-
Orthopedic Reviews 2021Peroneal neuropathy is the most common compressive neuropathy of the lower extremity. It should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with... (Review)
Review
Peroneal neuropathy is the most common compressive neuropathy of the lower extremity. It should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with foot drop, the pain of the lower extremity, or numbness of the lower extremity. Symptoms of peroneal neuropathy may occur due to compression of the common peroneal nerve (CPN), superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), or deep peroneal nerve (DPN), each with different clinical presentations. The CPN is most commonly compressed by the bony prominence of the fibula, the SPN most commonly entrapped as it exits the lateral compartment of the leg, and the DPN as it crosses underneath the extensor retinaculum. Accurate and timely diagnosis of any peroneal neuropathy is important to avoid progression of nerve injury and permanent nerve damage. The diagnosis is often made with physical exam findings of decreased strength, altered sensation, and gait abnormalities. Motor nerve conduction studies, electromyography studies, and diagnostic nerve blocks can also assist in diagnosis and prognosis. First-line treatments include removing anything that may be causing external compression, providing stability to unstable joints, and reducing inflammation. Although many peroneal nerve entrapments will resolve with observation and activity modification, surgical treatment is often required when entrapment is refractory to these conservative management strategies. Recently, additional options including microsurgical decompression and percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation have been reported; however, large studies reporting outcomes are lacking.
PubMed: 34745471
DOI: 10.52965/001c.24937 -
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation... Jan 2021Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the paretic peroneal nerve has positive clinical effects on foot drop secondary to stroke. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the paretic peroneal nerve has positive clinical effects on foot drop secondary to stroke.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of FES applied to the paretic peroneal nerve on gait speed, active ankle dorsiflexion mobility, balance, and functional mobility.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for articles published from inception to January 2020. We included randomized controlled trials or crossover trials focused on determining the effects of FES combined or not with other therapies in individuals with foot drop after stroke. Characteristics of studies, participants, comparison groups, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I statistic.
RESULTS
We included 14 studies providing data for 1115 participants. FES did not enhance gait speed as compared with conventional treatments (i.e., supervised/unsupervised exercises and regular activities at home). FES combined with supervised exercises (i.e., physiotherapy) was better than supervised exercises alone for improving gait speed. We found no effect of FES combined with unsupervised exercises and inconclusive effects when FES was combined with regular activities at home. When FES was compared with conventional treatments, it improved ankle dorsiflexion, balance and functional mobility, albeit with high heterogeneity for these last 2 outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis revealed low quality of evidence for positive effects of FES on gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. FES can improve ankle dorsiflexion, balance, and functional mobility. However, considering the low quality of evidence and the high heterogeneity, these results must be interpreted carefully.
Topics: Electric Stimulation Therapy; Gait Disorders, Neurologic; Humans; Peroneal Nerve; Physical Therapy Modalities; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation; Walking Speed
PubMed: 32376404
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.012 -
Nature Communications Nov 2020The lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN) is known to relay noxious information to the amygdala for processing affective responses. However, it is unclear whether the LPBN...
The lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN) is known to relay noxious information to the amygdala for processing affective responses. However, it is unclear whether the LPBN actively processes neuropathic pain characterized by persistent hyperalgesia with aversive emotional responses. Here we report that neuropathic pain-like hypersensitivity induced by common peroneal nerve (CPN) ligation increases nociceptive stimulation-induced responses in glutamatergic LPBN neurons. Optogenetic activation of GABAergic LPBN neurons does not affect basal nociception, but alleviates neuropathic pain-like behavior. Optogenetic activation of glutamatergic or inhibition of GABAergic LPBN neurons induces neuropathic pain-like behavior in naïve mice. Inhibition of glutamatergic LPBN neurons alleviates both basal nociception and neuropathic pain-like hypersensitivity. Repetitive pharmacogenetic activation of glutamatergic or GABAergic LPBN neurons respectively mimics or prevents the development of CPN ligation-induced neuropathic pain-like hypersensitivity. These findings indicate that a delicate balance between excitatory and inhibitory LPBN neuronal activity governs the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain.
Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials; GABA Agonists; Glutamic Acid; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials; Male; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Neural Pathways; Neuralgia; Neurons; Nociception; Optogenetics; Parabrachial Nucleus; Peroneal Nerve; Stereotaxic Techniques; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
PubMed: 33239627
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19767-w -
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA Dec 2019Despite their emerging therapeutic relevance, there are many discrepancies in anatomical description and terminology of the articular nerves supplying the human knee...
BACKGROUND
Despite their emerging therapeutic relevance, there are many discrepancies in anatomical description and terminology of the articular nerves supplying the human knee capsule. This cadaveric study aimed to determine their origin, trajectory, relationship and landmarks for therapeutic purpose.
