-
Materials Science & Engineering. C,... Mar 2021The aim of this work was to develop a mucoadhesive iontophoretic patch for anesthetic delivery in the buccal epithelium. The patch was comprised of three different...
The aim of this work was to develop a mucoadhesive iontophoretic patch for anesthetic delivery in the buccal epithelium. The patch was comprised of three different layers, namely i) drug release (0.64 cm); ii) mucoadhesive (1.13 cm); and iii) backing (1.13 cm). Prilocaine and lidocaine hydrochlorides were used as model drugs (1:1 ratio, 12.5 mg per unit). An anode electrode (0.5 cm spiral silver wire) was placed in between the drug release and mucoadhesive/backing layers to enable iontophoresis. Surface microscopy; mechanical and in vitro mucoadhesive properties; drug release kinetics and mechanism; and drug permeation through the porcine esophageal epithelium were assessed. Topographic analysis evidenced differences in the physical structures for the several layers. All layers presented suitable handling properties i.e., flexibility, elasticity and resistance. Both the release and mucoadhesive layers presented features of a soft and tough material, while the backing layer matched the characteristics of a hard and brittle material. A synergy between the drug release and mucoadhesive layers on the mucoadhesive force and work of adhesion of the tri-layered patch was observed. Passive drug release of both drugs fitted to First-order, Hixson-Crowell and Weibull kinetic models; and the release mechanism was attributed to anomalous transport. Iontophoresis remarkably enhanced the permeation of both drugs, but mainly prilocaine through the mucosa as evidenced by the permeability coefficient parameter (3.0-fold). The amount of these amino amide salts retained in the mucosa were also equally enhanced (4.7-fold), while the application of a tiny constant electric current (1 mA·cm·h) significantly decreased the lag time for lidocaine permeation by about 45%. In view of possible in vitro / in vivo correlations, the buccal iontophoretic patch displays a promising strategy for needle-free and patient-friendly local anesthesia in dentistry.
Topics: Anesthesia; Animals; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Iontophoresis; Mouth Mucosa; Prilocaine; Swine
PubMed: 33641881
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111778 -
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Aug 2022A common and to some degree painful procedure in veterinary practice is to insert an intra-venous catheter. In both human and veterinary medicine, a topical mixture of...
A common and to some degree painful procedure in veterinary practice is to insert an intra-venous catheter. In both human and veterinary medicine, a topical mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA cream) has shown to reduce the pain, however a period of 60 min between application and initiation of the procedure is recommended. This time lapse is not always suitable for clinical practise and a shorter time before anaesthetic effect is therefore desirable. Lidocaine has a shorter time lapse (1-3 min) when used on mucus membrane; however, the effect of lidocaine for desensitization of skin has shown variable results in humans. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine spray 10% on the response to placement of venous catheters in dogs. Topical lidocaine spray 10% or NaCl 0.9% was administered prior to placing an intravenous catheter in the cephalic vein. A cross-over of treatment with 2 h wash out period was used before placing a catheter in the opposite cephalic vein. The procedure was video recorded and the dogs' responses were later scored by three persons blinded to treatment using a visual analogue scale. The VAS scores were normalised and the mean difference between treatments were compared using Wilcox signed-rank test. This study could not find a statistical difference between the treatments (P = 0.1763) and could conclude that no significant difference in response to intravenous catheterisation was found between application of NaCl 0.9% or lidocaine 10% prior to the procedure.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Catheterization; Dogs; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lidocaine; Pain; Prilocaine; Sodium Chloride
PubMed: 35987686
DOI: 10.1186/s13028-022-00639-w -
The American Journal of Emergency... Apr 2022Lidocaine and prilocaine are local anesthetics, a class of medications which are frequently used in clinical medicine to minimize pain in a variety of procedures. They... (Review)
Review
