-
JAMA Oct 2023Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly administered to hospitalized adults for empirical treatment of infection. Although piperacillin-tazobactam has been...
IMPORTANCE
Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly administered to hospitalized adults for empirical treatment of infection. Although piperacillin-tazobactam has been hypothesized to cause acute kidney injury and cefepime has been hypothesized to cause neurological dysfunction, their comparative safety has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the choice between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam affects the risks of acute kidney injury or neurological dysfunction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The Antibiotic Choice on Renal Outcomes (ACORN) randomized clinical trial compared cefepime vs piperacillin-tazobactam in adults for whom a clinician initiated an order for antipseudomonal antibiotics within 12 hours of presentation to the hospital in the emergency department or medical intensive care unit at an academic medical center in the US between November 10, 2021, and October 7, 2022. The final date of follow-up was November 4, 2022.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the highest stage of acute kidney injury or death by day 14, measured on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from no acute kidney injury to death. The 2 secondary outcomes were the incidence of major adverse kidney events at day 14 and the number of days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days.
RESULTS
There were 2511 patients included in the primary analysis (median age, 58 years [IQR, 43-69 years]; 42.7% were female; 16.3% were Non-Hispanic Black; 5.4% were Hispanic; 94.7% were enrolled in the emergency department; and 77.2% were receiving vancomycin at enrollment). The highest stage of acute kidney injury or death was not significantly different between the cefepime group and the piperacillin-tazobactam group; there were 85 patients (n = 1214; 7.0%) in the cefepime group with stage 3 acute kidney injury and 92 (7.6%) who died vs 97 patients (n = 1297; 7.5%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group with stage 3 acute kidney injury and 78 (6.0%) who died (odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.13], P = .56). The incidence of major adverse kidney events at day 14 did not differ between groups (124 patients [10.2%] in the cefepime group vs 114 patients [8.8%] in the piperacillin-tazobactam group; absolute difference, 1.4% [95% CI, -1.0% to 3.8%]). Patients in the cefepime group experienced fewer days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days (mean [SD], 11.9 [4.6] days vs 12.2 [4.3] days in the piperacillin-tazobactam group; odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.95]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among hospitalized adults in this randomized clinical trial, treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam did not increase the incidence of acute kidney injury or death. Treatment with cefepime resulted in more neurological dysfunction.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05094154.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Coma; Piperacillin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Retrospective Studies; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Sepsis; Acute Kidney Injury; Kidney; Delirium
PubMed: 37837651
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.20583 -
JAMA May 2023Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of...
IMPORTANCE
Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in reducing SSI is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
To define the effect of broad-spectrum perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis on postoperative SSI incidence compared with standard care antibiotics.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 clinical trial at 26 hospitals across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled between November 2017 and August 2021, with follow-up through December 2021. Adults undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy for any indication were eligible. Individuals were excluded if they had allergies to study medications, active infections, chronic steroid use, significant kidney dysfunction, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by the presence of a preoperative biliary stent. Participants, investigators, and statisticians analyzing trial data were unblinded to treatment assignment.
INTERVENTION
The intervention group received piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 or 4 g intravenously) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while the control group received cefoxitin (2 g intravenously; standard care).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was development of postoperative SSI within 30 days. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and sepsis. All data were collected as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
RESULTS
The trial was terminated at an interim analysis on the basis of a predefined stopping rule. Of 778 participants (378 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [median age, 66.8 y; 233 {61.6%} men] and 400 in the cefoxitin group [median age, 68.0 y; 223 {55.8%} men]), the percentage with SSI at 30 days was lower in the perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam vs cefoxitin group (19.8% vs 32.8%; absolute difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -19.1% to -6.9%]; P < .001). Participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, vs cefoxitin, had lower rates of postoperative sepsis (4.2% vs 7.5%; difference, -3.3% [95% CI, -6.6% to 0.0%]; P = .02) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.7% vs 19.0%; difference, -6.3% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.2%]; P = .03). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.3% (5/378) among participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and 2.5% (10/400) among those receiving cefoxitin (difference, -1.2% [95% CI, -3.1% to 0.7%]; P = .32).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In participants undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy, use of piperacillin-tazobactam as perioperative prophylaxis reduced postoperative SSI, pancreatic fistula, and multiple downstream sequelae of SSI. The findings support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam as standard care for open pancreatoduodenectomy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269994.
