-
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Jul 2021Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are regional anesthesia techniques in which the space ("plane") between two discrete fascial layers is the target of needle insertion and... (Review)
Review
Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are regional anesthesia techniques in which the space ("plane") between two discrete fascial layers is the target of needle insertion and injection. Analgesia is primarily achieved by local anesthetic spread to nerves traveling within this plane and adjacent tissues. This narrative review discusses key fundamental anatomical concepts relevant to FPBs, with a focus on blocks of the torso. Fascia, in this context, refers to any sheet of connective tissue that encloses or separates muscles and internal organs. The basic composition of fascia is a latticework of collagen fibers filled with a hydrated glycosaminoglycan matrix and infiltrated by adipocytes and fibroblasts; fluid can cross this by diffusion but not bulk flow. The plane between fascial layers is filled with a similar fat-glycosaminoglycan matric and provides gliding and cushioning between structures, as well as a pathway for nerves and vessels. The planes between the various muscle layers of the thorax, abdomen, and paraspinal area close to the thoracic paravertebral space and vertebral canal, are popular targets for ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection. The pertinent musculofascial anatomy of these regions, together with the nerves involved in somatic and visceral innervation, are summarized. This knowledge will aid not only sonographic identification of landmarks and block performance, but also understanding of the potential pathways and barriers for spread of local anesthetic. It is also critical as the basis for further exploration and refinement of FPBs, with an emphasis on improving their clinical utility, efficacy, and safety.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Fascia; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain Management
PubMed: 34145071
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102506 -
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia =... Mar 2021The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an emerging regional anesthetic technique with significant potential for clinical benefit. Nevertheless, its exact mechanism(s)... (Review)
Review
The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is an emerging regional anesthetic technique with significant potential for clinical benefit. Nevertheless, its exact mechanism(s) of action has been much debated. We reviewed the available literature to explore the possible mechanisms of analgesia for the ESP block. These include neural blockade and central inhibition from direct spread of local anesthetic to the paravertebral or epidural space; analgesia mediated by elevated local anesthetic plasma concentrations due to systemic absorption; immunomodulatory effects of local anesthetics; and an effect mediated through the mechanosensory properties of thoracolumbar fascia. Based on evidence from clinical, human cadaveric, animal, and mechanistic laboratory studies, the most probable primary mechanism is a direct effect of local anesthetic via physical spread and diffusion to neural structures in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscles and adjacent tissue compartments. Biological plausibility of this primary mechanism is confirmed by injectate spread to the ventral rami of spinal nerves (though quite variable) in most studies. There is consistent involvement of dorsal rami; epidural spread is a less commonly observed phenomenon. A systemic effect of local anesthetic is also plausible, but unlikely to be a major contributor to clinical analgesic efficacy. The evidence for significant analgesia due to other proposed mechanisms, such as fascia-mediated analgesia or lymphatic spread, are currently limited and thus remain speculative. Understanding the mechanisms of action could assist clinicians in further investigating and refining ESP block performance, with the ultimate goal of optimizing analgesic efficacy and improving postoperative patient outcomes.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain Management; Paraspinal Muscles
PubMed: 33403545
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2 -
The British Journal of Radiology Mar 2020Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in... (Review)
Review
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Child; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Retinal Neoplasms; Retinoblastoma; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Spinal Neoplasms
PubMed: 31529979
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190601 -
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Jul 2021There is heterogeneity in the names and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques. This may have adverse consequences on education, research, and...
BACKGROUND
There is heterogeneity in the names and anatomical descriptions of regional anesthetic techniques. This may have adverse consequences on education, research, and implementation into clinical practice. We aimed to produce standardized nomenclature for abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall regional anesthetic techniques.
METHODS
We conducted an international consensus study involving experts using a three-round Delphi method to produce a list of names and corresponding descriptions of anatomical targets. After long-list formulation by a Steering Committee, the first and second rounds involved anonymous electronic voting and commenting, with the third round involving a virtual round table discussion aiming to achieve consensus on items that had yet to achieve it. Novel names were presented where required for anatomical clarity and harmonization. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50% to 74% agreement.
RESULTS
Sixty expert Collaborators participated in this study. After three rounds and clarification, harmonization, and introduction of novel nomenclature, strong consensus was achieved for the names of 16 block names and weak consensus for four names. For anatomical descriptions, strong consensus was achieved for 19 blocks and weak consensus was achieved for one approach. Several areas requiring further research were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Harmonization and standardization of nomenclature may improve education, research, and ultimately patient care. We present the first international consensus on nomenclature and anatomical descriptions of blocks of the abdominal wall, chest wall, and paraspinal blocks. We recommend using the consensus results in academic and clinical practice.
