-
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis : Official... Mar 2021Cystic fibrosis patients are often adminstered tobramycin to treat pulmonary infections. Unfortunately, a common side effect is hearing loss, which can fluctuate....
BACKGROUND
Cystic fibrosis patients are often adminstered tobramycin to treat pulmonary infections. Unfortunately, a common side effect is hearing loss, which can fluctuate. Ebselen has known anti-inflammatory properties and could reduce the incidence and severity of tobramycin-induced hearing loss.
METHODS
In vitro: neonatal cochlear cultures were treated with tobramycin or cotreated with tobramycin and ebselen for 3 days. In vivo: adult mice were injected with tobramycin or tobramycin and ebselen for 14 days. ABRs were collected in a repeated measures design until 56 days after treatments. ABR threshold shifts were analyzed and a novel cochleotoxic criteria applied to determine the incidence of ototoxicity. Cochlear immunohistology was analyzed for IHC and OHC loss.
RESULTS
Tobramycin leads to significant IHC and OHC loss in cochlear explant cultures. Ebselen co-treatment at 1:20 concentrations resulted in significant otoprotection. Tobramycin leads to significant ABR threshold shifts that are ameliorated by ebselen co-treatment. Hearing loss did not correlate with significant IHC or OHC loss.
CONCLUSIONS
This mouse model of tobramycin-induced ototoxicity is clinically relevant in that it results in an incidence and severity of hearing loss recently documented in clinic. The in vitro experiments show that tobramycin kills hair cells and that ebselen co-treatment can attenuate this ototoxicity. The in vivo model shows tobramycin-induced hearing loss is ameliorated by ebselen co-treatment, but this is not explained by concomitant hair cell loss. These preclinical data support the testing of ebselen in CF patients receiving tobramycin treatment.
Topics: Animals; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer; Hearing Loss; Isoindoles; Mice; Organoselenium Compounds; Ototoxicity; Tobramycin
PubMed: 32147183
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.02.014 -
Journal of Cancer Survivorship :... Feb 2023Ototoxicity is a prominent side effect of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There are few reports, however, estimating its prevalence in well-defined cohorts and associated...
PURPOSE
Ototoxicity is a prominent side effect of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There are few reports, however, estimating its prevalence in well-defined cohorts and associated risk factors.
METHODS
Testicular cancer (TC) survivors given first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy completed validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics evaluated the prevalence of ototoxicity, defined as self-reported hearing loss and/or tinnitus. We compared patients with and without tinnitus or hearing loss using Chi-square test, two-sided Fisher's exact test, or two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test. To evaluate ototoxicity risk factors, a backward selection logistic regression procedure was performed.
RESULTS
Of 145 TC survivors, 74% reported ototoxicity: 68% tinnitus; 59% hearing loss; and 52% reported both. TC survivors with tinnitus were more likely to indicate hypercholesterolemia (P = 0.008), and difficulty hearing (P < .001). Tinnitus was also significantly related to age at survey completion (OR = 1.79; P = 0.003) and cumulative cisplatin dose (OR = 5.17; P < 0.001). TC survivors with hearing loss were more likely to report diabetes (P = 0.042), hypertension (P = 0.007), hypercholesterolemia (P < 0.001), and family history of hearing loss (P = 0.044). Risk factors for hearing loss included age at survey completion (OR = 1.57; P = 0.036), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 3.45; P = 0.007), cumulative cisplatin dose (OR = 1.94; P = 0.049), and family history of hearing loss (OR = 2.87; P = 0.071).
CONCLUSIONS
Ototoxicity risk factors included age, cisplatin dose, cardiovascular risk factors, and family history of hearing loss. Three of four TC survivors report some type of ototoxicity; thus, follow-up of cisplatin-treated survivors should include routine assessment for ototoxicity with provision of indicated treatments.
IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS
Survivors should be aware of risk factors associated with ototoxicity. Referrals to audiologists before, during, and after cisplatin treatment is recommended.
Topics: Male; Humans; Cisplatin; Testicular Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Tinnitus; Ototoxicity; Prevalence; Hypercholesterolemia; Cancer Survivors; Hearing Loss; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36637632
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01313-w -
Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam,... Jul 2023In this study, we aimed to identify novel compounds that could afford protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by employing both cell- and zebrafish (Danio...
In this study, we aimed to identify novel compounds that could afford protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by employing both cell- and zebrafish (Danio rerio)-based screening platforms. We screened 923 US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs to identify potential compounds exhibiting protective effects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in HEI-OC1 cells (auditory hair cell line). The screening strategy identified esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole as the primary hit compounds. Subsequently, we examined the effects of these compounds on cell viability and apoptosis. Our results revealed that esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole inhibited organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), thus providing in vitro evidence that these compounds could ameliorate cisplatin-induced ototoxicity by directly inhibiting OCT2-mediated cisplatin transport. In vivo, the protective effects were validated using zebrafish; esomeprazole was found to decrease cisplatin-induced hair cell damage in neuromasts. Furthermore, the esomeprazole-treated group showed a significantly lower number of TUNEL-positive cells than the cisplatin-treated group. Collectively, our findings revealed that esomeprazole exerts a protective effect against cisplatin-induced hair cell damage in both HEI-OC1 cells and a zebrafish model.