Topics: Male; Adult; Humans; Aged; Cefoxitin; Piperacillin; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Penicillanic Acid; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Surgical Wound Infection; Sepsis
PubMed: 37078771
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.5728 -
JAMA Oct 2022Cefepime/enmetazobactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and a potential empirical therapy for resistant gram-negative infections. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
IMPORTANCE
Cefepime/enmetazobactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and a potential empirical therapy for resistant gram-negative infections.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether cefepime/enmetazobactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam for the primary outcome of treatment efficacy in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) or acute pyelonephritis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial conducted at 90 sites in Europe, North and Central America, South America, and South Africa. Recruitment occurred between September 24, 2018, and November 2, 2019. Final follow-up occurred November 26, 2019. Participants were adult patients aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative urinary pathogens.
INTERVENTIONS
Eligible patients were randomized to receive either cefepime, 2 g/enmetazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 520), or piperacillin, 4 g/tazobactam, 0.5 g (n = 521), by 2-hour infusion every 8 hours for 7 days (up to 14 days in patients with a positive blood culture at baseline).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in the primary analysis set (patients who received any amount of study drug with a baseline gram-negative pathogen not resistant to either treatment and ≥105 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL in urine culture or the same pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures) who achieved overall treatment success (defined as clinical cure combined with microbiological eradication [<103 CFU/mL in urine] of infection). Two-sided 95% CIs were computed using the stratified Newcombe method. The prespecified noninferiority margin was -10%. If noninferiority was established, a superiority comparison was also prespecified.
RESULTS
Among 1041 patients randomized (mean age, 54.7 years; 573 women [55.0%]), 1034 (99.3%) received study drug and 995 (95.6%) completed the trial. Among the primary analysis set, the primary outcome occurred in 79.1% (273/345) of patients receiving cefepime/enmetazobactam compared with 58.9% (196/333) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (between-group difference, 21.2% [95% CI, 14.3% to 27.9%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.0% (258/516) of patients treated with cefepime/enmetazobactam and 44.0% (228/518) with piperacillin/tazobactam; most were mild to moderate in severity (89.9% vs 88.6%, respectively). A total of 1.7% (9/516) of participants who received cefepime/enmetazobactam and 0.8% (4/518) of those who received piperacillin/tazobactam did not complete the assigned therapy due to adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among patients with complicated UTI or acute pyelonephritis caused by gram-negative pathogens, cefepime/enmetazobactam, compared with piperacillin/tazobactam, met criteria for noninferiority as well as superiority with respect to the primary outcome of clinical cure and microbiological eradication. Further research is needed to determine the potential role for cefepime/enmetazobactam in the treatment of complicated UTI and pyelonephritis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03687255.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pyelonephritis; Urinary Tract Infections; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors
PubMed: 36194218
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.17034 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Dec 2021Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study).
BACKGROUND
Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).
METHODS
This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.
RESULTS
Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT02493764.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Cilastatin; Hospitals; Humans; Imipenem; Piperacillin; Tazobactam; Ventilators, Mechanical
PubMed: 32785589
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa803 -
Chest Aug 2023Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in...
BACKGROUND
Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in the ICU.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Does a difference exist in the association between commonly prescribed empiric antibiotics on ICU admission (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, and vancomycin and meropenem) and acute kidney injury?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the eICU Research Institute, which contains records for ICU stays between 2010 and 2015 across 335 hospitals. Patients were enrolled if they received vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, or vancomycin and meropenem exclusively. Patients initially admitted to the ED were included. Patients with hospital stay duration of < 1 h, receiving dialysis, or with missing data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 based on serum creatinine component. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the control (vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime) and treatment (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) groups, and ORs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the effect of longer courses of combination therapy and patients with renal insufficiency on admission.
RESULTS
Thirty-five thousand six hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, n = 27,459; vancomycin and cefepime, n = 6,371; vancomycin and meropenem, n = 1,824). Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury and initiation of dialysis when compared with that of both vancomycin and cefepime (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.49]; dialysis: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]) and vancomycin and meropenem (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.27 [95%, 1.06-1.52]; dialysis: OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.23-2.00]). The odds of acute kidney injury developing was especially pronounced in patients without renal insufficiency receiving a longer duration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy compared with vancomycin and meropenem therapy.