METHODS
We dissected 21 lower limbs from 21 cadavers, to investigate the anatomical distribution of all the articular nerves supplying the knee joint capsule. We identified constant genicular nerves according to their anatomical landmarks at their entering point to knee capsule and inserted Kirschner wires through the nerves in underlying bone at those target points. Measurements were taken, and both antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were obtained.
RESULTS
The nerve to vastus medialis, saphenous nerve, anterior branch of obturator nerve and a branch from sciatic nerve provide substantial innervation to the medial knee capsule and retinaculum. The sciatic nerve and the nerve to the vastus lateralis supply sensory innervation to the supero-lateral aspect of the knee joint while the fibular nerve supplies its infero-lateral quadrant. Tibial nerve and posterior branch of obturator nerve supply posterior aspect of knee capsule. According to our findings, five constant genicular nerves with accurate landmarks could be targeted for therapeutic purpose.
CONCLUSION
The pattern of distribution of sensitive nerves supplying the knee joint capsule allows accurate and safe targeting of five constant genicular nerves for therapeutic purpose. This study provides robust anatomical foundations for genicular nerve blockade and radiofrequency ablation.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anatomic Landmarks; Arthralgia; Cadaver; Catheter Ablation; Dissection; Female; Humans; Joint Capsule; Knee Joint; Male; Nerve Block; Obturator Nerve; Peroneal Nerve; Quadriceps Muscle; Radiography; Sciatic Nerve; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 31338537
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02291-y -
Handbook of Clinical Neurology 2024Fibular neuropathy has variable presenting features depending on the site of the lesion. Anatomical features make it susceptible to injury from extrinsic factors,... (Review)
Review
Fibular neuropathy has variable presenting features depending on the site of the lesion. Anatomical features make it susceptible to injury from extrinsic factors, particularly the superficial location of the nerve at the head of the fibula. There are many mechanisms of compression or other traumatic injury of the fibular nerve, as well as entrapment and intrinsic nerve lesions. Intraneural ganglion cysts are increasingly recognized when the mechanism of neuropathy is not clear from the medical history. Electrodiagnostic testing can contribute to the localization as well as the characterization of the pathologic process affecting the nerve. When the mechanism of injury is unclear from the analysis of the presentation, imaging with MRI and ultrasound may identify nerve lesions that warrant surgical intervention. The differential diagnosis of foot drop includes fibular neuropathy and other neurologic conditions, which can be distinguished through clinical and electrodiagnostic assessment. Rehabilitation measures, including ankle splinting, are important to improve function and safety when foot drop is present. Fibular neuropathy is less frequently painful than many other nerve lesions, but when it is painful, neuropathic medication may be required. Failure to spontaneously recover or the detection of a mass lesion may require surgical management.
Topics: Humans; Peroneal Neuropathies; Peroneal Nerve
PubMed: 38697737
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90108-6.00008-9 -
The Orthopedic Clinics of North America Apr 2022Nerve injury is one of the potential complications of total knee arthroplasty. The extent of the injury includes motor and sensory dysfunction, either temporary or... (Review)
Review
Nerve injury is one of the potential complications of total knee arthroplasty. The extent of the injury includes motor and sensory dysfunction, either temporary or permanent. Although the consequences of nerve injury may be dramatic, the probability of occurrence during the course of primary knee arthroplasty is low, around 0.12% to 0.4%. Local dressing removal and knee flexion are imperative, and the initial investigations include ultrasound or MRI and nerve conduction studies. The extent of recovery depends on the type and severity of the initial nerve palsy; however, most patients are expected to have at least a partial recovery.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Humans; Trauma, Nervous System
PubMed: 35365256
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.11.002 -
The British Journal of Radiology Jan 2023High resolution ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) neurography are both imaging modalities that are commonly used for assessing peripheral nerves including the... (Review)
Review
High resolution ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) neurography are both imaging modalities that are commonly used for assessing peripheral nerves including the sural nerve (SN). The SN is a cutaneous sensory nerve which innervates the lateral ankle and foot to the base of the fifth metatarsal. It is formed by contributing nerves from the tibial and common peroneal nerves with six patterns and multiple subtypes described in literature. In addition to the SN being a cutaneous sensory nerve, the superficial location enables the nerve to be easily biopsied and harvested for a nerve graft, as well as increasing the susceptibility to traumatic injury. As with any peripheral nerves, pathologies such as peripheral nerve sheath tumors and neuropathies can also affect the SN. By utilizing a high frequency probe in US and high-resolution MR neurography, the SN can be easily identified even with the multiple variations given the standard distal course. US and MRI are also useful in determining pathology of the SN given the specific image findings that are seen with peripheral nerves. In this review, we evaluate the normal imaging anatomy of the SN and discuss common pathologies identified on imaging.
Topics: Humans; Sural Nerve; Peroneal Nerve; Ankle; Lower Extremity; Ankle Joint; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 36039944
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220336