-
Pain and Therapy Dec 2021Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability among older adults worldwide. Treatment aims are to alleviate inflammatory pain and improve physical function... (Review)
Review
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability among older adults worldwide. Treatment aims are to alleviate inflammatory pain and improve physical function through non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as first-line therapy. However, selection is challenged by patient age, comorbidities and polypharmacy, and by the drug's benefit/risk balance, all of which together influence the risk of cardiovascular (CV), gastrointestinal (GI) and renal adverse events (AEs). While the efficacy profile of the various NSAIDs is delineated, the differences in their safety profile are not straightforward. This narrative review provides practical indications by a multidisciplinary Italian expert panel for general practitioners and specialists managing OA patients with chronic inflammatory pain; the goal is to maximize therapy efficacy while reducing untoward effects caused by inappropriate NSAID use. The discussion on the best approach to NSAIDs spanned the following topics: (1) patient evaluation: investigate pain origin, duration and components together with possible risk factors for CV, GI and renal AEs; (2) non-pharmacological interventions: the physiatrist provides a person-centered, holistic approach accounting for all patient aspects; (3) pharmacological interventions: patient profile and drugs' pharmacological properties affect NSAID selection, which drugs to be used in combination or to be avoided, formulation and therapy duration; (4) the pharmacologist's, general practitioner's and pain therapist's points of view; (5) NSAID safety: the individual baseline risk and the drug's safety profile are major determinants of CV, GI and renal risk; consider possible drug-drug interactions; (6) periodical re-evaluation of treatment response and adherence, using scales to assess pain and function.
PubMed: 33876393
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00260-1 -
Current Physical Medicine and... 2023Individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a much greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population.... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a much greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. This review discusses dietary patterns as a means of addressing modifiable risk factors following TBI exposure. Evidence-based resources for practicing Physiatrists and Brain Injury Medicine specialists pertaining to nutrition education and counseling are also provided.
RECENT FINDINGS
We examined Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, plant-based, ketogenic, and intermittent fasting dietary patterns through publications of clinical trials and systematic reviews. While many reviews had significant positive findings, some were limited by generalizability.
SUMMARY
While there is extensive literature on the immediate nutrition goals in the inpatient setting following an acute TBI exposure, there is limited literature discussing the nature of diet and nutrition in the post-acute setting. Fortunately, most individuals with TBI exposure survive their initial injury and continue into the recovery phase. The scientific literature supports increased morbidity and mortality with chronic TBI exposure compared to matched counterparts, most notably with CVD. A diet rich in fiber and nutrients but limited in added sugars, saturated fats, and excess calories would likely have the greatest cardiovascular and related neurologic protection. Future studies are needed to assess the specific impact of dietary interventions in the chronic phase of brain injury recovery.
PubMed: 37732170
DOI: 10.1007/s40141-023-00413-7 -
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association... Apr 2022
Topics: Brachial Plexus Neuritis; Humans; Physiatrists
PubMed: 35379665
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220382 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Oct 2021Transitions across care settings can be stressful for trauma patients, and when poorly executed, can lead to poor outcomes. Early physical medicine and rehabilitation...
PURPOSE
Transitions across care settings can be stressful for trauma patients, and when poorly executed, can lead to poor outcomes. Early physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) consults in acute care settings can optimize the continuum of care for trauma patients, but there is a need for additional insight on its impact. This study aimed to better understand how early PM&R consults influence the continuum of care between acute and rehabilitation trauma settings.
METHODS
Four focus groups were conducted with 21 trauma acute care and rehabilitation staff, and data were analyzed via content analysis.
RESULTS
The main themes identified were: (1) patient-level considerations (i. readiness for rehab [mental health]; ii. patient education and expectations for rehab); (2) clinical-team considerations (i. physiatry role clarity and role limitations; ii. access and accuracy of information; iii. departmental silos); and (3) system-level considerations (i. occupancy and discharge pressures; ii. inter-facility coordination and patient flow).