INTERPRETATION
VPT is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than both vancomycin and cefepime and vancomycin and meropenem in patients in the ICU, especially for patients with normal initial kidney function requiring longer durations of therapy. Clinicians should consider vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity for patients in the ICU.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Vancomycin; Retrospective Studies; Meropenem; Critical Illness; Piperacillin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Acute Kidney Injury
PubMed: 37040818
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.046 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Dec 2021This study aims to assess the association of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and beta-lactam resistance genes with mortality... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Association Between Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, Beta-lactamase Genes and Mortality for Patients Treated With Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem From the MERINO Study.
INTRODUCTION
This study aims to assess the association of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and beta-lactam resistance genes with mortality in the MERINO trial.
METHODS
Blood culture isolates from enrolled patients were tested by broth microdilution and whole genome sequencing at a central laboratory. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to account for confounders. Absolute risk increase for 30-day mortality between treatment groups was calculated for the primary analysis (PA) and the microbiologic assessable (MA) populations.
RESULTS
In total, 320 isolates from 379 enrolled patients were available with susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam 94% and meropenem 100%. The piperacillin/tazobactam nonsusceptible breakpoint (MIC >16 mg/L) best predicted 30-day mortality after accounting for confounders (odds ratio 14.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-87.2). The absolute risk increase for 30-day mortality for patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam compared with meropenem was 9% (95% CI 3%-15%) and 8% (95% CI 2%-15%) for the original PA population and the post hoc MA populations, which reduced to 5% (95% CI -1% to 10%) after excluding strains with piperacillin/tazobactam MIC values >16 mg/L. Isolates coharboring extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and OXA-1 genes were associated with elevated piperacillin/tazobactam MICs and the highest risk increase in 30-day mortality of 14% (95% CI 2%-28%).
CONCLUSIONS
After excluding nonsusceptible strains, the 30-day mortality difference from the MERINO trial was less pronounced for piperacillin/tazobactam. Poor reliability in susceptibility testing performance for piperacillin/tazobactam and the high prevalence of OXA coharboring ESBLs suggests that meropenem remains the preferred choice for definitive treatment of ceftriaxone nonsusceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mortality; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Reproducibility of Results; beta-Lactamases
PubMed: 33106863
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1479 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Jul 2023The optimal treatment regimen for infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of...
Effectiveness of third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin compared with cefepime or carbapenems for severe infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: A multi-centre retrospective propensity-weighted study.
BACKGROUND
The optimal treatment regimen for infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of bloodstream infections (BSI) and pneumonia according to the type of definitive antibiotic therapy: third-generation cephalosporin (3GC), piperacillin ± tazobactam, cefepime or carbapenem.
METHODS
All cases of BSI and pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales over 2 years in eight university hospitals were reviewed. Patients who received definitive therapy consisting of either a 3GC (3GC group), piperacillin ± tazobactam (piperacillin group), or cefepime or a carbapenem (reference group) were included in this study. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was treatment failure due to infection by emerging AmpC-overproducing strains. Propensity-score-based models were used to balance confounding factors between groups.
RESULTS
In total, 575 patients were included in this study: 302 (52%) with pneumonia and 273 (48%) with BSI. Half (n=271, 47%) received cefepime or a carbapenem as definitive therapy, 120 (21%) received a 3GC, and 184 (32%) received piperacillin ± tazobactam. Compared with the reference group, 30-day mortality was similar in the 3GC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.31)] and piperacillin (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.86-1.66) groups. The likelihood of treatment failure was higher in the 3GC (aHR 6.81, 95% CI 3.76-12.4) and piperacillin (aHR 3.13, 95% CI 1.69-5.80) groups. The results were similar when stratifying the analysis on pneumonia or BSI.
CONCLUSION
Treatment of included BSI or pneumonia caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with 3GC or piperacillin ± tazobactam was not associated with higher mortality, but was associated with increased risk of AmpC overproduction leading to treatment failure compared with cefepime or a carbapenem.
Topics: Humans; Cefepime; Piperacillin; Carbapenems; Retrospective Studies; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamases; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Cephalosporins
PubMed: 37028731
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106809 -
Intensive Care Medicine Mar 2022Insufficient antimicrobial exposure is associated with worse outcomes in sepsis. We evaluated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided antibiotic therapy... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.
