-
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Nov 2020Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function can be most conveniently assessed by echocardiography which provides reliable assessments of LV structure and function. Most... (Review)
Review
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function can be most conveniently assessed by echocardiography which provides reliable assessments of LV structure and function. Most patients with structural heart disease have variable degrees of myocardial dysfunction. LV structural changes as pathologic hypertrophy and systolic functional abnormalities as depressed LV long-axis systolic function are associated with diastolic dysfunction. The recognition of structural abnormalities and abnormal LV long-axis function as indices of diastolic dysfunction is an important difference between 2016 and 2009 guidelines. In addition, there are other Doppler findings indicative of diastolic dysfunction and abnormally elevated LV filling pressures. In the absence of clinical, 2D echocardiographic, and specific Doppler indices of diastolic dysfunction, mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (e'), left atrium (LA) maximum volume index, peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation jet by continuous-wave Doppler, and ratio of mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to e' velocity can be used to draw inferences about LV diastolic function. In the presence of diastolic dysfunction, mean LA pressure and grade of diastolic dysfunction should be determined. When LA pressure at rest is normal, it is reasonable to proceed to diastolic stress testing in an attempt to identify patients with dyspnea due to heart failure. There are specific algorithms recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation, moderate or severe mitral annular calcification, and noncardiac pulmonary hypertension.
Topics: Diastole; Echocardiography; Humans; Systole; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 32476157
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14742 -
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging Nov 2022Functional or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Mechanistically, secondary MR is attributable to... (Review)
Review
Functional or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Mechanistically, secondary MR is attributable to an imbalance between mitral leaflet tethering and closure forces, leading to poor coaptation. The pathophysiology of functional MR is most often the result of abnormalities in left ventricular function and remodeling, seen in ischemic or nonischemic conditions. Less commonly and more recently recognized is the scenario in which left ventricular geometry and function are preserved, the culprit being mitral annular enlargement associated with left atrial dilatation, termed atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). This most commonly occurs in the setting of chronic atrial fibrillation or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. There is variability in the published reports and in current investigations as to the definition of AFMR. This paper reviews the pathophysiology of AFMR and focus on the need for a collective definition of AFMR to facilitate consistency in reported data and enhance much-needed research into outcomes and treatment strategies in AFMR.
Topics: Humans; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Mitral Valve; Predictive Value of Tests; Heart Atria; Mitral Valve Annuloplasty
PubMed: 36357130
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.08.016 -
Circulation Sep 2019Despite a 2% to 3% prevalence of echocardiographically defined mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the general population, the actual burden, risk stratification, and... (Review)
Review
Despite a 2% to 3% prevalence of echocardiographically defined mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the general population, the actual burden, risk stratification, and treatment of the so-called arrhythmic MVP are unknown. The clinical profile is characterized by a patient, usually female, with mostly bileaflet myxomatous disease, mid-systolic click, repolarization abnormalities in the inferior leads, and complex ventricular arrhythmias with polymorphic/right bundle branch block morphology, without significant regurgitation. Among the various pathophysiologic mechanisms of electrical instability, left ventricular fibrosis in the papillary muscles and inferobasal wall, mitral annulus disjunction, and systolic curling have been recently described by pathological and cardiac magnetic resonance studies in sudden death victims and patients with arrhythmic MVP. In addition, premature ventricular beats arising from the Purkinje tissue as ventricular fibrillation triggers have been documented by electrophysiologic studies in MVP patients with aborted sudden death. The genesis of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in MVP probably recognizes the combination of the substrate (regional myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, Purkinje fibers) and the trigger (mechanical stretch) eliciting premature ventricular beats because of a primary morphofunctional abnormality of the mitral valve annulus. The main clinical challenge is how to identify patients with arrhythmic MVP (which imaging technique and in which patient) and how to treat them to prevent sudden death. Thus, there is a necessity for prospective multicenter studies focusing on the prognostic role of cardiac magnetic resonance and electrophysiologic studies and on the therapeutic efficacy of targeted catheter ablation and mitral valve surgery in reducing the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, as well as the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention.
