-
Journal of the American Academy of... Jun 2023Patients with refractory erythema of rosacea have limited treatment options. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients with refractory erythema of rosacea have limited treatment options.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 12-week course of paroxetine for moderate-to-severe erythema of rosacea.
METHODS
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients with refractory erythema of rosacea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive paroxetine 25 mg daily or placebo for 12 weeks.
RESULTS
Overall, 97 patients completed the study (paroxetine: 49; placebo: 48). The primary end point was the proportion of participants achieving Clinical Erythema Assessment success (defined as Clinical Erythema Assessment score of 0, 1, or ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at week 12; this was significantly greater in the paroxetine group than in the placebo group (42.9% vs 20.8%, P = .02). Some secondary end points were met, such as flushing success with point reductions ≥2 (44.9% vs 25.0%, P = .04) and improvement in overall flushing (2.49 ± 3.03 vs 1.68 ± 2.27, P = .047), burning sensation (46.9% vs 18.8%, P = .003), and depression (P = .041). The most reported adverse events associated with paroxetine were dizziness, lethargy, nausea, dyspepsia, and muscle tremors.
LIMITATIONS
Only a single-dosage regimen of paroxetine within a 12-week study was evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS
Paroxetine is an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment for moderate-to-severe erythema of rosacea.
Topics: Humans; Paroxetine; Prospective Studies; Rosacea; Erythema; Treatment Outcome; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 36806645
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.01.044 -
Paediatric Drugs May 2023The prescription of antidepressant drugs during pregnancy has been steadily increasing for several decades. Meta-analyses (MAs), which increase the statistical power and...
BACKGROUND
The prescription of antidepressant drugs during pregnancy has been steadily increasing for several decades. Meta-analyses (MAs), which increase the statistical power and precision of results, have gained interest for assessing the safety of antidepressant drugs during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to provide a meta-review of MAs assessing the benefits and risks of antidepressant drug use during pregnancy.
METHODS
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search on PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted on 25 October, 2021, on MAs assessing the association between antidepressant drug use during pregnancy and health outcomes for the pregnant women, embryo, fetus, newborn, and developing child. Study selection and data extraction were carried out independently and in duplicate by two authors. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated with the AMSTAR-2 tool. Overlap among MAs was assessed by calculating the corrected covered area. Data were presented in a narrative synthesis, using four levels of evidence.
RESULTS
Fifty-one MAs were included, all but one assessing risks. These provided evidence for a significant increase in the risks for major congenital malformations (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, paroxetine, fluoxetine, no evidence for sertraline; eight MAs), congenital heart defects (paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline; 11 MAs), preterm birth (eight MAs), neonatal adaptation symptoms (eight MAs), and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (three MAs). There was limited evidence (only one MA for each outcome) for a significant increase in the risks for postpartum hemorrhage, and with a high risk of bias, for stillbirth, impaired motor development, and intellectual disability. There was inconclusive evidence, i.e., discrepant results, for an increase in the risks for spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age and low birthweight, respiratory distress, convulsions, feeding problems, and for a subsequent risk for autism with an early antidepressant drug exposure. Finally, MAs provided no evidence for an increase in the risks for gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and for a subsequent risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Only one MA assessed benefits, providing limited evidence for preventing relapse in severe or recurrent depression. Effect sizes were small, except for neonatal symptoms (small to large). Results were based on MAs in which overall methodological quality was low (AMSTAR-2 score = 54.8% ± 12.9%, [19-81%]), with a high risk of bias, notably indication bias. The corrected covered area was 3.27%, which corresponds to a slight overlap.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-review has implications for clinical practice and future research. First, these results suggest that antidepressant drugs should be used as a second-line treatment during pregnancy (after first-line psychotherapy, according to the guidelines). The risk of major congenital malformations could be prevented by observing guidelines that discourage the use of paroxetine and fluoxetine. Second, to decrease heterogeneity and bias, future MAs should adjust for maternal psychiatric disorders and antidepressant drug dosage, and perform analyses by timing of exposure.
