-
The Angle Orthodontist Mar 2020To evaluate systematically the effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion compared with other nonsurgical intrusive mechanics for deep-bite... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate systematically the effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion compared with other nonsurgical intrusive mechanics for deep-bite correction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Unrestricted electronic searches in Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, LILACS, and Cochrane's CENTRAL as well as manual searches were conducted up to August 2019. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment were done by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used, and the quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. A random-effects meta-analysis of continuous data, with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was used.
RESULTS
Seven RCTs were included in the quantitative synthesis, and the overall quality of evidence was very low to low. When compared with intrusion arches, miniscrews resulted in a more efficient deep-bite reduction with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.48 (95% CI, -0.89 to -0.07). When miniscrews were used, a statistically significant difference was observed favoring less maxillary molar extrusion (SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.46 to -0.27) and more incisor intrusion as measured from centroid to palatal plane (SMD, -0.95; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.49). Results also showed a statistically nonsignificant difference regarding the amount of resultant root resorption between miniscrews and intrusion arches.
CONCLUSIONS
There is weak evidence indicating efficient deep-bite correction using miniscrews. Root resorption seems to be an associated adverse effect that occurs regardless of the intrusive mechanics used. These conclusions should be viewed with great caution as further well-designed long-term research is recommended.
Topics: Bone Screws; Humans; Incisor; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Overbite; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 31816252
DOI: 10.2319/061119-400.1 -
Journal of Orthodontic Science 2022Protraction therapy for maxillary deficiency in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion involves the use of facemask. Conventionally facemask has been anchored... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Protraction therapy for maxillary deficiency in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion involves the use of facemask. Conventionally facemask has been anchored to the maxillary dentition, which is responsible for some of the counter-productive effects of facemask therapy including backward and downward rotation of the chin, increase in the lower anterior facial height, proclination of maxillary incisors, retroclination of mandibular incisors apart from mesialization of maxillary molars with extrusion and decreased overbite.
AIM
The aim of this article is to highlight the nuances of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) including a literature review, which is comprehensive and narrative and comparing the different techniques involved such as type 1 BAMP versus type 2 BAMP and BAMP versus facemask.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A computerized search was performed in electronic databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Embase, DOAJ, and Google scholar using key words such as "bone-anchored maxillary protraction" and "BAMP." The search was confined to articles in English published till March 2021. Forty-seven case-controlled, cross-sectional, retrospective and prospective studies, as well as systematic reviews and meta-analysis were included in this article, which were limited to human subjects. A hand search of the reference lists of the included articles was also carried out to include missed out articles.
CONCLUSION
To overcome these drawbacks, BAMP was introduced, which causes both maxillary protraction, restraint of mandibular growth with minimal dentoalveolar changes. BAMP is used widely nowadays in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion.
PubMed: 35754417
DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_153_21 -
The Angle Orthodontist Nov 2019To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effects of two common methods of overbite reduction on smile esthetics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 32 patients in whom overbite reduction was achieved using a maxillary incisor intrusion arch (18 patients) or flat anterior bite plate (14 patients). Clinical and cephalometric records were compared pretreatment (T1), after overbite reduction (T2), and posttreatment (T3).
RESULTS
Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in overbite and maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination during treatment (T1-T3). The center of resistance of the maxillary incisor and the incisal edge was significantly intruded in the intrusion arch group during overbite reduction (T1-T2). However, most of the intrusion of the center of resistance was lost by the end of treatment (T2-T3). Both treatment groups experienced a reduction in maxillary incisor display and flattening of the smile arc during overbite reduction.
CONCLUSIONS
Both overbite reduction methods caused a decrease in incisor display and flattening of the smile arc. Smiles were improved in some patients by the end of treatment. However, reduction in incisor display persisted. Clinicians should take precautions to prevent negative effects of overbite reduction.
Topics: Cephalometry; Esthetics, Dental; Humans; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Maxilla; Overbite; Prospective Studies; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 31306077
DOI: 10.2319/030819-177.1 -
The Angle Orthodontist Nov 2022To determine recognition ability and the levels of esthetic tolerance of deep bite and anterior open bite (AOB) among laypeople and investigate the factors affecting...
OBJECTIVES
To determine recognition ability and the levels of esthetic tolerance of deep bite and anterior open bite (AOB) among laypeople and investigate the factors affecting levels of tolerance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Using a questionnaire, laypeople (N = 100) were examined, and overbite was measured. They were tested for whether they recognized deep bite and AOB. Esthetic tolerance thresholds for deep bite and AOB were selected by incremental depiction in grayscale images. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to quantify the effect of recognition and other factors (age, sex, education level, occupation, history of orthodontic treatment, interest in orthodontic treatment or retreatment, and overbite presence) affecting the tolerance of overbite problems (α = 0.05).