Topics: Animals; Cisplatin; Antineoplastic Agents; Zebrafish; Esomeprazole; Dexlansoprazole; Ototoxicity; Cell Line; Reactive Oxygen Species; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Apoptosis; Cell Survival
PubMed: 37210931
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106573 -
Advances in Therapy Apr 2023Aminoglycosides are a class of medications used to treat certain bacterial infections, specifically gram-negative aerobes. These drugs can be used alone as first-line... (Review)
Review
Aminoglycosides are a class of medications used to treat certain bacterial infections, specifically gram-negative aerobes. These drugs can be used alone as first-line treatments or in combination with other medications. There can be many different formulations of aminoglycosides including oral, inhalants, intravascular, intramuscular, or intraventricular. There are many distinctive types of aminoglycosides, and although they provide excellent coverage, they can have a wide variety of side effects. The most prevalent side effects of aminoglycosides are nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity is concerning because of the effects that abnormal creatinine levels can have on other drugs and the potential for neurotoxicity. Fortunately, changes in renal function are typically reversible. The kidney is affected by the drug's ability to enter the proximal tubule and cause a buildup of phospholipids in the lysosomes, inhibiting their function. Exposure to aminoglycosides in utero can result in permanent ototoxicity. The mechanism of ototoxicity is through the drug's ability to freely pass into hair cells and cause reactive oxygen species to damage the mitochondria, resulting in cell death. There is not a substantial amount of research regarding the prevention and treatment of adverse effects of aminoglycosides. Future research on the mediation or modulation of these pathophysiological processes would expand their usage in modern medicine.
Topics: Humans; Aminoglycosides; Ototoxicity; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Kidney; Bacterial Infections; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
PubMed: 36738370
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02436-x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2021Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic inflammation and infection of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic inflammation and infection of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Systemic antibiotics are a commonly used treatment option for CSOM, which act to kill or inhibit the growth of micro-organisms that may be responsible for the infection. Antibiotics can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of systemic antibiotics for people with CSOM.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 16 March 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials comparing systemic antibiotics (oral, injection) against placebo/no treatment or other systemic antibiotics with at least a one-week follow-up period, involving patients with chronic (at least two weeks) ear discharge of unknown cause or due to CSOM. Other treatments were allowed if both treatment and control arms also received it.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not, measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks, and after four weeks); health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes included hearing, serious complications and ototoxicity measured in several ways.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 18 studies (2135 participants) with unclear or high risk of bias. 1. Systemic antibiotics versus no treatment/placebo It is very uncertain if there is a difference between systemic (intravenous) antibiotics and placebo in the resolution of ear discharge at between one and two weeks (risk ratio (RR) 8.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88 to 38.21; 33 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report results for resolution of ear discharge after two weeks. Health-related quality of life was not reported. The evidence is very uncertain for hearing and serious (intracranial) complications. Ear pain and suspected ototoxicity were not reported. 2. Systemic antibiotics versus no treatment/placebo (both study arms received topical antibiotics) Six studies were included of which five presented useable data. There may be little or no difference in the resolution of ear discharge at between one to two weeks for oral ciprofloxacin compared to placebo or no treatment when ciprofloxacin ear drops were used in both intervention arms (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.12; 390 participants; low-certainty evidence). No results after two weeks were reported. Health-related quality of life was not reported. The evidence is very uncertain for ear pain, serious complications and suspected ototoxicity. 3. Systemic antibiotics versus no treatment/placebo (both study arms received other background treatments) Two studies used topical antibiotics plus steroids as background treatment in both arms. It is very uncertain if there is a difference in resolution of ear discharge between metronidazole and placebo at four weeks (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.65; 40 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). This study did not report other outcomes. It is also very uncertain if resolution of ear discharge at six weeks was improved with co-trimoxazole compared to placebo (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.16; 98 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Resolution of ear discharge was not reported at other time points. From the narrative report there was no evidence of a difference between groups for health-related quality of life, hearing or serious complications (very low-certainty evidence). One study (136 participants) used topical antiseptics as background treatment in both arms and found similar resolution of ear discharge between the amoxicillin and no treatment groups at three to four months (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41; 136 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The narrative report indicated no evidence of differences in hearing or suspected ototoxicity (both very low-certainty evidence). No other outcomes were reported. 4. Different types of systemic antibiotics This is a summary of four comparisons, where different antibiotics were compared to each other. Eight studies compared different types of systemic antibiotics against each other: quinolones against beta-lactams (four studies), lincosamides against nitroimidazoles (one study) and comparisons of different types of beta-lactams (three studies). It was not possible to conclude if there was one class or type of systemic antibiotic that was better in terms of resolution of ear discharge. The studies did not report adverse events well.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was a limited amount of evidence available to examine whether systemic antibiotics are effective in achieving resolution of ear discharge for people with CSOM. When used alone (with or without aural toileting), we are very uncertain if systemic antibiotics are more effective than placebo or no treatment. When added to an effective intervention such as topical antibiotics, there seems to be little or no difference in resolution of ear discharge (low-certainty evidence). Data were only available for certain classes of antibiotics and it is very uncertain whether one class of systemic antibiotic may be more effective than another. Adverse effects of systemic antibiotics were poorly reported in the studies included. As we found very sparse evidence for their efficacy, the possibility of adverse events may detract from their use for CSOM.
