-
Clinical Endoscopy Jul 2021Photodynamic therapy, a curative local treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, involves a photosensitizing drug (photosensitizer) with affinity for tumors and... (Review)
Review
Photodynamic therapy, a curative local treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, involves a photosensitizing drug (photosensitizer) with affinity for tumors and a photodynamic reaction triggered by laser light. Previously, photodynamic therapy was used to treat superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma judged to be difficult to undergo endoscopic resection. Recently, photodynamic therapy has mainly been performed for local failure after chemoradiotherapy. Although surgery is the most promising treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy, its morbidity and mortality rates are high. Endoscopic resection is feasible for local failure after chemoradiotherapy but requires advanced skills, and its indication is limited to within the submucosal layer by depth. Photodynamic therapy is less invasive than surgery and has a wider indication than endoscopic resection. Porfimer sodium (a first-generation photosensitizer) causes a high frequency of side effects related to photosensitivity and requires the long-term sun-shade period. Talaporfin (a second-generation photosensitizer) requires a much shorter sun-shade period than porfimer sodium. Photodynamic therapy will profoundly change treatment strategies for local failure after chemoradiotherapy.
PubMed: 32422695
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.073 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022The poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer leads to the constant search for new ways of treatment of this disease. One of the methods used in high-grade... (Review)
Review
The poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer leads to the constant search for new ways of treatment of this disease. One of the methods used in high-grade dysplasia, superficial invasive carcinoma, and sometimes palliative care is photodynamic therapy (PDT). This method has come a long way from the first experimental studies to registration in the treatment of esophageal cancer and is constantly being improved and refined. This review describes esophageal cancer, current treatment methods, the introduction to PDT, the photosensitizers (PSs) used in esophageal carcinoma PDT, PDT in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus, and PDT in invasive adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. For this review, research and review articles from PubMed and Web of Science databases were used. The keywords used were "photodynamic therapy in esophageal cancer" in the years 2000-2020. The total number of papers returned was 1,000. After the review was divided into topic blocks and the searched publications were analyzed, 117 articles were selected.
PubMed: 36465381
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024576 -
Journal of Biomedical Optics Nov 2019The goal of our study was to determine the susceptibility of different pancreatic cell lines to clinically applicable photodynamic therapy (PDT). The efficacy of PDT of...
The goal of our study was to determine the susceptibility of different pancreatic cell lines to clinically applicable photodynamic therapy (PDT). The efficacy of PDT of two different commercially available photosensitizers, verteporfin and sodium porfimer, was compared using a panel of four different pancreatic cancer cell lines, PANC-1, BxPC-3, CAPAN-2, and MIA PaCa-2, and an immortalized non-neoplastic pancreatic ductal epithelium cell line, HPNE. The minimum effective concentrations and dose-dependent curves of verteporfin and sodium porfimer on PANC-1 were determined. Since pancreatic cancer is known to have significant stromal components, the effect of PDT on stromal cells was also assessed. To mimic tumor-stroma interaction, a co-culture of primary human fibroblasts or human pancreatic stellate cell (HPSCs) line with PANC-1 was used to test verteporfin-PDT-mediated cell death of PANC-1. Two cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β) were used for stimulation of primary fibroblasts (derived from human esophageal biopsies) or HPSCs. The increased expression of smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) confirmed the activation of fibroblasts or HPSC upon treatment with TNF-α and IL-1β. Cell death assays showed that both sodium porfimer- and verteporfin-mediated PDT-induced cell death in a dose-dependent manner. However, verteporfin-PDT treatment had a greater efficiency with 60 × lower concentration than sodium porfimer-PDT in the PANC-1 incubated with stimulated fibroblasts or HPSC. Moreover, activation of stromal cells did not affect the treatment of the pancreatic cancer cell lines, suggesting that the effects of PDT are independent of the inflammatory microenvironment found in this two-dimensional culture model of cancers.
Topics: Biopsy; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; Coculture Techniques; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Fibroblasts; Humans; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Photochemotherapy; Stromal Cells; Tumor Microenvironment; Verteporfin
PubMed: 31741351
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.11.118001 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Mar 2020Photodynamic therapy is a less invasive therapeutic procedure for carcinomas. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of Photofrin (porfimer sodium)-mediated...
BACKGROUND
Photodynamic therapy is a less invasive therapeutic procedure for carcinomas. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of Photofrin (porfimer sodium)-mediated photodynamic therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS
Forty-two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy were treated by intraoperative light activation at 630 nm via a fiber optic microlens, 48 h after injection. We evaluated the impact of age, sex, tumor stage, primary site, light dose, and cancer history on overall survival using a Cox proportional hazards model. Information on the survival status of patients was obtained after a mean follow-up period of 51 months (range, 6-180 months).
