-
Neurosurgical Review Jun 2021Pineal region tumors commonly present with non-communicating hydrocephalus. These heterogeneous histological entities require different therapeutic regimens. We...
Pineal region tumors commonly present with non-communicating hydrocephalus. These heterogeneous histological entities require different therapeutic regimens. We evaluated our surgical experience concerning procurance of a histological diagnosis, management of hydrocephalus, and choice of antitumoral treatment. We analyzed the efficacy of neuroendoscopic biopsy and endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV) in patients with pineal region tumors between 2006 and 2019 in a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study with regard to diagnostic yield, hydrocephalus treatment, as well as impact on further antitumoral management. Out of 28 identified patients, 23 patients presented with untreated hydrocephalus and 25 without histological diagnosis. One patient underwent open biopsy, and 24 received a neuroendoscopic biopsy with concomitant hydrocephalus treatment if necessary. Eighteen primary ETVs, 2 secondary ETVs, and 2 ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) were performed. Endoscopic biopsy had a diagnostic yield of 95.8% (23/24) and complication rates of 12.5% (transient) and 4.2% (permanent), respectively. ETV for hydrocephalus management was successful in 89.5% (17/19) with a median follow-up of more than 3 years. Following histological diagnosis, 8 patients (28.6%) underwent primary resection of their tumor. Another 9 patients underwent later-stage resection after either adjuvant treatment (n = 5) or for progressive disease during observation (n = 4). Eventually, 20 patients received adjuvant treatment and 7 were observed after primary management. One patient was lost to follow-up. Heterogeneity of pineal region tumor requires histological confirmation. Primary biopsy of pineal lesions should precede surgical resection since less than a third of patients needed primary surgical resection according to the German pediatric brain tumor protocols. Interdisciplinary decision making upfront any treatment is warranted in order to adequately guide treatment.
Topics: Adolescent; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disease Management; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Infant; Male; Neuroendoscopy; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma; Retrospective Studies; Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt; Ventriculostomy
PubMed: 32504201
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01323-1 -
Neurological Research Apr 2023Neuroendoscopic resection supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach is adequate for some indicated pineal region tumors with the natural infratentorial corridor.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Neuroendoscopic resection supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach is adequate for some indicated pineal region tumors with the natural infratentorial corridor. We described this full endoscopic approach through a modified 'head-up' park-bench position to facilitate the procedure.
METHODS
We reviewed the clinical and radiological data of four patients with pineal region lesions who underwent pure endoscopic tumor resection through the SCIT approach with this modified position. The related literature concerning fully endoscopic pineal region tumor resection was also reviewed.
RESULTS
This cohort included four patients with pineal region tumors. External ventricular drainage (Ommaya reservoir) was performed in three patients with hydrocephalus in advance. The average tumor volume was 19.2 ± 17.2 cm. Pathological examination confirmed two mixed germinomas, one glioblastoma multiforme, and one hemangioblastoma. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in all patients, and all patients recovered well without neurological deficits or surgical complications. Hydrocephalus was relieved among all patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The pure endoscopic SCIT approach could enable safe and effective resection of pineal region tumors, even for relatively large lesions. The endoscope could provide a panoramic view and illumination of the deep-seated structures. Compared with the sitting position, this modified ergonomic position could be implemented easily.
Topics: Humans; Sitting Position; Neurosurgical Procedures; Pinealoma; Pineal Gland; Neuroendoscopy; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 36509700
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2146266 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Feb 2023Pineal anlage tumor is an extremely rare tumor which was considered as a subtype of pineovlatoma with an overall poor prognosis. This case-based review further... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Pineal anlage tumor is an extremely rare tumor which was considered as a subtype of pineovlatoma with an overall poor prognosis. This case-based review further summarize the clinical profile.
METHODS
A patient with pineal anlage tumor was reported, her clinical data and gene analysis results were recorded.