Topics: Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Humans; Otitis Media, Suppurative; Ototoxicity; Pain; Persistent Infection
PubMed: 35819801
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub2 -
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Feb 2024Cinchonine (CN) and its isomer cinchonidine (CD), two of the common cinchona alkaloids, are wildly used as antimalarial drugs. However, the effects of CN and CD on the...
AIM
Cinchonine (CN) and its isomer cinchonidine (CD), two of the common cinchona alkaloids, are wildly used as antimalarial drugs. However, the effects of CN and CD on the auditory system are unknown.
METHODS
Molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were used for predicting effective drugs. The CCK-8 assay was conducted for assessing cell viability in House Ear Institute-Organ of Corti 1 (HEI-OC1) cells. MitoSox Red staining revealed reactive oxygen species (ROS) amounts. TMRM staining was used to assess the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Immunofluorescence staining of myosin 7a was used to examine hair cells (HCs) in cisplatin-treated neonatal mouse cochlear explants, while TUJ-1 immunostaining was used for the detection of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). Cleaved caspase-3 and TUNEL immunostaining were utilized for apoptosis assessment. Immunoblot was carried out to detect PI3K-AKT signaling effectors.
RESULTS
Pretreatment with CN or CD significantly increased cell viability and reduced mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS accumulation in cisplatin-treated HEI-OC1 cells. Immunofluorescent staining of cochlear explants showed that CN and CD attenuated cisplatin-induced damage to SGNs and HCs. Immunoblot revealed that CN and CD downregulated the expression of cleaved caspase-3 and activated PI3K-AKT signaling in cisplatin-injured HEI-OC1 cells.
CONCLUSION
CD and CN can reduce ototoxicity caused by cisplatin and might help treat cisplatin-associated hearing loss.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Cisplatin; Antineoplastic Agents; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Caspase 3; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Reactive Oxygen Species; Ototoxicity; Molecular Docking Simulation; Cinchona Alkaloids; Apoptosis
PubMed: 37577804
DOI: 10.1111/cns.14403 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Jun 2023The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of genetic polymorphisms on platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC)-induced ototoxicity. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of genetic polymorphisms on platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC)-induced ototoxicity.
DATA SOURCES
Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were conducted from the inception of the databases to May 31, 2022. Abstracts and presentations from conferences were also reviewed.
REVIEW METHODS
Four investigators independently extracted data in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Differences in the prevalence of PBC-induced ototoxicity between reference and variant (i) genotypes and (ii) alleles were analyzed. The overall effect size was presented using the random-effects model as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
From 32 included articles, 59 single nucleotide polymorphisms on 28 genes were identified, with 4406 total unique participants. For allele frequency analysis, the A allele in ACYP2 rs1872328 was positively associated with ototoxicity (OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.06-6.43; n = 2518). Upon limiting to cisplatin use only, the T allele of COMT rs4646316 and COMT rs9332377 revealed significant results. For genotype frequency analysis, the CT/TT genotype in ERCC2 rs1799793 demonstrated an otoprotective effect (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27-0.94; n = 176). Excluding studies using carboplatin or concomitant radiotherapy revealed significant effects with COMT rs4646316, GSTP1 rs1965, and XPC rs2228001. Major sources of variations between studies include differences in patient demographics, ototoxicity grading systems, and treatment protocols.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis presents polymorphisms that exert ototoxic or otoprotective effects in patients undergoing PBC. Importantly, several of these alleles are observed at high frequencies globally, highlighting the potential for polygenic screening and cumulative risk evaluation for personalized care.
Topics: Humans; Antineoplastic Agents; Ototoxicity; Platinum; Cisplatin; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein; Acid Anhydride Hydrolases
PubMed: 36802061
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.222 -
Anales de Pediatria Nov 2021Ototoxicity occurs in different percentages in patients after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy or cranial radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to...
