-
Toxicology Communications 2020The media have featured the antimalarials chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat coronavirus (COVID-19). Political leaders have touted their use and...
The media have featured the antimalarials chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat coronavirus (COVID-19). Political leaders have touted their use and recommended availability to the public. These anti-inflammatory agents have substantial human toxicity with a narrow therapeutic window. CQ and HCQ poisoning cause myocardial depression and profound hypotension due to vasodilation. Bradycardia and ventricular escape rhythms arise from impaired myocardial automaticity and conductivity due to sodium and potassium channel blockade. With cardiotoxicity, ECGs may show widened QRS, atrioventricular heart block and QT interval prolongation. CQ may also cause seizures, often refractory to standard treatment. Of concern is pediatric poisoning, where 1-2 pills of CQ or HCQ can cause serious and potentially fatal toxicity in a toddler. The treatment of CQ/HCQ poisoning includes high-dose intravenous diazepam postulated to have positive ionotropic and antidysrhythmic properties that may antagonize the cardiotoxic effects of CQ. Infusions of epinephrine titrated to treat unstable hypotension, as well as potassium for severe hypokalemia may be required. Current scientific evidence does not support treatment or prophylactic use of these agents for COVID-19 disease. Regulatory and public health authorities recognize that CQ/HCQ may offer little clinical benefit and only add risk requiring further investigation before wider public distribution.
PubMed: 32457932
DOI: 10.1080/24734306.2020.1757967 -
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 2021Machine Learning, a fast-growing technology, is an application of Artificial Intelligence that has provided important contributes to drug discovery and clinical... (Review)
Review
Machine Learning, a fast-growing technology, is an application of Artificial Intelligence that has provided important contributes to drug discovery and clinical development. In the last few years, the number of clinical applications based on Machine Learning has been constantly growing and this is now affecting the National Competent Authorities during the assessment of most recently submitted Clinical Trials that are designed, managed or that are generating data deriving from the use of Machine Learning or Artificial Intelligence technologies. We review current information available on the regulatory approach to Clinical Trials and Machine Learning. We also provide inputs for further reasoning and potential indications, including six actionable proposals for regulators to proactively drive the upcoming evolution of Clinical Trials within a strong regulatory framework, focusing on patient's safety, health protection and fostering immediate access to effective treatments.
Topics: Artificial Intelligence; Drug Discovery; Humans; Machine Learning
PubMed: 34269668
DOI: 10.2174/1574887116666210715114203 -
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory... Mar 2023National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) globally are facing the challenge of evaluating pharmaceutical products in a speedy manner, whilst simultaneously ensuring...
National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) globally are facing the challenge of evaluating pharmaceutical products in a speedy manner, whilst simultaneously ensuring adequate efficacy, safety and quality of approved products. Additionally, common expectations include that the evaluation process is competent, flexible, commensurate with risk, efficient and rapid. In 2014, the Australian regulatory system was out of step with global regulatory developments which led to a comprehensive regulatory review and reform process. As part of the reforms, two Facilitated Regulatory Pathways (FRP) were developed for prescription medicines: Priority Review (PR) and Provisional Approval (PA). Furthermore, regulatory reliance and recognition arrangements have been expanded with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) making increased use of evaluation reports by trusted NRAs. The new pathways have been utilised by the pharmaceutical industry in Australia since 2017, with the number of medicines going through these pathways gradually increasing. Additional facilitated pathways have been developed following the review, providing alternatives to the standard pathway for registration of prescription medicines in Australia. The reform is timely, helping to position Australia well in the current global regulatory climate.
Topics: Australia; Prescription Drugs; Drug Industry; Prescriptions
PubMed: 36271207
DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00465-2 -
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory... Jul 2023Safety clinicians have a wealth of resources describing how to perform signal detection. Nevertheless, there are some nuances concerning approaches taken by regulatory... (Review)
Review
Safety clinicians have a wealth of resources describing how to perform signal detection. Nevertheless, there are some nuances concerning approaches taken by regulatory authorities and statistical considerations that should be appreciated. New approaches, such as the FDA Medical Queries, illustrate the value of considering medical concepts over individual adverse events. One area which would benefit from further clarity is how safety signals may be evaluated for evidence of a causal relationship to the drug of interest. Just as such safety signals can take many forms, the types of tools and methods required to interrogate these signals are equally as diverse. An understanding of the complexity of this process can aid the safety reviewer in successfully characterizing the emerging safety profile of a drug during the pre-marketing phase of development.
PubMed: 37067682
DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00518-0 -
Health Informatics Journal 2021Pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC) consists of multiple stakeholders including raw material suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, regulatory authorities, pharmacies,... (Review)
Review
Pharmaceutical supply chain (PSC) consists of multiple stakeholders including raw material suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, regulatory authorities, pharmacies, hospitals, and patients. The complexity of product and transaction flows in PSC requires an effective traceability system to determine the current and all previous product ownerships. In addition, digitizing track and trace process provides significant benefit for regulatory oversight and ensures product safety. Blockchain-based drug traceability offers a potential solution to create a distributed shared data platform for an immutable, trustworthy, accountable and transparent system in the PSC. In this paper, we present an overview of product traceability issues in the PSC and envisage how blockchain technology can provide effective provenance, track and trace solution to mitigate counterfeit medications. We propose two potential blockchain based decentralized architectures, Hyperledger Fabric and Besu to meet critical requirements for drug traceability such as privacy, trust, transparency, security, authorization and authentication, and scalability. We propose, discuss, and compare two potential blockchain architectures for drug traceability. We identify and discuss several open research challenges related to the application of blockchain technology for drug traceability. The proposed blockchain architectures provide a valuable roadmap for Health Informatics researchers to build and deploy an end-to-end solution for the pharmaceutical industry.
Topics: Blockchain; Hospitals; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Privacy; Technology
PubMed: 33899576
DOI: 10.1177/14604582211011228 -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Mar 2023This evidence-based practice guideline was developed to update and address new issues in the handling of hazardous drugs including being compliant with NAPRA (National...
This evidence-based practice guideline was developed to update and address new issues in the handling of hazardous drugs including being compliant with NAPRA (National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities) and USP 800 (United States Pharmacopeia) standards, the use of personal protective equipment and treatment in diverse settings including in the home setting. This guideline was developed from an adaptation and endorsement of existing guidelines and from three systematic reviews. Prior to publication, this guideline underwent a series of peer, patient, methodological and external reviews to gather feedback. All comments were addressed and the guideline was amended when required. This guideline applies to and is intended for all health care workers who may come into contact with hazardous drugs at any point in the medication circuit. The recommendations represent a reasonable and practical set of procedures that the intended users of this guideline should implement to minimize the opportunity for accidental exposure. These recommendations are not limited to just the point of care, but cover the entire chain of handling of cytotoxics from the time they enter the institution until they leave in the patient or as waste. Decreasing the likelihood of accidental exposure to cytotoxic agents within the medication circuit is the main objective of this evidenced-based guideline. The recommendations differ slightly from previous guidelines due to new evidence.
Topics: Humans; Hazardous Substances; Antineoplastic Agents; Health Personnel; Pharmacy; Personal Protective Equipment; Occupational Exposure
PubMed: 36373754
DOI: 10.1177/10781552221135121 -
Bundesgesundheitsblatt,... Nov 2020Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causally effective, disease-modifying form of therapy that, in addition to alleviating allergic symptoms, counteracts disease... (Review)
Review
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causally effective, disease-modifying form of therapy that, in addition to alleviating allergic symptoms, counteracts disease progression.This article provides an up-to-date overview of immunological, regulatory and practical aspects of AIT. Current literature was included and recent conceptual regulatory developments from the Division of Allergology at the higher federal authority (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut) are presented.The 62 AIT products currently approved in Germany and further 61 AIT products under the development program of the Therapy Allergen Ordinance (TAO) include 95 products for subcutaneous (SCIT) and 28 for sublingual (SLIT) treatment of birch/alder/hazel pollen, grass pollen, weed pollen, house dust mite and insect venom allergies. Native and chemically modified allergen extracts (allergoids) adsorbed to aluminium, tyrosine (partly monophosphoryl lipid A-adjuvanted) or lactose or based on lyophilisates are used as active ingredients.These 123 AIT products are subject to official state batch release testing. This does not apply to named patient products (NPPs) available for the treatment of less prevalent allergies (e.g. to olive pollen, animal hair, storage mites or moulds). There is a particular need for development of AIT products for children.As a new class of active ingredients, food allergens are in clinical phase II and III studies. A first food preparation for oral AIT of peanut allergy in children is currently undergoing a central European marketing authorization (MA) procedure. MA can only be granted if the benefit-risk balance is positive. Science and regulation are in continuous exchange on the development of AIT products that correspond to the current state of clinical research and regulation in the EU and enable early causal treatment of widespread allergies.
Topics: Allergens; Animals; Asthma; Child; Desensitization, Immunologic; Germany; Humans; Pollen
PubMed: 33140209
DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03224-6 -
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and... 2022Soft Tissue Filler (STF) Therapy for cosmetic facial rejuvenation is associated with known complications. The manifestation of these known complications can lead to... (Review)
Review
Soft Tissue Filler (STF) Therapy for cosmetic facial rejuvenation is associated with known complications. The manifestation of these known complications can lead to patients commencing civil litigation actions or making complaints to provincial regulatory authorities and alleging that the practitioner failed to obtain the patient's informed consent to the therapy. Data provided by the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) on medical-legal cases arising from the provision of STF therapy between 2005 and 2019 are presented. Select reported case law decisions from Canadian courts and regulatory bodies addressing the concept of informed consent are reviewed. Insights about the risk factors pertaining to the process of obtaining informed consent for STF therapy are presented to increase an understanding of the elements of communication and documentation needed to ensure patients are aware of the consequences of this treatment.
Topics: Canada; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; Face; Humans; Informed Consent; Malpractice
PubMed: 34310242
DOI: 10.1177/12034754211032542 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Considerable efforts have been exerted to implement Pharmacogenomics (PGx), the study of interindividual variations in DNA sequence related to drug response, into... (Review)
Review
Considerable efforts have been exerted to implement Pharmacogenomics (PGx), the study of interindividual variations in DNA sequence related to drug response, into routine clinical practice. In this article, we first briefly describe PGx and its role in improving treatment outcomes. We then propose an approach to initiate clinical PGx in the hospital setting. One should first evaluate the available PGx evidence, review the most relevant drugs, and narrow down to the most actionable drug-gene pairs and related variant alleles. This is done based on data curated and evaluated by experts such as the pharmacogenomics knowledge implementation (PharmGKB) and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), as well as drug regulatory authorities such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicinal Agency (EMA). The next step is to differentiate reactive point of care from preemptive testing and decide on the genotyping strategy being a candidate or panel testing, each of which has its pros and cons, then work out the best way to interpret and report PGx test results with the option of integration into electronic health records and clinical decision support systems. After test authorization or testing requirements by the government or drug regulators, putting the plan into action involves several stakeholders, with the hospital leadership supporting the process and communicating with payers, the pharmacy and therapeutics committee leading the process in collaboration with the hospital laboratory and information technology department, and healthcare providers (HCPs) ordering the test, understanding the results, making the appropriate therapeutic decisions, and explaining them to the patient. We conclude by recommending some strategies to further advance the implementation of PGx in practice, such as the need to educate HCPs and patients, and to push for more tests' reimbursement. We also guide the reader to available PGx resources and examples of PGx implementation programs and initiatives.
PubMed: 37274118
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1189976 -
Vaccine Aug 2022Vaccine products represent one of the most successful public health measure to this day. This has been reflected during the current COVID-19 pandemic where more than...
Vaccine products represent one of the most successful public health measure to this day. This has been reflected during the current COVID-19 pandemic where more than 4.87 billion people have received at least one vaccine dose. In Latin America, Mexico occupies the second position in terms of the number of vaccinated people with 83.97 million people receiving at least a single dose. As in other countries, regulatory approval in Mexico is one of the key aspects that influences the public access to vaccines. This creates an active interplay between regulatory authorities establishing a regulatory framework to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of the vaccines, and applicants fulfilling this information. Mexico is a member of the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) and it has adopted the Common Technical Document (CTD) for providing this information. This is particularly useful for vaccines developed abroad where it is expected to speed the evaluation of the new product. The Secretariat of Health of Mexico (SALUD) has published guidelines and laws or regulations related to GMP, labeling, stability, clinical trials, biocomparability and pharmacovigilance for drug products including vaccines which are classified as biological products. SALUD has also established guidelines and international homologating agreements to facilitate the application process for vaccine approval. Nevertheless, technical and scientific information and administrative processes for vaccine approval might be relatively concealed. Therefore, we aim to enable researchers and manufacturers in Mexico and overseas to better understand these requirements. To our knowledge, this is the most up-to-date and comprehensive attempt to present this information, also including information for COVID-19 vaccines. Here we describe the current requirements and processes by COFEPRIS, the national regulatory agency, for vaccine licensing and for emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines in Mexico.
Topics: COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Humans; Mexico; Pandemics; Vaccines
PubMed: 35835630
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.003