RESULTS
An 8-month-old girl, with an obvious enhancing pineal occupancy and obstructive hydrocephalus. Her histological and immunohistochemical findings contained rhabdomyoblastic, melanin pigment and cartilage island. The wholeexpme sequencing and genome-wide copy number variation sequencing were performed, no mutations associated with pineoblatoma as well as copy number variants were identified. In terms of treatment, our patient underwent subtotal resection without radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and the residual tumor enlarged 4 months after surgery. We have followed her up for 10 months, and the child is still alive.
CONCLUSION
Surgery combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy is still the best treatment currently,and genetic testing for patients is necessary.
Topics: Humans; Child; Female; Infant; Brain Neoplasms; DNA Copy Number Variations; Pinealoma; Pineal Gland; Supratentorial Neoplasms
PubMed: 36471063
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05763-6 -
World Neurosurgery May 2023Obtaining a prompt diagnosis, avoiding indwelling ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and enhancing the predictive value of pathologic examinations are only some of the... (Review)
Review
Obtaining a prompt diagnosis, avoiding indwelling ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and enhancing the predictive value of pathologic examinations are only some of the advantages conferred by a simultaneous third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy in patients with pineal region tumors. The objective of this study was to retrospectively search the literature on concomitant, single burr hole endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and tumor biopsy (TB) for pineal region tumors and to analyze the feasibility, surgical safety, and benefits of these 2 combined procedures. Consequently, a comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed in compliance with the updated PRISMA 2020 guidelines within electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, PLOS, and Cochrane Library. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS 28.0.1.1(14), using Kendall's and Spearman's tests, with a P < 0.05 considered significant. A total of 25 studies were selected and included in this review, for a total of 368 patients (mean age 20.6 years; range 1-86 years; SD 17.5). More than two-thirds of the procedures were operated with a rigid endoscope and 27.6% were performed with either a flexible endoscope, a combination of the 2, or not otherwise specified. Germinoma represented the most frequent diagnosis (20.1%) followed by astrocytoma (12.9%) and pineocytoma (9.9%). The single-entry approach allowed a correct histologic diagnosis in 88.7% of the examined cases. Summing up, concomitant ETV and TB represent a valuable option for the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus and the initial assessment of pineal region tumors. The histologic confirmation rate was 88.7% in the examined cohort, with only 10% of the biopsies yielding inconclusive results.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Ventriculostomy; Retrospective Studies; Feasibility Studies; Third Ventricle; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma; Neuroendoscopy; Biopsy; Hydrocephalus; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 36764448
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.082 -
Acta Neuropathologica Dec 2023
Genetical and epigenetical profiling identifies two subgroups of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) with distinct molecular, histological and clinical characteristics.
Topics: Humans; Pinealoma; Pineal Gland; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 37776353
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-023-02638-1 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Feb 2021Intra-axial "pineal region" tumors include pineal, tectal, and aqueductal tumors. All three tumor subgroups cause obstruction of the aqueduct; however, they differ in...
PURPOSE
Intra-axial "pineal region" tumors include pineal, tectal, and aqueductal tumors. All three tumor subgroups cause obstruction of the aqueduct; however, they differ in radiological nuances, pathology, differential diagnosis, and treatment. The goal of this manuscript is to describe the radiological, clinical, and pathological nuances that differentiate between these subgroups.
METHODS
All patients with intra-axial pineal region tumors were analyzed retrospectively, including demographics, radiological characteristics, pathology, treatment, and outcome.
