-
Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal =... Jul 2022The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) promised to eradicate polio by 2000, yet the disease remains endemic in 2 countries. The current threat of resurgence in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) promised to eradicate polio by 2000, yet the disease remains endemic in 2 countries. The current threat of resurgence in countries with low vaccine coverage and circulating vaccinederived poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks due to oral polio vaccine warrants a strategy review.
AIMS
To review the performance of the GPEI from a context based in Pakistan, identifying threats to success and suggesting strategy modifications to help achieve eradication.
METHODS
This was a desk review of the effectiveness of GPEI that was launched in 1988 to eradicate polio by 2000. Subsequent failure to eradicate led to multiple iterations in strategy and planning documents. These documents were reviewed alongside relevant literature to explore the reasons for failure and emergence of cVDPV.
RESULTS
GPEI has been effective in reducing the global polio disease burden by > 99%, but it remains endemic in Pakistan and Afghanistan. cVDPV has caused multiple outbreaks since 2000, and caused 7 times more cases than wild poliovirus (WPV) globally in 2020. The Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013-2018 aimed to eradicate WPV and cVDPV simultaneously. In 2019, Pakistan saw an upsurge in WPV amid an outbreak of cVDPV infection that continued throughout 2020. Wild polio eradication was not realized and the country was unable to transition to inactivated polio vaccine as predicted in the strategic plan.
CONCLUSION
Over 20 countries now report cVDPV outbreaks and many others are at risk. A country-specific modified strategy is required to eradicate WPV and cVDPV simultaneously, more so in endemic countries.
Topics: Disease Eradication; Disease Outbreaks; Global Health; Humans; Immunization Programs; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral
PubMed: 35959667
DOI: 10.26719/emhj.22.045 -
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly... Apr 2020Circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs) can emerge in areas with low poliovirus immunity and cause outbreaks* of paralytic polio (1-5). Among the three types...
Circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs) can emerge in areas with low poliovirus immunity and cause outbreaks* of paralytic polio (1-5). Among the three types of wild poliovirus, type 2 was declared eradicated in 2015 (1,2). The use of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV; types 1, 2, and 3 Sabin strains) ceased in April 2016 via a 1-month-long, global synchronized switch to bivalent OPV (bOPV; types 1 and 3 Sabin strains) in immunization activities (1-4). Monovalent type 2 OPV (mOPV2; type 2 Sabin strain) is available for cVDPV type 2 (cVDPV2) outbreak response immunization (1-5). The number and geographic breadth of post-switch cVDPV2 outbreaks have exceeded forecasts that trended toward zero outbreaks 4 years after the switch and assumed rapid and effective control of any that occurred (4). New cVDPV2 outbreaks have been seeded by mOPV2 use, by both suboptimal mOPV2 coverage within response zones and recently mOPV2-vaccinated children or contacts traveling outside of response zones, where children born after the global switch are fully susceptible to poliovirus type 2 transmission (2-4). In addition, new emergences can develop by inadvertent exposure to Sabin OPV2-containing vaccine (i.e., residual response mOPV2 or tOPV) (4). This report updates the January 2018-June 2019 report with information on global cVDPV outbreaks during July 2019-February 2020 (as of March 25, 2020) (2). Among 33 cVDPV outbreaks reported during July 2019-February 2020, 31 (94%) were cVDPV2; 18 (58%) of these followed new emergences. In mid-2020, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) plans to introduce a genetically stabilized, novel OPV type 2 (nOPV2) that has a lower risk for generating VDPV2 than does Sabin mOPV2; if nOPV2 is successful in limiting new VDPV2 emergences, GPEI foresees the replacement of Sabin mOPV2 with nOPV2 for cVDPV2 outbreak responses during 2021 (2,4,6).
Topics: Disease Outbreaks; Global Health; Humans; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Serotyping
PubMed: 32324719
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6916a1 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2021vaccine utilization monitoring provides valuable information for practical forecasting and formulation of strategies to reduce avoidable wastage. This monitoring is weak...
INTRODUCTION
vaccine utilization monitoring provides valuable information for practical forecasting and formulation of strategies to reduce avoidable wastage. This monitoring is weak at county and health facility levels in South Sudan. Lack of national wastage rates could result in inaccurate forecasting, leading to vaccine shortages or overstocking and expiration of vaccines at the subnational and service delivery points. As the country gears to introduce relatively expensive vaccines such as rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines, a robust vaccine utilization monitoring system must be rolled out. This study provides the best possible estimates of vaccine wastage rates and the possible causes of the wastage.
METHODS
we conducted the study in 45 conveniently sampled health facilities across 9 of the ten states in South Sudan. Vaccine consumption data was prospectively collected to estimate vaccine wastage and the reason for the wastage of each vaccine type.
RESULTS
wastage of lyophilized vaccines, measles, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) ranged between 39.0-66.7% and 52.1-74.3%, respectively, mainly due to doses that were discarded 6 hours after the opening of the vial or at the end of the immunization session. Wastage of liquid vaccines Oral poliovirus vaccines (OPV), Penta, Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), and Tetanus- diphtheria (Td) ranged between 24.4-49%, 15.5-43.4%, 25.3-57.9%, and 3.8-57.2%, respectively, mainly due to unusable VVM, expiry, unused doses at the end of outreach sessions, and vials without labels.
CONCLUSION
wasted rates for all vaccines were higher than the indicative WHO wastage rates used in South Sudan to forecast national vaccine needs. Unopened vial wastage was high and needs immediate attention.
Topics: Humans; Immunization; Immunization Programs; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; South Sudan; Vaccination
PubMed: 34887988
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.114.28373 -
International Journal of Infectious... Dec 2023During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decline in vaccine coverage, and the implementation of combined vaccines and co-administration strategies emerged as potential... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of the sabin-strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine, the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccine to healthy infants aged 18 months in China.
OBJECTIVES
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decline in vaccine coverage, and the implementation of combined vaccines and co-administration strategies emerged as potential solutions to alleviate this predicament. Our objective is to delve into the concurrent administration of the sabin-strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (sIPV), the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), and measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR), with the intention of bridging the evidentiary gap pertaining to vaccine co-administration in Chinese infants, and to ensure a safe and effective vaccination strategy, ultimately leading to an augmentation in immunization coverage.
METHODS
This study was a follow-up trial of the "Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of the sIPV with the DTaP vaccine in children: a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled trial." Blood samples were collected on day 0 and day 30, and serum antibody levels were detected to measure antibody responses to each of the antigens. Local and systemic adverse events were monitored and compared among groups. This study is the first to fill the knowledge gap in China regarding the safe and effective combined vaccination of sIPV, DTaP, and MMR vaccines.
RESULTS
The geometric mean titer of the poliovirus types I, II, and III neutralizing antibodies were 1060.22 (95% CI: 865.73-1298.39), 1537.06 (95% CI: 1324.27-1784.05), and 1539.10 (95% CI: 1296.37-1827.29) in group I on day 30; geometric mean titer of antibodies against DTaP and MMR in the simultaneous vaccination group was non-inferior to those in the DTaP alone and MMR alone group. Reporting rates of local and systemic adverse reactions were similar between groups and no serious adverse events were reported throughout the clinical study period.
CONCLUSION
Co-administration of the sIPV, DTaP, and MMR was safe and did not impact immunogenicity, which would help to mitigate administrative costs and enhance vaccine coverage rates.
Topics: Child; Humans; Infant; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines; Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Pandemics; Vaccines, Combined; Poliovirus; Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine; Haemophilus Vaccines; Antibodies, Bacterial; Immunization Schedule
PubMed: 37832931
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.10.006 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Feb 2021In 2000, China was declared polio-free. However, in 2018, wild poliovirus (WPV) was still endemic in two of its neighboring countries, making WPV importation and...
In 2000, China was declared polio-free. However, in 2018, wild poliovirus (WPV) was still endemic in two of its neighboring countries, making WPV importation and outbreak alarming possibilities. This study documents the seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies before and after the polio vaccine switch in 2012 and 2017 in Beijing. Cross-sectional population-based serologic surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2017 in Beijing. The study subjects were selected from 10 different age groups (<1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, and ≥40 y) using a multi-stage-stratified sampling method. Neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus serotypes 1 (P1), 2 (P2), and 3 (P3) were assayed by World Health Organization standards. The seropositive rates (SR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) of the neutralizing antibodies were 91.71% and 1:130.26, respectively, for P1, 94.09% and 1:113.39, respectively, for P2, and 88.78% and 1:79.65, respectively, for P3 before the switch in 2012, and 87.78% and 1:108.93, respectively, for P1, and 81.67% and 1:70.56, respectively, for P3 after the switch in 2017, with a statistically significant difference for P1 and P3 between 2012 and 2017. The neutralizing antibodies for all poliovirus serotypes differed among different age and vaccination groups in both 2012 and 2017. After switching polio vaccines twice in 2014 and 2016, the P1 and P3 polio antibody levels were lower in 2017 than in 2012. The P2 antibody levels were determined from the first dose of IPV. The seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies after adjustment of the immunization schedule of the polio vaccine on January 1, 2020, must be further monitored.
Topics: Antibodies, Viral; Beijing; China; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Infant; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Poliovirus Vaccines; Seroepidemiologic Studies; Vaccination
PubMed: 32703060
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1778409 -
Expert Review of Vaccines 2023Achieving polio eradication requires ensuring the delivery of sufficient supplies of the right vaccines to the right places at the right times. Despite large global... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Achieving polio eradication requires ensuring the delivery of sufficient supplies of the right vaccines to the right places at the right times. Despite large global markets, decades of use, and large quantity purchases of polio vaccines by national immunization programs and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), forecasting demand for the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) stockpile remains challenging.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We review OPV stockpile experience compared to pre-2016 expectations, actual demand, and changes in GPEI policies related to the procurement and use of type 2 OPV vaccines. We use available population and immunization schedule data to explore polio vaccine market segmentation, and its role in polio vaccine demand forecasting.