INTRODUCTION
Ototoxicity occurs in different percentages in patients after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy or cranial radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to present our experience in ototoxicity monitoring.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A review was made of the registry of paediatric cancer patients referred to the Children's Hearing Loss Unit from 1999 to 2019.
RESULTS
Of the 46 patients referred to this unit, 41 had received platinum as part of their treatment, 17 patients underwent neurosurgery, and 18 patients received cranial radiation therapy. An anamnesis and otoscopy were performed on all of them, and the monitoring was carried out with tone-verbal audiometry and/or distortion products. Hearing loss was observed in eight patients (21.05% of patients referred for audiological follow-up) as a consequence of the treatment. It was impossible to determine the audiological situation in eight patients at the end of treatment. Hearing aid adaption was necessary in two patients. In coordination with Paediatric Oncology, a change from cisplatin to carboplatin due to bilateral grade two ototoxicity was considered appropriate during treatment in one patient.
CONCLUSION
Adequate coordination with Paediatric Oncology is essential to carry out active surveillance for ototoxicity and to modify, if possible, the dosage or type of chemotherapy in case hearing is affected. In our experience, and following current recommendations, a pre-treatment assessment is usually performed, as well as monitoring during treatment, at the end of treatment, and annually thereafter due to the risk of a later development of hearing loss.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cancer Survivors; Carboplatin; Child; Cisplatin; Humans; Neoplasms; Ototoxicity
PubMed: 34702687
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2020.08.014 -
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling Jun 2022Cisplatin is an important component of treatment regimens for different cancers. Notwithstanding that therapeutic success often results from partial efficacy or... (Review)
Review
Cisplatin is an important component of treatment regimens for different cancers. Notwithstanding that therapeutic success often results from partial efficacy or stabilizing the disease, chemotherapy failure is driven by resistance to drug treatment and occurrence of side effects, such as progressive irreversible ototoxicity. Cisplatin's side effects, including ototoxicity, are often dose limiting. Cisplatin ototoxicity results from several mechanisms, including redox imbalance caused by reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation, activation of inflammation, and p53 and its downstream pathways that culminate in apoptosis. Considerable efforts in research have targeted development of molecular interventions that can be concurrently administered with cisplatin or other chemotherapies to reduce side effect toxicities while preserving or enhancing the antineoplastic effects. Evidence from studies has indicated some polyphenols, such as curcumin, can help to regulate redox signaling and inflammatory effects. Furthermore, polyphenols can exert opposing effects in different types of tissues, that is, normal cells undergoing stressful conditions cancer cells. This review article summarizes evidence of curcumin antioxidant effect against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity that is converted to a pro-oxidant activity in cisplatin-treated cancer cells, thus providing an ideal chemosensitivity combined with otoprotection. Polyphenols can modulate the adaptive responses to stress in the cisplatin-exposed cochlea. These adaptive effects can result from the interaction/cross talk between the cell's defenses, inflammatory molecules, and the key signaling molecules of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT-3), nuclear factor κ-B (NF-κB), p53, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2). We provide molecular evidence for alternative strategies for chemotherapy with cisplatin addressing the otoprotection and chemosensitization properties of polyphenols. . 36, 1229-1245.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cisplatin; Cochlea; Curcumin; Humans; Ototoxicity; Polyphenols; Reactive Oxygen Species; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 34731023
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0183 -
The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health Aug 2019The identification of preventive interventions that are safe and effective for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is important, especially in children because hearing loss... (Review)
Review
The identification of preventive interventions that are safe and effective for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is important, especially in children because hearing loss can impair speech-language acquisition development. Previous randomised trials assessed systemic drugs such as amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate or disulfiram, and sodium thiosulfate. Amifostine, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, and disulfiram did not show hearing preservation. Paediatric trials assessing sodium thiosulfate showed efficacy in terms of hearing protection. The SIOPEL 6 trial consisted solely of patients with localised hepatoblastoma and no effects on survival were shown. In the ACCL0431 trial, which included heterogeneous patients, a post-hoc analysis showed significantly worse overall survival among patients who had disseminated disease receiving sodium thiosulfate than among controls, but not among those with localised disease. Intratympanically administered drugs have mainly been assessed in adults and include N-acetylcysteine and dexamethasone. Inconsistent effects of these drugs were identified but these studies were limited by design, small sample size, and statistical approach. Future studies of systemic drugs will need to consider the measurement of disease outcomes through study design and sample size, and ototoxicity endpoints should be harmonised to enhance comparability between trials.
Topics: Acetylcysteine; Adolescent; Amifostine; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Chelating Agents; Child; Cisplatin; Cytoprotection; Dexamethasone; Disulfiram; Ditiocarb; Humans; Neoplasms; Ototoxicity; Thiosulfates
PubMed: 31160205
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30115-4