-
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2021Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is associated with poor outcomes, but a consensus is lacking in the literature regarding which compound represents the best... (Review)
Review
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is associated with poor outcomes, but a consensus is lacking in the literature regarding which compound represents the best pharmacological augmentation strategy to antidepressants (AD). In the present review, we identify the available literature regarding the pharmacological augmentation to AD in TRD. Research in the main psychiatric databases was performed (PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, PsychInfo). Only original articles in English with the main topic being pharmacological augmentation in TRD and presenting a precise definition of TRD were included. Aripiprazole and lithium were the most investigated molecules, and aripiprazole presented the strongest evidence of efficacy. Moreover, olanzapine, quetiapine, cariprazine, risperidone, and ziprasidone showed positive results but to a lesser extent. Brexpiprazole and intranasal esketamine need further study in real-world practice. Intravenous ketamine presented an evincible AD effect in the short-term. The efficacy of adjunctive ADs, antiepileptic drugs, psychostimulants, pramipexole, ropinirole, acetyl-salicylic acid, metyrapone, reserpine, testosterone, T3/T4, naltrexone, SAMe, and zinc cannot be precisely estimated in light of the limited available data. Studies on lamotrigine and pindolol reported negative results. According to our results, aripiprazole and lithium may be considered by clinicians as potential effective augmentative strategies in TRD, although the data regarding lithium are somewhat controversial. Reliable conclusions about the other molecules cannot be drawn. Further controlled comparative studies, standardized in terms of design, doses, and duration of the augmentative treatments, are needed to formulate definitive conclusions.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Buspirone; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Humans; Ketamine; Lithium
PubMed: 34884874
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222313070 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... May 2020
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension
PubMed: 32555118
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of Head Trauma...To systematically review the available literature on the pharmacological management of agitation and/or aggression in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI),...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the available literature on the pharmacological management of agitation and/or aggression in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), synthesize the available data, and provide guidelines.
DESIGN
Systematic review of systematic reviews.
MAIN MEASURES
A literature review of the following websites was performed looking for systematic reviews on the treatment of agitation and/or aggression among patients with TBI: PubMed, CINAHL, DynaMed, Health Business Elite, and EBSCO (Psychology and behavioral sciences collection). Two researchers independently assessed articles for meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on year of publication, reviewed databases, dates of coverage, search limitations, pharmacological agents of interest, and a list of all controlled studies included. The included controlled studies were then examined to determine potential reasons for any difference in recommendations.
RESULTS
The literature review led to 187 citations and 67 unique publications after removing the duplicates. Following review of the title/abstracts and full texts, a total of 11 systematic reviews were included. The systematic reviews evaluated the evidence for safety and efficacy of the following medications: amantadine, amphetamines, methylphenidate, antiepileptics, atypical and typical antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, β-blockers, and sertraline.
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of the results of this literature review, the authors recommend avoiding benzodiazepines and haloperidol for treating agitation and/or aggression in the context of TBI. Atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine in particular) can be considered as practical alternatives for the as-needed management of agitation and/or aggression in lieu of benzodiazepines and haloperidol. Amantadine, β-blockers (propranolol and pindolol), antiepileptics, and methylphenidate can be considered for scheduled treatment of agitation and/or aggression in patients with TBI.
Topics: Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Humans; Psychomotor Agitation; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 33656478
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000656 -
Cell and Tissue Research Jul 2019Major depressive disorder is a severe, disabling disorder that affects around 4.7% of the population worldwide. Based on the monoaminergic hypothesis of depression,... (Review)
Review
Major depressive disorder is a severe, disabling disorder that affects around 4.7% of the population worldwide. Based on the monoaminergic hypothesis of depression, monoamine reuptake inhibitors have been developed as antidepressants and nowadays, they are used widely in clinical practice. However, these drugs have a limited efficacy and a slow onset of therapeutic action. Several strategies have been implemented to overcome these limitations, including switching to other drugs or introducing combined or augmentation therapies. In clinical practice, the most often used augmenting drugs are lithium, triiodothyronine, atypical antipsychotics, buspirone, and pindolol, although some others are in the pipeline. Moreover, multitarget antidepressants have been developed to improve efficacy. Despite the enormous effort exerted to improve these monoaminergic drugs, they still fail to produce a rapid and sustained antidepressant response in a substantial proportion of depressed patients. Recently, new compounds that target other neurotransmission system, such as the glutamatergic system, have become the focus of research into fast-acting antidepressant agents. These promising alternatives could represent a new pharmacological trend in the management of depression.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Biogenic Monoamines; Buspirone; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Synergism; Excitatory Amino Acid Agents; Humans; Lithium; Pindolol; Triiodothyronine
PubMed: 30627806
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-018-2978-8 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... May 2024
Review
Topics: Humans; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 38771738
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2024.1703a -
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Apr 2021Although the β-blocker propranolol is considered one of the most effective tremor treatments and other β-blockers are often prescribed to patients with tremor, those...
