-
Carbohydrate Polymers Nov 2022A novel Fe-complex loaded visible-light active cellulose acetate (CA) composite membrane (Fe-complex/CA) was fabricated using the tape casting method. The Fe-complex was...
A novel Fe-complex loaded visible-light active cellulose acetate (CA) composite membrane (Fe-complex/CA) was fabricated using the tape casting method. The Fe-complex was structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and the prepared composite membrane was characterized by SEM, XPS, XRD, FTIR and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The Fe-complex/CA composite membrane exhibited relatively good visible light photocatalytic activity toward organic dyes and sulfadiazine antibiotics in the presence of low concentrations of HO. After irradiation for 60 min, the degradation efficiencies of basic fuchsin, methylene blue and sulfadiazine reached 100 %, 93.4 % and 95.7 %, respectively. The composite membrane maintained good photocatalytic activity after four catalytic cycles. Kinetic studies showed that the degradation processes of basic fuchsin, methylene blue and sulfadiazine were all in accordance with first-order reaction kinetics. In addition, the photocatalytic mechanism of the Fe-complex/CA composite membrane in the photo-Fenton reaction was also discussed in detail.
Topics: Acetates; Cellulose; Hydrogen Peroxide; Kinetics; Methylene Blue; Sulfadiazine
PubMed: 36088002
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119960 -
Bioresource Technology Aug 2022Both co-cultivation and co-substrate addition strategies have exhibited massive potential in microalgae-based antibiotic bioremediation. In this study, glucose and...
Both co-cultivation and co-substrate addition strategies have exhibited massive potential in microalgae-based antibiotic bioremediation. In this study, glucose and sodium acetate were employed as co-substrate in the cultivation of microalgae-bacteria consortium for enhanced sulfadiazine (SDZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) removal. Glucose demonstrated a two-fold increase in biomass production with a maximum specific growth rate of 0.63 ± 0.01 d compared with sodium acetate. The supplementation of co-substrate enhanced the degradation of SDZ significantly up to 703 ± 18% for sodium acetate and 290 ± 22% for glucose, but had almost no effect on SMX. The activities of antioxidant enzymes, including peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase decreased with co-substrate supplementation. Chlorophyll a was associated with protection against sulfonamides and chlorophyll b might contribute to SDZ degradation. The addition of co-substrates influenced bacterial community structure greatly. Glucose enhanced the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, while sodium acetate improved the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes significantly.
Topics: Bacteria; Chlorophyll A; Dietary Supplements; Glucose; Microalgae; Sodium Acetate; Sulfadiazine; Sulfamethoxazole; Sulfanilamide; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 35671911
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127431 -
Surgical Infections Nov 2022The increase of multi-drug-resistant organisms has revived the use of silver as an alternative antibiotic-independent antimicrobial. Although silver's multimodal... (Review)
Review
The increase of multi-drug-resistant organisms has revived the use of silver as an alternative antibiotic-independent antimicrobial. Although silver's multimodal mechanism of action provides low risk for bacterial resistance, high local and uncontrolled concentrations have shown toxicity. This has resulted in efforts to develop novel silver formulations that are safer and more predictable in their application. Optimization of silver as an antimicrobial is crucial given the growing resistance profile against antibiotics. This article reviews formulations of silver used as antimicrobials, focusing on the mechanisms of action, potential for toxicity, and clinical applications. A search of four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) was conducted for relevant studies up to January 2022. Searches were conducted for the following types of silver: ionic, nanoparticles, colloidal, silver nitrate, silver sulfadiazine, silver oxide, silver carboxylate, and AQUACEL (ConvaTec, Berkshire, UK). Sources were compiled based on title and abstract and screened for inclusion based on relevance and study design. A review of the antimicrobial activity and uses of ionic silver, silver nanoparticles, colloidal silver, silver nitrate, silver sulfadiazine, silver oxide, Aquacel, and silver carboxylate was conducted. The mechanisms of action, clinical uses, and potential for toxicity were studied, and general trends between earlier and more advanced formulations noted. Early forms of silver have more limited utility because of their uncontrolled release of silver ions and potential for systemic toxicity. Multiple new formulations show promise; however, there is a need for more prospective in vivo studies to validate the clinical potential of these formulations.
