-
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Dec 2021Vaccination and single-dose rifampin are the main proven effective intervention types for preventing leprosy among contacts of Mycobacterium leprae endemic areas.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vaccination and single-dose rifampin are the main proven effective intervention types for preventing leprosy among contacts of Mycobacterium leprae endemic areas. Currently, no high-quality evidence is available regarding the best prophylactic intervention.
OBJECTIVES
Our primary study aim is to detect the most effective prophylactic intervention for the prevention of leprosy.
METHODS
In May 2019, 12 databases were searched systematically. Updated search terms were developed in March 2020 to complete an updated search. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the different types of chemoprophylactic and immunoprophylactic interventions in leprosy prevention were included. Our participants were contacts of patients with leprosy or people residing in leprosy endemic communities. We searched for different types of chemoprophylactic and immunoprophylactic interventions used in leprosy prevention. We used network meta-analysis and meta-analysis. Quality assessment was performed using Cochrane Risk of Bias for included RCTs, in which all included RCTs were rated to be low to moderate risk. We registered our protocol in Prospero with ID CRD42019143207.
RESULTS
Among 11 included studies (326 264 patients) from original and updated search terms, eight were eligible for network meta-analysis (NMA) while four were eligible for MA. Findings suggest that Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination was the most effective intervention compared to placebo (risk ratios (RRs) 0.49 (0.30, 0.80), p 0.77), followed by combined BCG vaccination and single-dose rifampicin (SDR) with similarly low values (RR 48%, p 0.77). BCG revaccination was the least effective intervention compared to placebo (RR 1.08 (0.36, 3.22), p 0.26).
CONCLUSION
Compared to placebo, the BCG vaccine was the most effective prophylactic intervention. The combination of BCG vaccination + SDR had nearly the same efficacy as BCG vaccination alone, while BCG revaccination was the least effective. Thus, vaccination proved to be a more effective treatment than SDR alone. A well-designed multicenter RCT is warranted to evaluate the safety of these vaccines.
Topics: BCG Vaccine; Chemoprevention; Humans; Leprosy; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rifampin
PubMed: 34332107
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.032 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Jun 2024This study aims to estimate the overall in vitro activity of bedaquiline (BDQ) against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABS) and M. avium complex... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to estimate the overall in vitro activity of bedaquiline (BDQ) against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABS) and M. avium complex (MAC), considering BDQ as a repurposed drug for non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of publications in PubMed/ MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase up to 15 April 2023. Studies were included if they followed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for drug susceptibility testing (DST). Using a random effects model, we assessed the overall in vitro BDQ resistance rate in clinical isolates of MABS and MAC. Sources of heterogeneity were analysed using Cochran's Q and the I statistic. All analyses were performed using CMA V3.0.
RESULTS
A total of 24 publications (19 reports for MABS and 11 for MAC) were included. Using 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL as the breakpoint for BDQ resistance, the pooled rates of in vitro BDQ resistance in clinical isolates of MABS were found to be 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-4.6%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6-4.4%), respectively. In the case of MAC, the pooled rates were 1.7% (95% CI, 0.4-6.9%) and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-6.8%) for 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL, respectively.
CONCLUSION
This study reports the prevalence of BDQ resistance in clinical isolates of MABS and MAC. The findings suggest that BDQ holds potential as a repurposed drug for treating MABS and MAC infections.
Topics: Diarylquinolines; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mycobacterium abscessus; Mycobacterium avium Complex; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Antitubercular Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection
PubMed: 38561143
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.03.009 -
Medicine May 2022The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy (TBP) head-to-head using meta-analysis method.
METHODS
On May 12, 2021, we searched multiple databases for reports that used Xpert Ultra and Xpert for TBP diagnosis head-to-head and screened eligible studies for inclusion. Accuracy of Xpert Ultra and Xpert were compared to that of the composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. When heterogeneity was evident, sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression analyses.
RESULTS
Five articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. When results from different specimens or different reference standards were reported in the same article, we analyzed them as separate studies. Thus, 6 studies compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert with CRS, 5 studies compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert with culture. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert Ultra were 52% and 98% compared to CRS, and 82% and 77% compared to culture. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 22% and 99% compared to CRS, and 48% and 94% compared to culture. Significant heterogeneity in sensitivity was observed compared to CRS.
CONCLUSION
The sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was moderate but better than that of the Xpert; however, its specificity was lower. The role of Xpert Ultra and Xpert in the early and rapid diagnosis of TBP was limited.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35608435
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029363 -
International Journal of Environmental... Dec 2022Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) prevents TB in PLWHIV, but estimates... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) prevents TB in PLWHIV, but estimates of its effects and actual implementation vary across countries. We reviewed studies that examined the impact of IPT on PLHIV and the factors influencing its implementation in Ethiopia.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Controlled Trials from their inception to 1 April 2021 for studies of any design that examined the impact of IPT on PLHIV and the factors influencing its implementation. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42021256579.
RESULT
Of the initial 546 studies identified, 13 of which enrolled 12,426 participants, 15,640 PLHIV and 62 HIV clinical care providers were included. PLHIV who were on IPT, independently or simultaneously with ART, were less likely to develop TB than those without IPT. IPT interventions had a significant association with improved CD4 count and reduced all-cause mortality. IPT was less effective in people with advanced HIV infection. The major factors influencing IPT implementation and uptake were stock-outs, fear of developing isoniazid-resistant TB, patient's refusal and non-adherence, and improper counseling and low commitment of HIV clinical care providers.
CONCLUSION
IPT alone or in combination with ART significantly reduces the incidence of TB and mortality in PLHIV in Ethiopia than those without IPT. More research on safety is needed, especially on women with HIV who receive a combination of IPT and ART. Additionally, studies need to be conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the new TPT (3 months combination of isoniazid and rifapentine) in children and people living with HIV.
Topics: Child; Humans; Female; Isoniazid; Antitubercular Agents; HIV Infections; Ethiopia; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 36612942
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010621 -
PLoS Medicine Sep 2021Tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapy (TPT) is an essential component of care for people living with HIV (PLHIV). We compared efficacy, safety, completion, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapy (TPT) is an essential component of care for people living with HIV (PLHIV). We compared efficacy, safety, completion, and drug-resistant TB risk for currently recommended TPT regimens through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized trials.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 9, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 2 or more TPT regimens (or placebo/no treatment) in PLHIV. Two independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We grouped TPT strategies as follows: placebo/no treatment, 6 to 12 months of isoniazid, 24 to 72 months of isoniazid, and rifamycin-containing regimens. A frequentist NMA (using graph theory) was carried out for the outcomes of development of TB disease, all-cause mortality, and grade 3 or worse hepatotoxicity. For other outcomes, graphical descriptions or traditional pairwise meta-analyses were carried out as appropriate. The potential role of confounding variables for TB disease and all-cause mortality was assessed through stratified analyses. A total of 6,466 unique studies were screened, and 157 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 20 studies (reporting 16 randomized trials) were included. The median sample size was 616 (interquartile range [IQR], 317 to 1,892). Eight were conducted in Africa, 3 in Europe, 3 in the Americas, and 2 included sites in multiple continents. According to the NMA, 6 to 12 months of isoniazid were no more efficacious in preventing microbiologically confirmed TB than rifamycin-containing regimens (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.0, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.4, p = 0.8); however, 6 to 12 months of isoniazid were associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0, p = 0.02) and a higher risk of grade 3 or higher hepatotoxicity (risk difference [RD] 8.9, 95% CI 2.8 to 14.9, p = 0.004). Finally, shorter regimens were associated with higher completion rates relative to longer regimens, and we did not find statistically significant differences in the risk of drug-resistant TB between regimens. Study limitations include potential confounding due to differences in posttreatment follow-up time and TB incidence in the study setting on the estimates of incidence of TB or all-cause mortality, as well as an underrepresentation of pregnant women and children.
CONCLUSIONS
Rifamycin-containing regimens appear safer and at least as effective as isoniazid regimens in preventing TB and death and should be considered part of routine care in PLHIV. Knowledge gaps remain as to which specific rifamycin-containing regimen provides the optimal balance of efficacy, completion, and safety.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Coinfection; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Long-Term Survivors; Humans; Infant; Isoniazid; Male; Middle Aged; Preventive Health Services; Rifamycins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Young Adult
PubMed: 34520459
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003738 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Feb 2024Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are increasing in incidence and associated mortality. NTM are naturally resistant to a variety of antibiotics, complicating... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are increasing in incidence and associated mortality. NTM are naturally resistant to a variety of antibiotics, complicating treatment. We conducted a literature assessment on the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM species in vitro and in vivo (animal models and humans); meta-analyses were performed where possible.
METHOD
Four databases were searched using specific terms. Publications were included according to predefined criteria. Bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, MICs and epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values were evaluated. A meta-analysis of bedaquiline efficacy against NTM infections in animal models was performed. Culture conversion, cure and/or relapse-free cure were used to evaluate the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM infection in humans.
RESULTS
Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria: 33 assessed bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, 9 in animal models and 8 in humans. Three studies assessed bedaquiline's efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Due to data paucity, an ECOFF value of 0.5 mg/mL was estimated for Mycobacterium abscessus only. Meta-analysis of animal studies showed a 1.86× reduction in bacterial load in bedaquiline-treated versus no treatment within 30 days. In humans, bedaquiline-including regimens were effective in treating NTM extrapulmonary infection but not pulmonary infection.
CONCLUSIONS
Bedaquiline demonstrated strong antibacterial activity against various NTM species and is a promising drug to treat NTM infections. However, data on the genomic mutations associated with bedaquiline resistance were scarce, preventing statistical analyses for most mutations and NTM species. Further studies are urgently needed to better inform treatment strategies.