Lidocaine and prilocaine are local anesthetics, a class of medications which are frequently used in clinical medicine to minimize pain in a variety of procedures. They are commonly found in over-the-counter products such as topical anesthetic creams advertised to relieve localized muscle and joint pain. While safe and well-tolerated when used appropriately, an overdose of these anesthetics increases the risk for local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), which in severe cases can present with seizures, cardiac dysrhythmias, and ultimately cardiovascular collapse. The reduced muscle mass of pediatric patients puts them at an increased risk of LAST due to the depot effect of the systemically absorbed anesthetic. Methemoglobinemia may also be associated with local anesthetic toxicity. Our case involves a previously healthy 15-month-old female who presented to one of our networks' emergency departments in status epilepticus following an accidental ingestion of a tube of 2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine cream. Her seizure activity was initially resistant to intraosseous benzodiazepine administration, but ultimately resolved following administration of lipid emulsion and sodium bicarbonate. Additionally, the patient had refractory hypoxia on the monitor which resolved shortly after administration of methylene blue. After stabilization, the patient was transferred to the Pediatric ICU and ultimately made a complete recovery. LAST is a life-threatening presentation which requires early recognition by clinicians, as well as an understanding of the appropriate treatment modalities. We review the assessment and management of LAST, with special focus on the pediatric patient.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Child; Female; Humans; Infant; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination; Methemoglobinemia; Prilocaine
PubMed: 34742600
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.021 -
Anaesthesia Jun 2021
Topics: Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Cesarean Section; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Prilocaine
PubMed: 33428235
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15341 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Feb 2020To compare pain control during vulvar biopsy after either application of 5% lidocaine-prilocaine cream or injection of 1% lidocaine. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To compare pain control during vulvar biopsy after either application of 5% lidocaine-prilocaine cream or injection of 1% lidocaine.
METHODS
In a single-site randomized trial, patients who needed vulvar biopsy on a non-hair-bearing surface were recruited from a gynecologic oncology clinic to compare lidocaine-prilocaine cream (placed at least 10 minutes before biopsy) with lidocaine injection (at least 1 minute prior). A sample size of 53 participants in each arm (N=106) was planned. Pain was recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale at three time points: baseline, after application of anesthesia, and after biopsy. The primary outcome was highest pain score recorded. Secondary outcomes were pain score at biopsy, patient experience, and tolerability and acceptability. Linear regression was used to compare the primary outcome between arms while controlling for baseline vulvar pain. A convenience analysis was performed in March 2019.
RESULTS
From October 2018 to March 2019, 38 patients completed informed consent and were randomized. Participants were women with median age of 60 years. Most characteristics between groups were similar. Nineteen were analyzed in the lidocaine-prilocaine group, and 18 were analyzed in the lidocaine injection group. The median highest pain score in the lidocaine-prilocaine group was 20.0 mm vs 56.5 mm in the lidocaine injection group. Controlling for baseline pain, the highest pain score in the lidocaine-prilocaine arm was 25.7 mm lower than in the lidocaine injection arm (95% CI [-45.1 to -6.3]; P<.01). Patients randomized to lidocaine-prilocaine had a significantly better experience than those receiving injected lidocaine (median experience score 2.0 mm vs 17.0 mm; P=.02).
CONCLUSION
Lidocaine-prilocaine cream before vulvar biopsy resulted in a lower maximum pain score and a significantly better patient rating of the biopsy experience when compared with lidocaine injection. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream, alone, is a reasonable option to use for vulvar biopsy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03654417.
Topics: Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Biopsy, Needle; Female; Humans; Injections; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination; Linear Models; Middle Aged; Nerve Block; Ointments; Pain; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Patient Satisfaction; Perineum; Vulva
PubMed: 31923074
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003660 -
Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie,... Aug 2021Aetiologically, prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia is a rare form of acquired methaemoglobinaemia, which occurs rarely in the first place. The following report...
Aetiologically, prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia is a rare form of acquired methaemoglobinaemia, which occurs rarely in the first place. The following report highlights a potentially dangerous complication arising after application of prilocaine during liposuction.A young female visited the Accident and Emergency Department following a pre-syncopal fall. As a consequence of her fall, she experienced debilitating wrist pain and exhibited a laceration on her chin. She had undergone liposuction of the lower extremity as an outpatient approximately 12 hours earlier and received regional anaesthesia in the process. A large volume of an anaesthetic solution containing prilocaine had been injected into the tissue.The patient was normotensive and slightly tachycardic and had oxygen saturations of 90 % on room air. She was cyanotic and her lips were pale. Initial arterial blood gas analysis showed a methaemoglobin fraction, which was increased significantly to 10.9 %. Conventional radiography confirmed the presence of a minimally dislocated distal radius fracture. Following subsequent oxygen therapy over a four-hour period, the patient's methaemoglobin level dropped to 6 %, her lip cyanosis abated and her vital parameters stabilised. The laceration of her chin was sutured and her wrist immobilised in a split plaster brace. After a 12-hour hospital stay, the patient was discharged. At her six-week follow-up appointment, the fracture had healed and both the functional and cosmetic aspects of her chin wound were adequate. We hope that this report draws the attention of emergency care personnel to the possible diagnosis of prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia after liposuction and encourages more general discussions around the use of prilocaine.
Topics: Female; Humans; Lipectomy; Methemoglobinemia; Prilocaine
PubMed: 33862646
DOI: 10.1055/a-1382-1628 -
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/oncology Jan 2022Deep sedation/general anesthesia is commonly used in pediatric oncology patients undergoing lumbar puncture (LP). Propofol is often used for sedation, with or without a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Eutectic Mixture of Lidocaine and Prilocaine Decreases Movement and Propofol Requirements for Pediatric Lumbar Puncture During Deep Sedation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double Blind Trial.
Deep sedation/general anesthesia is commonly used in pediatric oncology patients undergoing lumbar puncture (LP). Propofol is often used for sedation, with or without a narcotic. We hypothesized that eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) would allow for lower cumulative doses of propofol and less movement. We performed a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial in children undergoing sedation for LP. Standard initial weight-based doses of propofol and fentanyl were administered, with either EMLA cream or a placebo cream applied topically. The primary outcome was the total dose of propofol administered to each patient. We also tracked patient movement and complications. Twenty-seven patients underwent 152 LPs. Patients randomized to EMLA cream (n=75) were significantly more likely to receive a lower dose of propofol (2.94 mg/kg, SE=0.25, vs. 3.22 mg/kg, SE=0.19; P=0.036) and to not require additional propofol doses (probability 0.49, SE=0.08 vs. 0.69, SE=0.06; P=0.001) compared with patients randomized to placebo cream (n=77). In addition, patients with EMLA cream were significantly less likely to demonstrate minor or major movement. EMLA cream results in less movement and less propofol administration in pediatric oncology patients undergoing sedation for LP.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Deep Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Prilocaine; Propofol; Prospective Studies; Spinal Puncture
PubMed: 33885035
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002169 -
CJEM Jun 2023The objective of this study was to synthesize indication-based evidence for NO for distress and pain in children. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to synthesize indication-based evidence for NO for distress and pain in children.
STUDY DESIGN
We included trials of NO in participants 0-21 years, reporting distress or pain for emergency department procedures. The primary outcome was procedural distress. Where meta-analysis was not possible, we used Tricco et al.'s classification of "neutral" (p ≥ 0.05), "favorable," or "unfavorable" (p < 0.05, supporting NO or comparator, respectively). We used the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to evaluate risk of bias and quality of evidence, respectively.
RESULTS
We included 30 trials. For pain using the Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm) during IV insertion, 70% NO (delta:-16.5; 95%CI:-28.6 to -4.4; p = 0.008; three trials; I = 0%) and 50% NO plus eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) (delta:-1.2; 95%CI:-2.1 to -0.3; p = 0.007; two trials; I = 43%) were superior to EMLA. 50% NO was not superior to EMLA (delta:-0.4; 95%CI:-1.2 to 0.3; p = 0.26; two trials; I = 15%). For distress and pain during laceration repair, NO was "favorable" versus each of SC lidocaine, oxygen, and oral midazolam but "neutral" versus IV ketamine (five trials). For distress and pain during fracture reduction (three trials), NO was "neutral" versus each of IM meperidine plus promethazine, regional anesthesia, and IV ketamine plus midazolam. For distress and pain during lumbar puncture (one trial), NO was "favorable" versus oxygen. For distress and pain during urethral catheterization (one trial), NO was "neutral" versus oral midazolam. For pain during intramuscular injection (one trial), NO plus EMLA was "favorable" versus NO and EMLA alone. Common adverse effects of NO included nausea (4.4%), agitation (3.7%), and vomiting (3.6%) AEs were less frequent with NO alone (278/1147 (24.2%)) versus NO plus midazolam (48/52 (92.3%)) and NO plus fentanyl (123/201 (61.2%)).
