-
Terapevticheskii Arkhiv Oct 2022To evaluate the advantages of using combined therapy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and esophagoprotector in comparison with basic therapy of PPIs for 4 weeks based on...
AIM
To evaluate the advantages of using combined therapy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and esophagoprotector in comparison with basic therapy of PPIs for 4 weeks based on the results of changes in the endoscopic picture.To compare the effectiveness of 4-week PPI therapy and 4-week combination therapy with PPI and esophagoprotector Alfasoxx (sodium hyaluronate, chondroitin sulfate, poloxomer 407) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) of any degree according to the Los Angeles Endoscopic Classification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
81 patients with EE AC according to the Los Angeles endoscopic classification (1994) was enrolled in the study on the basis of the clinic of Peter the Great, Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University. By computer randomization, patients were divided into the control group 40 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day) and the intervention group 41 patients (pantoprazole 40 mg 1 time per day + Alfasoxx 1 sachet qid). The therapy was carried out for 4 weeks. In all patients before and after therapy, the frequency and severity of the main symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were assessed, esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed.
RESULTS
The advantage of combination therapy over standard PPI monotherapy in patients with EE was revealed. According to the results of the control endoscopy, healing of erosions of the esophageal mucosa was observed in 39 out of 41 (95.1%) patients in the intervention group and 32 out of 39 (82.1%) in the control group. The proportion of patients who showed an improvement in the endoscopic picture before and after treatment for 4 weeks by at least 1 level according to the Los Angeles classification was significantly higher in the comparison group 41 patients (100%), while in the control group 33 patients (85%); p0.009. After treatment, the combination therapy group had a lower incidence (p0.01) and severity of heartburn (p0.01). The same results are demonstrated by combination therapy regarding the symptom belching of air: in the study group after treatment, this symptom occurred less frequently (p=0.014), its severity was significantly less than in the control group (p0.01). There was a statistically significant decrease in the need for on-demand antacid therapy in the study group.
CONCLUSION
In this study involving 81 patients with erosive GERD, the benefits of combination therapy were demonstrated. The addition of Alfasoxx medical device to PPI therapy increases the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of therapy. This positive effect is associated with the esophagoprotective properties of the drug, based on unique pharmacodynamic characteristics. Combination therapy for GERD is preferred in patients with EE. Studies have shown the expediency of using Alfasoxx in case of insufficient effectiveness of classical acid-suppressive therapy for GERD.
Topics: Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pantoprazole; Antacids; Hyaluronic Acid; Chondroitin Sulfates; Esophagitis; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Peptic Ulcer; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36286979
DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.08.201828 -
Scientific Reports Dec 2020Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) belong to the most common medication in geriatric medicine. They are known to reduce osteoclast activity and to delay fracture healing in...
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) belong to the most common medication in geriatric medicine. They are known to reduce osteoclast activity and to delay fracture healing in young adult mice. Because differentiation and proliferation in fracture healing as well as pharmacologic actions of drugs markedly differ in the elderly compared to the young, we herein studied the effect of the PPI pantoprazole on bone healing in aged mice using a murine fracture model. Bone healing was analyzed by biomechanical, histomorphometric, radiological and protein biochemical analyses. The biomechanical analysis revealed a significantly reduced bending stiffness in pantoprazole-treated animals when compared to controls. This was associated with a decreased amount of bone tissue within the callus, a reduced trabecular thickness and a higher amount of fibrous tissue. Furthermore, the number of osteoclasts in pantoprazole-treated animals was significantly increased at 2 weeks and decreased at 5 weeks after fracture, indicating an acceleration of bone turnover. Western blot analysis showed a lower expression of the bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4), whereas the expression of the pro-angiogenic parameters was higher when compared to controls. Thus, pantoprazole impairs fracture healing in aged mice by affecting angiogenic and osteogenic growth factor expression, osteoclast activity and bone formation.
Topics: Aging; Animals; Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4; Disease Models, Animal; Fracture Healing; Mice; Neovascularization, Physiologic; Osteogenesis; Pantoprazole
PubMed: 33361800
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79605-3 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Apr 2022
Topics: Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors
PubMed: 35348553
DOI: No ID Found -
European Journal of Case Reports in... 2021Drugs can cause fever of unknown origin. Drug fever is a diagnosis of exclusion and can lead to unnecessary investigations and prolonged hospitalization. Any drug can be...
UNLABELLED
Drugs can cause fever of unknown origin. Drug fever is a diagnosis of exclusion and can lead to unnecessary investigations and prolonged hospitalization. Any drug can be responsible. Here, we describe the case of a woman admitted because of acute hepatitis. Pantoprazole was started for stress ulcer prophylaxis when she was admitted to the ICU. Fever developed a few days later and an extensive diagnostic work-up was negative. Fever remitted after pantoprazole discontinuation and the diagnosis of drug fever was established.