RESULTS
Of the participants, 55% and 94% recognized deep bite and AOB, respectively. Participants with a deep bite were significantly more likely to esthetically tolerate deep bite compared with those without a deep bite (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-9.89). Participants who recognized a deep bite problem had significantly lower esthetic tolerance to deep bite compared with participants who did not recognize a deep bite (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45). None of the other eight chosen factors significantly affected the tolerance level of AOB (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Participants with a deep bite or those who did not recognize a deep bite had significantly higher esthetic tolerance of deep bite than those without or those who recognized the problem (P < .05).
PubMed: 36409267
DOI: 10.2319/051822-367.1 -
Progress in Orthodontics Sep 2020Malocclusion is a highly prevalent public health problem, and several studies have shown its negative correlation with quality of life, self-esteem, and social... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Malocclusion is a highly prevalent public health problem, and several studies have shown its negative correlation with quality of life, self-esteem, and social perceptions. However, its association with bullying is still controversial.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the relationship between malocclusion and bullying in children and adolescents.
SEARCH METHODS
The databases used for the electronic researches were PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs/BBO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Grey literature was reviewed through Open Grey literature with no language or date restrictions. Selection criteria, based on the PECO strategy, were considered eligible observational studies that included schoolchildren or adolescents (P) with malocclusion (E), compared to those with normal occlusion (C), in which the relationship between malocclusion and bullying was determined (O).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Risk of bias evaluation was made for the qualitative synthesis by the Fowkes and Fulton criteria. Data regarding the age of participants and types of malocclusion and of bullying were extracted among other reported data. The quality of the evidence analyzed was evaluated through the GRADE approach.
RESULTS
From 2744 articles identified in databases, nine met the eligibility criteria and were included in present systematic review, of which two studies were judged with methodological soundness. The quality of the evidence was classified as very low due to very serious problems for "risk of bias" and "other considerations" and serious problems of "indirectness". The age of participants ranged from 9 to 34 years considering a cohort study, with a bullying recalling perspective. Malocclusion was both evaluated by researchers and self-reported by participants addressing dentofacial characteristics mostly related to the incisors relationship. All studies evaluated the verbal type of bullying, while 3 also considered physical type. Both types were reported as related to malocclusion, although the results showed that extreme maxillary overjet (> 4 mm, > 6 mm, > 9 mm), extreme deep overbite, and having space between anterior teeth or missing teeth were the types of malocclusion with the strongest relations to bullying.
CONCLUSIONS
With very low certainty of evidence, the results of this systematic review suggest that conspicuous extreme malocclusion may be related to the occurrence of bullying among children and adolescents.
Topics: Adolescent; Bullying; Child; Cohort Studies; Humans; Malocclusion; Overbite; Quality of Life
PubMed: 32869136
DOI: 10.1186/s40510-020-00323-7 -
International Orthodontics May 2024The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign®...
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign® aligners (Align Technology, San Jose, California) with those planned by orthodontists via its ClinCheck® digital treatment planning facility.
METHODS
Data provided by Align regarding patients who had completed an initial series of Invisalign® aligner treatment and were less than 18-years old were assessed in relation to pre-treatment, planned and achieved overjet and overbite measurements. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Mann Whitney calculations were computed.
RESULTS
A total of 290 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 14.17 (13,15.42) years. The median achieved overjet and overbite changes were less than those planned (p<0.01) with 53.33% of the planned median overjet increase achieved and 52.94% of planned median overjet reduction achieved. Additionally, 58.33% of the planned median overbite increase was achieved and 55.55% of the planned median overbite reduction was achieved. A total of 21.52% patients recorded no change or an increase from pre-treatment to the achieved overjet where reduction was planned, whereas 41.67% recorded no change or a reduction in overjet where increase was planned. A total of 18.72% recorded no change or an increase in overbite where reduction was planned, whereas 20.75% recorded no change or a reduction in overbite where increase was planned.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than 60% of the planned overjet and overbite changes per patient were achieved. Between 18.72 and 41.67% of patients experienced no change or changes in overjet and overbite in the opposite direction to that planned. This is likely to be clinically significant.