CONCLUSIONS
Although both acute and rehabilitation care staff find early PM&R consults as being important to support the recovery of trauma patients, there is a need for greater role clarity of the physiatrist across settings and a more refined implementation approach to better meet the communication needs of clinical staff. Implications for RehabilitationEarly physical medicine and rehabilitation consults are seen by acute care and rehabilitation front-line staff as valuable for optimizing the continuum of trauma care.There is a lack of clarity on the role of physiatrists among acute care and rehabilitation clinical staff.The physiatrist plays an important role to help prepare trauma patients for rehabilitation. For patients with complex physical and/or mental health challenges, the physiatrist can also serve as an advocate for access to rehabilitation services.
Topics: Humans; Patient Discharge; Physiatrists; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; Qualitative Research; Rehabilitation Centers
PubMed: 32017865
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1719215 -
Pain Reports 2021Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a highly prevalent condition which is underdiagnosed and poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to outline the various aspects of... (Review)
Review
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a highly prevalent condition which is underdiagnosed and poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to outline the various aspects of the nature of CPP, including its etiologies, clinical presentation, and nonoperative treatment options. For data collection, a PubMed search was conducted using indexing terms such as chronic pelvic pain and pelvic pain. Literature reviews and studies focusing on etiologies, clinical presentation, and/or the diagnosis of CPP were compiled for review by a team of 3 physiatrists. Studies investigating conservative treatments, medications, and interventional procedures for CPP and related conditions with comparable etiologies were also included. Of the 502 articles retrieved, 116 were deemed suitable by the team for this study. Although CPP is a complex, multifaceted condition, a particular susceptibility to nociceptive stimuli was demonstrated as an underlying theme in its evolution. There are many treatment options currently used; however, more robust evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed before creating comprehensive guidelines for treating CPP.
PubMed: 34476302
DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000949 -
EFORT Open Reviews Aug 2023The total number of spine surgeries is increasing, with a variable percentage of patients remaining symptomatic and functionally impaired after surgery. Rehabilitation... (Review)
Review
The total number of spine surgeries is increasing, with a variable percentage of patients remaining symptomatic and functionally impaired after surgery. Rehabilitation has been widely recommended, although its effects remain unclear due to lack of research on this matter. The aim of this comprehensive review is to resume the most recent evidence regarding postoperative rehabilitation after spine surgery and make recommendations. The effectiveness of cervical spine surgery on the outcomes is moderate to good, so most physiatrists and surgeons agree that patients benefit from a structured postoperative rehabilitation protocol and despite best timing to start rehabilitation is still unknown, most programs start 4-6 weeks after surgery. Lumbar disc surgery has shown success rates between 78% and 95% after 2 years of follow-up. Postoperative rehabilitation is widely recommended, although its absolute indication has not yet been proven. Patients should be educated to start their own postoperative rehabilitation immediately after surgery until they enroll on a rehabilitation program usually 4-6 weeks post-intervention. The rate of lumbar interbody fusion surgery is increasing, particularly in patients over 60 years, although studies report that 25-45% of patients remain symptomatic. Despite no standardized rehabilitation program has been defined, patients benefit from a cognitive-behavioral physical therapy starting immediately after surgery with psychological intervention, patient education and gradual mobilization. Formal spine rehabilitation should begin at 2-3 months postoperatively. Rehabilitation has benefits on the recovery of patients after spine surgery, but further investigation is needed to achieve a standardized rehabilitation approach.
PubMed: 37526242
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0015 -
The Urologic Clinics of North America May 2024This article discusses the ideal neurogenic bladder management team for patients who have neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). It emphasizes the... (Review)
Review
This article discusses the ideal neurogenic bladder management team for patients who have neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). It emphasizes the importance of a diverse team, including urologists, physiatrists, neurologist and others, working collaboratively to prevent complications and enhance patient outcomes. Owing to the unique nuances of the various neurologic conditions and patterns of NLUTD dysfunction, the roles of different specialists in the interdisciplinary team are outlined. This article describes 3 team models: multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary, highlighting the benefits of collaborative approaches.