Topics: Humans; Silver Sulfadiazine; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium; Metal Nanoparticles; Prospective Studies; Silver Nitrate; Silver; Anti-Infective Agents; Oxides
PubMed: 36178480
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.229 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023In this review, we discuss a variety of immune modulating approaches that could be used to counteract tissue-damaging viral immunoinflammatory lesions which typify many... (Review)
Review
In this review, we discuss a variety of immune modulating approaches that could be used to counteract tissue-damaging viral immunoinflammatory lesions which typify many chronic viral infections. We make the point that in several viral infections the lesions can be largely the result of one or more aspects of the host response mediating the cell and tissue damage rather than the virus itself being directly responsible. However, within the reactive inflammatory lesions along with the pro-inflammatory participants there are also other aspects of the host response that may be acting to constrain the activity of the damaging components and are contributing to resolution. This scenario should provide the prospect of rebalancing the contributions of different host responses and hence diminish or even fully control the virus-induced lesions. We identify several aspects of the host reactions that influence the pattern of immune responsiveness and describe approaches that have been used successfully, mainly in model systems, to modulate the activity of damaging participants and which has led to lesion control. We emphasize examples where such therapies are, or could be, translated for practical use in the clinic to control inflammatory lesions caused by viral infections.
Topics: Humans; Models, Biological; Pyrimethamine; Sulfadiazine
PubMed: 37671156
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1257192 -
Water Research Jul 2022Co-metabolism and photodegradation are two approaches for remediating trace organic compounds (TOrCs), however, interactions between the two with regards to TOrCs...
Co-metabolism and photodegradation are two approaches for remediating trace organic compounds (TOrCs), however, interactions between the two with regards to TOrCs degradation have not been elucidated. In this study, sulfadiazine (SDZ) was chosen as a representative TOrC and Methylocystis bryophila as a typical strain. Under light conditions, about 80.6% of SDZ was removed by M. bryophila, but only 7.6% or 28.9% of SDZ was eliminated by either individual photodegradation or by co-metabolism. The SDZ stimulated more extracellular organic matter (EOM) production by M. bryophila. The enhanced SDZ degradation was attributed to indirect photolysis caused by the excited triplet state of EOM (EOM*) and co-metabolism. The UPLC-QTOF-MS analysis showed that due to co-metabolism, the pyrimidine ring was broken and could further be oxidized into smaller molecules under light conditions, such as formic and acetic acids. The SDZ mineralization ratio increased from 9.9% under the co-metabolic condition alone to 36.5% under co-metabolism coupled with photodegradation. The Ames tests confirmed that the SDZ degradation products by co-metabolism were mutagenic, however, their toxicity was ameliorated by light during co-metabolism. In conclusion, light plays a crucial role in co-metabolic processes of TOrCs.
Topics: Oxidation-Reduction; Photolysis; Sulfadiazine; Water Pollutants, Chemical
PubMed: 35665677
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118623 -
Biology Jan 2023This work aims to investigate the impact of antibiotics and extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs) on the dynamics of gastrointestinal antimicrobial...
Spatially and Temporally Confined Response of Gastrointestinal Antibiotic Resistance Gene Levels to Sulfadiazine and Extracellular Antibiotic Resistance Gene Exposure in Mice.
This work aims to investigate the impact of antibiotics and extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs) on the dynamics of gastrointestinal antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) levels of different segments of the gastrointestinal tract of mouse models were analyzed and compared after exposure to clinical concentrations of sulfadiazine and environmental levels of eARGs carried by the conjugative plasmid pR55. Exposure to sulfadiazine and eARGs led to significant changes in ARG levels by as many as four log-folds. Further analysis showed that the response of ARG levels appeared from 12-16 days after exposure and diminished 20 days after exposure. The responses in ARG levels were also restricted to different gastrointestinal segments for sulfadiazine and eARGs. Combined exposure of sulfadiazine and eARGs was unable to further increase ARG levels. From these findings, we concluded that the short-term consumption of environmental levels of eARGs and uptake of clinical levels of antibiotics lead to a spatially and temporally confined response in gastrointestinal AMR. These findings further clarify the detrimental impacts of antibiotic and eARG uptake, and the complexity of AMR development and dissemination dynamics in the gastrointestinal tract.
PubMed: 36829487
DOI: 10.3390/biology12020210 -
International Journal of Biological... Jul 2023This article aims to assess the highly potent antimicrobial hydrogels composed of cellulose and Arabic gum containing sulfadiazine drug (sulfadiazine-loaded Cel/AG) as...
This article aims to assess the highly potent antimicrobial hydrogels composed of cellulose and Arabic gum containing sulfadiazine drug (sulfadiazine-loaded Cel/AG) as drug-targeting carriers. ATR-IR, SEM/ EDS, XRD, and XPS methods were used to investigate the hydrogel. The highest water absorption % was 489.93 ± 4.5 at pH 7.4. Pseudo-second order and Fickian diffusion govern the swelling behavior. The maximal sulfadiazine loading percent was 82.291 ± 74. The in-vitro drug release exhibited significant responses in physiologically simulated pH values. The maximum cumulative release percent was 66.42 ± 0.6 % at pH 7.4. The drug release is predicted by the first order and Korsmeyer-Peppas models. The first diffusion coefficient was (D = 9.207 ± 47 × 10 cm/h) and the late one was (D = 5.64 ± 9.0 × 10 cm/h) at pH 7.4. That hydrogel is well-thought-out a potential drug delivery vehicle. The thermal stability of the Cel/AG hydrogel drug carrier has been enhanced by the incorporation of sulfadiazine which is evidenced by increasing the total activation approximately two-fold. The total activation energy of Cel/AG and sulfadiazine-loaded Cel/AG hydrogels were -0.07362 and -0.2092 J/mol. The sulfadiazine medication's inhibitory effect was markedly enhanced when it was incorporated into the Cel/AG hydrogel films.