PubMed: 38805975
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100888 -
American Journal of Orthodontics and... Dec 2019
Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Humans; Overbite
PubMed: 31784002
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.004 -
Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.The Angle Orthodontist Nov 2023To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances with miniscrew (FM) during molar intrusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty adults with anterior open bite were randomized into either CA or FM groups. Lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and MBF were collected at pretreatment (T0) and 6 months of treatment (T1). Maxillary molar intrusion in FM were intruded by nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed-coil spring delivered force (150 grams/side) while clear aligners combined with squeezing exercise were performed in CA. Parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
After 6 months of treatment, significant root resorption of 0.21-0.24 mm in CA and 0.38-0.47 mm in FM were found while maxillary molars were intruded 0.68 and 1.49 mm in CA and FM, respectively. CA showed significant less root resorption and intrusion than FM. Overbite, bite closing, and MBF increased significantly. CA showed significantly less overbite and SN-MP changes but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was correlated with the amount of maxillary molar intrusion (r = 0.736, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Maxillary molar intrusion and root resorption in CA were half the amount in FM in 6 months. The amount of maxillary molar root resorption was one-third of the intrusion distance. CA displayed less overbite increase and bite closing but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was positively correlated with the molar intrusion amount.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Root Resorption; Overbite; Open Bite; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Molar; Tooth Movement Techniques; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Maxilla
PubMed: 37922387
DOI: 10.2319/010723-14.1 -
European Journal of Orthodontics Sep 2023To systematically review the available evidence concerning the risk factors for gingival recessions (GR) after orthodontic treatment (OT).
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the available evidence concerning the risk factors for gingival recessions (GR) after orthodontic treatment (OT).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data was obtained and collected by systematically searching 3 data bases: Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until 20 April 2023. Controlled trials, cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies describing GR or clinical crown height (CCH) after OT were included. The risk of bias in the selected studies was evaluated with the methodological index for non-randomized studies.
RESULTS
Forty-eight articles were included, investigating the following six risk factors for GR: 1. OT (n = 21), 2. Type of orthodontic intervention (n = 32), 3. Patient's baseline occlusal and skeletal characteristics (n = 14), 4. Mucogingival characteristics (n = 10), 5. Oral hygiene (n = 9), and 6. Others (n = 12). Significantly higher prevalence, severity and extent of GR were found in orthodontic patients by 10/15, 4/10, and 2/2 articles respectively. 10/16 articles reported significantly more GR and increased CCH in patients where orthodontic incisor proclination was performed. The evidence surrounding maxillary expansion and orthodontic retention was too heterogeneous to allow for? definitive conclusions. Pre-treatment angle classification, ANB, overjet, overbite, arch width and mandibular divergence were found not to be associated with GR (9/14), while pre-treatment crossbite, symphysis height and width were (5/7 studies). A thin gingival biotype, presence of previous GR, baseline width of keratinized gingiva and facial gingival margin thickness were correlated with increased risk of GR after OT by nine articles, while pocket depth was not. Oral hygiene, sex, treatment duration, and oral piercings were found not to be linked with GR in orthodontic patients, while GR was reported to increase with age in orthodontic patients by 50 per cent of the articles investigating this factor. The mean risk of bias for comparative and not comparative studies was 14.17/24 and 9.12/16.
LIMITATIONS
The selected studies were quite heterogeneous regarding study settings, variables reported and included very limited sample sizes.
CONCLUSION
Although studies regarding the risk factors for GR are relatively abundant, they are very heterogeneous concerning design, studied factors, methodology and reporting, which often leads to contradictory results. Uniform reporting guidelines are urgently needed for future research.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42020181661.
FUNDING
This research received no funding.
Topics: Humans; Gingival Recession; Cross-Sectional Studies; Overbite; Malocclusion; Gingiva
PubMed: 37432131
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad026 -
The Journal of Clinical Pediatric... Apr 2021To identify the association of occlusal disorders in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To identify the association of occlusal disorders in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).
STUDY DESIGN
A literature review was conducted, and articles published between 2010 and 2019 were searched on Bireme and PubMed websites and in MEDLINE and LILACS databases, in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, using the keywords "malocclusion," "sickle cell disease," and "cephalometry," combined by Boolean operators AND and OR. One of the criteria for the selection of articles was the presence of adolescents in the sample. This methodology followed the PRISMA recommendations. Seventy-nine articles were found, seven of which were included in the review as they met the inclusion criteria and the study goals.
RESULTS
The prevalence of malocclusion in SCD patients ranged from 62.9% to 100%, which was considered very severe in 30.1% to 80.6%. The most common occlusal changes were Angle's class II malocclusion, increased maxillary overjet, and anterior open bite. In addition, class II skeletal pattern was the most prevalent due to mandibular retrusion.
CONCLUSION
Malocclusion prevalence in SCD patients is high and considered to be a risk factor, with a significant rate of very severe malocclusion when compared to healthy patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Cephalometry; Humans; Malocclusion; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Open Bite; Overbite
PubMed: 33951171
DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.2.8