Topics: Child; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Paroxetine; Sertraline; Fluoxetine; Premature Birth; Antidepressive Agents; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 36853497
DOI: 10.1007/s40272-023-00561-2 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Anxiety Disorders
PubMed: 37516898
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2023.1682a -
Urology Journal Nov 2021The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Dapoxetine, and Paroxetine as well as Dapoxetine/Tadalafil and Paroxetine/Tadalafil combinational... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Dapoxetine, and Paroxetine as well as Dapoxetine/Tadalafil and Paroxetine/Tadalafil combinational therapies, for the treatment of patients with premature ejaculation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this clinical trial study, 120 patients with premature ejaculation were randomly divided into 4 groups: The first group was treated with Paroxetine (Pa), while the second group received Dapoxetine(Da). The third group received Paroxetine combined with Tadalafil(PT) whereas the fourth group's treatment involved the use of Dapoxetine and Tadalafil(DT) for one month. In the next 2 and 4 weeks, the cases were evaluated in terms of ejaculation duration, frequency of intercourse per week, and drug side effects.
RESULTS
The mean age of the Da, Pa, PT, DT groups was 32 ± 6.9, 32.4 ± 7.2, 31.6 ± 1.9, and 32.9 ± 7.7 years, respectively. There was a significant difference between the Da and DT groups (p = .029) in the ejaculation latency in the 4-week follow-up. In the two weeks follow-up, a significant difference was observed between DA and DT (p = 0.043), Pa and PT (p = 0.006), and Pa and DT groups (p = 0.004) in terms of ejaculation latency. Four weeks after the intervention, a significant difference was detected in the intercourse frequency of Da and PT groups (p =0.033), Pa and PT groups (p = 0.043), Pa and DT groups (p = 0.02), and Da and DT groups (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION
Combination therapy (Tadalafil plus Paroxetine or Dapoxetine) was more effective in IELT (Intra ejaculation latency time) than mono-therapy especially in younger patients despite its slightly more side effects.
Topics: Benzylamines; Ejaculation; Humans; Male; Naphthalenes; Paroxetine; Premature Ejaculation; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Tadalafil; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34773634
DOI: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6644 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Dec 2023
Topics: Humans; Antidepressive Agents; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 38133585
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2023.1691a -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020Antidepressants are prescribed for the treatment of a number of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, however there is still controversy about whether they...
Antidepressants are prescribed for the treatment of a number of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, however there is still controversy about whether they should be used in this population. This meta-review aimed to assess the effects of antidepressants for the acute treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders (ADs), autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), enuresis, major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents. Efficacy was measured as response to treatment (either as mean overall change in symptoms or as a dichotomous outcome) and tolerability was measured as the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events. Suicidality was measured as suicidal ideation, behavior (including suicide attempts) and completed suicide. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched (until 31 October 2019) for existing systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of double-blind randomized controlled trials. The quality of the included reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Our meta-review included nine systematic reviews/meta-analyses (2 on ADHD; 1 on AD; 2 on ASD; 1 on enuresis; 1 on MDD, 1 on OCD and 1 on PTSD). In terms of efficacy this review found that, compared to placebo: fluoxetine was more efficacious in the treatment of MDD, fluvoxamine and paroxetine were better in the treatment of AD; fluoxetine and sertraline were more efficacious in the treatment of OCD; bupropion and desipramine improved clinician and teacher-rated ADHD symptoms; clomipramine and tianeptine were superior on some of the core symptoms of ASD; and no antidepressant was more efficacious for PTSD and enuresis. With regard to tolerability: imipramine, venlafaxine, and duloxetine were less well tolerated in MDD; no differences were found for any of the antidepressants in the treatment of anxiety disorders (ADs), ADHD, and PTSD; tianeptine and citalopram, but not clomipramine, were less well tolerated in children and adolescents with ASD. For suicidal behavior/ideation, venlafaxine (in MDD) and paroxetine (in AD) were associated with a significantly increased risk; by contrast, sertraline (in AD) was associated with a reduced risk. The majority of included systematic reviews/meta-analyses were rated as being of high or moderate in quality by the AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool (one and five, respectively). One included study was of low quality and two were of critically low quality. Compared to placebo, selected antidepressants can be efficacious in the acute treatment of some common psychiatric disorders, although statistically significant differences do not always translate into clinically significant results. Little information was available about tolerability of antidepressants in RCTs of OCD and in the treatment of ADHD, ASD, MDD, and PTSD. There is a paucity of data on suicidal ideation/behavior, but paroxetine may increase the risk of suicidality in the treatment of AD and venlafaxine for MDD. Findings from this review must be considered in light of potential limitations, such as the lack of comparative information about many antidepressants, the short-term outcomes and the quality of the available evidence.
PubMed: 32982805
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00717