of novel agents in the armamentarium against MM has questioned its value, ASCT remains a backbone treatment for fit MM patients. However, there is no unanimous approach for several aspects including the positioning of ASCT in the therapeutic algorithm either upfront or following the first relapse, the need for single or tandem ASCT, as well as the role of ASCT as salvage therapy. Furthermore, the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies along with the next generation proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs provide a platform for optimizing the induction and consolidation/maintenance regimens. In this review, we present current data pertaining to all aspects of ASCT in MM, whereas we highlight the open issues that should be addressed in the design of future clinical trials in the field.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Patient Care Management; Proteasome Inhibitors; Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 31770695
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101929 -
Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery Feb 2021Notch signalling is involved in many aspects of cancer biology, including angiogenesis, tumour immunity and the maintenance of cancer stem-like cells. In addition, Notch... (Review)
Review
Notch signalling is involved in many aspects of cancer biology, including angiogenesis, tumour immunity and the maintenance of cancer stem-like cells. In addition, Notch can function as an oncogene and a tumour suppressor in different cancers and in different cell populations within the same tumour. Despite promising preclinical results and early-phase clinical trials, the goal of developing safe, effective, tumour-selective Notch-targeting agents for clinical use remains elusive. However, our continually improving understanding of Notch signalling in specific cancers, individual cancer cases and different cell populations, as well as crosstalk between pathways, is aiding the discovery and development of novel investigational Notch-targeted therapeutics.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Receptors, Notch; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 33293690
DOI: 10.1038/s41573-020-00091-3 -
The Lancet. Gastroenterology &... Jan 2023Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7 and αEβ7 integrins. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two doses of etrolizumab... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (BERGAMOT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7 and αEβ7 integrins. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two doses of etrolizumab with placebo in patients with Crohn's disease.
METHODS
BERGAMOT was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 326 treatment centres worldwide. We included patients aged 18-80 years with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score of 220-480, and a mean daily stool frequency score of ≥6 or a mean daily stool frequency score of >3, and a mean daily abdominal pain score of >1, as well as the presence of active inflammation on screening ileocolonoscopy) who had intolerance, inadequate response, or no response to one or more of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or anti-TNF therapy within the past 5 years. BERGAMOT consisted of three induction cohorts (a placebo-controlled, double-blind exploratory cohort [cohort 1]; an active treatment cohort not containing a placebo control [cohort 2]; and a placebo-controlled, double-blind pivotal cohort [cohort 3]) and one maintenance cohort. In induction cohort 3, during the 14-week induction, patients were randomly assigned (2:3:3) to receive matched placebo, 105 mg etrolizumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks (at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12) or 210 mg etrolizumab subcutaneously (at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12), stratified by concomitant treatment with oral corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, baseline disease activity, and previous exposure to anti-TNF therapy. To preserve masking, all patients received two injections at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 and one injection at week 2. Week 14 etrolizumab responders from all cohorts were re-randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 105 mg etrolizumab (etrolizumab maintenance group) or placebo (placebo maintenance group) every 4 weeks for 52 weeks; patients in the induction placebo group underwent a sham re-randomisation to preserve masking. During maintenance, randomisation was stratified by CDAI remission status, concomitant treatment with oral corticosteroids, induction dose regimen, and previous exposure to anti-TNF therapy. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment for both induction and maintenance. Co-primary induction endpoints at week 14 (placebo vs 210 mg etrolizumab) were clinical remission (mean stool frequency ≤3 and mean abdominal pain ≤1, with no worsening) and endoscopic improvement (≥50% reduction in Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD]). Co-primary maintenance endpoints at week 66 (placebo vs etrolizumab) were clinical remission and endoscopic improvement. Efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug (induction) and as all patients re-randomised into maintenance who received at least one dose of study drug in the maintenance phase (maintenance). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Maintenance safety analyses include all adverse events occurring in both induction and maintenance. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02394028, and is closed to recruitment.
FINDINGS
Between March 20, 2015, and Sept 7, 2021, 385 patients (209 [54%] male and 326 [85%] white) were randomly assigned in induction cohort 3 to receive placebo (n=97), 105 mg etrolizumab (n=143), or 210 mg etrolizumab (n=145). 487 patients had a CDAI-70 response in any of the induction cohorts and were enrolled into the maintenance cohort, of whom 434 had a response to etrolizumab and were randomly assigned to placebo (n=217) or 105 mg etrolizumab (n=217). At week 14, 48 (33%) of 145 patients in the 210 mg induction etrolizumab group versus 28 (29%) of 96 patients in the placebo induction group were in clinical remission (adjusted treatment difference 3·8% [95% CI -8·3 to 15·3]; p=0·52), and 40 (27%) versus 21 (22%) showed endoscopic improvement (5·8% [-5·4 to 17·1]; p=0·32). At week 66, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving etrolizumab than those receiving placebo had clinical remission (76 [35%] of 217 vs 52 [24%] of 217; adjusted treatment difference 11·3% [95% CI 2·7-19·7]; p=0·0088) and endoscopic improvement (51 [24%] vs 26 [12%]; 11·5% [4·1-18·8]; p=0·0026). Similar proportions of patients reported one or more adverse events during induction (95 [66%] of 143 in the 105 mg etrolizumab group, 85 [59%] of 145 in the 210 mg etrolizumab group, and 51 [53%] of 96 in the placebo group) and maintenance (189 [87%] of 217 in the etrolizumab group and 190 [88%] of 217 in the placebo group). During induction, the most common treatment-related adverse events were injection site erythema (six [4%] of 143 in the 105 mg etrolizumab group, four [3%] of 145 in the 210 mg etrolizumab group, and none of 96 in the placebo group), and arthralgia (two [1%], one [1%], and four [4%]). In the maintenance cohort, the most common treatment-related adverse events were injection site erythema (six [3%] of 217 in the etrolizumab group vs 14 [6%] of 217 in the placebo: group), arthralgia (five [2%] vs eight [4%]), and headache (five [2%] vs seven [3%]). The most common serious adverse event was exacerbation of Crohn's disease (14 [6%] of 217 patients taking placebo and four [2%] of 217 patients taking 105 mg etrolizumab in the maintenance cohort).
INTERPRETATION
A significantly higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease achieved clinical remission and endoscopic improvement with etrolizumab than placebo during maintenance, but not during induction.
FUNDING
F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Crohn Disease; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Induction Chemotherapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Abdominal Pain
PubMed: 36240801
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00303-X -
Current Oncology Reports Jul 2021Until recently, improvement in terms of survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was achieved mostly in younger patients with dose intensification of... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Until recently, improvement in terms of survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was achieved mostly in younger patients with dose intensification of conventional chemotherapy and a broadening use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) whereas the results remained dismal and very stable in patients older than 60 years. The current review highlights the recent developments in standard intensive post-remission chemotherapy, evidence for the use of recently approved agents, and discusses the relevance of measurable residual disease (MRD) measurement in treatment adaptation.
RECENT FINDINGS
Current approvals of midostaurin, venetoclax, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, VYXEOS, ivosidenib, enasidenib, glasdegib, and CC-486 have changed the structure, aim, and schedule of consolidation therapy, and new, well-tolerated agents are being evaluated as maintenance therapies. Furthermore, MRD assessment has been implemented to guide the duration and type of consolidation and maintenance therapy as well as indicate the optimal timing of allo-HCT. Novel therapies have changed the structure and perspective of post-remission therapy in AML for both young and elderly patients. In addition, MRD assessment could guide the type, duration, and intensity of consolidation and maintenance therapy.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cytarabine; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm, Residual; Remission Induction; Survival Analysis; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 34272619
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01092-0 -
Journal of Ovarian Research Nov 2019Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is usually diagnosed late at an advanced stage. Though EOC initially responds to treatment, the recurrence rate is pretty high. The... (Review)
Review
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is usually diagnosed late at an advanced stage. Though EOC initially responds to treatment, the recurrence rate is pretty high. The efficacy of different targeted therapies reduces with each recurrence. Hence there is need of effective maintenance therapy in recurrent EOC. Recently, polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved both for initial treatment of EOC and as its maintenance treatment. PARPi have also been found to act regardless of BRCA status or homologous recombination (HR) deficiency. Several trials testing PARPi early in maintenance therapy are in progress and their results will shed light on the optimal timing of maintenance therapy that gives the most benefit with least toxicity. Right patient selection for maintenance treatment is also a challenge. Hence, though PARPi are emerging as a promising maintenance treatment in recurrent EOC with prolongation of progression free survival (PFS), results from further trials and overall survival (OS) data from current trials are awaited to fulfill the gaps in understanding the role of this pathway in treatment of EOC. This review discusses the current therapies for EOC, challenges in the treatment of recurrent EOC, recent developments and trials in recurrent EOC maintenance with special focus on PARPi and future perspectives.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Ovarian Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retreatment; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31685032
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0579-0 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2020Induction of immune tolerance is the Holy Grail in transplantation medicine and autoimmunity. Currently, patients are required to use immunosuppressive drugs for the... (Review)
Review
Induction of immune tolerance is the Holy Grail in transplantation medicine and autoimmunity. Currently, patients are required to use immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of their lives, resulting in unwanted side effects and complication from global suppression of the immune response. It is well established that regulatory T cells (Tregs) are critical for the maintenance of immune tolerance towards self-antigens by several mechanisms of immune regulation, in parallel with intrathymic deletion of self-reactive T cells during ontogeny. Therefore, approaches for increasing Treg numbers or function could provide an all-purpose solution for tolerance induction. Currently, most state-of-the-art therapeutics for treating autoimmune diseases or preventing allograft rejection work either by general immunosuppression or blocking inflammatory reactions and are non-specific. Hence, these approaches cannot provide satisfactory long-term results, let alone a cure. However, in animal models the therapeutic potential of Treg expansion for inducing effective tolerance has now been demonstrated in various models of autoimmunity and allogeneic transplantation. Here, we focus on therapies for increasing the size of the Treg pool by expanding endogenous Treg numbers or by adoptive transfer of Tregs. In particular, we discuss IL-2 based approaches (low dose IL-2, IL-2 complexes) for inducing Treg expansion as well as cell-based approaches (polyclonal, antigen specific, or cell engineered) for adoptive Treg therapy. We also mention new questions arising from the first clinical studies on Treg therapy in the fields of transplantation and autoimmunity.
Topics: Animals; Autoimmune Diseases; Clonal Deletion; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunotherapy; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 33633742
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.622810 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2021The interest in maintenance therapy for patients with advanced cancers has been rapidly growing. Maintenance therapy is a useful strategy that may strengthen results of... (Review)
Review
The interest in maintenance therapy for patients with advanced cancers has been rapidly growing. Maintenance therapy is a useful strategy that may strengthen results of induction therapy thus extending survival and preserving the quality of life (QoL) with less toxicity. Maintenance also represents a suitable setting to investigate novel agents. The value of maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy has been well established in several solid tumours, such as colorectal, lung, breast, and ovarian cancer in which it is largely adopted. To date, there is no established role for maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC). This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding maintenance strategies in advanced GC exploring cytotoxic agents, biologic agents and immunotherapy. We also critically review new issues to optimize randomized clinical trials for maintenance therapies and suggest clinical consideration to guide a personalized approach in daily clinical practice for this setting.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Immunotherapy; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Quality of Life; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 33753249
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103307