Topics: Catheter Ablation; Death, Sudden; Humans; Mitral Valve Prolapse; Papillary Muscles; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 31498700
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034075 -
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Aug 2019Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality where there is a separation between the mitral valve annulus and the left atrial wall which is not well...
BACKGROUND
Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality where there is a separation between the mitral valve annulus and the left atrial wall which is not well understood.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the prevalence of MAD, factors associated with MAD and clinical outcomes among patients with MAD.
RESULTS
A total of 19 studies were included in this review, and the number of noncase report studies had between 23 and 1439 patients. The pooled rate of MAD in studies of myxomatous mitral valve patients was 66/130 (50.8%, 3 studies), and among patients with mitral valve prolapse was 95/291 (32.6%, 3 studies). One study suggests that 78% of patients with MAD had mitral valve prolapse, and another suggested it was strongly associated with myxomatous mitral valve disease (HR 5.04 95% CI 1.66-15.31). In terms of clinical significance, it has been reported that MAD with disjunction > 8.5 mm was associated with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (OR 10 95% CI 1.28-78.1). There is also evidence that gadolinium enhancement in papillary muscle (OR 4.09 95% CI 1.28-13.05) and longitudinal MAD distance in posterolateral wall (OR 1.16 95% CI 1.02-1.33) was predictive of ventricular arrhythmia and late gadolinium enhancement in anterolateral papillary muscle was strongly associated with serious arrhythmic event (OR 7.35 95% CI 1.15-47.02).
CONCLUSIONS
Mitral annular disjunction appears to be common in myxomatous mitral valve disease and mitral valve prolapse which can be detected on cardiac imaging and may be important because of its association with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.
Topics: Echocardiography; Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Mitral Valve
PubMed: 31385360
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14437 -
Journal of the American College of... Aug 2020Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is often considered benign but recent suggestion of an arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) form remains incompletely defined and uncertain.
BACKGROUND
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is often considered benign but recent suggestion of an arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) form remains incompletely defined and uncertain.
OBJECTIVES
This study determined ventricular arrhythmia prevalence, severity, phenotypical context, and independent impact on outcome in patients with MVP.
METHODS
A cohort of 595 (age 65 ± 16 years; 278 women) consecutive patients with MVP and comprehensive clinical, arrhythmia (24-h Holter monitoring) and Doppler-echocardiographic characterization, was identified. Long-term outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
Ventricular arrhythmia was frequent (43% with at least ventricular ectopy ≥5%), most often moderate (ventricular tachycardia [VT]; 120 to 179 beats/min) in 27%, and rarely severe (VT ≥180 beats/min) in 9%. Presence of ventricular arrhythmia was associated with male sex, bileaflet prolapse, marked leaflet redundancy, mitral annulus disjunction (MAD), a larger left atrium and left ventricular end-systolic diameter, and T-wave inversion/ST-segment depression (all p ≤ 0.001). Severe ventricular arrhythmia was independently associated with presence of MAD, leaflet redundancy, and T-wave inversion/ST-segment depression (all p < 0.0001) but not with mitral regurgitation severity or ejection fraction. Overall mortality after arrhythmia diagnosis (8 years; 13 ± 2%) was strongly associated with arrhythmia severity (8 years; 10 ± 2% for no/trivial, 15 ± 3% for mild and/or moderate, and 24 ± 7% for severe arrhythmia; p = 0.02). Excess mortality was substantial for severe arrhythmia (univariate hazard ratio [HR]: 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27 to 5.77; p = 0.01 vs. no/trivial arrhythmia), even after it was comprehensively adjusted, including for MVP characteristics (adjusted HR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.36 to 6.36; p = 0.006) and by time-dependent analysis (adjusted HR: 3.25; 95% CI: 1.56 to 6.78; p = 0.002). Severe arrhythmia was also associated with higher rates of mortality, defibrillator implantation, VT ablation (adjusted HR: 4.68; 95% CI: 2.45 to 8.92; p < 0.0001), particularly under medical management (adjusted HR: 5.80; 95% CI: 2.75 to 12.23; p < 0.0001), and weakly post-mitral surgery (adjusted HR: 3.69; 95% CI: 0.93 to 14.74; p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large cohort of patients with MVP, ventricular arrhythmia by Holter monitoring was frequent but rarely severe. AMVP was independently associated with phenotype dominated by MAD, marked leaflet redundancy, and repolarization abnormalities. Long-term severe arrhythmia was independently associated with notable excess mortality and reduced event-free survival, particularly under medical management. Therefore, AMVP is a clinical entity strongly associated with outcome and warrants careful risk assessment and well-designed clinical trials.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve Prolapse; Phenotype; Prevalence; Severity of Illness Index; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Ventricular Premature Complexes
PubMed: 32762897
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.029 -
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging Nov 2022Among patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR) represents an underrecognized entity. Data regarding...
