-
Journal of Patient-reported Outcomes Apr 2022The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet, many articles studied heterogeneous groups with chronic orthopedic disorders in which fracture patients were included as well. At this moment, there is no systematic overview of the exact use of PROMIS measures in the orthopedic fracture population. Therefore this review aimed to provide an overview of the PROMIS health domains physical health, mental health and social health in patients suffering an orthopedic fracture.
METHODS
This systematic review was documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar in December 2020 using a combination of MeSH terms and specific index terms related to orthopedic fractures and PROMIS questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were available full text articles that were describing the use of any PROMIS questionnaires in both the adult and pediatric extremity fracture population.
RESULTS
We included 51 relevant articles of which most were observational studies (n = 47, 92.2%). A single fracture population was included in 47 studies of which 9 involved ankle fractures (9/51; 17.6%), followed by humeral fractures (8/51; 15.7%), tibia fractures (6/51; 11.8%) and radial -or ulnar fractures (5/51; 9.8%). PROMIS Physical Function (n = 32, 32/51 = 62.7%) and PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 21, 21/51 = 41.2%) were most frequently used questionnaires. PROMIS measures concerning social (n = 5/51 = 9.8%) and mental health (10/51 = 19.6%) were much less often used as outcome measures in the fracture population. A gradually increasing use of PROMIS questionnaires in the orthopedic fracture population was seen since 2017.
CONCLUSION
Many different PROMIS measures on multiple domains are available and used in previous articles with orthopedic fracture patients. With physical function and pain interference as most popular PROMIS measures, it is important to emphasize that other health-domains such as mental and social health can also be essential to fracture patients.
PubMed: 35384568
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Apr 2024Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common in patients suffering even minor trauma; timely diagnosis and treatment can prevent the development of early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common in patients suffering even minor trauma; timely diagnosis and treatment can prevent the development of early osteoarthritis. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to evaluate the effects of additional procedures on arthroscopic ankle microperforations for osteochondral lesions.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar to select clinical studies analyzing the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) procedures. Ten articles following PRISMA guidelines with a total of 464 patients were included in this review. Quality assessment using MINORS was performed, and all studies demonstrated high quality.
RESULTS
The results of the systematic review showed benefits in all patients undergoing infiltrative therapy with PRP, hyaluronic acid, and BMC. The best results in terms of AOFAS score and VAS scale were found in patients undergoing PRP injection. The meta-analysis showed improvements in pain relief and return to daily activities in patients undergoing arthroscopic microperforations and PRP, although not reporting statistically significant results (p = 0.42).
CONCLUSION
All treatment strategies reported better scores compared to the control groups. Among the various treatments analyzed, the addition of PRP appears to be the most valuable probably for the larger population receiving this treatment, showing excellent outcomes in pain reduction, clinical outcomes, and return to daily activities.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II.
Topics: Humans; Fractures, Stress; Hyaluronic Acid; Cartilage, Articular; Talus; Pain; Arthroscopy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38309989
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.12.005 -
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Jun 2024This systematic review aimed to analyse the effect of early weight bearing versus late weight bearing on rehabilitation outcomes after ankle fractures, which primarily... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effect of early weight-bearing and later weight-bearing rehabilitation interventions on outcomes after ankle fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to analyse the effect of early weight bearing versus late weight bearing on rehabilitation outcomes after ankle fractures, which primarily include ankle function scores, time to return to work/daily life and complication rates.
METHODS
The China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Science and Technology Journal, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The focus was on identifying randomised controlled trials centred on early weight-bearing interventions for post-operative ankle fracture rehabilitation. All databases were searched for eligible studies published within the period from database inception to 20 June 2023. The eligible studies were screened according to the inclusion criteria. Study quality was evaluated using the methodology recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for the Systematic Evaluation of Interventions. Two authors independently performed the literature search and data extraction. Eligible studies were subjected to meta-analyses using Review Manager 5.3. Based on the time points at which post-operative ankle function was reported in the studies included in this paper, we decided to perform a meta-analysis of ankle function scores at 6 weeks post-operatively, 12 weeks post-operatively, 24-26 weeks post-operatively and 1 year post-operatively.