PURPOSE
Insufficient antimicrobial exposure is associated with worse outcomes in sepsis. We evaluated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided antibiotic therapy improves outcomes.
METHODS
Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial from January 2017 to December 2019. Adult patients (n = 254) with sepsis or septic shock were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam with dosing guided by daily TDM of piperacillin or continuous infusion with a fixed dose (13.5 g/24 h if eGFR ≥ 20 mL/min). Target plasma concentration was four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (range ± 20%) of the underlying pathogen, respectively, of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in empiric situation. Primary outcome was the mean of daily total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score up to day 10.
RESULTS
Among 249 evaluable patients (66.3 ± 13.7 years; female, 30.9%), there was no significant difference in mean SOFA score between patients with TDM (7.9 points; 95% CI 7.1-8.7) and without TDM (8.2 points; 95% CI 7.5-9.0) (p = 0.39). Patients with TDM-guided therapy showed a lower 28-day mortality (21.6% vs. 25.8%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.44) and a higher rate of clinical (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.5-6.2, p = 0.30) and microbiological cure (OR 2.4; 95% CI 0.7-7.4, p = 0.12), but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Attainment of target concentration was more common in patients with TDM (37.3% vs. 14.6%, OR 4.5, CI 95%, 2.9-6.9, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
TDM-guided therapy showed no beneficial effect in patients with sepsis and continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam with regard to the mean SOFA score. Larger studies with strategies to ensure optimization of antimicrobial exposure are needed to definitively answer the question.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Multiple Organ Failure; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Sepsis
PubMed: 35106617
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06609-6 -
Microbiology Spectrum Aug 2022Although piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) was shown to be less effective than carbapenems in treating bacteremia due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of the Treatment Outcome of Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Carbapenems for Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Areas with Low Frequency of Coproduction of OXA-1: a Preliminary Analysis.
Although piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) was shown to be less effective than carbapenems in treating bacteremia due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL)-producing organisms in a randomized controlled trial, the fact that many of the causative organisms co-produced inhibitor-resistant OXA-1 along with ESBLs may have influenced the results. In this study, we compared the therapeutic effectiveness of TZP and carbapenem in treating ESBL-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia in areas with low frequency of OXA-1 co-production. Forty patients, 14 in the TZP treatment group and 26 in the carbapenem treatment group, were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient background between the two groups. Urinary tract infection or cholangitis was the source of bacteremia in 26 patients (65%), and the Pitt bacteremia score was zero or one in 35 patients (87.5%). Only four (11.4%) of the 35 causative isolates available for microbiological analysis harbored , and only three (8.6%) were non-susceptible to TZP. Seventeen (48.6%) isolates carried , none of which carried other β-lactamase genes. No significant difference in the frequency of treatment failure on day 14 of bacteremia was documented between the TZP and carbapenem treatment groups in both the crude analysis and the inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis. This study demonstrates that TZP may be a treatment option for non-severe cases of ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia in areas with low frequency of OXA-1 co-production. Although carbapenems are considered the drug of choice for severe infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL)-producing organisms, other therapeutic options are being explored to avoid increasing the selective pressure for carbapenem-resistant organisms. In this study, it was suggested that piperacillin-tazobactam may be as effective as carbapenems for the treatment of mild bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in areas where OXA-1 co-production by ESBL-producing E. coli is rare. The genetic background of each regional epidemic clone differs even among multidrug-resistant bacteria classified under the same name (e.g., ESBL-producing organisms), resulting in possible differences in the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Exploration of treatment options for multidrug-resistant organisms according to local epidemiology is worthwhile from the perspective of antimicrobial stewardship.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Carbapenems; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Humans; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Treatment Outcome; beta-Lactamases
PubMed: 35916524
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02206-22 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Nov 2019In a multicenter, observational, propensity-score-weighted cohort of 249 adults with uncomplicated Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, patients receiving short-course... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
In a multicenter, observational, propensity-score-weighted cohort of 249 adults with uncomplicated Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, patients receiving short-course (median, 9 days; interquartile range [IQR], 8-10) therapy had a similar odds of recurrent infection or death within 30 days as those receiving longer courses (median, 16 days; IQR, 14-17).
Topics: Aged; Bacteremia; Cefepime; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PubMed: 30882137
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz223