-
Annals of Surgical Oncology Jan 2023
Topics: Female; Humans; Mastectomy; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 36264517
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12702-x -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Mar 2020: The contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rate in the U.S. has been steadily increasing. This is of particular concern because many women who undergo this... (Review)
Review
: The contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rate in the U.S. has been steadily increasing. This is of particular concern because many women who undergo this procedure are candidates for breast-conserving surgery.: CPM's medical benefit is related to the risk of contralateral cancer development and whether CPM provides a survival benefit. Contralateral cancer rates have decreased, and CPM does not provide a survival benefit. Other potential benefits of the procedure may be improved quality of life; these data are reviewed. Research efforts have been undertaken to better understand the decision-making process of patients who consider, and ultimately undergo, this procedure.: Decisional traits, personal values, the desire for peace of mind, and the desire to obtain breast symmetry are important factors that drive a woman's decision to undergo CPM. Additionally, many patients lack the knowledge on how different types of breast surgery impact outcomes. To improve the shared decision-making process, a stepwise approach to address possible misconceptions, and clarify the real risks/benefits of this procedure should be utilized. A clear recommendation (for/against) should be made for every patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer who considers CPM. Communication tools to assist patients and surgeons in this process are sorely needed.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Communication; Decision Making; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Prophylactic Mastectomy; Quality of Life
PubMed: 32077338
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1732213 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Feb 2024Little is known regarding racial differences in satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). In this study, we aim to...
BACKGROUND
Little is known regarding racial differences in satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). In this study, we aim to characterize associations between race, and postoperative satisfaction and well-being, utilizing the validated BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with stage 0-III unilateral breast cancer and underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction at our institution between 2016 and 2022. BREAST-Q surveys were administered in routine clinical care preoperatively and postoperatively to assess QOL. We assessed whether the relationship between race, and domains of satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being differed by receipt of CPM compared with unilateral mastectomy at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years following reconstruction.
RESULTS
Of 3334 women, 2040 (61%) underwent unilateral mastectomy and 1294 (39%) underwent CPM. Compared with White and Asian women who received CPM, Black women who underwent CPM were more likely to have higher BMI (p < 0.001), undergo autologous reconstruction (p = 0.006), and receive postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) (p < 0.001). There was no association between race and domains of satisfaction of breasts or psychosocial well-being for women who underwent unilateral mastectomy (p = 0.6 and p > 0.9, respectively) or CPM (p = 0.8 and p = 0.9, respectively). PMRT was negatively associated with both satisfaction with breasts (p < 0.001) and psychosocial well-being (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being at 3-year follow-up were not associated with race but rather treatment variables, particularly the receipt of PMRT. Further investigations with a larger and more diverse population are needed to validate these findings.
Topics: Humans; Female; Mastectomy; Prophylactic Mastectomy; Quality of Life; Breast Neoplasms; Mammaplasty; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Breast Carcinoma In Situ
PubMed: 37973646
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14527-8 -
Gland Surgery Sep 2023The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has increased over the last two decades with variations in the frequency of reconstruction. The objective of this...
BACKGROUND
The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has increased over the last two decades with variations in the frequency of reconstruction. The objective of this cohort study is to elucidate the use of CPM and reconstruction among underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and women over 65 years.
METHODS
Women over 18 years, diagnosed with stages I to III breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from 2004-2017 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and grouped into CPM non-CPM. Multivariable analyses were used to examine the associations between CPM and reconstruction with sociodemographic and clinical factors.
RESULTS
A total of 571,649 patients were identified. Patients who underwent CPM were under 50 years (45.9%), White (88.4%) and with private insurance (73.5%). On multivariable analysis, women over 65 years [odds ratio (OR): 0.18, P<0.001], non-White (Black, OR: 0.56, P<0.001) and without private insurance (uninsured, OR: 0.50, P<0.001) had decreased odds of CPM. Women over 65 years (OR: 0.11, P<0.001), non-White (Asian/Pacific Islander, OR: 0.58, P<0.001) and without private insurance (Medicaid, OR: 0.41, P<0.001) had decreased odds of reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-White women and women over the age of 65 years were less likely to have CPM or reconstruction than their White counterparts from 2004 to 2017. Research is needed to understand factors impacting decision-making.
PubMed: 37842536
DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-759 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery Jan 2023Few studies have investigated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with high breast cancer risk undergoing elective risk reduction mastectomy and...
BACKGROUND
Few studies have investigated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with high breast cancer risk undergoing elective risk reduction mastectomy and reconstruction. These patients incur operative risk in the absence of active cancer, which renders their treatment experience unique. This study aimed to identify longer-term quality of life (QoL) issues that persist in this patient cohort.
METHODS
A cross-sectional cohort study assessed PROs in 48 women with high breast cancer risk who attended the Royal Melbourne Hospital Risk Management Clinic, at least 12 months post-mastectomy and reconstruction, with surgery between 2011 and 2020, using the BREAST-Q© Likert surveys. The BREAST-Q© internationally validated QoL instrument scales survey data from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) in 14 domains addressing satisfaction and psychosocial issues.
RESULTS
There was higher overall breast and psychosocial satisfaction, with scores of 11 and four, respectively, yet lower chest, abdomen and sexual well-being scores with 14, three and four, respectively, in contrast to normative BREAST-Q© data from >1000 women without prior breast cancer or breast operations. High average scores >90 were found for patient satisfaction with surgical, medical and office staff. Twenty-one patients had an average score of 63 for satisfaction with breast implants, while 27 patients post-DIEP had average scores >72 for abdominal well-being, appearance and overall outcomes. Higher mean QoL outcomes were found with DIEP flap in all domains, compared with breast implant reconstruction.
CONCLUSION
QoL assessment with PROs 12 months post-risk reduction mastectomy and reconstruction demonstrated higher psychosocial well-being, yet highlights physical implications, with patients experiencing reduced chest, abdomen and sexual well-being, compared with normative BREAST-Q© control data. Higher mean QoL outcomes were found with DIEP flap compared with breast implant reconstruction. PROs studies can identify unmet needs and facilitate change in service provision.
Topics: Female; Humans; Mastectomy; Breast Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Patient Satisfaction; Cross-Sectional Studies; Mammaplasty; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Personal Satisfaction
PubMed: 36692298
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18277 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Feb 2023Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous radiotherapy. A prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may be considered a suitable risk-reducing procedure in some cases. However, there are significant discrepancies between national society recommendations and insurance company requirements for PM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a PM. One-hundred companies were selected based on the greatest state enrolment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted.
RESULTS
Preauthorized coverage of PMs was provided by 39% of insurance policies (n = 39) and 5 indications were identified. There was consensus amongst these policies to cover a PM for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 39, 100%), but was more variable for other genetic mutations (15%-90%). Coverage of PM for the remaining indications varied among insurers: previous radiotherapy (92%), pathological changes in the breast (3%-92%), personal history of cancer (64%) and family history risk factors (39%-51%).
CONCLUSION
There is a marked level of variability in both the indications and medical necessity criteria for PM insurance policies. The decision to undergo a PM must be carefully considered with a patient's care team and should not be affected by insurance coverage status.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Cross-Sectional Studies; Insurance Coverage; Mastectomy; Prophylactic Mastectomy; United States
PubMed: 36588087
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.001 -
Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990) 2021The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) increased within the recent years. The main reasons are: genetic testing, availability of breast reconstruction,...
The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) increased within the recent years. The main reasons are: genetic testing, availability of breast reconstruction, more often use of preoperative breast MRI, improvement of postoperative aesthetic results and reimbursement of breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to analyze the indication of CPM, it's evolution and the surgical techniques used for this type of surgery. Materials and methods: This prospective study enrolled patients with unilateral breast cancer for which conservative treatment was not an option and underwent CPM concomitant with therapeutic mastectomy, using different techniques, followed by immediate breast reconstruction using alloplastic materials. A total of 45 patients with unilateral breast cancer underwent therapeutic mastectomy and CPM followed by immediate breast reconstruction, between January 2015-December 2020. The mean age was 43.5 years, 64,44% patients had stage I and II breast cancer and 22,22% were triplenegative. The indications for CPM were: pathogenic mutation of BRCA or of other genes associated with high risk of breast cancer, strong family history, suspicious findings on breast MRI, extended micro-calcifications, dense breasts, and extreme anxiety. A growing rate of bilateral mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer was observed. Availability of immediate breast reconstruction and reimbursement plays an important role for patients in choosing CPM. Factors associated with CPM include: young age, pathogenic BRCA mutation, significant family history and triple-negative disease. The rate of immediate postoperative complications was low. CPM is a valid option to reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer and to achieve a good aesthetic outcome for patients with unilateral breast cancer with high risk of contralateral breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Breast Neoplasms; Humans; Mastectomy; Prophylactic Mastectomy; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33963696
DOI: No ID Found -
Breastfeeding Medicine : the Official... Mar 2023Increasingly, young women are undergoing bilateral mastectomies before the completion of childbearing. This procedure, when performed prematurely, precludes any future...
Increasingly, young women are undergoing bilateral mastectomies before the completion of childbearing. This procedure, when performed prematurely, precludes any future lactation. However, not breastfeeding increases maternal and child morbidity and mortality, and carries an overall U.S. financial cost of $18.5 billion per year. The emotional and physical consequences of bilateral mastectomy in this patient population should be more carefully considered, and any prophylactic surgery deferred until childbearing has been completed.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Mastectomy; Breast Neoplasms; Breast Feeding; Lactation
PubMed: 36745397
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0262 -
Chinese Clinical Oncology Dec 2021The purpose of this review is to outline the surgical management of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) including the clinical decision making, operative approach and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this review is to outline the surgical management of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) including the clinical decision making, operative approach and current controversies.
BACKGROUND
IBC is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Trimodality therapy consisting of neoadjuvant therapy, modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and radiation therapy improves survival and is the recommended course of treatment. Advancements in systemic therapy and de-escalation strategies in non-IBC have accelerated discussions regarding several aspects of care in IBC including feasibility of de-escalation of surgical care, timing of reconstruction and the role of surgery in de novo stage IV disease. We discuss the evidence to support the surgical approach and decision-making in this rare disease.
METHODS
We reviewed existing literature using multiple electronic databases and clinical consensus guidelines to identify historical and current publications addressing current management recommendations and clinical controversies in IBC.
CONCLUSIONS
Breast conserving surgery (BCS), skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy should not be performed in IBC as surgical resection to negative margins results in improved locoregional recurrence rates. Level I and II axillary lymph node dissection should be performed regardless of response to therapy and initial nodal status. Reconstruction should be delayed and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is discouraged in IBC. Surgery may be considered for de novo stage IV IBC patients who demonstrate durable response to neoadjuvant therapy to improve local-regional control.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Mastectomy, Segmental; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 35016511
DOI: 10.21037/cco-21-113 -
Medical Decision Making : An... Feb 2023Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM)-removal of the healthy breast following breast cancer diagnosis-have increased, particularly among women for whom... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM)-removal of the healthy breast following breast cancer diagnosis-have increased, particularly among women for whom CPM provides no survival benefit. Affective (i.e., emotional) decision making is often blamed for this increase. We studied whether greater negative breast cancer affect could motivate uptake of CPM through increased cancer risk perceptions and biased treatment evaluations.
METHODS
We randomly assigned healthy women with average breast-cancer risk ( = 1030; M = 44.14, SD = 9.23 y) to 1 of 3 affect conditions (negative v. neutral v. positive narrative manipulation) in a hypothetical online experiment in which they were asked to imagine being diagnosed with cancer in one breast. We assessed 1) treatment choice, 2) affect toward CPM, and 3) perceived risk of future breast cancer in each breast (cancer affected and healthy) following lumpectomy, single mastectomy, and CPM.
RESULTS
The manipulation caused women in the negative and neutral narrative conditions (26.9% and 26.4%, respectively) to choose CPM more compared with the positive narrative condition (19.1%). Across conditions, women's CPM affect did not differ. However, exploratory analyses addressing a possible association of affect toward cancer-related targets suggested that women in the negative narrative condition may have felt more positively toward CPM than women in the positive narrative condition. The manipulation did not have significant effects on breast cancer risk perceptions.
LIMITATIONS
The manipulation of affect had a small effect size, possibly due to the hypothetical nature of this study and/or strong a priori knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer and its treatment options.
CONCLUSION
Increased negative affect toward breast cancer increased choice of CPM over other surgical options and might have motivated more positive affective evaluations of CPM.
HIGHLIGHTS
This study used narratives to elicit different levels of negative integral affect toward breast cancer to investigate the effects of affect on breast cancer treatment choices.Increased negative affect toward breast cancer increased the choice of double mastectomy over lumpectomy and single mastectomy to treat a hypothetical, early-stage cancer.The narrative manipulation of negative affect toward breast cancer did not change the perceived risks of future cancer following any of the surgical interventions.Negative affect toward breast cancer may have biased affective evaluations of double mastectomy.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Affect; Anxiety; Breast Neoplasms; Decision Making; Mastectomy; Prophylactic Mastectomy
PubMed: 36059240
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X221121134