RESULTS
A total of 11 papers, comprising 862 patients, were included. Meta-analysis indicated that patients receiving early weight-bearing interventions, which referred to weight-bearing for 6 weeks post-operatively, experienced enhancements in ankle function scores (Olerud-Molander score, AOFAS score or Baird-Jackson score) at various post-operative milestones: 6 weeks (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88 and p < 0.01), 12 weeks (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92 and p < 0.01) and the 24-26 weeks range (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85 and p < 0.01). The results of subgroup analyses revealed that the effects of early weight-bearing interventions were influenced by ankle range-of-motion exercises. Additionally, early weight bearing allows patients to return to daily life and work earlier, which was evaluated by time when they resumed their preinjury activities (MD = -2.74, 95% CI: -3.46 to -2.02 and p < 0.01), with no distinct elevation in the incidence of complications (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.85-2.61 and p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results showed that early weight bearing is effective in improving ankle function among post-operative ankle fracture patients and allows patients to return to daily life earlier. Significantly, the safety profile of early weight bearing remains favourable, with no higher risk of complications than late weight bearing.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Treatment Outcome; China; Weight-Bearing; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38635458
DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.12011 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders May 2023To systematically review the studies regarding to the safety, efficacy and application methods of PRP in promoting the talar cartilage repair. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To systematically review the studies regarding to the safety, efficacy and application methods of PRP in promoting the talar cartilage repair.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, OVID and EMBASE to identify studies that compared the clinical efficacy of PRP for talar cartilage repair. Main outcome was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score for function and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain was the second outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies were included in this systematic review, including 4 randomized controlled trials, 1 controlled trial, 3 case series and 2 cohort studies. Four RCTs were analyzed using meta-analysis. For all outcomes, statistical results favored PRP group (AOFAS: MD = 7.84; 95% CI= [-0.13, 15.80], I = 83%, P < 0.01; VAS: MD = 1.86; 95% CI= [0.68, 3.04], I = 85%, P < 0.01). There were almost no reports of adverse events related to PRP intervention. Subgroup analysis showed that whether PRP was used alone or combined with other treatments could result in high heterogeneity but no more specific factors were identified to contribute to this.
CONCLUSION
PRP is safe and effective for talar cartilage repair. In addition to the standardization of PRP preparation and application, it is necessary to distinguish the effects of PRP used alone or in combination with other treatments. In PRP studies, surgical treatment of talar cartilage repair remains the mainstream. The regulation of PRP in surgical applications are worth exploring. The most relative component is the mesenchymal stem cell because it is the only exposed chondrocyte precursor in the articular cavity whether it is microfracture or cell transplantation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The study was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022360183).
Topics: Humans; Chondrocytes; Fractures, Stress; Joints; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Cartilage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37161527
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06466-y -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jun 2023: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. : Pubmed, Embase, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. : Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared the efficacy of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. The meta package in R language was used to organize and analyze the obtained data. : A total of eight studies involving 2081 patients was considered eligible, including 1029 patients receiving surgical treatment and 1052 receiving conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42018520164. Olerud and Molander ankle-fracture scores (OMAS) and the health survey 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) were used as main outcome indicators, and the follow-up outcomes were grouped according to the follow-up time. Meta-analysis results showed significantly higher OMAS scores in patients receiving surgical treatment than those with conservative treatment at six months (MD = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07; 1.93) and over 24 months (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.46; 3.74), while this statistical significance was absent at 12-24 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: -5.80; 5.96). At six months and 12 months after treatment, patients receiving surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher SF12-physical results than those receiving conservative treatment (MD = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.89; 2.91). The MD of SF12-mental data at six months after meta-analysis was -0.81 (95% CI: -1.22; 0.39), and the MD of SF12-mental data at 12+ months was -0.81 (95% CI: -1.22; 0.39). There was no significant difference in SF12-mental results between the two treatment methods after six months, but after 12 months, the SF12-mental results of patients receiving surgical treatment were significantly lower than those of conservative treatment. : In the treatment of adult ankle fractures, surgical treatment is more efficacious than conservative treatment in improving early and long-term joint function and physical health of patients, but it is associated with long-term adverse mental health.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Ankle Fractures; Conservative Treatment; Prospective Studies; Fracture Fixation; Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PubMed: 37374356
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061152 -
Asian Nursing Research May 2023Ankle pump exercises (APE) have been widely used in clinical practice. However, best practices for APE have not been established. Recognize the most effective frequency... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Ankle pump exercises (APE) have been widely used in clinical practice. However, best practices for APE have not been established. Recognize the most effective frequency of APE for improving lower extremity hemodynamics and establish recommendations in clinical practice.
METHODS
Therefore, a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed according to PRISMA-NMA. Six English databases (Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane library and ProQuest) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sinomed) were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies investigating the effects of different frequencies of APE on lower limb hemodynamics published before July 2022 were included. The reference list was also searched. Seven studies (one RCTs and six quasi-experimental studies) were included in the systematic review and five studies (one RCTs and four quasi-experimental studies) were included in the NMA. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The NMA was performed using the R software (version 4.2.1) and OpenBUGS (version 3.2.3).
RESULTS
The results of the NMA showed that a frequency of every 3-4 s the most effective in improving lower extremity hemodynamics (P =.85), followed by every 1-2 s (P = .81), every 5-6 s (P=.32) and less than every 10 s (P =.02). Subgroup analysis failed to find a difference between healthy participants and those with unilateral total hip arthroplasty or fracture (MD = -0.23, 95% CI-5.92 to 4.61).
