-
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Nov 2021Third molar surgery is the most common ambulatory procedure done by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Surgical approaches for the removal of third molars have been... (Review)
Review
Third molar surgery is the most common ambulatory procedure done by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Surgical approaches for the removal of third molars have been published since the 20th century. This article reviews the history and development of extraction techniques through a literature review. The literature was selected through a search of an electronic database. Key words for the Medline search were "mandibular/maxillary third molar," "impacted mandibular/maxillary third molar," "mandibular/maxillary third molar flap design," and "mandibular/maxillary third molar incision." The search was restricted to English-language articles. Additionally, a manual search in the major oral surgery journals and books was performed. The aim of this article is to examine the evolution of third molar surgery, recognize pioneering techniques, and compare these techniques to current approaches. Common approaches employed today are discussed and treatment philosophies with thoughts for future therapies are provided.
Topics: Humans; Mandible; Molar; Molar, Third; Tooth Extraction; Tooth, Impacted
PubMed: 34030996
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.004 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Jan 2022The main objective of this systematic review was to collect the pre-existing scales for assessing the difficulty of third molar extraction. The secondary objective was...
BACKGROUND
The main objective of this systematic review was to collect the pre-existing scales for assessing the difficulty of third molar extraction. The secondary objective was to design a proposal for a preoperative evaluation protocol for the difficulty of third molar extraction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Two independent researchers conducted an electronic search in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane, and Scopus databases during March 2021. Included studies evaluated the prediction of the difficulty of surgical removal of impacted upper or lower third molars using new indices/scales or pre-existing scales with or without modifications. Articles referring to coronectomies or assessing pre-surgical difficulty using other tools were excluded. Neither language nor publication date restrictions were applied.
RESULTS
Out of 242 articles, 13 prospective cohort studies were finally selected. Seven developed new indices/scales, and 6 assessed the predictive ability of some pre-existing scales. Most of the indices/scales contained radiological variables and few added any patient-related variables. We proposed a preoperative assessment protocol of the difficulty of third molar extraction to facilitate treatment planning and/or considerate referral in cases of high difficulty. This proposal used patient-related, radiological and surgical variables.
CONCLUSIONS
Using a preoperative protocol to evaluate the surgical difficulty, including different patient-specific, radiological and surgical variables, could facilitate treatment planning, help clinicians prevent complications and assess the possibility of referral.
Topics: Humans; Molar, Third; Prospective Studies; Tooth Extraction; Tooth, Impacted
PubMed: 34874928
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24951 -
Australian Dental Journal Dec 2019The extraction of permanent molar teeth was first introduced in 1976 as a substitution for premolar extraction in cases with mild crowding. Since then, a number of... (Review)
Review
The extraction of permanent molar teeth was first introduced in 1976 as a substitution for premolar extraction in cases with mild crowding. Since then, a number of studies have investigated the effect of permanent molar extraction on dentofacial harmony. Undertaking the procedure of molar extraction is most commonly recommended in response to factors such as: gross caries, large restorations and root-filled teeth, along with its application in the management of anterior open bite and reduction in crowding in facial regions. It has been indicated, however, that before undertaking the extraction of molar teeth it is important to investigate the potential influence of the procedure on other molars, with particular consideration of their eruption path. This is due to the doubt as to the effect of the exact molar teeth extraction and their consequences. In light of this, This review was undertaken to investigate and compare the effect of first, second and the third molar teeth extraction and their subsequent dentofacial complex changes.
Topics: Bicuspid; Humans; Molar; Molar, Third; Tooth Eruption; Tooth Extraction
PubMed: 31465537
DOI: 10.1111/adj.12716 -
Journal of Dentistry Aug 2020To compare the survival of restorations placed in deep caries lesions after selective caries removal to soft dentin (SCRSD) over a 5-year period. A secondary aim was to... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To compare the survival of restorations placed in deep caries lesions after selective caries removal to soft dentin (SCRSD) over a 5-year period. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the material (amalgam or resin composite) affected the survival of restorations.
METHODS
This study used data derived from a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (Clinical trials registration NCT00887952). Inclusion criteria were: patients with permanent molars presenting occlusal or proximal deep caries lesions (≥1/2 of the dentin thickness on radiographic examination), positive response to a cold test, absence of spontaneous pain, negative sensitivity to percussion, and absence of periapical lesions. The teeth were randomized into SCRSD and restoration in a single visit or stepwise excavation (SW). Each of these groups was divided according to the filling material: amalgam (AM) or resin composite (RC). Survival analyses were performed to estimate therapy success rates over 5 years (adjusted Weibull regression model).
RESULTS
172 restorations were evaluated, 95 from SCRSD group and 77 from SW group, being 61 AMG and 111 RC. The 5-year survival analysis showed similar success rates for SW (76 %) and SCRSD (79 %) as well as for AM and RC (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that, after a 5-year follow-up period, the presence of decayed tissue beneath restorations in deep caries lesions did not seem to affect restoration survival. Amalgam and resin composite restorations had similar survival rates, irrespective of the caries removal technique used - SCRSD or SW.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Selective caries removal to soft dentin can be used in the management of deep caries to avoid pulp exposure and preserve tooth structure without affecting restoration longevity.
Topics: Composite Resins; Dental Caries; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Restoration, Permanent; Dentin; Humans; Molar
PubMed: 32585263
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103416 -
The International Journal of... 2020Furcation involvement (FI) is one of the most detrimental factors affecting tooth survival rate over time. Several authors have used the severity of FI for assessing the...
Furcation involvement (FI) is one of the most detrimental factors affecting tooth survival rate over time. Several authors have used the severity of FI for assessing the prognosis of the tooth and the complexity of periodontal disease. While many approaches have been shown to improve the prognosis of furcation-involved teeth, clinical guidelines recommending one treatment or another (based on the horizontal and vertical component of the furcation defects) have not yet been proposed. To this aim, the present article introduces recommendations for the treatment of molars with FI and discusses different treatment options with their potential regenerative approaches. Patient-related factors, together with hard and soft-tissue conditions that may affect the outcomes of periodontal regeneration, are discussed.
Topics: Furcation Defects; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Molar; Regeneration; Tooth
PubMed: 32559031
DOI: 10.11607/prd.4341 -
Pediatric Dentistry Nov 2021The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) antibiotic paste comprised of chloramphenicol, tetracycline,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) antibiotic paste comprised of chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and zinc oxide and eugenol (CTZ) versus zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy in the treatment of primary molars with pulp necrosis. A total of 70 three- to eight-year-old subjects with 88 primary mandibular molars with pulp necrosis were included. The teeth were randomized to the CTZ group or ZOE group. The time taken to perform both techniques was recorded. The parents of the children and the dentist who performed clinical evaluations were blind to the group assignment, although the radiographic evaluator could see the difference in treatments. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at three, six, nine, and 12 months. At the 12-month evaluation, the clinical success was 86.4 percent for CTZ and 90.9 percent for ZOE (P=0.50), the radiographic success was 75.0 percent for CTZ and 72.7 percent for ZOE (P=0.81), and the overall success was 70.5 percent for CTZ and 72.7 percent for ZOE (P=0.81). The mean time taken to perform was 61.4 (±20.5 standard deviation) minutes for CTZ and 145.1 (±53.2) minutes for ZOE (P<0.001). At 12 months, both techniques presented no significant difference in success rates for nonvital pulp therapy in primary molars with necrosis. The lesion sterilization and tissue repair procedure time using chloramphenicol, tetracycline, zinc oxide, and eugenol was significantly shorter than for a zinc oxide eugenol pulpectomy.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Dental Pulp Necrosis; Eugenol; Humans; Molar; Pulpectomy; Root Canal Filling Materials; Sterilization; Tooth, Deciduous; Zinc Oxide; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
PubMed: 34937613
DOI: No ID Found -
Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.The Angle Orthodontist Nov 2023To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances with miniscrew (FM) during molar intrusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty adults with anterior open bite were randomized into either CA or FM groups. Lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and MBF were collected at pretreatment (T0) and 6 months of treatment (T1). Maxillary molar intrusion in FM were intruded by nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed-coil spring delivered force (150 grams/side) while clear aligners combined with squeezing exercise were performed in CA. Parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
After 6 months of treatment, significant root resorption of 0.21-0.24 mm in CA and 0.38-0.47 mm in FM were found while maxillary molars were intruded 0.68 and 1.49 mm in CA and FM, respectively. CA showed significant less root resorption and intrusion than FM. Overbite, bite closing, and MBF increased significantly. CA showed significantly less overbite and SN-MP changes but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was correlated with the amount of maxillary molar intrusion (r = 0.736, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Maxillary molar intrusion and root resorption in CA were half the amount in FM in 6 months. The amount of maxillary molar root resorption was one-third of the intrusion distance. CA displayed less overbite increase and bite closing but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was positively correlated with the molar intrusion amount.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Root Resorption; Overbite; Open Bite; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Molar; Tooth Movement Techniques; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Maxilla
PubMed: 37922387
DOI: 10.2319/010723-14.1 -
American Journal of Physical... Apr 2021Standard methods of recording occlusal dental wear are problematic in that they either do not allow for individual variation of wear or are not designed to allow for...
OBJECTIVES
Standard methods of recording occlusal dental wear are problematic in that they either do not allow for individual variation of wear or are not designed to allow for comparisons of wear patterns. In this article, we (a) present a novel method for recording and analyzing molar wear, and (b) evaluate this method in light of existing methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eighty-two lower mandibular first molars from two regions (medieval Denmark, prehistoric Ohio Valley) were used to assess the method for replicability (intra and inter observer error) and accuracy (comparison to established methods of recording wear). Wear scores were recorded using the MolWear Android App (Beta) by both authors, and established methods of Smith and Scott by the first author. Intraobserver and interobserver error and comparison of the three methods were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficients.
RESULTS
The MolWear method presented high intraobserver (r = 0.985, p < 0.01) and interobserver (r = 0.978, p < 0.01) repeatability. Compared to other methods, the method was strongly correlated with Smith (r = 0.962, p < 0.01) and Smith (r = 0.891, p < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
The new MolWear method provides an improved way of measuring occlusal molar wear. This method bridges the gaps between established methods, performing comparatively while capturing more information about the distribution of wear in addition to the extent of wear. This method should be used for research comparing interpopulation or intrapopulation quantity of dental wear. While designed for a bioarchaeological population, this method could extend to any Y5 molar including nonhuman primates and hominins.
Topics: Humans; Molar; Paleodontology; Photography; Tooth Attrition
PubMed: 33522597
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24238 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Jan 2023We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of formocresol (FC), ferric sulfate (FS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of formocresol (FC), ferric sulfate (FS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide (CH), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), biodentine, and laser for pulpotomy of molar teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An updated search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before October 30, 2022, after screening previous meta-analyses. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Clinical and radiographic success rates were assessed as outcomes. Random network meta-analysis was performed by using STATA software (version 14.0) with "network" command.
RESULTS
A total of 43 RCTs were included. Network meta-analysis indicated that CH was inferior to other medicaments and techniques in all outcomes, and MTA and biodentine was better than FC, FS, and NaOCl in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates. Results of ranking probabilities suggested that MTA ranked first in all outcomes except for clinical success at both 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggested that MTA was associated with significant improvement in both clinical and radiographic success than other pulpotomy medicaments and techniques, with the highest probability of being the optimal option.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The current network meta-analysis determined the comparative efficacy and safety of 7 common pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy, including FC, FS, NaOCl, CH, MTA, biodentine, and laser, and the pooled results revealed comparable efficacy in clinical and radiographic success rates at 6 and 12 months between FC, FS, and NaOCl in primary molars pulpotomies. However, MTA, biodentine and laser may have more advantages than other pulpotomy medicaments for clinical and radiographic success. Therefore, in clinical practice, practitioners should select MTA, biodentine, or laser as pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy.
Topics: Pulpotomy; Network Meta-Analysis; Oxides; Calcium Compounds; Calcium Hydroxide; Silicates; Molar; Drug Combinations; Tooth, Deciduous; Aluminum Compounds
PubMed: 36580161
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1 -
Acta Medica Academica Aug 2023This study aimed to analyze the crown and root morphology of maxillary and mandibular third molars, and assess their position in relation to adjacent anatomical...
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to analyze the crown and root morphology of maxillary and mandibular third molars, and assess their position in relation to adjacent anatomical structures using clinical examination and radiographic images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 176 extracted impacted or partially impacted third molars were included in this study. Orthopantomogram images (OPG) were used to evaluate the number of roots, position, depth of impaction relative to the occlusal plane of the second molar, and angulation of maxillary and mandibular third molars. The extracted teeth were examined to determine the actual number of roots. The root morphology was classified using the Alavi classification system for maxillary third molars and the Machado classification for mandibular third molars. Additionally, the number of cusps, crown dimensions, and morphology were analyzed using digital and dental calipers.
RESULTS
The extracted samples exhibited a significantly higher number of roots compared to the number assessed on OPG images (P<0.001). The majority of mandibular third molars had two fused roots (37.39%) and a five-cuspid crown (48.70%), while maxillary third molars had three fused roots (26.23%) and four cusps (42.62%). Both maxillary (60.66%) and mandibular third molars (61.74%) were predominantly vertically positioned. Regarding the depth of impaction, maxillary third molars were primarily classified as Class C (65.57%), while mandibular third molars were classified as Class B (47.83%). Differences in crown shape were observed, with maxillary crowns being mostly triangular (36.07%) and mandibular crowns being oval (38.26%). Maxillary third molars had shorter crowns compared to mandibular third molars (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The root morphology of maxillary and mandibular third molars in the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina displays variability. Orthopantomogram imaging was found to be inadequate for accurate determination of the number of roots in third molars. The number of cusps on third molars cannot be relied upon as a predictor of the number of roots. The study's findings will have implications for dental practice, particularly for oral surgeons and restorative dentists.
Topics: Humans; Molar, Third; Tooth Root; Molar; Crowns; Radiography
PubMed: 37933504
DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.407