Topics: Humans; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Urologists
PubMed: 38609201
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.02.006 -
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 2022The Brazilian Consensus on Hip Viscosupplementation aims to generate a referential and consensual source from the theoretical knowledge and clinical experience of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The Brazilian Consensus on Hip Viscosupplementation aims to generate a referential and consensual source from the theoretical knowledge and clinical experience of specialists in the field.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary panel was formed with 15 specialists (sports medicine, orthopedists, physiatrists and rheumatologists), based on clinical and academic experience in the use of viscosupplementation of the hip. 12 statements were prepared, discussed and voted. Each panelist gave a value between 0 and 10 on a Likert scale, specifying their level of agreement with the statement.
RESULTS
The panel reached a consensus on several aspects of viscosupplementation of the hip, with emphasis on the following statements: best indication is for mild to moderate hip arthrosis; it may be indicated in severe osteoarthritis; results may vary according to the characteristics of the viscosupplement used; Viscosupplementation should not be performed as an isolated procedure, but in conjunction with other rehabilitation and pharmacological measures; best injection technique should be based on anatomical references coupled with imaging guidance; it is a cost-effective procedure.
CONCLUSION
Viscosupplementation is a safe and effective therapy for hip osteoarthritis, even in severe cases. Guided injection is recommended.
PubMed: 36451782
DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220223005e250414 -
BMC Medical Education Mar 2022The 36-month Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) or Physiatry residency provides a number of multidisciplinary clinical experiences. These experiences often...
BACKGROUND
The 36-month Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) or Physiatry residency provides a number of multidisciplinary clinical experiences. These experiences often translate to novel research questions, which may not be pursued by residents due to several factors, including limited research exposure and uncertainty of how to begin a project. Limited resident participation in clinical research negatively affects the growth of Physiatry as a field and medicine as a whole. The two largest Physiatry organizations - the Association of Academic Physiatrists and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - participate in the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Coalition (DRRC), seeking to improve the state of rehabilitation and disability research through funding opportunities by way of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). A paucity of new Physiatry researchers neutralizes these efforts.
RESULTS
This paper details the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Resident Research program that promotes resident research culture and production. Mirroring our collaborative clinical care paradigm, this program integrates faculty mentorship, institutional research collaborates (Neuroscience Nursing Research Center, Neuroscience Research Development Office) and departmental resources (Shark Tank competition) to provide resident-centric research support.
CONCLUSIONS
The resident-centric rehabilitation research team has formed a successful research program that was piloted from the resident perspective, facilitating academic productivity while respecting the clinical responsibilities of the 36-month PM&R residency. Resident research trainees are uniquely positioned to become future leaders of multidisciplinary and multispecialty collaborative teams, with a focus on patient function and health outcomes.
Topics: Efficiency; Humans; Internship and Residency; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; Rehabilitation Research; United States
PubMed: 35277154
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03167-3 -
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... Feb 2021Physiatrists care for patients and families with complex medical needs, and primary palliative care is an important part of the comprehensive rehabilitation care plan....
Physiatrists care for patients and families with complex medical needs, and primary palliative care is an important part of the comprehensive rehabilitation care plan. Palliative care improves patient and family quality of life and reduces healthcare costs. Clinical care guidelines for several physiatry patient populations now include the provision of palliative care.Current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education physiatry residency program requirements include foundational palliative care skills. Similarly, current clinical palliative care practice guidelines enumerate standards that apply to the rehabilitation setting. However, there is a dearth of literature on the current state of palliative care training within physiatry programs, and hospice and palliative medicine remains one of the least subscribed physiatry subspecialties.In this article, we describe palliative care, highlight existing literature on palliative care needs within physiatry patient populations, and identify a core physiatry-palliative care skillset. We look both within physiatry and across other specialties to guide recommendations for palliative care education within physiatry residency programs. We also describe opportunities for post-residency fellowship training in hospice and palliative medicine.
Topics: Education, Medical, Graduate; Hospice Care; Humans; Palliative Care; Palliative Medicine; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; United States
PubMed: 32541344
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001489