BACKGROUND
Among patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR) represents an underrecognized entity. Data regarding outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) in aFMR remain scarce.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to analyze the outcome of aFMR patients undergoing M-TEER.
METHODS
Using patients from the international EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) registry undergoing M-TEER for FMR, the authors analyzed baseline characteristics and 2-year outcomes in aFMR in comparison to non-aFMR and ventricular FMR. Additionally, the impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) (defined as right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling) on outcome after M-TEER was assessed.
RESULTS
Among 1,608 FMR patients treated by M-TEER, 126 (7.8%) were categorized as aFMR. All 126 aFMR patients had preserved left ventricular function without regional wall motion abnormalities, left arterial dilatation and Carpentier leaflet motion type I. Procedural success (defined as mitral regurgitation ≤2+ at discharge) was 87.2% (P < 0.001) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class significantly improved during follow-up (NYHA functional class III/IV: 86.5% at baseline to 36.6% at follow-up; P < 0.001). The estimated 2-year survival rate in aFMR patients was 70.4%. Two-year survival did not differ significantly between aFMR, non-aFMR, and ventricular FMR. Besides NYHA functional class IV, RVD was identified as a strong independent predictor for 2-year survival (HR: 2.82 [95% CI: 1.24-6.45]; P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS
aFMR is a frequent cause of FMR and can be effectively treated with M-TEER to improve symptoms at follow-up. Advanced heart failure symptoms and RVD were identified as important risk factors for survival in aFMR patients.
Topics: Humans; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Mitral Valve; Predictive Value of Tests; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Treatment Outcome; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
PubMed: 35842361
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.05.009 -
Current Opinion in Cardiology Sep 2020To review the prevalence and prognosis of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), the distinctive echocardiographic and mechanistic findings, and the therapeutic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
To review the prevalence and prognosis of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), the distinctive echocardiographic and mechanistic findings, and the therapeutic implications of this newly described disorder.
RECENT FINDINGS
Initial studies identified an association between atrial fibrillation, mitral annular dilation, and significant mitral regurgitation despite a normal mitral valve and left ventricle. Accumulating data suggest that AFMR is not rare and may have a prognosis as poor as functional MR associated with LV remodeling. Echocardiography has played an important role in understanding the unique pathophysiology of AFMR, and proposed mechanisms include not only atrial remodeling, but structural and functional abnormalities of the LV (HFpEF shares a common pathophysiology) and insufficient leaflet growth. Timely rhythm control of atrial fibrillation and strategies that reduce diastolic pressure, left atrial and mitral annular enlargement, and that favorably affect mitral leaflet adaptation, are promising preventive and treatment options that warrant clinical study.
SUMMARY
Functional mitral regurgitation may be atrial in origin and should be considered in patients with (particularly long-standing) atrial fibrillation and in those with HFpEF.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Atria; Heart Failure; Humans; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 32649349
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000761 -
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic... Apr 2021
PubMed: 33167012
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa418