-
The Lancet. Haematology Jan 2023Ponatinib and blinatumomab are effective therapies in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and their combination...
BACKGROUND
Ponatinib and blinatumomab are effective therapies in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and their combination might be a promising treatment option. In this study, we aimed to evaluate this chemotherapy-free strategy.
METHODS
We did a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, in patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed or relapsed or refractory Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or chronic myeloid leukaemia in lymphoid blast phase. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 or less who had a total bilirubin concentration two-times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or less (≤2·4 mg/dL), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentration no more than three-times the ULN, and serum lipase and amylase concentrations no more than three-times the ULN were eligible for inclusion. Ponatinib 30 mg orally and continuous intravenous blinatumomab 28 μg over 24 h (for 28 days each cycle) were given in combination for up to five 42-day cycles, followed by ponatinib monotherapy. Patients received 12 doses of intrathecal chemotherapy as CNS prophylaxis. The primary endpoints were complete molecular response (defined as absence of a detectable BCR-ABL1 transcript by PCR at a sensitivity of 0·01%) in patients with newly diagnosed disease and overall response in patients with relapsed or refractory disease or chronic myeloid leukaemia in lymphoid blast phase. All assessments were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial completed its original target accrual and was amended on March 23, 2022, to enrol an additional 30 patients, thus increasing the sample size to 90 patients. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03263572, and it is ongoing.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 6, 2018, to May 6, 2022, 60 (83%) of 72 patients assessed were enrolled and received ponatinib and blinatumomab (40 [67%] patients had newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 14 [23%] had relapsed or refractory Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and six [10%] had chronic myeloid leukaemia in lymphoid blast phase). 32 (53%) patients were men and 28 (47%) were women; 51 (85%) patients were White or Hispanic; and the median age of participants was 51 years (IQR 36-68). The median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 16 months (IQR 11-24). Of patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 33 (87%) of 38 evaluable patients had a complete molecular response. 12 (92%) of 13 evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia had an overall response. 11 (79%) had a complete molecular response. Five (83%) of six patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in lymphoid blast phase had an overall response. Two (33%) had a complete molecular response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in more than 5% of patients were infection (22 [37%] patients), increased amylase or lipase concentration (five [8%] patients), increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase concentration (four [7%] patients), pain (four [7%] patients), and hypertension (four [7%] patients). One (2%) patient discontinued blinatumomab due to tremor. Three (5%) patients discontinued ponatinib secondary to cerebrovascular ischaemia, portal vein thrombosis, and coronary artery stenosis in one patient each. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
INTERPRETATION
The chemotherapy-free combination of ponatinib and blinatumomab resulted in high rates of complete molecular response in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could be spared the toxicities associated with chemotherapy and the need for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in first response.
FUNDING
Takeda Oncology and Amgen.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Philadelphia Chromosome; Blast Crisis; Alanine Transaminase; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36402146
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00319-2 -
Haematologica Nov 2020The last decade has witnessed great advances in our understanding of the genetic and biological basis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the development of... (Review)
Review
The last decade has witnessed great advances in our understanding of the genetic and biological basis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the development of experimental models to probe mechanisms and evaluate new therapies, and the development of more efficacious treatment stratification. Genomic analyses have revolutionized our understanding of the molecular taxonomy of ALL, and these advances have led the push to implement genome and transcriptome characterization in the clinical management of ALL to facilitate more accurate risk-stratification and, in some cases, targeted therapy. Although mutation- or pathway-directed targeted therapy (e.g., using tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positive and Phlike B-cell-ALL) is currently available for only a minority of children with ALL, many of the newly identified molecular alterations have led to the exploration of approaches targeting deregulated cell pathways. The efficacy of cellular or humoral immunotherapy has been demonstrated with the success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and the bispecific engager blinatumomab in treating advanced disease. This review describes key advances in our understanding of the biology of ALL and optimal approaches to risk-stratification and therapy, and it suggests key areas for basic and clinical research.
Topics: Antibodies, Bispecific; Child; Humans; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
PubMed: 33054110
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2020.247031 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Jun 2022
Review
Topics: Acute Disease; Humans; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
PubMed: 35731654
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra2113347 -
Frontiers of Medicine Dec 2020The cure rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has exceeded 90% in some contemporary clinical trials. However, the dose intensity of conventional... (Review)
Review
The cure rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has exceeded 90% in some contemporary clinical trials. However, the dose intensity of conventional chemotherapy has been pushed to its limit. Further improvement in outcome will need to rely more heavily on molecular therapeutic as well as immuno-and cellular-therapy approaches together with precise risk stratification. Children with ETV6-RUNX1 or hyperdiploid > 50 ALL who achieve negative minimal residual disease during early remission induction are suitable candidates for reduction in treatment. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive or Ph-like ALL with ABL-class fusion should be treated with dasatinib. BH3 profiling and other preclinical methods have identified several high-risk subtypes, such as hypodiplod, early T-cell precursor, immature T-cell, KMT2A-rearranged, Ph-positive and TCF-HLF-positive ALL, that may respond to BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. There are other fusions or mutations that may serve as putative targets, but effective targeted therapy has yet to be established. For other high-risk patients or poor early treatment responders who do not have targetable genetic lesions, current approaches that offer hope include blinatumomab, inotuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL, and daratumumab and nelarabine for T-ALL. With the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, we should start focus on rational combinations of targeted therapy with non-overlapping toxicities.
Topics: Child; Dasatinib; Humans; Neoplasm, Residual; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precision Medicine; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
PubMed: 33074527
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-020-0759-8 -
Journal of the National Comprehensive... Sep 2021The NCCN Guidelines for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk...
The NCCN Guidelines for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk assessment and stratification for risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL for both adolescent and young adult and adult patients; and supportive care considerations. Given the complexity of ALL treatment regimens and the required supportive care measures, the NCCN ALL Panel recommends that patients be treated at a specialized cancer center with expertise in the management of ALL This portion of the Guidelines focuses on the management of Ph-positive and Ph-negative ALL in adolescents and young adults, and management in relapsed settings.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Immunophenotyping; Medical Oncology; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Young Adult
PubMed: 34551384
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0042 -
Blood Advances Jan 2020Philadelphia chromosome-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) accounts for 15% to 30% of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older children,... (Review)
Review
Philadelphia chromosome-like B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) accounts for 15% to 30% of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older children, adolescents, and adults and is associated with high rates of conventional treatment failure and relapse. Current clinical trials are assessing the efficacy of the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to chemotherapy for children and adults with Ph-like ALL harboring ABL class translocations or CRLF2 rearrangements and other JAK pathway alterations. However, real-time diagnosis of patients can be quite challenging given the genetic heterogeneity of this disease and the often cytogenetically cryptic nature of Ph-like ALL-associated alterations. In this review, we discuss the complex biologic and clinical features of Ph-like ALL across the age spectrum, available diagnostic testing modalities, and current clinical treatment strategies for these high-risk patients. We further propose a practical and step-wise approach to Ph-like ALL genetic testing to facilitate the identification and allocation of patients to appropriate clinical trials of TKI-based therapies or commercially available drugs. Although the majority of patients with Ph-like ALL can be successfully identified via current clinical assays by the end of induction chemotherapy, increasing diagnostic efficiency and sensitivity and decreasing time to test resulting will facilitate earlier therapeutic intervention and may improve clinical outcomes for these high-risk patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 31935290
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000163 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Oct 2020Outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Molecular...
BACKGROUND
Outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Molecular remission is a primary goal of treatment.
METHODS
We conducted a phase 2 single-group trial of first-line therapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL (with no upper age limit). Dasatinib plus glucocorticoids were administered, followed by two cycles of blinatumomab. The primary end point was a sustained molecular response in the bone marrow after this treatment.
RESULTS
Of the 63 patients (median age, 54 years; range, 24 to 82) who were enrolled, a complete remission was observed in 98%. At the end of dasatinib induction therapy (day 85), 29% of the patients had a molecular response, and this percentage increased to 60% after two cycles of blinatumomab; the percentage of patients with a molecular response increased further after additional blinatumomab cycles. At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival was 95% and disease-free survival was 88%; disease-free survival was lower among patients who had an deletion plus additional genetic aberrations ( or , , or both [i.e., ]). mutations were detected in 6 patients who had increased minimal residual disease during induction therapy, and all these mutations were cleared by blinatumomab. Six relapses occurred. Overall, 21 adverse events of grade 3 or higher were recorded. A total of 24 patients received a stem-cell allograft, and 1 death was related to transplantation (4%).
CONCLUSIONS
A chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation first-line treatment with dasatinib and blinatumomab that was based on a targeted and immunotherapeutic strategy was associated with high incidences of molecular response and survival and few toxic effects of grade 3 or higher in adults with Ph-positive ALL. (Funded by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and others; GIMEMA LAL2116 D-ALBA EudraCT number, 2016-001083-11; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02744768.).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Allografts; Antibodies, Bispecific; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Consolidation Chemotherapy; Dasatinib; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Remission Induction; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33085860
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2016272 -
The evolution of acute lymphoblastic leukemia research and therapy at MD Anderson over four decades.Journal of Hematology & Oncology Mar 2023Progress in the research and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is accelerating. This analysis summarizes the data derived from the clinical trials... (Review)
Review
Progress in the research and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is accelerating. This analysis summarizes the data derived from the clinical trials conducted at MD Anderson between 1985 and 2022 across ALL subtypes. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, the addition of BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to intensive chemotherapy since 2000, improved outcomes. More recently, a chemotherapy-free regimen with blinatumomab and ponatinib resulted in a complete molecular remission rate of 85% and an estimated 3-year survival rate of 90%, potentially reducing the role of, and need for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in remission. In younger patients with pre-B Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, the integration of blinatumomab and inotuzumab into the frontline therapy has improved the estimated 3-year survival rate to 85% across all risk categories. Our future strategy is to evaluate the early integration of both immunotherapy agents, inotuzumab and blinatumomab, with low-dose chemotherapy (dose-dense mini-Hyper-CVD-inotuzumab-blinatumomab) into the frontline setting followed by CAR T cells consolidation in high-risk patients, without any further maintenance therapy. In older patients, using less intensive chemotherapy (mini-Hyper-CVD) in combination with inotuzumab and blinatumomab has improved the 5-year survival rate to 50%. Among patients ≥ 65-70 years, the mortality in complete remission (CR) is still high and is multifactorial (old age, death in CR with infections, development of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia). A chemotherapy-free regimen with inotuzumab and blinatumomab is being investigated. The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is superior to conventional assays, with early MRD negativity by NGS being associated with the best survival. We anticipate that the future therapy in B-ALL will involve less intensive and shorter chemotherapy regimens in combination with agents targeting CD19 (blinatumomab), CD20, and CD22 (inotuzumab). The optimal timing and use of CAR T cells therapy may be in the setting of minimal disease, and future trials will assess the role of CAR T cells as a consolidation among high-risk patients to replace allogeneic SCT. In summary, the management of ALL has witnessed significant progress during the past four decades. Novel combination regimens including newer-generation BCR::ABL1 TKIs and novel antibodies are questioning the need and duration of intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic SCT.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Aged; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antibodies, Bispecific; Cardiovascular Diseases
PubMed: 36927623
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-023-01409-5 -
JAMA Oncology Sep 2022With the advent of potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is now a... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
With the advent of potent BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is now a relatively favorable-risk acute leukemia. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for frontline therapies of Ph-positive ALL, the major principles that guide therapy, and the progress with chemotherapy-free regimens.
OBSERVATIONS
Incorporating TKIs into the chemotherapy regimens of patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL has led to improved remission rates, higher probability of reaching allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), and longer survival compared with chemotherapy alone. Early achievement of a complete molecular remission (CMR) is an important end point in Ph-positive ALL and identifies patients who have excellent long-term survival and may not need allogeneic SCT. Second-generation TKIs combined with intensive or low-intensity chemotherapy resulted in higher CMR rates compared with imatinib-based regimens. This translated into better outcomes, with less reliance on allogeneic SCT. To further improve the outcomes, the potent third-generation TKI ponatinib was added to chemotherapy. The combination of hyper-CVAD and ponatinib resulted in an overall CMR rate of 84% and a 5-year survival rate of 73% and 86% among patients who did and did not undergo allogeneic SCT, respectively, suggesting that allogeneic SCT may not be needed with this regimen. The recent chemotherapy-free combination of dasatinib and blinatumomab was safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL and resulted in an estimated 3-year OS rate of 80%; 50% of patients underwent allogeneic SCT. The chemotherapy-free regimen of ponatinib and blinatumomab resulted in a CMR rate of 86% and a 2-year survival rate of 93%, with no relapses or leukemia-related deaths, and with only 1 patient proceeding to allogeneic SCT.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The promising results obtained with the chemotherapy-free regimens of blinatumomab plus TKIs question the role of allogeneic SCT in first remission. Patients with Ph-positive ALL who achieve early and deep molecular responses have excellent long-term outcomes and may not benefit from allogeneic SCT.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dasatinib; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Philadelphia Chromosome; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 35834222
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2398 -
The Lancet. Haematology Dec 2022Blinatumomab is effective in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia and results in high rates of minimal residual disease negativity. We aimed to...
Hyper-CVAD and sequential blinatumomab for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial.
BACKGROUND
Blinatumomab is effective in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia and results in high rates of minimal residual disease negativity. We aimed to establish whether the incorporation of blinatumomab into front-line therapy for acute lymphocytic leukaemia could improve outcomes.
METHODS
We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Patients aged 14 years or older with confirmed, newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia were eligible, including patients who had received up to one course of chemotherapy before enrolment. Patients received four cycles of intensive chemotherapy (hyper-CVAD [hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone] alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine), followed by four cycles of blinatumomab consolidation (up to 28 μg/day by continuous intravenous infusion for 28 days, given every 42 days). Maintenance consisted of 15 cycles of alternating blocks of three cycles of POMP (6-mercaptopurine, vincristine, methotrexate, and prednisone) chemotherapy and one of blinatumomab. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02877303, and is still enrolling patients.
FINDINGS
Between Nov 14, 2016, and Aug 27, 2020, 38 patients with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia were treated (median age 37 years [IQR 29-45]; 26 [68%] male; 21 [55%] White, non-Hispanic). With a median follow-up of 37 months (IQR 28-49), estimated 3-year relapse-free survival was 73% (95% CI 56-85). No patients relapsed more than 2 years after the start of therapy. One (3%) patient developed transient grade 3 cytokine release syndrome, and four (11%) patients had a grade 3 blinatumomab-related neurological event. The most common non-haematological grade 3-4 adverse events were infections, which occurred in 14 (37%) of 38 patients during induction and in 27 (71%) of 38 patients during consolidation chemotherapy cycles. One (3%) patient discontinued therapy because of treatment-related neurotoxicity. There were two deaths-one due to infection and one due to respiratory failure-which were not considered treatment-related.
INTERPRETATION
Front-line sequential chemotherapy with blinatumomab resulted in encouraging long-term survival. Future randomised studies should evaluate the routine incorporation of blinatumomab in the treatment of patients with Ph-negative B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia.
FUNDING
Amgen.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adult; Female; Philadelphia Chromosome; Vincristine; Methotrexate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
PubMed: 36279879
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00285-X