Topics: Abdominal Wall; Anesthesia, Conduction; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Humans; Thoracic Wall
PubMed: 34145070
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102451 -
The Spine Journal : Official Journal of... Apr 2022Previous studies have proposed that there is a relationship between low back pain (LBP) and morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles. However, results have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Previous studies have proposed that there is a relationship between low back pain (LBP) and morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles. However, results have been conflicting, especially regarding fatty infiltration of muscles.
PURPOSE
The primary goal of this study was to review and analyze results from imaging studies which investigated morphological and composition changes in the multifidus, erector spinae and psoas major muscles in people with LBP.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
PATIENT SAMPLE
A patient sample was not required OUTCOME MEASURES: This review did not have outcome measures.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, EMBASE and ProQuest were searched for eligible studies up to 31st July 2020 (all languages). A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies investigating the association between the morphology and fat content of lumbar muscles in people with LBP compared with a (no LBP) control group. 13,795 articles were identified. Based on the screening for inclusion/ exclusion, 25 were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From the 25 articles, 20 were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Results showed that the total cross-sectional area of the multifidus was smaller in people with LBP (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.24, 95% CI = -0.5 to 0.03). Combined SMDs showed a medium effect of LBP on increasing multifidus muscle fat infiltration (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.91). There were no LBP related differences identified in the morphology or composition of the lumbar erector spine and psoas major muscles.
CONCLUSIONS
People with LBP were found to have somewhat smaller multifidus muscles with a significant amount of intramuscular fat infiltration. Varying sample size, age and BMI of participants, quality of studies and the procedures used to measure fat infiltration are possible reasons for inconsistencies in results of previous studies.
Topics: Humans; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Lumbosacral Region; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Paraspinal Muscles
PubMed: 34718177
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.018 -
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2019One proposed mechanism of chronic low back pain might be paraspinal muscle impairment. Commonly, this impairment is treated with stabilization exercises. However, the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
One proposed mechanism of chronic low back pain might be paraspinal muscle impairment. Commonly, this impairment is treated with stabilization exercises. However, the effect size of stabilization exercises has been previously reported to be small.
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical benefit of using neuromuscular electrical stimulation as a supplement to stabilization exercises in patients with chronic low back pain.
METHODS
Thirty participants with chronic low back pain were randomized into a stabilization exercise only group (n=15) or a stabilization exercise plus neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (n=15). The stabilization exercises included abdominal, side support, and quadruped exercises. The neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied to the lumbar paraspinal muscles for 20min each session. Both groups received their respective interventions twice a week for 6 weeks. Participant eligibility for inclusion was age between 18 and 60 years, body mass index ≤34, chronic low back pain ≥3 months, Numeric Pain Rating Scale ≥3, Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score ≥20 and ability to understand English. Outcome measurements were self-reported neuromuscular electrical stimulation tolerability scale, Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and paraspinal muscle strength.
RESULTS
The neuromuscular electrical stimulation was reported to be tolerable. There were no significant between-group differences on any of the outcome measures (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the paraspinal muscles was reported to be tolerable. Supplementing stabilization exercises with neuromuscular electrical stimulation did not offer any additional clinical benefit for the chronic low back pain patients.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Electric Stimulation; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Infant; Low Back Pain; Lumbosacral Region; Muscle Strength
PubMed: 30482602
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.003 -
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2022The present study examined the posterior chain muscle excitation in different deadlift variations. Ten competitive bodybuilders (training seniority of 10.6 ± 1.8 years)...
The present study examined the posterior chain muscle excitation in different deadlift variations. Ten competitive bodybuilders (training seniority of 10.6 ± 1.8 years) performed the Romanian (RD), Romanian standing on a step (step-RD), and stiff-leg deadlift (SD) with an 80% 1-RM. The excitation of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, erector spinae longissimus, and iliocostalis was assessed during both the ascending and descending phases. During the ascending phase, the RMS of the gluteus maximus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (effect size (ES): 1.70, 0.55/2.84) and SD (ES: 1.18, 0.11/2.24). Moreover, a greater RMS was found in the SD than in the RD (ES: 0.99, 0.04/1.95). The RMS of the semitendinosus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (ES: 0.82, 0.20/1.44) and SD (ES: 3.13, 1.67/4.59). Moreover, a greater RMS was found in the RD than in the SD (ES: 1.38, 0.29/2.48). The RMS of the longissimus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (ES: 2.12, 0.89/3.34) and SD (ES: 3.28, 1.78/4.78). The descending phase had fewer differences between the exercises. No further differences between the exercises were found. The step-RD increased the overall excitation of the posterior chain muscles, possibly because of the greater range of movement and posterior muscle elongation during the anterior flexion. Moreover, the RD appeared to target the semitendinosus more than the SD, while the latter excited the gluteus maximus more.
