-
Anesthesia and Analgesia Feb 2024Mechanical ventilation (MV) has played a crucial role in the medical field, particularly in anesthesia and in critical care medicine (CCM) settings. MV has evolved...
Mechanical ventilation (MV) has played a crucial role in the medical field, particularly in anesthesia and in critical care medicine (CCM) settings. MV has evolved significantly since its inception over 70 years ago and the future promises even more advanced technology. In the past, ventilation was provided manually, intermittently, and it was primarily used for resuscitation or as a last resort for patients with severe respiratory or cardiovascular failure. The earliest MV machines for prolonged ventilatory support and oxygenation were large and cumbersome. They required a significant amount of skills and expertise to operate. These early devices had limited capabilities, battery, power, safety features, alarms, and therefore these often caused harm to patients. Moreover, the physiology of MV was modified when mechanical ventilators moved from negative pressure to positive pressure mechanisms. Monitoring systems were also very limited and therefore the risks related to MV support were difficult to quantify, predict and timely detect for individual patients who were necessarily young with few comorbidities. Technology and devices designed to use tracheostomies versus endotracheal intubation evolved in the last century too and these are currently much more reliable. In the present, positive pressure MV is more sophisticated and widely used for extensive period of time. Modern ventilators use mostly positive pressure systems and are much smaller, more portable than their predecessors, and they are much easier to operate. They can also be programmed to provide different levels of support based on evolving physiological concepts allowing lung-protective ventilation. Monitoring systems are more sophisticated and knowledge related to the physiology of MV is improved. Patients are also more complex and elderly compared to the past. MV experts are informed about risks related to prolonged or aggressive ventilation modalities and settings. One of the most significant advances in MV has been protective lung ventilation, diaphragm protective ventilation including noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Health care professionals are familiar with the use of MV and in many countries, respiratory therapists have been trained for the exclusive purpose of providing safe and professional respiratory support to critically ill patients. Analgo-sedation drugs and techniques are improved, and more sedative drugs are available and this has an impact on recovery, weaning, and overall patients' outcome. Looking toward the future, MV is likely to continue to evolve and improve alongside monitoring techniques and sedatives. There is increasing precision in monitoring global "patient-ventilator" interactions: structure and analysis (asynchrony, desynchrony, etc). One area of development is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in ventilator technology. AI can be used to monitor patients in real-time, and it can predict when a patient is likely to experience respiratory distress. This allows medical professionals to intervene before a crisis occurs, improving patient outcomes and reducing the need for emergency intervention. This specific area of development is intended as "personalized ventilation." It involves tailoring the ventilator settings to the individual patient, based on their physiology and the specific condition they are being treated for. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes by optimizing ventilation and reducing the risk of harm. In conclusion, MV has come a long way since its inception, and it continues to play a critical role in anesthesia and in CCM settings. Advances in technology have made MV safer, more effective, affordable, and more widely available. As technology continues to improve, more advanced and personalized MV will become available, leading to better patients' outcomes and quality of life for those in need.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Respiration, Artificial; Ventilator Weaning; Artificial Intelligence; Quality of Life; Positive-Pressure Respiration
PubMed: 38215710
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006701 -
American Journal of Respiratory and... May 2023Diaphragm neurostimulation consists of placing electrodes directly on or in proximity to the phrenic nerve(s) to elicit diaphragmatic contractions. Since its initial... (Review)
Review
Diaphragm neurostimulation consists of placing electrodes directly on or in proximity to the phrenic nerve(s) to elicit diaphragmatic contractions. Since its initial description in the 18th century, indications have shifted from cardiopulmonary resuscitation to long-term ventilatory support. Recently, the technical development of devices for temporary diaphragm neurostimulation has opened up the possibility of a new era for the management of mechanically ventilated patients. Combining positive pressure ventilation with diaphragm neurostimulation offers a potentially promising new approach to the delivery of mechanical ventilation which may benefit multiple organ systems. Maintaining diaphragm contractions during ventilation may attenuate diaphragm atrophy and accelerate weaning from mechanical ventilation. Preventing atelectasis and preserving lung volume can reduce lung stress and strain and improve homogeneity of ventilation, potentially mitigating ventilator-induced lung injury. Furthermore, restoring the thoracoabdominal pressure gradient generated by diaphragm contractions may attenuate the drop in cardiac output induced by positive pressure ventilation. Experimental evidence suggests diaphragm neurostimulation may prevent neuroinflammation associated with mechanical ventilation. This review describes the historical development and evolving approaches to diaphragm neurostimulation during mechanical ventilation and surveys the potential mechanisms of benefit. The review proposes a research agenda and offers perspectives for the future of diaphragm neurostimulation assisted mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients.
Topics: Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Diaphragm; Critical Illness; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Respiration
PubMed: 36917765
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2252CP -
Paediatric Anaesthesia Feb 2022Studies have shown that up to 63% of pediatric intensive care unit patients admitted with acute respiratory or cardiorespiratory illness require mechanical ventilation.... (Review)
Review
Studies have shown that up to 63% of pediatric intensive care unit patients admitted with acute respiratory or cardiorespiratory illness require mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilator support can be divided into three phases: initiation, escalation, and resolution. Noninvasive ventilation is typical during the initiation phase in the management of acute pediatric respiratory failure. The major advancements in the use of noninvasive ventilation involve the emergence of high-flow nasal cannula and how widespread the use of high-flow nasal cannula has become in pediatric critical care practice. When high-flow nasal cannula fails, escalation to continuous positive airway pressure or bi-level positive airway pressure is the next step in respiratory care progression. Careful clinical assessment is necessary to avoid delayed escalation between forms of noninvasive support or escalation to intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. Advancements in conventional mechanical ventilation are centered on optimizing ventilator settings and customizing monitoring with the overarching goal to reduce complications of mechanical ventilation, such as ventilator-induced lung injury. New mechanical ventilator strategies integrating esophageal pressure monitoring, volumetric capnography, and neurally adjusted ventilator assist help to optimize conventional ventilator support. Nonconventional modes of ventilation in the intensive care unit are high-frequency modes and airway pressure release ventilation. Extracorporeal pulmonary support via extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or paracorporeal lung assist devices provides rescue options when conventional and nonconventional methods fail. During resolution of a course of mechanical ventilator support, reliable weaning strategies and extubation readiness testing are lacking in pediatric critical care. Further, timing of tracheostomy, risk reduction in ventilator-induced lung injury, and decreased sedation requirements in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit are areas of ongoing research.
Topics: Airway Extubation; Cannula; Child; Humans; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric; Noninvasive Ventilation; Respiration, Artificial
PubMed: 34882910
DOI: 10.1111/pan.14374 -
Respiratory Care Nov 2023Mechanical ventilation is ubiquitous in critical care, and duration of ventilator liberation is variable and multifactorial. While ICU survival has increased over the... (Review)
Review
Mechanical ventilation is ubiquitous in critical care, and duration of ventilator liberation is variable and multifactorial. While ICU survival has increased over the last two decades, positive-pressure ventilation can cause harm to patients. Weaning and discontinuation of ventilatory support is the first step in ventilator liberation. Clinicians have a wealth of evidence-based literature at their disposal; however, more high-quality research is needed to describe outcomes. Additionally, this knowledge must be distilled into evidence-based practice and applied at the bedside. A proliferation of research on the subject of ventilator liberation has been published in the last 12 months. Whereas some authors have reconsidered the value of applying the rapid shallow breathing index in weaning protocols, others have begun to investigate new indices to predict liberation outcomes. New tools such as diaphragmatic ultrasonography have begun to appear in the literature as a tool for outcome prediction. A number of systematic reviews with both meta-analysis and network meta-analysis that synthesize the literature on ventilator liberation have also been published in the last year. This review describes changes in performance, monitoring of spontaneous breathing trials, and evaluations of successful ventilator liberation.
Topics: Humans; Critical Care; Respiration, Artificial; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Ventilator Weaning; Ventilators, Mechanical; Meta-Analysis as Topic
PubMed: 37402584
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11114 -
Critical Care (London, England) Mar 2020This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at... (Review)
Review
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2020. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Topics: Diaphragm; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Lung; Monitoring, Physiologic; Protective Agents; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Physiological Phenomena
PubMed: 32204729
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2777-y -
Journal of Critical Care Apr 2022To compare neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), proportional assist ventilation (PAV), adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and Smartcare pressure support... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of advanced closed-loop ventilation modes with pressure support ventilation for weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To compare neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), proportional assist ventilation (PAV), adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and Smartcare pressure support (Smartcare/PS) with standard pressure support ventilation (PSV) regarding their effectiveness for weaning critically ill adults from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched to identify parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NAVA, PAV, ASV, or Smartcare/PS with PSV, in adult patients under IMV through July 28, 2021. Primary outcome was weaning success. Secondary outcomes included weaning time, total MV duration, reintubation or use of non-invasive MV (NIMV) within 48 h after extubation, in-hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, in-hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) (PROSPERO registration No:CRD42021270299).