Topics: Hydrogels; Cellulose; Drug Delivery Systems; Anti-Infective Agents; Drug Carriers; Excipients; Sulfadiazine; Drug Liberation; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
PubMed: 37247718
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125083 -
Environmental Research Apr 2021This work focuses on studying the efficacy of three different by-products to adsorb three antibiotics (sulfadiazine, SDZ; sulfamethazine, SMT; sulfachloropyridazine,...
This work focuses on studying the efficacy of three different by-products to adsorb three antibiotics (sulfadiazine, SDZ; sulfamethazine, SMT; sulfachloropyridazine, SCP). These antibiotics can be considered pollutants of the environment when they reach water, as well as in cases where they are spread on soils through irrigation or contained in sewage sludge or livestock manure. In this study, batch-type adsorption/desorption experiments were performed for each of the three sulfonamides, adding 7 different concentrations of the antibiotics, going from 1 to 50 μmol L, and with contact time of 24 h. The results indicate that pine bark is the most efficient bioadsorbent among those studied, as it adsorbs up to 95% of the antibiotics added, while desorption is always less than 11%. However, for "oak ash" and mussel shell the adsorption is always lower than 45 and 15%, respectively, and desorption is high, reaching up to 49% from "oak ash" and up to 81% from mussel shell. Adsorption data showed good fitting to the Linear and Freundlich models, with R values between 0.98 and 1.00 in both cases. K and K adsorption parameters showed similar values for the same sorbent materials but were much higher for pine bark than for the other two bioadsorbents. The Freundlich's n parameter showed values in the range 0.81-1.28. The highest K values (and therefore the highest adsorption capacities) were obtained for the antibiotic SCP in pine bark. Pine bark showed the highest capacity to adsorb each of the antibiotics, increasing as a function of the concentration added. When the concentration of sulfonamide added was 50 μM, the amounts adsorbed were 780 μmol kg for SDZ, 890 μmol kg for SMT, and 870 μmol kg for SCP. "Oak ash" and mussel shell have low adsorption capacity for all three sulfonamides, showing values always lower than 150 μmol kg (oak ash) and 20 μmol kg (mussel shell) when a concentration of 50 μmol L of antibiotic is added. The results of this study could aid to make an appropriate management of the by-products studied, in order to facilitate their valorization and recycling in the treatment of environmental compartments polluted with sulfonamide antibiotics.
Topics: Adsorption; Animals; Bivalvia; Plant Bark; Porosity; Quercus; Soil; Soil Pollutants; Sulfachlorpyridazine; Sulfadiazine; Sulfamethazine
PubMed: 33524329
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110814 -
Journal of Ayub Medical College,... 2021This study shares our experience and review the outcome of the use of cling film with silver sulfadiazine cream in terms of healing time, and patient's satisfaction...
BACKGROUND
This study shares our experience and review the outcome of the use of cling film with silver sulfadiazine cream in terms of healing time, and patient's satisfaction score.
METHODS
It was a descriptive case series conducted at Jinnah Burn and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Lahore, from March 2018 to February 2019. In this study, a thick layer of silver sulfadiazine was applied and then wrapped with cling film on 35 patients sustained mix thickness burns on the trunk and limbs. Dressing was done daily after wound wash with normal saline. Consultant Plastic surgeon assessed the wound healing by observation and serial photographs. Duration of wound healing and complications were noted.
RESULTS
Complete wound healing was achieved in 25 (71.4%) patients with mean healing time of 13.3 days (range 11-15 days). The wound infection was seen in 5 (14.2%) patients, that were diagnosed by change in colour of wound edges and patients with signs of sepsis (ABA scoring). Sepsis was treated in 5 patients with debridement and culture specific antibiotics. split skin graft done in 8 (22.8%) cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Moist wound dressing with Silver Sulfadiazine and cling film is cost effective, easy to apply with good visibility of the wound and has good patient satisfaction, but is labour intensive.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bandages; Burns; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Extremities; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Silver Sulfadiazine; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 34137536
DOI: No ID Found -
JAMA Health Forum Oct 2023
Topics: Controlled Substances; Sulfadiazine; Telemedicine
PubMed: 37862032
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3251