RESULTS
The 5-year overall survival for all patients was 57.8 % (95 % confidence interval of the survival rate: 39.8 %-72.1 %). The complete response rate was 69.0 %, and the efficacy (complete response + partial response) was 97.6 %. Earlier tumor stage was associated with increased survival (p = 0.012). Diseases of the respiratory tract also showed significant association with survival as compared to those of the alimentary tract (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy is useful for treating head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, and provides an improved quality of life in patients with recurrent or residual disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Photochemotherapy; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Survival Rate
PubMed: 31866532
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.101627 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Jul 2021Lung cancer is the greatest cause of cancer mortality in the United States, necessitating ongoing improvements in current treatment techniques. Photodynamic therapy... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Lung cancer is the greatest cause of cancer mortality in the United States, necessitating ongoing improvements in current treatment techniques. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the interaction between a photosensitizer, light, and oxygen. The resulting release of reactive oxygen species causes tumor necrosis. It has been used as an endoscopic technique for the palliation of lung cancer. Porfimer sodium (Photofrin) is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved photosensitizer for PDT but has limited depth of penetration and produces prolonged skin phototoxicity. Multiple newer photosensitizers are in development, including PS785. The effectiveness of PS785 was compared with porfimer sodium in the treatment of human lung cancer xenografts in mice.
METHODS
Human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenografts were established in severe combined immunodeficient mice and grouped into small (3-5 mm) and large tumors (6-10 mm). PS785 or porfimer sodium was administered intravenously, and PDT was executed at 24, 48, or 72 h after injection. The primary endpoint was the delay of tumor regrowth after PDT.
RESULTS
Porfimer sodium and PS785 produced statistically similar delays of tumor regrowth after PDT when small tumors were treated at 24 and 48 h. At 72 h, PS785 performed better in small tumors. However, for large tumors, PS785 produced no delay in tumor regrowth at any time point.
CONCLUSIONS
PS785 and porfimer sodium were able to effectively treat NSCLC to a depth of ≤5 mm. However, porfimer sodium was more effective in treating NSCLC tumors to a depth of 6-10 mm. Further efforts are required to produce photosensitizers that will facilitate PDT of larger tumors.
Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Pneumonectomy; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
PubMed: 33713956
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.067 -
Recent Studies in Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Treatment: From Basic Research to Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutics Aug 2023Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging and less invasive treatment modality for various types of cancer. This review provides an overview of recent trends in PDT... (Review)
Review
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging and less invasive treatment modality for various types of cancer. This review provides an overview of recent trends in PDT research, ranging from basic research to ongoing clinical trials, focusing on different cancer types. Lung cancer, head and neck cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer are discussed in this context. In lung cancer, porfimer sodium, chlorin e6, and verteporfin have shown promising results in preclinical studies and clinical trials. For head and neck cancer, PDT has demonstrated effectiveness as an adjuvant treatment after surgery. PDT with temoporfin, redaporfin, photochlor, and IR700 shows potential in early stage larynx cancer and recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Non-melanoma skin cancer has been effectively treated with PDT using methyl aminolevulinate and 5-aminolevulinic acid. In prostate cancer and breast cancer, PDT research is focused on developing targeted photosensitizers to improve tumor-specific uptake and treatment response. In conclusion, PDT continues to evolve as a promising cancer treatment strategy, with ongoing research spanning from fundamental investigations to clinical trials, exploring various photosensitizers and treatment combinations. This review sheds light on the recent advancements in PDT for cancer therapy and highlights its potential for personalized and targeted treatments.
PubMed: 37765226
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092257 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Mar 2022To assess the influence of different photosensitizers activated by PDT as a disinfectant in comparison to conventional sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the EBS (extrusion...
AIM
To assess the influence of different photosensitizers activated by PDT as a disinfectant in comparison to conventional sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the EBS (extrusion bond strength) of FRCP with radicular dentin.
METHODS
A total of fifty single-rooted human maxillary central incisors with fully developed apices were selected. Endodontic treatment of samples was performed using 10 K file to obtain patency than sequentially with a 25 K file followed by rotary pro tapers till F2 with constant irrigation. The canal was dried and obturated with corresponding gutta-percha and sealer. A Peso reamer was employed to prepare post space. Based on canal disinfection regimes, samples were divided into five groups. Group 1 Riboflavin (RF)+17%EDTA, group 2 Rose bengal (RB) +17%EDTA, group 3 Curcumin CP +17%EDTA, group 4 Porfimer sodium, Photofrin (PS) +17%EDTA and group 5 2.25% NaOCl +17% EDTA (control). Following disinfection, the canal space of all specimens was dried followed by FRCP cementation. Specimens were placed on a Universal testing machine (UTM) for EBS. The type of bond failure was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used to compare means.
RESULTS
The highest EBS was shown by group 1 canal disinfected with riboflavin (RF) and 17% EDTA at all three levels. The lowest EBS was displayed in group 5 canal cleaned with 2.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Intragroup assessment disclosed a decrease in EBS from cervical one-third to apical one-third in all experimental groups. Intergroup comparison revealed group 4 using PS and 17% EDTA and group 5 canal disinfected with 2.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA at all three levels of root structure coronal, middle, and apical exhibited comparable EBS (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Root canal dentin treated with different PS (RF, RB, CP) has the potential to be used as canal disinfection as it demonstrates better EBS than the conventional disinfecting regime (2.25% NaOCl +17% EDTA). PS and 17% EDTA as a canal disinfectant need further investigation.
Topics: Curcumin; Dental Pulp Cavity; Dentin; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Disinfection; Edetic Acid; Humans; Materials Testing; Photochemotherapy; Riboflavin; Root Canal Irrigants; Root Canal Preparation; Rose Bengal; Sodium Hypochlorite
PubMed: 34781034
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102625 -
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2022The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the triad effects of photosensitizer (PS), molecular oxygen and visible light on malignant tumors. Such... (Review)
Review
The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the triad effects of photosensitizer (PS), molecular oxygen and visible light on malignant tumors. Such complex induces a multifactorial manner including reactive-oxygen-species-mediated damage and the killing of cells, vasculature damage of the tumor, and activation of the organism immunity. The effectiveness of PDT depends on the properties of photosensitizing drugs, their selectivity, enhanced photoproduction of reactive particles, absorption in the near infrared spectrum, and drug delivery strategies. Photosensitizers of the tetrapyrrole structure (porphyrins) are widely used in PDT because of their unique diagnostic and therapeutic functions. Nevertheless, the clinical use of the first-generation PS (sodium porfimer and hematoporphyrins) revealed difficulties, such as long-term skin photosensitivity, insufficient penetration into deep-seated tumors and incorrect localization to it. The second generation is based on different approaches of the synthesis and conjugation of porphyrin PS with biomolecules, which made it possible to approach the targeted PDT of tumors. Despite the fact that the development of the second-generation PS started about 30 years ago, these technologies are still in demand and are in intensive development, especially in the direction of improving the process of optimization split linkers responsive to input. Bioconjugation and encapsulation by targeting molecules are among the main strategies for developing of the PS synthesis. A targeted drug delivery system with the effect of increased permeability and retention by tumor cells is one of the ultimate goals of the synthesis of second-generation PS. This review presents porphyrin PS of various generations, discusses factors affecting cellular biodistribution and uptake, and indicates their role as diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostic) agents. New complexes based on porphyrin PS for photoimmunotherapy are presented, where specific antibodies are used that are chemically bound to PS, absorbing light from the near infrared part of the spectrum. Additionally, a two-photon photodynamic approach using third-generation photosensitizers for the treatment of tumors is discussed, which indicates the prospects for the further development of a promising method antitumor PDT.
PubMed: 35200435
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9020082 -
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Dec 2023Gastric cancer is the world's second leading cause of cancer-related fatalities, with the epidemiology changing over the previous several decades. FOXOs are the O...
Gastric cancer is the world's second leading cause of cancer-related fatalities, with the epidemiology changing over the previous several decades. FOXOs are the O subfamily of the forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family, which consists of four members: FOXO1, FOXO3, FOXO4, and FOXO6. FOXO6 mRNA and protein levels are increased in gastric cancer tissues. FOXO6 forced overexpression enhances gastric cancer cell growth, while knockdown decreases proliferation. In our study, the GEPIA, Kaplan-Meier, KEGG, and STRING databases were used to determine FOXO6 mRNA expression, overall survival ratio, interactive pathways, and top 10 associated proteins in gastric cancer respectively. Due to the lack of a solved structure for FOXO6, homology modeling was performed to obtain a 3D structure model, and we used anti-cancer drugs and small molecules to target FOXO6 for identifying a potential selective FOXO6 inhibitor. The chemical composition of the proteins and ligands has a significant impact on docking procedure performance. With this in mind, a critical evaluation of the performance of three regularly used docking routines was carried out: MVD, AutoDock Vina in PyRx, and ArgusLab. The binding affinities, docking scores, and intermolecular interactions were used as assessment criteria. In the study, the porfimer sodium showed excellent binding affinity to the FOXO6 protein. The major three docking software packages were used to analyze the scoring/H-bonding energy and intermolecular interactions. Based on the results, we concluded that FOXO6 was upregulated in gastric cancer and the ligand porfimer sodium emerges as a promising potential FOXO6 inhibitor to curtail gastric cancer progression.
Topics: Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Drug Repositioning; Early Detection of Cancer; Forkhead Transcription Factors; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 37086375
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04490-1