-
Acta Neurochirurgica Sep 2023Traumatic peroneal nerve injuries are typically associated with high-energy injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics and outcomes following...
BACKGROUND
Traumatic peroneal nerve injuries are typically associated with high-energy injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics and outcomes following surgical management of peroneal nerve injuries.
METHODS
Patients evaluated at a single institution with peroneal nerve injuries between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Mechanism of injury, time to surgery, pre- and postoperative examinations, and operative reports were recorded. Satisfactory outcome, defined as the ability to achieve anti-gravity dorsiflexion strength or stronger following surgery, was compared between nerve grafting and nerve transfers in patients with at least 9 months of postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven patients had follow-up greater than 9 months after surgery, with an average follow-up of 3.8 years. Surgeries included neurolysis (n=5), direct repair (n=2), tibial motor nerve fascicle transfer to the anterior tibialis motor branch (n=18), or interposition nerve grafting using sural nerve autograft (n=12). At last follow-up, 59.5% (n=22) of patients had anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. Nineteen (51.4%) patients used an ankle-foot orthosis during all or some activities. In patients that underwent nerve grafting only across the peroneal nerve defect, 44.4% (n=4) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion. In patients that had a tibial nerve fascicle transfer to the tibialis anterior motor branch of the peroneal nerve, 42.9% (n=6) were able to achieve anti-gravity strength or stronger dorsiflexion at last follow-up. There was no statistical difference between nerve transfers and nerve grafting in postoperative dorsiflexion strength (p = 0.51).
CONCLUSION
Peroneal nerve injuries frequently occur in the setting of knee dislocations and similar high-energy injuries. Nerve surgery is not universally successful in restoration of ankle dorsiflexion, with one-third of patients requiring an ankle-foot orthosis at mid-term follow-up. Patients should be properly counseled on the treatment challenges and variable outcomes following peroneal nerve injuries.
Topics: Humans; Peroneal Nerve; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Nerve; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Nerve Transfer
PubMed: 37479915
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05727-y -
Insights Into Imaging Oct 2023Peripheral nerves of the lower limb may become entrapped at various points during their anatomical course. While clinical assessment and nerve conduction studies are the... (Review)
Review
Peripheral nerves of the lower limb may become entrapped at various points during their anatomical course. While clinical assessment and nerve conduction studies are the mainstay of diagnosis, there are multiple imaging options, specifically ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which offer important information about the potential cause and location of nerve entrapment that can help guide management. This article overviews the anatomical course of various lower limb nerves, including the sciatic nerve, tibial nerve, medial plantar nerve, lateral plantar nerve, digital nerves, common peroneal nerve, deep peroneal nerve, superficial peroneal nerve, sural nerve, obturator nerve, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and femoral nerve. The common locations and causes of entrapments for each of the nerves are explained. Common ultrasound and MRI findings of nerve entrapments, direct and indirect, are described, and various examples of the more commonly observed cases of lower limb nerve entrapments are provided.Critical relevance statement This article describes the common sites of lower limb nerve entrapments and their imaging features. It equips radiologists with the knowledge needed to approach the assessment of entrapment neuropathies, which are a critically important cause of pain and functional impairment.Key points• Ultrasound and MRI are commonly used to investigate nerve entrapment syndromes.• Ultrasound findings include nerve hypo-echogenicity, calibre changes and the sonographic Tinel's sign.• MRI findings include increased nerve T2 signal, muscle atrophy and denervation oedema.• Imaging can reveal causative lesions, including scarring, masses and anatomical variants.
PubMed: 37782348
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01514-6 -
Muscle & Nerve Jul 2021Our electrodiagnostic laboratory uses reference limits (RL) that have been handed down for four decades. With changes in instrumentation and technique, we wish to know...
INTRODUCTION/AIMS
Our electrodiagnostic laboratory uses reference limits (RL) that have been handed down for four decades. With changes in instrumentation and technique, we wish to know if our RL should be modified. It is also useful to have RL based on patient demographics.
METHODS
Latency and velocity data from motor nerve conduction studies of 740 adult patients studied over an 8 mo period were tabulated. RL were derived using both extrapolated reference value (ERef) and multi-variable extrapolated reference value (MeRef) methods.
RESULTS
Distal latency values showed a significant but weak correlation with age and/or height. ERef limits for the median and ulnar nerve latency (3.96 and 3.45 ms, respectively) were very similar to current laboratory limits (3.9 and 3.3 ms, respectively). ERef limits for the tibial and fibular nerve latency (5.1 and 4.95 ms, respectively) were slightly shorter. Ulnar velocity did not depend on age or height. The ERef limit was the same as our present laboratory limit (50 m/s). Median and tibial velocity limits decreased with age (R > 0.25). Fibular motor nerve conduction limits decreased with age and height (R = 0.39).