Topics: Electromyography; Humans; Leg; Muscle, Skeletal; Paraspinal Muscles; Resistance Training; Romania
PubMed: 35162922
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031903 -
The Journal of Manual & Manipulative... Jun 2022Dry needling treatment focuses on restoring normal muscle function in patients with musculoskeletal pain; however, little research has investigated this assertion. Shear... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Dry needling treatment focuses on restoring normal muscle function in patients with musculoskeletal pain; however, little research has investigated this assertion. Shear wave elastography (SWE) allows quantification of individual muscle function by estimating both resting and contracted muscle stiffness.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effects of dry needling to sham dry needling on lumbar muscle stiffness in individuals with low back pain (LBP) using SWE.
METHODS
Sixty participants with LBP were randomly allocated to receive one session of dry needling or sham dry needling treatment to the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles on the most painful side and spinal level. Stiffness (shear modulus) of the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles was assessed using SWE at rest and during submaximal contraction before treatment, immediately after treatment, and 1 week later. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models.
RESULTS
After 1 week, resting erector spinae muscle stiffness was lower in individuals who received dry needling than those that received sham dry needling. All other between-groups differences in muscle stiffness were similar, but non-significant.
CONCLUSION
Dry needling appears to reduce resting erector spinae muscle following treatment of patients with LBP. Therefore, providers should consider the use of dry needling when patients exhibit aberrant stiffness of the lumbar muscles.
Topics: Dry Needling; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Humans; Low Back Pain; Lumbosacral Region; Paraspinal Muscles
PubMed: 34525901
DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1977069 -
Insights Into Imaging Jul 2023The paraspinal region encompasses all tissues around the spine. The regional anatomy is complex and includes the paraspinal muscles, spinal nerves, sympathetic chains,... (Review)
Review
The paraspinal region encompasses all tissues around the spine. The regional anatomy is complex and includes the paraspinal muscles, spinal nerves, sympathetic chains, Batson's venous plexus and a rich arterial network. A wide variety of pathologies can occur in the paraspinal region, originating either from paraspinal soft tissues or the vertebral column. The most common paraspinal benign neoplasms include lipomas, fibroblastic tumours and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Tumour-like masses such as haematomas, extramedullary haematopoiesis or abscesses should be considered in patients with suggestive medical histories. Malignant neoplasms are less frequent than benign processes and include liposarcomas and undifferentiated sarcomas. Secondary and primary spinal tumours may present as midline expansile soft tissue masses invading the adjacent paraspinal region. Knowledge of the anatomy of the paraspinal region is of major importance since it allows understanding of the complex locoregional tumour spread that can occur via many adipose corridors, haematogenous pathways and direct contact. Paraspinal tumours can extend into other anatomical regions, such as the retroperitoneum, pleura, posterior mediastinum, intercostal space or extradural neural axis compartment. Imaging plays a crucial role in formulating a hypothesis regarding the aetiology of the mass and tumour staging, which informs preoperative planning. Understanding the complex relationship between the different elements and the imaging features of common paraspinal masses is fundamental to achieving a correct diagnosis and adequate patient management. This review gives an overview of the anatomy of the paraspinal region and describes imaging features of the main tumours and tumour-like lesions that occur in the region.
PubMed: 37466751
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01462-1 -
The Journal of the American Academy of... Sep 2022Current advancements in spine surgery have led to a recent interest in regional anesthesia for spine surgery. Spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, and their... (Review)
Review
Current advancements in spine surgery have led to a recent interest in regional anesthesia for spine surgery. Spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, and their combination are commonly used modalities for regional anesthesia in spine surgeries. The successful use of regional anesthesia has led to the emergence of several new concepts such as awake spinal fusion and outpatient spinal surgery. Regarding analgesic techniques, several new modalities have been described recently such as erector spinae and thoracolumbar interfascial plane blocks. These regional analgesic modalities are aimed at decreasing perioperative pain and enhancing early recovery in patients undergoing spine surgery. This narrative review focuses on the techniques, indications and contraindications, benefits, and complications of regional anesthesia in the context of spine surgery.
Topics: Anesthesia, Conduction; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative; Paraspinal Muscles
PubMed: 35617645
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00101