RESULTS
Twenty RCTs were finally included. Compared to PSV, NAVA was associated with significantly lower risk for in-hospital and ICU death and lower requirements for post-extubation NIMV. Moreover, PAV showed significant advantage over PSV in terms of weaning rates, MV duration and ICU LOS. No significant differences were found between ASV or Smart care/PS and PSV.
CONCLUSIONS
Moderate certainty evidence suggest that PAV increases weaning success rates, shortens MV duration and ICU LOS compared to PSV. It is also noteworthy that NAVA seems to improve in-hospital and ICU survival.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Interactive Ventilatory Support; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Respiration, Artificial; Ventilator Weaning
PubMed: 34839229
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.11.010 -
Medicina Intensiva 2021
Topics: Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Insufficiency; Spain
PubMed: 33678221
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.08.012 -
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing Feb 2023To assess risk factors of reintubation in intensive care unit patients on mechanical ventilation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess risk factors of reintubation in intensive care unit patients on mechanical ventilation.
METHODOLOGY
We conducted a systematic review of literature (inception to May 2022) and a meta-analysis. Data are reported as pooled odds ratios for categorical variables and mean differences for continuous variables.
RESULTS
A total of 2459 studies were retrieved of which 38 studies were included in a meta-analysis involving 22,304 patients. Risk factors identified were: older age, higher APACHE II scores, COPD, pneumonia, shock, low SaO, low PaO, low PaO/FiO, low hemoglobin, low albumin, high brain natriuretic peptide, low pH, high respiratory rate, low tidal volume, a higher rapid shallow breathing index, a lower vital capacity, a higher number of spontaneous breathing trials, prolonged length of mechanical ventilation, weak cough, a reduced patient's cough peak flow and positive cuff leak test. Subgroup analysis showed that risk factors substantially overlap when reintubation was considered within 48 hours or within 72 hours after extubation.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified 21 factors associated with increased risk for reintubation. These allow to recognize the patient at high risk for reintubation at an early stage. Future studies may combine these factors to develop comprehensive predictive algorithms allowing appropriate vigilance.
Topics: Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Intensive Care Units; Ventilator Weaning; Airway Extubation; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36369190
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103340 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Jun 2023There is a well-recognised importance for personalising mechanical ventilation settings to protect the lungs and the diaphragm for each individual patient. Measurement... (Review)
Review
There is a well-recognised importance for personalising mechanical ventilation settings to protect the lungs and the diaphragm for each individual patient. Measurement of oesophageal pressure ( ) as an estimate of pleural pressure allows assessment of partitioned respiratory mechanics and quantification of lung stress, which helps our understanding of the patient's respiratory physiology and could guide individualisation of ventilator settings. Oesophageal manometry also allows breathing effort quantification, which could contribute to improving settings during assisted ventilation and mechanical ventilation weaning. In parallel with technological improvements, monitoring is now available for daily clinical practice. This review provides a fundamental understanding of the relevant physiological concepts that can be assessed using measurements, both during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation. We also present a practical approach for implementing oesophageal manometry at the bedside. While more clinical data are awaited to confirm the benefits of -guided mechanical ventilation and to determine optimal targets under different conditions, we discuss potential practical approaches, including positive end-expiratory pressure setting in controlled ventilation and assessment of inspiratory effort during assisted modes.
Topics: Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Lung; Respiratory Mechanics; Ventilators, Mechanical; Monitoring, Physiologic
PubMed: 37197768
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0186-2022 -
Respiratory Care Jun 2020The estimation of pleural pressure with esophageal manometry has been used for decades, and it has been a fertile area of physiology research in healthy subject as well... (Review)
Review
The estimation of pleural pressure with esophageal manometry has been used for decades, and it has been a fertile area of physiology research in healthy subject as well as during mechanical ventilation in patients with lung injury. However, its scarce adoption in clinical practice takes its roots from the (false) ideas that it requires expertise with years of training, that the values obtained are not reliable due to technical challenges or discrepant methods of calculation, and that measurement of esophageal pressure has not proved to benefit patient outcomes. Despites these criticisms, esophageal manometry could contribute to better monitoring, optimization, and personalization of mechanical ventilation from the acute initial phase to the weaning period. This review aims to provide a comprehensive but comprehensible guide addressing the technical aspects of esophageal catheter use, its application in different clinical situations and conditions, and an update on the state of the art with recent studies on this topic and on remaining questions and ways for improvement.
Topics: Catheters; Esophagus; Humans; Manometry; Monitoring, Physiologic; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Mechanics
PubMed: 32457170
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07425