-
Epilepsia Sep 2023The Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology...
OBJECTIVE
The Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 include a diagnostic trial with intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs) to assess electroencephalographic (EEG) and clinical response as a diagnostic criterion for definite NCSE and possible NCSE. However, how to perform this diagnostic test and assessing the EEG and clinical responses have not been operationally defined.
METHODS
We performed a Delphi process involving six experts to standardize the diagnostic administration of IV ASM and propose operational criteria for EEG and clinical response.
RESULTS
Either benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-BZD ASMs can be used as first choice for a diagnostic IV ASM trial. However, non-BZDs should be considered in patients who already have impaired alertness or are at risk of respiratory depression. Levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide, brivaracetam, or (if the only feasible drug) fosphenytoin or phenobarbital were deemed appropriate for a diagnostic IV trial. The starting dose should be approximately two thirds to three quarters of the full loading dose recommended for treatment of status epilepticus, with an additional smaller dose if needed. ASMs should be administered during EEG recording under supervision. A monitoring time of at least 15 min is recommended. If there is no response, a second trial with another non-BDZ or BDZs may be considered. A positive EEG response is defined as the resolution of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern for at least three times the longest previously observed spontaneous interval of resolution (if any), but minimum of one continuous minute. For a clinical response, physicians should use a standardized examination before and after IV ASM administration. We suggest a definite time-locked improvement in a focal deficit or at least one-step improvement on a new dedicated one-domain 10-level NCSE response scale.
SIGNIFICANCE
The proposed standardized approach of a diagnostic IV ASM trial further refines the ACNS and Salzburg diagnostic criteria for NCSE.
Topics: Humans; Administration, Intravenous; Benzodiazepines; Electroencephalography; Phenobarbital; Status Epilepticus; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37350392
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17694 -
Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) Feb 2020A symptom-triggered lorazepam regimen is the standard for treating alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in an inpatient setting. However, in severe AWS, lorazepam... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
A symptom-triggered lorazepam regimen is the standard for treating alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in an inpatient setting. However, in severe AWS, lorazepam requirements can reach significant amounts and lead to risk of delirium and propylene glycol toxicity. Phenobarbital has been shown to be an effective adjunctive therapy for AWS, reducing benzodiazepine use, in the emergency department. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital in adjunct to symptom-triggered lorazepam for severe AWS vs. lorazepam alone in the intensive care unit (ICU). A retrospective cohort was conducted at Cleveland Clinic hospitals from 2013 to 2018 of ICU patients with AWS receiving either phenobarbital adjunct to symptom-triggered lorazepam or lorazepam alone. The primary outcome was the total duration of treatment. Secondary outcomes include ICU length of stay, change in CIWA-Ar score at 24 h, incidence of hypotension, mechanical ventilation, and serum osmolar gap. A total of 72 ICU patients were included with 36 patients in each arm. The median duration of treatment in the phenobarbital adjunct arm was 2.7 days (IQR = 1.7-6.4), compared to 3.1 days (IQR = 1.6-4.8) in the lorazepam arm (p = 0.578). The median ICU length of stay was similar between both arms [4.1 days (IQR = 2.4-8.4) vs. 4.5 days (IQR = 2.8-6.1), p = 0.727]. The average change in CIWA-Ar from baseline at 24 h was significantly lower for those who received phenobarbital (1.8 ± 9.0 vs. 6.5 ± 8.5, p = 0.028). Three patients in the phenobarbital-adjunct group received mechanical ventilation after starting phenobarbital treatment. There were no new incidences of hypotension or increased osmol gap >10 mmol/L after starting treatment in both groups. In conclusion, phenobarbital is an effective adjunct to symptom-triggered lorazepam in severe alcohol withdrawal in the ICU with no significant difference in adverse events.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Alcoholism; Central Nervous System Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanol; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Lorazepam; Male; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Respiration, Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31326601
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.07.004 -
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Sep 2020Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a common reason for admission to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and requires significant hospital resource utilization.... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a common reason for admission to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and requires significant hospital resource utilization. Benzodiazepines are first-line therapy for AWS in many intensive care units. We propose the use of symptom-triggered phenobarbital for the treatment of AWS as a safe alternative to benzodiazepines.
METHODS
This was a retrospective observational study of a 4-year period, 2011 to 2015, of all patients with AWS admitted to the MICU of 1 tertiary care hospital and treated with phenobarbital. A symptom-triggered protocol was used. Resolution of AWS was assessed with the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale to goal score of 0 to -1. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used as an index of patient illness severity. Complications associated with phenobarbital use and/or the AWS admission were analyzed.
RESULTS
Data of 86 AWS patient encounters were analyzed. The mean Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised score of patients admitted to the MICU with AWS was 19 ± 9. The mean phenobarbital dose administered during the MICU stay was 1977.5 ± 1531.5 mg. There were a total of 17 (20%) intubations. The most frequent cause of mechanical ventilation in patients with AWS was loss of airway clearance, followed by hemodynamic instability secondary to upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the corresponding need for endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS
Sole use of phenobarbital use for control of AWS may be a safe alternative to benzodiazepines. Further study is needed to correlate phenobarbital serum levels with clinical control of AWS.
Topics: Adult; Alcohol-Induced Disorders; Critical Care Outcomes; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Respiration, Artificial; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29925291
DOI: 10.1177/0885066618783947 -
Epileptic Disorders : International... Dec 2022We carried out a systematic review of published information on transfer of antiseizure medications (ASMs) into breastmilk, ASM serum concentrations in breastfed infants,...
We carried out a systematic review of published information on transfer of antiseizure medications (ASMs) into breastmilk, ASM serum concentrations in breastfed infants, and the wellbeing of infants breastfed by mothers on ASM treatment. Information was extracted from 85 relevant articles. No data on ASM levels in breastmilk or in breastfed infants was identified for cannabidiol, cenobamate, clobazam, eslicarbazepine-acetate, everolimus, felbamate, fenfluramine, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. For ASMs, with available information on levels in breastfed infants, very low concentrations (in the order of 10% or less of maternal serum concentrations) were reported for carbamazepine, gabapentin, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, valproate, and clonazepam. Slightly higher levels (up to approximately 30% of maternal serum concentrations) have been observed with lamotrigine and topiramate, and in single case reports for brivaracetam, lacosamide, and perampanel. High infant levels (30% up to 100% of maternal serum concentrations) have been reported with ethosuximide, phenobarbital and zonisamide. Adverse infant effects during breastfeeding by mothers on ASMs appear to be rare regardless of the type of ASM, but systematic study is limited. Prospective long-term follow-up studies of developmental outcomes among children who have been breastfed by mothers taking ASMs are sparse and have mainly involved children whose mothers were taking carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, phenytoin or valproate as monotherapy while breastfeeding. Although these studies have not indicated poorer outcome among breastfed children compared with those who were not breastfed, further data on long-term outcomes are needed to draw firm conclusions. It is concluded that breastfeeding should in general be encouraged in women taking ASMs, given the well-established benefits of breastfeeding with regard to both short- and long-term infant health in the general population. Counselling needs to be individualized including information on the current knowledge regarding the woman's specific ASM treatment.
Topics: Breast Feeding; Cannabidiol; Carbamazepine; Child; Clobazam; Clonazepam; Epilepsy; Ethosuximide; Everolimus; Felbamate; Female; Fenfluramine; Gabapentin; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Prospective Studies; Tiagabine; Topiramate; Valproic Acid; Vigabatrin; Zonisamide
PubMed: 36193017
DOI: 10.1684/epd.2022.1492 -
JAMA Neurology May 2024Women with epilepsy (WWE) require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy, which may be associated with an increased risk of major congenital... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
IMPORTANCE
Women with epilepsy (WWE) require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy, which may be associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in their offspring.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the prevalence of MCMs after prenatal exposure to 8 commonly used ASM monotherapies and changes in MCM prevalence over time.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study conducted from June 1999 to October 2022. Since 1999, physicians from more than 40 countries enrolled ASM-treated WWE before pregnancy outcome was known and followed up their offspring until 1 year after birth. Participants aged 14 to 55 years who were exposed to 8 of the most frequently used ASMs during pregnancy were included in this study. Data were analyzed from April to September 2023.
EXPOSURE
Maternal use of ASMs at conception.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
MCMs were assessed 1 year after birth by a committee blinded to type of exposure. Teratogenic outcomes across exposures were compared by random-effects logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders and prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 10 121 prospective pregnancies exposed to ASM monotherapy met eligibility criteria. Of those, 9840 were exposed to the 8 most frequently used ASMs. The 9840 pregnancies occurred in 8483 women (mean [range] age, 30.1 [14.1-55.2] years). MCMs occurred in 153 of 1549 pregnancies for valproate (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.5%-11.5%), 9 of 142 for phenytoin (6.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%-11.6%), 21 of 338 for phenobarbital (6.2%; 95% CI, 4.1%-9.3%), 121 of 2255 for carbamazepine (5.4%; 95% CI, 4.5%-6.4%), 10 of 204 for topiramate (4.9%; 95% CI, 2.7%-8.8%), 110 of 3584 for lamotrigine (3.1%; 95% CI, 2.5%-3.7%), 13 of 443 for oxcarbazepine (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.0%), and 33 of 1325 for levetiracetam (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.8%-3.5%). For valproate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of MCMs associated with increasing dose of the ASM. Overall prevalence of MCMs decreased from 6.1% (153 of 2505) during the period 1998 to 2004 to 3.7% (76 of 2054) during the period 2015 to 2022. This decrease over time was significant in univariable logistic analysis but not after adjustment for changes in ASM exposure pattern.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Of all ASMs with meaningful data, the lowest prevalence of MCMs was observed in offspring exposed to levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine. Prevalence of MCMs was higher with phenytoin, valproate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital, and dose dependent for the latter 3 ASMs. The shift in exposure pattern over time with a declining exposure to valproate and carbamazepine and greater use of lamotrigine and levetiracetam was associated with a 39% decline in prevalence of MCMs, a finding that has major public health implications.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anticonvulsants; Adult; Pregnancy; Young Adult; Adolescent; Epilepsy; Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Middle Aged; Longitudinal Studies; Pregnancy Complications; Prospective Studies; Valproic Acid; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Phenytoin; Lamotrigine; Carbamazepine; Phenobarbital; Cohort Studies; Oxcarbazepine; Prevalence
PubMed: 38497990
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0258 -
Cureus Feb 2021Introduction Annually, 500,000 episodes of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) are severe enough to require clinical attention. A symptom-triggered lorazepam regimen...
Introduction Annually, 500,000 episodes of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) are severe enough to require clinical attention. A symptom-triggered lorazepam regimen remains the standard of care for the management of hospitalized AWS patients. However, phenobarbital has also been shown to be an effective adjunctive therapy for severe AWS, reducing benzodiazepine use in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU). The purpose of this study is to compare hospital length of stay (LOS) for AWS patients using phenobarbital-based versus lorazepam-based treatment protocols as monotherapy for management of AWS on general medical units. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study over a two-year period (March, 2016 to March, 2018), conducted at three hospitals within the St. Joseph Mercy Health System. We included 606 patients with a primary diagnosis of AWS or alcohol intoxication who met our inclusion criteria (543 in the lorazepam cohort and 63 in the phenobarbital cohort). Adjusted comparisons were done using propensity scoring methods. Hospital LOS was set as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included all-cause 30-day readmission, alcohol-related 30-day readmission, 30-day ED visits after discharge, and need for ICU transfer during hospital stay. Results Patients who received phenobarbital had a statistically significant shorter hospital LOS as compared to patients who received lorazepam (2.8 versus 3.6 days, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the phenobarbital treatment group had statistically significant lower rates of all-cause 30-day readmission (11.11% versus 14.18%, P = 0.020) and 30-day ED visits after discharge (11.11% versus 18.6%, P = 0.015). No statistical significance was detected for alcohol-related 30-day readmission and the need for ICU transfer between the treatment groups. Conclusion This study suggests that phenobarbital may be a reasonable alternative to lorazepam in the management of AWS patients admitted to general medical units. Larger scale, well-executed, and adequately powered prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to corroborate these findings.
PubMed: 33728215
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13282 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sep 2020
Topics: Esophageal Achalasia; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Humans; Phenobarbital; Pyloromyotomy
PubMed: 32838924
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.059 -
Australian Journal of General Practice Dec 2019Evidence exists for the use of palliative sedation for people approaching the last days of life with refractory and intolerable symptoms. It is a third-line intervention... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Evidence exists for the use of palliative sedation for people approaching the last days of life with refractory and intolerable symptoms. It is a third-line intervention that deliberately lowers the conscious state to relieve intolerable and refractory symptoms. This level of intervention is not routinely used in primary care, and there is a lack of guidelines for palliative sedation in this context.
OBJECTIVE
This article provides some key information about palliative sedation and global issues faced by all individuals involved. A tertiary centre case study is used to illustrate the key points. Given this form of therapy may be required for palliative patients in the community, another aim of this article is to provide an overview for primary care practitioners to raise their awareness of such therapy and the issues related to it.
DISCUSSION
While palliative sedation has been regarded as 'controversial' in early palliative care literature, there has been an increased effort to formulate standardised guidelines to define and ethically justify this procedure.
Topics: Aged; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Dehydration; Dyspnea; Humans; Hydromorphone; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Methotrimeprazine; Midazolam; Multiple Myeloma; Multiple Organ Failure; Pain; Palliative Care; Phenobarbital; Propofol; Psychomotor Agitation; Sepsis; Terminal Care
PubMed: 31774984
DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-05-19-4938