-
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases May 2021MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS
This phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre 52-week trial included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PsA and classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, with spinal pain Visual Analogue Score ≥40/100 and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥4 despite use of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly for 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter. At week 12, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 300/150 mg. Primary endpoint was ASAS20 (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society) response with secukinumab 300 mg at week 12.
RESULTS
Patients were randomly assigned; 167 to secukinumab 300 mg, 165 to secukinumab 150 mg and 166 to placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg significantly improved ASAS20 response versus placebo at week 12 (63% and 66% vs 31% placebo). The OR (95% CI) comparing secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, using a logistic regression model after multiple imputation, was 3.8 (2.4 and 6.1) and 4.4 (2.7 and 7.0; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg provided significant improvement in signs and symptoms of axial disease compared with placebo in patients with PsA and axial manifestations with inadequate response to NSAIDs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02721966.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33334727
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218808 -
The Journal of the American Academy of... Feb 2020Os odontoideum is a rare entity of the second cervical vertebra, characterized by a circumferentially corticated ossicle separated from the body of C2. The ossicle is a... (Review)
Review
Os odontoideum is a rare entity of the second cervical vertebra, characterized by a circumferentially corticated ossicle separated from the body of C2. The ossicle is a distinct entity from an odontoid fracture or a persistent ossiculum terminale. The diagnosis may be made incidentally on imaging obtained for the workup of neck pain or neurologic signs and symptoms. Diagnosis usually can be made with plain radiographs. MRI and CT can assess spinal cord integrity and C1-C2 instability. The etiology of os odontoideum is a topic of debate, with investigative studies supporting both congenital and traumatic origins. A wide clinical range of symptoms exists. Symptoms may present as nondescript pain or include occipital-cervical pain, myelopathy, or vertebrobasilar ischemia. Asymptomatic cases without evidence of radiologic instability are typically managed with periodic observation and serial imaging. The presence of atlantoaxial instability or neurological dysfunction necessitates surgical intervention with instrumentation and fusion for stability.
Topics: Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Child; Humans; Joint Instability; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 31977608
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00637 -
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction &... 2022Os odontoideum (OO) is a rare craniocervical anomaly that is characterized by a round ossicle separated from the C2 vertebral body. With a controversial etiology and... (Review)
Review
Os odontoideum (OO) is a rare craniocervical anomaly that is characterized by a round ossicle separated from the C2 vertebral body. With a controversial etiology and unknown prevalence in the population, OO may be asymptomatic or present in patients with myelopathic and neurological symptoms. In this literature review, we aimed to investigate epidemiology, embryology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and the role of diagnostic radiography in OO. By providing an overview of different management strategies, surgical complications, and postoperative considerations for OO, our findings may guide neurosurgeons in providing proper diagnosis and treatment for OO patients. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. A search using the query "os odontoideum" yielded 4319 results, of which 112 articles were chosen and analyzed for insights on factors such as etiology, clinical presentation, and management of OO. The presentation of OO varies widely from asymptomatic cases to severe neurological deficits. Asymptomatic patients can be managed either conservatively or surgically, while symptomatic patients should undergo operative stabilization. Although multiple studies show different techniques for surgical management involving posterior fusion, the diversity of such cases illustrates how treatment must be tailored to the individual patient to prevent complications. Conflicting studies and the paucity of current literature on OO highlight poor comprehension of the condition. Further understanding of the natural history of OO is critical to form evidence-based guidelines for the management of OO patients. More large-center studies are thus needed to promote accurate management of OO patients with optimal outcomes.
PubMed: 36263339
DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_71_22 -
World Neurosurgery Sep 2020To add to the confusion in the debate on pathogenesis of os-odontoideum, an additional report of its occurrence in two members of the same family is reported.
BACKGROUND
To add to the confusion in the debate on pathogenesis of os-odontoideum, an additional report of its occurrence in two members of the same family is reported.
CASE DESCRIPTION
This is a report of a rare coincidence wherein both father (51 years old) and daughter (25 years old) were diagnosed to have os odontoideum and presented with crippling neurologic deficits.
CONCLUSIONS
Following atlantoaxial fixation, both recovered in their symptoms. Investigations revealed no genetic abnormality. Literature on the subject is briefly reviewed.
Topics: Adult; Atlanto-Axial Joint; Fathers; Female; Humans; Joint Instability; Male; Middle Aged; Nuclear Family; Odontoid Process; Spinal Cord Compression; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 32565378
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.102 -
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA Feb 2020To elucidate the imaging manifestations of os odontoideum, establish the diagnosis and guide surgical therapy.
OBJECTIVE
To elucidate the imaging manifestations of os odontoideum, establish the diagnosis and guide surgical therapy.
METHODS
Clinical and imaging data, including X-ray, CT and MR of 24 patients with os odontoideum, were retrieved and reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Os odontoideum with intact cortex was divided into round, conical and blunt tooth types. Four cases of orthotopic and 20 cases of dystopic os odontoideum were included. There was anterior displacement of the base of the dens in six cases, posterior displacement in nine cases and no displacement in nine cases. A widening of anterior atlanto-axial space was shown in 14 patients with varying degrees. Thickening of the soft tissue posterior to the dens was observed in 19 patients, spinal canal stenosis in 21 patients, cervical myelopathy in 10 patients and craniocervical junction malformation in 9 patients. Posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation and fusion was performed in 12 patients and 4 patients underwent posterior occipito-cervical fixation and fusion.
CONCLUSION
Radiographically, os odontoideum is defined as an independent ossicle of variable size with smooth circumferential cortical margins separated from the axis. Imaging can be used to assess atlanto-axial instability, associated normal or abnormal anatomical structures and guide surgical therapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Atlanto-Axial Joint; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Female; Humans; Joint Instability; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Pedicle Screws; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 31616983
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02351-3 -
Advanced Emergency Nursing JournalOdontoid fractures remain the most common C2 fracture and of those individuals older than 65 years. The type of optimal management remains in question given...
Odontoid fractures remain the most common C2 fracture and of those individuals older than 65 years. The type of optimal management remains in question given comorbidities, risk of nonunion, and limitations in mobility when surgical fusion is the treatment selected. These fractures are of particular importance, given the high incident of morbidity and mortality following an odontoid fracture. Overall quality of life remains a significant consideration when selecting the best intervention following careful examination and confirmation with radiographic imaging. The literature continues with controversies in the best treatment interventions for these fractures, resulting in a case-by-case decision-making process.
Topics: Humans; Odontoid Process; Quality of Life; Fractures, Bone
PubMed: 38285420
DOI: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000495