DISCUSSION
ERef and MeRef were useful to validate and revise our latency and velocity RL. We will use ERef limits for tibial and fibular latency. MeRef generated linear regression equations based on age and/or height will be used for conduction velocity analysis of median, fibular, and tibial nerves. This will increase the specificity of our values.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Median Nerve; Middle Aged; Neural Conduction; Peroneal Nerve; Reference Values; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Nerve; Ulnar Nerve
PubMed: 33899969
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27256 -
European Journal of Neurology Feb 2022Daily management of patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment varies between a purely conservative treatment and early surgery, with no high-quality... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Daily management of patients with foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment varies between a purely conservative treatment and early surgery, with no high-quality evidence to guide current practice. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) prognostic features and the value of imaging in establishing and supplementing the diagnosis have not been clearly established.
METHODS
We performed a literature search in the online databases MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Of the 42 unique articles meeting the eligibility criteria, 10 discussed diagnostic performance of imaging, 11 reported EDX limits for abnormal values and/or the value of EDX in prognostication, and 26 focused on treatment outcome.
RESULTS
Studies report high sensitivity and specificity of both ultrasound (varying respectively from 47.1% to 91% and from 53% to 100%) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; varying respectively from 31% to 100% and from 73% to 100%). One comparative trial favoured ultrasound over MRI. Variable criteria for a conduction block (>20%-≥50) were reported. A motor conduction block and any baseline compound motor action potential response were identified as predictors of good outcome. Based predominantly on case series, the percentage of patients with good outcome ranged 0%-100% after conservative treatment and 40%-100% after neurolysis. No study compared both treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound and MRI have good accuracy, and introducing imaging in the standard diagnostic workup should be considered. Further research should focus on the role of EDX in prognostication. No recommendation on the optimal treatment strategy of peroneal nerve entrapment can be made, warranting future randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neurosurgical Procedures; Peroneal Neuropathies; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 34662481
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15145 -
An overview of common peroneal nerve dysfunction and systematic assessment of its relation to falls.International Orthopaedics Dec 2022Compression of the peroneal nerve is recognized as a common cause of falls. The superficial course of the peroneal nerve exposes it to trauma and pressure from common... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Compression of the peroneal nerve is recognized as a common cause of falls. The superficial course of the peroneal nerve exposes it to trauma and pressure from common activities such as crossing of legs. The nerve can be exposed also to distress due to metabolic problems such as diabetes. The purpose of our manuscript is to review common peroneal nerve dysfunction symptoms and treatment as well as provide a systematic assessment of its relation to falls.
METHODS
We pooled the existing literature from PubMed and included studies (n = 342) assessing peroneal nerve damage that is related in any way to falls. We excluded any studies reporting non-original data, case reports and non-English studies.
RESULTS
The final systematic assessment included 4 articles. Each population studied had a non-negligible incidence of peroneal neuropathy. Peroneal pathology was found to be consistently associated with falls.
CONCLUSION
The peroneal nerve is an important nerve whose dysfunction can result in falls. This article reviews the anatomy and care of the peroneal nerve. The literature review highlights the strong association of this nerve's pathology with falls.
Topics: Humans; Peroneal Nerve; Peroneal Neuropathies; Incidence
PubMed: 36169699
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05593-w -
Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation Feb 2022Dysfunction of the common peroneal nerve is the most common mononeuropathy in the lower limb and a source of significant disability for patients. The nerve can be...
Dysfunction of the common peroneal nerve is the most common mononeuropathy in the lower limb and a source of significant disability for patients. The nerve can be damaged at various levels for various reasons (direct or indirect trauma, extrinsic compression, anatomical variant, endocrine, rheumatological, or neurological disease). Clinical evidence of foot drop with steppage gait is very typical. Conservative treatment should be considered as a first step (avoidance of the contributing factors, functional rehabilitation, foot drop brace ± injection). If properly conducted conservative treatment is not successful, palliative surgery is indicated: either tendon transfer using the posterior tibial tendon or ankle arthrodesis.
Topics: Humans; Palliative Care; Peroneal Nerve; Peroneal Neuropathies; Tendon Transfer; Tendons
PubMed: 34571208
DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.11.015 -
Foot & Ankle International Sep 2020The anterocentral portal is not a standard portal in anterior ankle arthroscopy due to its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle. However, it provides certain...
BACKGROUND
The anterocentral portal is not a standard portal in anterior ankle arthroscopy due to its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle. However, it provides certain advantages, including a wide field of vision, and portal changes become redundant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neurovascular complications after anterior ankle arthroscopy using the anterocentral portal.
METHODS
We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone anterior ankle arthroscopy with an anterocentral portal at our institution from 2013 to 2018. Medical record data were reviewed and patients were invited for clinical follow-up, where a clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing for the deep peroneal nerve, and ultrasonography of the structures at risk were performed. A total of 101 patients (105 arthroscopies) were identified and evaluated at a mean follow-up of 31.5 ± 17.7 months.
RESULTS
Leading indications to surgery were heterogeneous and included anterior impingement (48.6%), osteochondral lesions of the talus (24.8%), chronic ankle instability (14.3%), and fractures (8.6%). The overall complication rate was 7.6%, and no major complications were observed. In 1.9% (2/105) of the cases, the complications were associated with the anterocentral portal and included injury to the medial branch of the superficial nerve (1/105) and to the deep peroneal nerve (1/105). Injury to the deep peroneal nerve was associated with a loss of detection and nociception. There were no injuries to the anterior tibial artery. In 41.9% (44/105) of the cases, only 1 working portal was used in addition to the anterocentral portal, and in 19% (20/105) the anterolateral portal could be avoided. Ultrasonography confirmed the integrity of the deep peroneal nerve, the medial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, and the anterior tibial artery in all patients. Patients with nerve injuries associated with the anterocentral portal showed no signs of neuroma or pseudoaneurysm.
CONCLUSION
Using a standardized technique, the anterocentral portal in ankle arthroscopy is safe with a low number of neurovascular injuries and can be recommended as a standard portal. The anterolateral portal remains associated with a high number of injuries to the superficial peroneal nerve.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ankle Joint; Arthroscopy; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peroneal Nerve; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 32546005
DOI: 10.1177/1071100720931095 -
JBJS Reviews Jan 2022The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most commonly injured peripheral nerve of the lower extremity in patients with trauma. Traumatic CPN injuries have historically...
BACKGROUND
The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most commonly injured peripheral nerve of the lower extremity in patients with trauma. Traumatic CPN injuries have historically been associated with relatively poor outcomes and patient satisfaction, although improved surgical technique and novel procedures appear to improve outcomes. Given the variety of underlying injury modalities, treatment options, and prognostic variables, we sought to evaluate and summarize the current literature on traumatic CPN injuries and to provide recommendations from an analysis of the included studies for treatment and future research.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "peroneal nerve" or "fibular nerve" combined with "injury," "laceration," "entrapment," "repair," or "neurolysis." Information with regard to treatment modality, outcomes, and patient demographic characteristics was recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS
The initial search yielded 2,301 articles; 42 met eligibility criteria. Factors associated with better outcomes included a shorter preoperative interval, shorter graft length when an interposed graft was used, nerve continuity, and younger patient age. Gender or sex was not mentioned as a factor affecting outcomes in any study. Motor grades of ≥M3 on the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale are typically considered successful outcomes. This was achieved in 81.4% of patients who underwent neurolysis, 78.8% of patients who underwent end-to-end suturing, 49.0% of patients who underwent nerve grafting, 62.9% of patients who underwent nerve transfer, 81.5% of patients who underwent isolated posterior tibial tendon transfer (PTTT), and 84.2% of patients who underwent a surgical procedure with concurrent PTTT.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies included in this review were heterogenous, complicating our ability to perform further analysis. It is not possible to uniformly advocate for the best treatment option, given diverse injury modalities and patient presentations and a variety of prognostic factors. Many studies do not show outcomes with respect to injury modality. Future studies should show preoperative muscle strengths and should clearly define outcomes based on the injury modality and surgical treatment option. This would allow for greater analysis of the most appropriate treatment option for a given mechanism of injury. Newer surgical techniques are promising and should be further explored.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Transfer; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Peroneal Nerve; Peroneal Neuropathies; Tendon Transfer
PubMed: 35020680
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00256 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Feb 2023The peroneal nerve is one of the most commonly injured nerves of the lower extremity. Nerve grafting has been shown to result in poor functional outcomes. The aim of...
The peroneal nerve is one of the most commonly injured nerves of the lower extremity. Nerve grafting has been shown to result in poor functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare anatomical feasibility as well as axon count of the tibial nerve motor branches and the tibialis anterior motor branch for a direct nerve transfer to reconstruct ankle dorsiflexion. In an anatomical study on 26 human body donors (52 extremities) the muscular branches to the lateral (GCL) and the medial head (GCM) of the gastrocnemius muscle, the soleus muscle (S) as well as the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) were dissected, and each nerve's external diameter was measured. Nerve transfers from each of the three donor nerves (GCL, GCM, S) to the recipient nerve (TA) were performed and the distance between the achievable coaptation site and anatomic landmarks was measured. Additionally, nerve samples were taken from eight extremities, and antibody as well immunofluorescence staining were performed, primarily evaluating axon count. The average diameter of the nerve branches to the GCL was 1.49 ± 0.37, to GCM 1.5 ± 0.32, to S 1.94 ± 0.37 and to TA 1.97 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. The distance from the coaptation site to the TA muscle was 43.75 ± 12.1 using the branch to the GCL, 48.31 ± 11.32 for GCM, and 19.12 ± 11.68 mm for S, respectively. The axon count for TA was 1597.14 ± 325.94, while the donor nerves showed 297.5 ± 106.82 (GCL), 418.5 ± 62.44 (GCM), and 1101.86 ± 135.92 (S). Diameter and axon count were significantly higher for S compared to GCL as well as GCM, while regeneration distance was significantly lower. The soleus muscle branch exhibited the most appropriate axon count and nerve diameter in our study, while also reaching closest to the tibialis anterior muscle. These results indicate the soleus nerve transfer to be the favorable option for the reconstruction of ankle dorsiflexion, in comparison to the gastrocnemius muscle branches. This surgical approach can be used to achieve a biomechanically appropriate reconstruction, in contrast to tendon transfers which generally only achieve weak active dorsiflexion.
PubMed: 36836578
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020344