CONCLUSIONS
There is sufficient evidence to recommend NO plus topical anesthetic for IV insertion and laceration repair. Adverse effects are greater when combined with other sedating agents.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Nitrous Oxide; Midazolam; Ketamine; Lacerations; Pain; Anesthetics, Local; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination; Oxygen
PubMed: 37171705
DOI: 10.1007/s43678-023-00507-0 -
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine... Jun 2022This study aims to compare the efficacy of the wrist splint and the injection of corticosteroid, autologous blood, and hypertonic dextrose in the treatment of lateral...
Effects of splinting and three injection therapies (corticosteroid, autologous blood and prolotherapy) on pain, grip strength, and functionality in patients with lateral epicondylitis.
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to compare the efficacy of the wrist splint and the injection of corticosteroid, autologous blood, and hypertonic dextrose in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 120 patients (43 males, 77 females; mean age: 45.7±7.7 years; range, 18 to 65 years) diagnosed with LE between December 2013 and June 2015 were included in the study and randomized into four groups. The first group was administered 20 mg methylprednisolone acetate + 2 mL 2% prilocaine, the second group 2 mL venous blood + 0.5 mL prilocaine, and the third group 2 mL 30% dextrose + 0.5 mL prilocaine injections. A second injection was administered to the third group one month later. The fourth group was recommended to use only a wrist splint. Pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluations of the patients were carried out at one and six months by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in terms of pain, by Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire in terms of functional level, and by the Jamar dynamometer in terms of grip strength.
RESULTS
In all groups, VAS values at one and six months after treatment were found to be lower in comparison to baseline. Except for the splint group, a significant improvement was observed in all three injection groups in terms of grip strength and PRTEE values at six months compared to the baseline values. In the comparison of the groups, no significant difference was observed in terms of improvement in VAS scores and grip strength. While corticosteroid injection was significantly effective in terms of PRTEE pain, function, and total scores only at one month, the autologous injection was effective in terms of PRTEE function and total scores at only six months after treatment. There were no significant differences for splint and prolotherapy groups in terms of PRTEE scores.
CONCLUSION
Corticosteroid injection, autologous blood injection, and prolotherapy are effective and safe long-term methods in LE treatment.
PubMed: 35989952
DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8007 -
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences Sep 2020The use of amide-based local anesthetics is generally considered to be safe. However, the literature on their safety in patients with hepatic injury is scarce. For the...
BACKGROUND
The use of amide-based local anesthetics is generally considered to be safe. However, the literature on their safety in patients with hepatic injury is scarce. For the first time, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of five commonly used amide-based local anesthetics in the setting of hepatic failure.
METHODS
A total of 96 Sprague-Dawley rats were studied from September 2015 to September 2016 in the Animal Laboratory Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. They divided into three groups, namely a control, induced liver failure (LF), and non-LF groups. The rats were administered local anesthetic agents (lidocaine, prilocaine with felypressin, lidocaine with epinephrine, mepivacaine, articaine, and prilocaine). The effect of these drugs was evaluated by comparing the liver enzyme levels of the rats. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. The independent test, one-way ANOVA, and the tests were used to compare groups. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
In non-LF rats, mepivacaine, lidocaine, and lidocaine with epinephrine caused a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level compared with the effect of prilocaine with felypressin and articaine. In non-LF rats, only mepivacaine resulted in a significant increase in AST level compared with lidocaine (P=0.007) and prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.044). In this group, only mepivacaine caused a significant increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) level compared with lidocaine (P=0.016). Whereas in the LF group, mepivacaine caused an increase in ALT level compared with the effect of both prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.009) and articaine (P<0.001). The use of mepivacaine in the LF group caused a significant increase in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level compared prilocaine with felypressin (P=0.039).
CONCLUSION
Articaine and prilocaine with felypressin local anesthetics induced the least change in hepatic enzyme levels in rats with abnormal hepatic function.
PubMed: 33060881
DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2020.72596.0