LEARNING POINTS
Despite extensive diagnostic work-up, the aetiology of acute liver failure remains unclear in a large proportion of cases.Drug fever is a diagnosis of exclusion and must be considered in every patient with unexplained fever; any drug should be seen as a possible offending agent.Pantoprazole, a commonly prescribed drug, can be a rare cause of fever.
PubMed: 34123946
DOI: 10.12890/2021_002571 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... May 2021: Nearly 80% of children with epilepsy have one or more chronic comorbidities that require specific drug treatments in several cases. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs)... (Review)
Review
: Nearly 80% of children with epilepsy have one or more chronic comorbidities that require specific drug treatments in several cases. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiseizure medications (ASMs) and all other drugs (NON-ASMs) used to treat comorbid diseases may have serious consequences.: All potential DDIs between 27 ASMs and all NON-ASMs used for oral chronic treatment of those disorders most often comorbid with epilepsy in children were searched for drug compendia. Clinical evidence of the identified DDIs was also searched in the literature. Forty-eight drugs have been identified as potential DDIs with at least one ASM. Most important DDIs are between some ASMs and omeprazole and pantoprazole (drugs for gastrointestinal disorders), ibuprofen and cyclobenzaprine (drugs for musculoskeletal disorders), loratidine, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, montelukast, and theophylline (drugs for respiratory system), levothyroxine, liothyronine and several corticosteroids (systemic hormonal preparations), almotriptan, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, and several antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics (drugs for nervous diseases). Clinical evidence of the predicted DDIs was found in a minority of cases.: Treatment of children with epilepsy should be decided considering treatment of both seizures and comorbid diseases and aimed at minimizing the risk of DDIs between ASMs and NON-ASMs.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticonvulsants; Child; Comorbidity; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans
PubMed: 33709868
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1903429 -
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice 2021Gastrointestinal bleeding, a side effect of clopidogrel, is usually prevented by proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). Due to omeprazole's inhibitory effects on the liver...
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of Clopidogrel and Pantoprazole in Comparison with Clopidogrel and Omeprazole for the Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in Iran.
OBJECTIVE
Gastrointestinal bleeding, a side effect of clopidogrel, is usually prevented by proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). Due to omeprazole's inhibitory effects on the liver enzyme CYP2C19, its concomitant use with clopidogrel is argued to increase the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) recurrence, as CYP2C19 activates clopidogrel. Pantoprazole as an alternative PPI has shown no inhibitory effect on CYP2C19. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of concomitant use of clopidogrel and pantoprazole in MI patients compared to the simultaneous use of clopidogrel and omeprazole.
METHODS
We used the Markov-modeling technique with a hypothetical cohort of 1000 acute MI patients aged 55 years using Microsoft Excel 2013 software. The study was done from the payer perspective, and a lifetime horizon with 1-year cycles was considered in the model. Life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were used to quantify the health effects of these interventions. Two separate scenarios of public tariffs and private tariffs with various discount rates (0%, 3%, and 7.2% discounts (only for costs)) were evaluated, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to report the results. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to deal with uncertainty. Data were sourced from published literature and tariff book of the Iranian ministry of health.
FINDINGS
The estimated ICERs were 342 USD/QALY and 236 USD/LYG per patient for the base-case scenario.
CONCLUSION
Abiding by the WHO threshold for cost-effectiveness, the concomitant use of pantoprazole and clopidogrel can be considered cost-effective compared to the use of omeprazole and clopidogrel.
PubMed: 34527614
DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_22 -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Feb 2024The association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and rhabdomyolysis were unclear. The aim of this study was to explore and systematically analyze the potential link...
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The association between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and rhabdomyolysis were unclear. The aim of this study was to explore and systematically analyze the potential link between five PPIs and the rhabdomyolysis events using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
METHODS
Suspected rhabdomyolysis events associated with PPIs were identified by data mining with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Demographic information, drug administration, and outcomes of PPI-induced rhabdomyolysis events were also analyzed.
RESULTS
There were 3311 reports associated with PPI-induced rhabdomyolysis that were identified. After removing duplicates, 1899 cases were determined to contain complete patient demographic data. The average age was 65 ± 18 year and 57% were male. Omeprazole and pantoprazole had the same largest percentage of reports. Lansoprazole had the highest ROR index of 12.67, followed by esomeprazole (11.18), omeprazole (10.27), rabeprazole (10.06), and pantoprazole (9.24). PRR, IC, and EBGM showed similar patterns. This suggested that lansoprazole exhibited the strongest correlation with rhabdomyolysis. In rhabdomyolysis events, PPIs were mainly "concomitant" (>60%), and only a few cases were "primary suspects" (<15%). Rabeprazole showed the lowest death rate while lansoprazole showed the highest.
