-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2023This is the second update of the original Cochrane review published in 2013 (issue 6), which was updated in 2016 (issue 11). Pruritus occurs in patients with disparate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This is the second update of the original Cochrane review published in 2013 (issue 6), which was updated in 2016 (issue 11). Pruritus occurs in patients with disparate underlying diseases and is caused by different pathologic mechanisms. In palliative care patients, pruritus is not the most prevalent but is a burdening symptom. It can cause considerable discomfort and negatively affect patients' quality of life.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of different pharmacological treatments compared with active control or placebo for preventing or treating pruritus in adult palliative care patients.
SEARCH METHODS
For this update, we searched CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OVID) and Embase (OVID) up to 6 July 2022. In addition, we searched trial registries and checked the reference lists of all relevant studies, key textbooks, reviews and websites, and we contacted investigators and specialists in pruritus and palliative care regarding unpublished data.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of different pharmacological treatments, compared with a placebo, no treatment, or an alternative treatment, for preventing or treating pruritus in palliative care patients.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the identified titles and abstracts, performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias and methodological quality. We summarised the results descriptively and quantitatively (meta-analyses) according to the different pharmacological interventions and the diseases associated with pruritus. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created 13 summary of findings tables.
MAIN RESULTS
In total, we included 91 studies and 4652 participants in the review. We added 42 studies with 2839 participants for this update. Altogether, we included 51 different treatments for pruritus in four different patient groups. The overall risk of bias profile was heterogeneous and ranged from high to low risk. The main reason for giving a high risk of bias rating was a small sample size (fewer than 50 participants per treatment arm). Seventy-nine of 91 studies (87%) had fewer than 50 participants per treatment arm. Eight (9%) studies had low risk of bias in the specified key domains; the remaining studies had an unclear risk of bias (70 studies, 77%) or a high risk of bias (13 studies, 14%). Using GRADE criteria, we judged that the certainty of evidence for the primary outcome (i.e. pruritus) was high for kappa-opioid agonists compared to placebo and moderate for GABA-analogues compared to placebo. Certainty of evidence was low for naltrexone, fish-oil/omega-3 fatty acids, topical capsaicin, ondansetron and zinc sulphate compared to placebo and gabapentin compared to pregabalin, and very low for cromolyn sodium, paroxetine, montelukast, flumecinol, and rifampicin compared to placebo. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence mainly due to serious study limitations regarding risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. For participants suffering from uraemic pruritus (UP; also known as chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus (CKD-aP)), treatment with GABA-analogues compared to placebo likely resulted in a large reduction of pruritus (visual analogue scale (VAS) 0 to 10 cm): mean difference (MD) -5.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.56 to -4.55; five RCTs, N = 297, certainty of evidence: moderate. Treatment with kappa-opioid receptor agonists (difelikefalin, nalbuphine, nalfurafine) compared to placebo reduced pruritus slightly (VAS 0 to 10 cm, MD -0.96, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.71; six RCTs, N = 1292, certainty of evidence: high); thus, this treatment was less effective than GABA-analogues. Treatment with montelukast compared to placebo may result in a reduction of pruritus, but the evidence is very uncertain (two studies, 87 participants): SMD -1.40, 95% CI -1.87 to -0.92; certainty of evidence: very low. Treatment with fish-oil/omega-3 fatty acids compared to placebo may result in a large reduction of pruritus (four studies, 160 observations): SMD -1.60, 95% CI -1.97 to -1.22; certainty of evidence: low. Treatment with cromolyn sodium compared to placebo may result in a reduction of pruritus, but the evidence is very uncertain (VAS 0 to 10 cm, MD -3.27, 95% CI -5.91 to -0.63; two RCTs, N = 100, certainty of evidence: very low). Treatment with topical capsaicin compared with placebo may result in a large reduction of pruritus (two studies; 112 participants): SMD -1.06, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.57; certainty of evidence: low. Ondansetron, zinc sulphate and several other treatments may not reduce pruritus in participants suffering from UP. In participants with cholestatic pruritus (CP), treatment with rifampicin compared to placebo may reduce pruritus, but the evidence is very uncertain (VAS: 0 to 100, MD -42.00, 95% CI -87.31 to 3.31; two RCTs, N = 42, certainty of evidence: very low). Treatment with flumecinol compared to placebo may reduce pruritus, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR > 1 favours treatment group; RR 2.32, 95% CI 0.54 to 10.1; two RCTs, N = 69, certainty of evidence: very low). Treatment with the opioid antagonist naltrexone compared to placebo may reduce pruritus (VAS: 0 to 10 cm, MD -2.42, 95% CI -3.90 to -0.94; two RCTs, N = 52, certainty of evidence: low). However, effects in participants with UP were inconclusive (percentage of difference -12.30%, 95% CI -25.82% to 1.22%, one RCT, N = 32). In palliative care participants with pruritus of a different nature, the treatment with the drug paroxetine (one study), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, compared to placebo may reduce pruritus slightly by 0.78 (numerical analogue scale from 0 to 10 points; 95% CI -1.19 to -0.37; one RCT, N = 48, certainty of evidence: low). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Two interventions showed multiple major adverse events (naltrexone and nalfurafine).
AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS
Different interventions (GABA-analogues, kappa-opioid receptor agonists, cromolyn sodium, montelukast, fish-oil/omega-3 fatty acids and topical capsaicin compared to placebo) were effective for uraemic pruritus. GABA-analogues had the largest effect on pruritus. Rifampin, naltrexone and flumecinol tended to be effective for cholestatic pruritus. However, therapies for patients with malignancies are still lacking. Due to the small sample sizes in most meta-analyses and the heterogeneous methodological quality of the included trials, the results should be interpreted cautiously in terms of generalisability.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Capsaicin; Cromolyn Sodium; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Naltrexone; Ondansetron; Palliative Care; Paroxetine; Receptors, Opioid; Rifampin; Zinc Sulfate
PubMed: 37314034
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008320.pub4 -
Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma, and... Aug 2021Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging worldwide issue, that has affected a large number of people around the world. So far, many studies have aimed to... (Review)
Review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging worldwide issue, that has affected a large number of people around the world. So far, many studies have aimed to develop a therapeutic approach against COVID-19. Montelukast (MK) is a safe asthma controller drug, which is considered as a potential antiviral drug for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This review has a systematic approach to investigate the reports on the use of MK as a part of treatment or a prophylactic agent in COVID-19. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and yielded 35 studies containing the influence of MK on SARS-CoV-2. Ultimately, MK appears to be worth being used as an adjuvant therapeutic and prophylactic drug against SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, more clinical trials are required to accurately investigate its effectiveness.
Topics: Acetates; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Cyclopropanes; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Quinolines; SARS-CoV-2; Sulfides; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34418892
DOI: No ID Found -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Apr 2023Montelukast is a leukotriene inhibitor that is widely used to treat chronic asthma and allergic rhinitis. The drug interferes with molecular signaling pathways produced... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Montelukast is a leukotriene inhibitor that is widely used to treat chronic asthma and allergic rhinitis. The drug interferes with molecular signaling pathways produced by leukotrienes in a variety of cells and tissues throughout the human body that lead to tightening of airway muscles, production of aberrant pulmonary fluid (airway edema), and in some cases, pulmonary inflammation.
AREAS COVERED
Montelukast has also been noted to have anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting it may have a role in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has been noted to induce misfiring of the immune system in some patients. A literature search of PubMed was performed to identify all relevant studies of montelukast and SARS-CoV-2 through 27 January 2023.
EXPERT OPINION
Montelukast has been the subject of small studies of SARS-CoV-2 and will be included in a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of outpatients with COVID-19 sponsored by the United States National Institutes of Health known as Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines-6. This paper reviews what is known about montelukast, an inexpensive, well-tolerated, and widely available medication, and examines the rationale for using this drug to potentially treat patients with COVID-19.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Leukotriene Antagonists; SARS-CoV-2; Asthma; Acetates; Quinolines; Cyclopropanes; Sulfides; Double-Blind Method; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36927284
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2192866 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Nov 2022Capsular contracture is the most common complication following breast augmentation. Recently, prophylaxis studies aiming to inhibit the release of profibrotic substances...
BACKGROUND
Capsular contracture is the most common complication following breast augmentation. Recently, prophylaxis studies aiming to inhibit the release of profibrotic substances to prevent capsular contracture have gained in importance. This study investigated the effects of cromolyn sodium, montelukast, and zafirlukast on capsular contracture in a rat model.
METHODS
Thirty female Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into five groups: control, sham, cromolyn sodium, montelukast, and zafirlukast. Intraperitoneal injections were administered daily to the sham (1 ml per day), cromolyn sodium (10 mg/kg per day), montelukast (10 mg/kg per day), and zafirlukast (1.25 mg/kg per day) groups 1 month before surgery. Miniature breast implants were then placed on the backs of the rats in each group. Injections were continued for the next 3 months. The rats were subsequently killed, and the capsules were harvested and assessed histopathologically. The histopathologic outcomes were acute inflammation status, inflammation severity, synovial metaplasia, foreign body reaction, mast cell count, and capsular thickness.
RESULTS
The cromolyn sodium, montelukast, and zafirlukast groups had less acute inflammation and lower mean inflammation severity scores, foreign body reaction occurrence, mast cell counts, and capsular thickness than the control and sham groups ( p < 0.05). These parameters were better in the cromolyn sodium group than in the montelukast and zafirlukast groups ( p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Cromolyn sodium appears to inhibit capsular contracture more efficiently than montelukast and zafirlukast. This report may be a pioneer study for the prophylactic use of cromolyn sodium in capsular contracture.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT
The prophylactic administration of cromolyn sodium appears to reduce capsular contracture more efficiently than that of montelukast and zafirlukast. This report might constitute a pioneer study for the prophylactic use of cromolyn sodium in capsular contracture.
Topics: Animals; Female; Rats; Breast Implants; Cromolyn Sodium; Foreign-Body Reaction; Implant Capsular Contracture; Leukotriene Antagonists; Rats, Wistar; Tosyl Compounds
PubMed: 35994348
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009653 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Dec 2023This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast (Mon) + fluticasone propionate (Flu) versus Flu in the treatment of cough variant asthma (CVA) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
An efficacy and safety evaluation of montelukast + fluticasone propionate vs. fluticasone propionate in the treatment of cough variant asthma in children: a meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast (Mon) + fluticasone propionate (Flu) versus Flu in the treatment of cough variant asthma (CVA) in children.
METHODS
Eligible documents were selected from various databases. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate continuous variables, and categorical variables were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity analysis was performed using Cochran's Q test and I statistics, followed by sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included, and Flu + Mon was found to significantly improve the total effective rate and reduce cough recurrence compared to Flu. The cough remission and disappearance times in the Mon + Flu group were significantly lower than those in the Flu group. FEV1% recovery in the Mon + Flu group was significantly better than that in the Flu group.
CONCLUSION
Mon + Flu is effective and safe for the treatment of CVA in children.
Topics: Child; Humans; Acetates; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Cough; Cyclopropanes; Fluticasone; Quinolines
PubMed: 38053076
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02721-z -
Journal of Psychosomatic Research Jan 2023While implicated in causing depression, no studies have examined the impact of montelukast on antidepressant effectiveness. We examined whether existing montelukast...
OBJECTIVE
While implicated in causing depression, no studies have examined the impact of montelukast on antidepressant effectiveness. We examined whether existing montelukast therapy was associated with acute antidepressant treatment failure (objective 1), and whether montelukast initiation was associated with depression relapse during maintenance antidepressant therapy (objective 2), relative to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS).
METHODS
Patients with asthma and depression were identified using national Veterans Health Administration data from 2007 to 2019. Objective 1: 12,109 patients initiated an antidepressant after receiving montelukast or ICS for 6 months. The primary outcome was acute antidepressant treatment failure, defined as subsequent initiation of a new antidepressant or augmenting agent within 6 months. Objective 2: 14,673 patients initiated montelukast or ICS after receiving stable antidepressant monotherapy for 6 months. The primary outcome of depression relapse was defined by a subsequent change in the pre-existing maintenance antidepressant regimen within 6 months. Both objectives employed a retrospective cohort design with log-binomial regression.
RESULTS
Objective 1: Acute antidepressant failure was observed in 21.3% (628/2943) and 22.3% (2044/9166) of patients receiving montelukast versus ICS, respectively. Relative risk in adjusted analyses was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.07). Objective 2: Depression relapse was observed in 24.4% (288/1182) and 22.4% (3027/13,491) of patients initiating montelukast versus ICS, respectively. Relative risk in adjusted analyses was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.20) within 6 months and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.93) within 45 days.
CONCLUSION
Discontinuation of existing montelukast therapy is unnecessary when initiating antidepressants. However, potential evidence for depression relapse following montelukast initiation warrants additional investigation.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Retrospective Studies; Acetates; Quinolines; Antidepressive Agents; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36368225
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111075 -
The Journal of Pediatrics Sep 2019
Topics: Acetates; Asthma; Case-Control Studies; Child; Cyclopropanes; Humans; Quinolines; Sulfides
PubMed: 31201029
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.05.022