RESULTS
We find that substantial challenges remain in forecasting polio vaccine needs, mainly due to (1) deviations in implementation of plans that formed the basis for earlier forecasts, (2) lack of alignment of tactics/objectives among GPEI partners and other key stakeholders, (3) financing, and (4) uncertainty about development and licensure timelines for new polio vaccines and their field performance characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS
Mismatches between supply and demand over time have led to negative consequences associated with both oversupply and undersupply, as well as excess costs and potentially preventable cases.
Topics: Humans; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Disease Eradication; Poliovirus Vaccines; Poliomyelitis; Vaccination; Immunization Programs; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Global Health
PubMed: 37747090
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2263096 -
Emerging Infectious Diseases Aug 2023Guatemala implemented wastewater-based poliovirus surveillance in 2018, and three genetically unrelated vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) were detected in 2019. The... (Review)
Review
Guatemala implemented wastewater-based poliovirus surveillance in 2018, and three genetically unrelated vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) were detected in 2019. The Ministry of Health (MoH) response included event investigation through institutional and community retrospective case searches for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) during 2018-2020 and a bivalent oral polio/measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination campaign in September 2019. This response was reviewed by an international expert team in July 2021. During the campaign, 93% of children 6 months <7 years of age received a polio-containing vaccine dose. No AFP cases were detected in the community search; institutional retrospective searches found 37% of unreported AFP cases in 2018‒2020. No additional VDPV was isolated from wastewater. No evidence of circulating VDPV was found; the 3 isolated VDPVs were classified as ambiguous VDPVs by the international team of experts. These detections highlight risk for poliomyelitis reemergence in countries with low polio vaccine coverage.
Topics: Child; Humans; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Wastewater; Guatemala; Retrospective Studies; Poliomyelitis; Environmental Monitoring
PubMed: 37486156
DOI: 10.3201/eid2908.230236 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Mar 2022The DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine is the most recently approved combination hexavalent vaccine. In Europe, it is licensed since 2016 for primary and booster vaccination in... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine is the most recently approved combination hexavalent vaccine. In Europe, it is licensed since 2016 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers above the age of 6 weeks to provide active immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, invasive diseases caused by type b and hepatitis B. In the US, DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB is approved since 2018 in children 6 weeks through 4 years of age. Its safety profile has been extensively documented in infants and children born at term, and also data in preterm infants are made available.
AREAS COVERED
In this article, we conducted a safety evaluation of the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine in infants and toddlers considering evidence from clinical trials and post-marketing use, also with regard to data on special populations e.g. preterm infants.
EXPERT OPINION
Based on the available data, the DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB vaccine has demonstrated a good safety profile, similar to that of other approved penta- and hexavalent vaccines. Rather, post-marketing data are limited and are frequently reported in combination with other hexavalent vaccines or are not adjusted for shares of vaccines use. Neither relevant interferences with other co-administered pediatric vaccines nor safety issues in premature infants have been shown.
Topics: Antibodies, Bacterial; Child, Preschool; Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine; Haemophilus Vaccines; Haemophilus influenzae type b; Hepatitis B Vaccines; Humans; Infant; Infant, Premature; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated
PubMed: 34787536
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2007882 -
The Journal of Infectious Diseases Mar 2020
Topics: Humans; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral
PubMed: 31242297
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz300 -
Revista Chilena de Infectologia :... Dec 2020Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has been instrumental in controlling the polio epidemic, and stands out for its safety, efficacy, ease of oral administration, and low... (Review)
Review
Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has been instrumental in controlling the polio epidemic, and stands out for its safety, efficacy, ease of oral administration, and low cost. However, despite these advantages, as it is a live attenuated virus vaccine, there is the possibility of mutations that confer neurovirulence. Therefore, surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) is important, whether associated with live vaccines (VAPP) or vaccine-derived viruses (VDPV). In this review we present important data from Latin America in recent years, where data on VDPV of community transmission, of ambiguous origin and associated with immunodeficiencies are reviewed. Due to the presence of VDPV, it is important to strengthen the epidemiological surveillance system for AFP, with data much lower than those recommended in recent years in the Americas. Additionally, it is essential to improve vaccination coverage to reduce the number of infants at risk of acquiring poliomyelitis. Consequently, we present the vaccination coverage rates with the inactivated vaccine against poliovirus (IPV) in the region and analyze the vaccination programs against poliomyelitis in accordance with the recommendations of the Latin American Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SLIPE; minimum 3 doses of IPV) and the WHO Strategic Advisory Expert Group (SAGE) on Immunization (minimum 2 doses of IPV). The study concludes with recommendations from the authors for the change from OPV to exclusive use of IPV, to increase vaccination coverage and to strengthen surveillance for AFP in the region.
Topics: Child; Humans; Immunization Schedule; Infant; Latin America; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Vaccination
PubMed: 33844811
DOI: 10.4067/S0716-10182020000600701