CONCLUSIONS
The study suggested that significant rhabdomyolysis signals were associated with PPIs. Further research should be performed in drug safety evaluation for a more comprehensive association.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pantoprazole; Rabeprazole; Pharmacovigilance; Bayes Theorem; Omeprazole; Lansoprazole; Rhabdomyolysis
PubMed: 37961012
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16411 -
Drug Development Research Jun 2024Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancers. The prevention and therapy for this deadly disease remain a global medical challenge. In this study, we...
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the deadliest cancers. The prevention and therapy for this deadly disease remain a global medical challenge. In this study, we investigated the effect of pantoprazole (PPZ) on the carcinogenesis and growth of HCC. Both diethylnitrosamine (DEN) plus CCl4-induced and DEN plus high fat diet (HFD)-induced HCC models in mice were established. Cytokines and cell proliferation-associated gene in the liver tissues of mice and HCC cells were analyzed. Cellular glycolysis and Na/H exchange activity were measured. The preventive administration of pantoprazole (PPZ) at a clinically relevant low dose markedly suppressed HCC carcinogenesis in both DEN plus CCl4-induced and HFD-induced murine HCC models, whereas the therapeutic administration of PPZ at the dose suppressed the growth of HCC. In the liver tissues of PPZ-treated mice, inflammatory cytokines, IL1, CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5, CCL6, CCL7, CCL20, and CCL22, were reduced. The administration of CXCL1, CXCL5, CCL2, or CCL20 all reversed PPZ-suppressed DEN plus CCL4-induced HCC carcinogenesis in mice. PPZ inhibited the expressions of CCNA2, CCNB2, CCNE2, CDC25C, CDCA5, CDK1, CDK2, TOP2A, TTK, AURKA, and BIRC5 in HCC cells. Further results showed that PPZ reduced the production of these inflammatory cytokines and the expression of these cell proliferation-associated genes through the inhibition of glycolysis and Na/H exchange. In conclusion, PPZ suppresses the carcinogenesis and growth of HCC, which is related to inhibiting the production of inflammatory cytokines and the expression of cell proliferation-associated genes in the liver through the inhibition of glycolysis and Na/H exchange.
Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Glycolysis; Liver Neoplasms; Mice; Pantoprazole; Male; Cell Proliferation; Humans; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Carcinogenesis; Diethylnitrosamine; Cytokines; Cell Line, Tumor; Diet, High-Fat
PubMed: 38764200
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.22198 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Nov 2021The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal...
BACKGROUND
The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.
AIM
To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies.
METHODS
This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies ( = 12), epidemiological studies ( = 11), and CRC treatment studies ( = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design.
RESULTS
Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen.
CONCLUSION
An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents.
Topics: Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Proton Pump Inhibitors
PubMed: 34908809
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7716 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2021This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan when coadministered with amoxicillin/clarithromycin in healthy... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan when coadministered with amoxicillin/clarithromycin in healthy subjects. Cohort 1 was an open-label, randomized multiple-dose study to evaluate the mutual interaction of tegoprazan and amoxicillin/clarithromycin on the disposition of 3 tested drugs including tegoprazan M1 metabolite and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14-OH-clarithromycin). Cohort 2 was an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel multiple-dose study to compare the intragastric pH profile after multiple oral doses of 50 or 100 mg tegoprazan coadministered with amoxicillin/clarithromycin 1000/500 mg for 7 days and pantoprazole-based triple therapy as the comparator arm. The coadministration of tegoprazan with amoxicillin/clarithromycin increased C (2.2-fold) and AUC (2.7-fold) of tegoprazan and M1 (2.1- and 2.2-fold for C and AUC , respectively) compared with administration of tegoprazan alone. The C and AUC of 14-OH-clarithromycin increased by 1.7- and 1.8-fold, respectively; the disposition of amoxicillin and clarithromycin were not significantly changed. On days 1 and 7 of treatment, tegoprazan-based therapies (both 50- and 100-mg therapies) maintained pH above 6 for more than 88% of the 24-hour period, which was significantly longer compared with pantoprazole-based therapy. Tegoprazan either alone or in combination with amoxicillin/clarithromycin was well tolerated in healthy subjects. In conclusion, the exposure of tegoprazan was increased after coadministration of amoxicillin/clarithromycin, which led to increase pharmacodynamic response measured by intragastric pH compared with tegoprazan alone. Therefore, tegoprazan-based triple therapy would be effective therapeutic regimen to manage intragastric pH in terms of gastric or duodenal ulcers healing, treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Helicobacter pylori eradication.
Topics: Adult; Amoxicillin; Area Under Curve; Benzene Derivatives; Clarithromycin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Gastrointestinal Agents; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Imidazoles; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged
PubMed: 33341955
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1805