CONCLUSIONS
Consequencely, for adult patients, with or without lower extremity disease, a frequency of every 3-4 s can be recommended as the optimal frequency of APE in clinical care practice.
REGISTERED NUMBER ON PROSPERO
CRD42022349365. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=349365.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Animals; Ankle; Network Meta-Analysis; Lower Extremity; Hemodynamics; Hominidae
PubMed: 36933769
DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.001 -
International Orthopaedics Oct 2021This meta-analysis aims to provide updated evidence on the success rate, return to play (RTP) rate, time to RTP, and complications of operatively and conservatively... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This meta-analysis aims to provide updated evidence on the success rate, return to play (RTP) rate, time to RTP, and complications of operatively and conservatively managed navicular stress fractures (NSFs) as well as delays in diagnosis while avoiding limitations of previous similar studies.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent team members electronically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases throughout February 2021 using the following keywords with their synonyms: "Navicular stress fracture," "return to play," and "athletes." The primary outcomes were (1) management success rate, (2) RTP rate, and (3) time to RTP. The secondary outcomes were (1) non-union, (2) time to diagnosis, (3) refracture, and (4) other complications. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies on NSFs reporting at least one of the desirable outcomes. Studies not reporting any of the outcomes of interest or the full text was not available in English, German, French, or Arabic were excluded. Case reports, case series with less than ten cases, and studies reporting exclusively on navicular non-union management were also excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment while Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4 was used for the risk of bias assessment. Data were presented by type of treatment (surgical or conservative). If enough studies were present that were clinically and statistically homogeneous and data on them adequately reported, a meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effects model. In case of statistical heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used. If meta-analysis was not possible, results were reported in a descriptive fashion. The need to explore for statistical heterogeneity was determined by an I greater than 40%.
RESULTS
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 315 NSF. Out of those, 307 (97.46%) NSFs were in athletes. One hundred eight (34.29%) NSFs were managed operatively, while 207 (65.71%) NSFs were managed conservatively. Successful outcomes were reported in 104/108 (96.30%) NSF treated operatively with a mean success rate of 97.9% (CI: 95.4-100%, I = 0%). Successful outcomes were reported in 149/207 (71.98%) NSF treated conservatively, with a mean success rate of 78.1% (CI: 66.6-89.6%, I = 84.93%). Successful outcome differences were found to be significant in favor of operative management (OR = 5.52, CI: 1.74-17.48, p = 0.004, I = 4.6%). RTP was noted in 97/98 (98.98%) NSF treated operatively and in 152/207 (73.43%) NSF treated conservatively, with no significant difference between operative and conservative management (OR = 2.789, CI: 0.80-9.67, p = 0.142, I = 0%). The pooled mean time to RTP in NSF treated operatively was 4.17 months (CI: 3.06-5.28, I = 92.88%), while NSF treated conservatively returned to play at 4.67 months (CI: 0.97-8.37, I = 99.46%) postoperatively, with no significant difference between operative and conservative management (SMD = - 0.397, CI: - 1.869-1.075, p = 0.60, I = 92.24). The pooled mean duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 9.862 (3.3-123.6) months (CI: 6.45-13.28, I = 94.92%), reported in ten studies. Twenty (23.53%) refractures were reported after conservative management of 85 NSFs, while one (1.28%) refracture was reported after operative management of 78 NSFs, with a significant difference in favor of operative management (OR = 0.083, CI: 0.007-0.973, p = 0.047, I = 38.78%).
CONCLUSION
Operative management of NSF provides a higher success rate, a lower refracture rate, and a lower non-union rate as compared to other non-operative management options. While not significant, there is a notable trend towards superior RTP rates and time to RTP following operative management. Therefore, we recommend operative fixation for all NSFs type I through III in athletes. Athletes continue to exhibit an alarmingly long duration of symptoms before diagnosis is made; a high index of suspicion must be maintained, therefore, and adjunct CT imaging is strongly recommended in the case of any work-up. Unfortunately, the published literature on NSFs remains of lower level of evidence and high-quality studies are needed.
Topics: Ankle Injuries; Fractures, Stress; Humans; Return to Sport; Sports; Tarsal Bones
PubMed: 34415421
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05147-6 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... May 2021To determine the incidence and location of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) following ankle fractures as well as to determine the association between fracture type and the...
PURPOSE
To determine the incidence and location of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) following ankle fractures as well as to determine the association between fracture type and the presence of OCLs. Up to 50% of patients with ankle fractures that receive surgical treatment show suboptimal functional results with residual complaints at a long-term follow-up. This might be due to the presence of intra-articular osteochondral lesions (OCL).