RESULTS
Forty-nine patients (1-69 years of age) were included: 19 pineal, 10 tectal, 10 aqueductal, 4 periaqueductal, and 6 complex. The 3 main subgroups differed in various radiological and anatomical nuances. Age and gender did not differ between groups. Other factors that did not differ between groups included T1 and T2 signals, presence of blood products, a normally located (non-displaced) tectum, anterior tectal displacement, thalamic involvement, and presence of hydrocephalus. The pathological spectrum differed between the 3 main subgroups, as well as the surgical treatment, and outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite sharing a close anatomical location, as well as all causing obstruction of the aqueduct with secondary hydrocephalus, the differential diagnosis, diagnostic methods, and possible treatment and surgical options differ between the various subgroups. Anatomical nuances are described to better delineate the various tumor subgroups and recommend specific treatment approaches.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32725465
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04826-w -
Digital Journal of Ophthalmology : DJO Jun 2021
Topics: Adult; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Nystagmus, Pathologic; Pinealoma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Conformal; Visual Fields
PubMed: 34512208
DOI: 10.5693/djo.02.2020.12.002 -
BMJ Case Reports Mar 2022
Topics: Brain Stem Neoplasms; Child; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22; DiGeorge Syndrome; Glioma; Humans; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma
PubMed: 35272994
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-249232 -
World Neurosurgery Feb 2021Given the rarity of patients with pineal glioblastoma (GBM), clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognostic factors are not well characterized. This study aimed to...
OBJECTIVE
Given the rarity of patients with pineal glioblastoma (GBM), clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognostic factors are not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate these characteristics and identify the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS).
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with pineal GBM, including our 3 cases and an additional 44 cases from published articles, was conducted. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 47 patients (28 males and 19 females) were enrolled, with a median age of 46 years (range, 5-74 years). Forty-four patients (90.9%) had preoperative obstructive hydrocephalus. Among 38 patients, 21 (55.3%) had distal leptomeningeal dissemination. Forty-five patients (95.7%) had resection/biopsy, 6 of whom had gross total resection, 22 had subtotal resection, 7 had partial resection, and 10 had biopsy. Adjuvant therapy included radiotherapy in 36 patients and chemotherapy in 27 patients. The median OS was 10.0 months. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival was 68.0%, 42.6%, and 17.0%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that patients receiving biopsy (P = 0.042) or chemotherapy (P = 0.029) had the better OS and these were regarded as independent prognostic factors. Further survival analysis showed that chemoradiotherapy had better survival benefit than other regimens.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we summarized the characteristics of patients with pineal GBM and showed the correlation between clinical characteristics and prognosis. This study may give readers a deep understanding of these rare GBMs and provide some references for future management.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Glioblastoma; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurosurgical Procedures; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Survival Rate; Young Adult
PubMed: 33186787
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.016 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jan 2024To provide a treatment-focused review and develop basic treatment guidelines for patients diagnosed with pineal anlage tumor (PAT).
PURPOSE
To provide a treatment-focused review and develop basic treatment guidelines for patients diagnosed with pineal anlage tumor (PAT).
METHODS
Prospectively collected data of three patients with pineal anlage tumor from Germany was combined with clinical details and treatment information from 17 published cases.
RESULTS
Overall, 20 cases of PAT were identified (3 not previously reported German cases, 17 cases from published reports). Age at diagnosis ranged from 0.3 to 35.0 (median: 3.2 ± 7.8) years. All but three cases were diagnosed before the age of three years. For three cases, metastatic disease at initial staging was described. All patients underwent tumor surgery (gross-total resection: 9, subtotal resection/biopsy: 9, extent of resection unknown: 2). 15/20 patients were alive at last follow-up. Median follow-up for 10/15 surviving patients with available follow-up and treatment data was 2.4 years (0.3-6.5). Relapse was reported for 3 patients within 0.8 years after diagnosis. Five patients died, 3 after relapse and 2 from early postoperative complications. Two-year-progression-free- and -overall survival were 65.2 ± 12.7% and 49.2 ± 18.2%, respectively. All 4 patients who received intensive chemotherapy including high-dose chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (2 focal, 2 craniospinal [CSI]) had no recurrence. Focal radiotherapy- and CSI-free survival rates in 13 evaluable patients were 46.2% (6/13) and 61.5% (8/13), respectively.
CONCLUSION
PAT is an aggressive disease mostly affecting young children. Therefore, adjuvant therapy using intensive chemotherapy and considering radiotherapy appears to comprise an appropriate treatment strategy. Reporting further cases is crucial to evaluate distinct treatment strategies.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Young Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pineal Gland; Pinealoma; Recurrence; Supratentorial Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38253790
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04547-5