BACKGROUND
Although the β-blocker propranolol is considered one of the most effective tremor treatments and other β-blockers are often prescribed to patients with tremor, those with partial β-agonist activity on β-adrenoreceptors can theoretically induce or exacerbate tremor. Here we report 2 patients with tremor induced or worsened by such β-blockers.
CASES
Case 1 is a 38-year-old man with worsening of tremor in both upper extremities after the introduction of pindolol as an adjunct treatment for severe depression. The tremor improved 1 month after discontinuing this medication. Case 2 is a 77-year-old woman with new bilateral hand tremor after receiving labetalol for the management of hypertension during a hospital admission. Tremor markedly attenuated after eliminating labetalol.
CONCLUSION
β-Blockers with partial agonist activity can induce or exacerbate tremor.
PubMed: 33816676
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13176 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Oct 2020Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, although the optimal treatment is unclear. The aim of this network metaanalysis was to simultaneously... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE DATA
Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, although the optimal treatment is unclear. The aim of this network metaanalysis was to simultaneously compare the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive agents in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.
STUDY
Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically from inception to December 15, 2019. Both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were held eligible if they reported the effects of antihypertensive agents on perinatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
The primary outcomes were preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age risk. A frequentist network metaanalytic random-effects model was fitted. The main analysis was based on randomized controlled trials. The credibility of evidence was assessed by taking into account within-study bias, across-studies bias, indirectness, imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 8 cohorts) were included, comprising 4464 women. Pooling of randomized controlled trials indicated that no agent significantly affected the incidence of preeclampsia. Atenolol was associated with significantly higher risk of small-for-gestational age compared with placebo (odds ratio, 26.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.61-259.29) and is ranked as the worst treatment (P-score=.98). The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.55), methyldopa (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.56), ketanserin (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.90), and pindolol (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.55) were administered compared with no drug intake. The highest probability scores were calculated for furosemide (P-score=.86), amlodipine (P-score=.82), and placebo (P-score=.82). The use of nifedipine and methyldopa were associated with significantly lower placental abruption rates (odds ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.58] and 0.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.46], respectively). No significant differences were estimated for cesarean delivery, perinatal death, preterm birth, and gestational age at delivery.
CONCLUSION
Atenolol was associated with a significantly increased risk for small-for-gestational-age infants. The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine and methyldopa were administered, although preeclampsia risk was similar among antihypertensive agents. Future large-scale trials should provide guidance about the choice of antihypertensive treatment and the goal blood pressure during pregnancy.
Topics: Abruptio Placentae; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Cesarean Section; Chronic Disease; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Furosemide; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Ketanserin; Methyldopa; Network Meta-Analysis; Nifedipine; Perinatal Death; Pindolol; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Premature Birth; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 32199925
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.016 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Jun 2023It is known that S-pindolol attenuates muscle loss in animal models of cancer cachexia and sarcopenia. In cancer cachexia, it also significantly reduced mortality and...
BACKGROUND
It is known that S-pindolol attenuates muscle loss in animal models of cancer cachexia and sarcopenia. In cancer cachexia, it also significantly reduced mortality and improved cardiac function, which is strongly compromised in cachectic animals.
METHODS
Here, we tested 3 mg/kg/day of S-pindolol in two murine cancer cachexia models: pancreatic cancer cachexia (KPC) and Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC).
RESULTS
Treatment of mice with 3 mg/kg/day of S-pindolol in KPC or LLC cancer cachexia models significantly attenuated the loss of body weight, including lean mass and muscle weights, leading to improved grip strength compared with placebo-treated mice. In the KPC model, treated mice lost less than half of the total weight lost by placebo (-0.9 ± 1.0 vs. -2.2 ± 1.4 g for S-pindolol and placebo, respectively, P < 0.05) and around a third of the lean mass lost by tumour-bearing controls (-0.4 ± 1.0 vs. -1.5 ± 1.5 g for S-pindolol and placebo, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas loss of fat mass was similar. In the LLC model, the gastrocnemius weight was higher in sham (108 ± 16 mg) and S-pindolol tumour-bearing (94 ± 15 mg) mice than that in placebo (83 ± 12 mg), whereas the soleus weight was only significantly higher in the S-pindolol-treated group (7.9 ± 1.7 mg) than that in placebo (6.5 ± 0.9). Grip strength was significantly improved by S-pindolol treatment (110.8 ± 16.2 vs. 93.9 ± 17.1 g for S-pindolol and placebo, respectively). A higher grip strength was observed in all groups; whereas S-pindolol-treated mice improved by 32.7 ± 18.5 g, tumour-bearing mice only show minimal improvements (7.3 ± 19.4 g, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
S-pindolol is an important candidate for clinical development in the treatment of cancer cachexia that strongly attenuates loss of body weight and lean body mass. This was also seen in the weight of individual muscles and resulted in higher grip strength.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Cachexia; Lung Neoplasms; Muscle, Skeletal; Carcinoma, Lewis Lung; Pancreas
PubMed: 37130578
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13249 -
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Aug 2019The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-adrenergic blocking agents used in cardiology by reviewing single-dose and steady-state... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-adrenergic blocking agents used in cardiology by reviewing single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic studies from the literature. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies of beta-adrenergic blocking agents, both single-dose and steady-state studies. The studies included reported maximum plasma concentration (C) and/or area under the concentration curve (AUC). The coefficient of variation (CV%) was calculated for all studies, and a CV% <40% was considered low or moderate variability, and a CV% >40% was considered high variability. The C and AUC were reported a total of 672 times in 192 papers. Based on AUC, metoprolol, propranolol, carvedilol, and nebivolol showed high pharmacokinetic variability (highest first), whereas bisoprolol, atenolol, sotalol, labetalol, nadolol, and pindolol showed low to moderate variability (lowest first). We have shown a high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability that varies markedly in different beta-adrenergic blocking agents; the extreme being steady state ratios as high as 30 in metoprolol. A more personalized approach to the medical treatment of patients may be obtained by combining known pharmacokinetic information about variability, pharmaco-genetics and -dynamics, and patient characteristics, to avoid adverse events or lack of treatment effect.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Carvedilol; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Metoprolol; Propranolol
PubMed: 31338197
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.496 -
Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford,... Dec 2021To compare different β-adrenoceptor antagonists for the risk of reporting nightmare.
AIM
To compare different β-adrenoceptor antagonists for the risk of reporting nightmare.
METHODS
The study involved two approaches: first, we investigated in VigiBase, the World Health Organization Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database, the disproportionality between exposure to each β-adrenoceptor antagonists and reports of nightmares between 1967 and 2019. Second, in a pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic analysis, we assessed whether use of β-adrenoceptor antagonists with moderate and high lipid solubility or strong 5-HT affinity were associated with an increased risk of reporting nightmares. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to estimate reporting odds ratios (RORs) of nightmares compared to all other adverse drug reactions.
RESULTS
Of the 126,964 reports recorded with β-adrenoceptor antagonists, 1138 (0.9%) were nightmares. The highest risk of reporting a nightmare was found with exposure of pindolol (adjusted ROR 2.82, 95%CI, 2.19-3.61), metoprolol (1.89, 1.66-2.16), and alprenolol (1.77, 1.06-2.97). Compared to use of low lipid solubility β-adrenoceptor antagonists, use of moderate or high lipid solubility β-adrenoceptor antagonists were significantly more associated with nightmare reports (aROR moderate vs. low 1.72, 95%CI 1.47-2.00 and aROR high vs. low 1.84, 95%CI 1.53-2.22). Use of moderate or high 5-HT affinity of β-adrenoceptor antagonists was associated with an increased ROR of nightmares compared with low 5-HT affinity of β-adrenoceptor antagonists (aROR moderate vs. low 1.22, 95%CI 1.04-1.43 and aROR high vs. low 2.46, 95%CI 1.93-3.13).
CONCLUSION
In our large pharmacovigilance study, nightmares are more frequently reported for pindolol and metoprolol, and among β-adrenoceptor antagonists with high lipid solubility and high 5-HT receptor affinity.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Databases, Pharmaceutical; Dreams; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Pharmacoepidemiology; Pharmacovigilance
PubMed: 34318729
DOI: 10.1177/02698811211034810