METHODS
A literature search was carried out in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE and CENTRAL to identify relevant studies. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the MINORS criteria. Available full-text clinical articles on ankle fractures published in English, Dutch and German were eligible for inclusion. Per fracture classification, the OCL incidence and location were extracted from the included articles. Where possible, OCL incidence per fracture classification (Danis-Weber and/or Lauge-Hansen classification) was calculated and pooled. Two-sided p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Twenty articles were included with a total of 1707 ankle fractures in 1707 patients. When focusing on ankle fractures that were assessed directly after the trauma, the OCL incidence was 45% (n = 1404). Furthermore, the most common location of an OCL following an ankle fractures was the talus (43% of all OCLs). A significant difference in OCL incidence was observed among Lauge-Hansen categories (p = 0.049). Post hoc pairwise comparisons between Lauge-Hansen categories (with adjusted significance level of 0.01) revealed no significant difference (n.s.).
CONCLUSION
OCLs are frequently seen in patients with ankle fractures when assessed both directly after and at least 12 months after initial trauma (45-47%, respectively). Moreover, the vast majority of post-traumatic OCLs were located in the talus (42.7% of all OCLs). A higher incidence of OCLs was observed with rotational type fractures. The clinical relevance of the present systematic review is that it provides an overview of the incidence and location of OCLs in ankle fractures, hereby raising awareness to surgeons of these treatable concomitant injuries. As a result, this may improve the clinical outcomes when directly addressed during index surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ankle; Ankle Fractures; Ankle Injuries; Ankle Joint; Cartilage Diseases; Cartilage, Articular; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Talus; Young Adult
PubMed: 32761358
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06187-y -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics May 2020Foot and ankle injuries in elite athletes can result in decreased performance, absence from sport and prolonged morbidity. There is paucity of data on foot and ankle...
INTRODUCTION
Foot and ankle injuries in elite athletes can result in decreased performance, absence from sport and prolonged morbidity. There is paucity of data on foot and ankle injuries in Olympics athletes.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Studies in English language that reported the incidence and/or prevalence of foot and ankle injuries in during Olympics games (summer, winter and youth Olympics) were included. Studies in languages other than English, those that looked at injuries other than foot and ankle injuries, studies looking at injuries in non-Olympics events and those looking at Olympics trials were excluded. We determined the injury rates and burden of foot and ankle injuries. We also looked at the patterns and trends of foot and ankle injuries.
RESULTS
A total of 399 foot and ankle injuries from 25 publications were included in the review. Foot and ankle injury rates ranged from 0.09 to 0.42 injuries per athlete-years for summer Olympics and 0.02-0.35 injuries per athlete-years for winter Olympics. Quantitative analysis revealed that foot and ankle injuries contributed to 16.9% of all injuries (95% CI 8.1-31.9%) for summer Olympics and 5.1% of all injuries (95% CI 1.9-12.6%) for winter Olympics; however, a high statistical heterogeneity was noted. The three most common injuries were tendon injuries, ligament injuries and stress fractures. The rates and burden of foot and ankle injuries showed a declining trend.
CONCLUSIONS
Foot and ankle injuries are an important cause of morbidity amongst Olympics athletes. The declining trend amongst these injuries notwithstanding, there is a need for a global electronic database for reporting of injuries in Olympics athletes.
PubMed: 32399148
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00058-x -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Feb 2023Open reduction and internal fixation were routinely used to treat patients with unstable ankle fractures (ORIF). However, some patients may experience persistent ankle... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Open reduction and internal fixation were routinely used to treat patients with unstable ankle fractures (ORIF). However, some patients may experience persistent ankle pain and disability following ORIF due to untreated intra-articular lesions. Moreover, ankle fractures may be treated with arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF). This study aimed to compare the feasibility and benefits of ARIF versus ORIF for ankle fractures.
METHODS
We performed this meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted for comparative studies comparing ARIF and ORIF for ankle fractures. Nine studies were included in the analysis of clinical and secondary outcomes. In summary, we calculated the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), confidence interval, and p value.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis demonstrated that the ARIF group achieved a higher Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score (MD: 6.6; 95% CI 0.20 to 13.0; p = 0.04) and lower visual analog scale (VAS) score (MD: - 0.36; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.10; p = 0.01) at the final follow-up. Nevertheless, the smallest treatment effect of OMA score and VAS score did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). There were longer surgery time (MD: 15.0; 95% CI 10.7 to 19.3; p < 0.01) and lower complication rates (RR: 0.53; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89; p = 0.02) in ARIF compared with ORIF. The random-effect model suggested no significant difference in the arthritis change rate between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the results of this meta-analysis indicated that ARIF and ORIF are comparable in terms of providing pain relief and improving function for patients with ankle fractures. Therefore, the choice between the two techniques should be based on the patient's individual factors and the surgeon's personal preference.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Open Fracture Reduction; Ankle Joint; Arthralgia; Fracture Fixation, Internal
PubMed: 36805794
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03597-9