Topics: Humans; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Diarylquinolines; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 38134888
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad372 -
BMJ Open Aug 2019The objective of this study was to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferase 2 (, cytochrome P450 2E1 (, glutathione S-transferase... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferase 2 (, cytochrome P450 2E1 (, glutathione S-transferase ( and solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 ( and the risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATDILI).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Reviews databases were searched through April 2019.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included case-control or cohort studies investigating an association between or polymorphisms and the ATDILI risk in patients with tuberculosis.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Three authors screened articles, extracted data and assessed study quality. The strength of association was evaluated for each gene using the pooled OR with a 95% CI based on the fixed-effects or random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the reliability and robustness of the results.
RESULTS
Fifty-four studies were included in this analysis (n=26 for , n=35 for , n=19 for , n=4 for ). The risk of ATDILI was significantly increased with the following genotypes: II c1/c1 (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.83), slow acetylator (OR=3.30, 95% CI 2.65 to 4.11) and null (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52). No significant association with ATDILI was found for the genetic polymorphisms of I, , , 388A>G and 521T>C (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
ATDILI is more likely to occur in patients with slow acetylator genotype, genotype and null genotype. Close monitoring may be warranted for patients with these genotypes.
Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1; Genotype; Glutathione Transferase; Humans; Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1; Polymorphism, Genetic; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 31375612
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027940 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2022To explore the efficacy and safety of drugs in patients with scrub typhus. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To explore the efficacy and safety of drugs in patients with scrub typhus.
METHODS
For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang data (WF) up to December 2021. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antibiotics used to treat scrub typhus were included without language or date restrictions. The overall effectiveness was evaluated from 4 perspectives: cure rate (CR), defervescence time (DT), gastrointestinal symptoms-adverse events (GS-AD), and abnormal blood count-adverse events (ABC-AD). The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE system.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies involving 1,582 patients were included to evaluate 7 drugs, namely, azithromycin, doxycycline, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, rifampin, moxifloxacin, and telithromycin. In this network meta-analysis, rifampicin (82%) and chloramphenicol (65%) were more effective in terms of CR, and moxifloxacin (3%) from the quinolone family was the worst. Azithromycin caused the fewest events in terms of ABC-AD. No differences were found in this network meta-analysis (NMA) in terms of DT and GS-AD.
CONCLUSIONS
Rifampicin was associated with the highest CR benefit and the lowest risk of DT when used to treat patients with scrub typhus, except in areas where tuberculosis (TB) was endemic. Azithromycin was found to be better in CR and was associated with a lower probability of GS-AD and ABC-AD; therefore, it may be considered to treat pregnant women and children. Moxifloxacin had a much lower CR than other drugs and is, therefore, not recommended for the management of scrub typhus.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021287837.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Chloramphenicol; Female; Humans; Moxifloxacin; Network Meta-Analysis; Rifampin; Scrub Typhus
PubMed: 35570886
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883945 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Apr 2024This scoping review aimed to characterise definitions used to describe subclinical tuberculosis (TB), estimate the prevalence in different populations and describe the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This scoping review aimed to characterise definitions used to describe subclinical tuberculosis (TB), estimate the prevalence in different populations and describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in the scientific literature.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed. We included studies published in English between January 1990 and August 2022 that defined "subclinical" or "asymptomatic" pulmonary TB disease, regardless of age, HIV status and comorbidities. We estimated the weighted pooled proportions of subclinical TB using a random-effects model by World Health Organization reported TB incidence, populations and settings. We also pooled the proportion of subclinical TB according to definitions described in published prevalence surveys.
RESULTS
We identified 29 prevalence surveys and 71 other studies. Prevalence survey data (2002-2022) using "absence of cough of any duration" criteria reported higher subclinical TB prevalence than those using the stricter "completely asymptomatic" threshold. Prevalence estimates overlap in studies using other symptoms and cough duration. Subclinical TB in studies was commonly defined as asymptomatic TB disease. Higher prevalence was reported in high TB burden areas, community settings and immunocompetent populations. People with subclinical TB showed less extensive radiographic abnormalities, higher treatment success rates and lower mortality, although studies were few.
CONCLUSION
A substantial proportion of TB is subclinical. However, prevalence estimates were highly heterogeneous between settings. Most published studies incompletely characterised the phenotype of people with subclinical TB. Standardised definitions and diagnostic criteria are needed to characterise this phenotype. Further research is required to enhance case finding, screening, diagnostics and treatment options for subclinical TB.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Asymptomatic Infections; Cough; Asymptomatic Diseases; Antitubercular Agents
PubMed: 38719737
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0208-2023 -
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2021The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains unclear. Therefore, a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The performance of Xpert MTB/RIF using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains unclear. Therefore, a systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted. Studies published before 31 December 2019 were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using the keywords "pulmonary tuberculosis," "Xpert MTB/RIF," and "BAL." Two independent evaluators extracted the data and assessed the bias risk of the included studies. A random-effects model was used to calculate the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR, respectively), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC), as well as the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nineteen trials involving 3,019 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the culture method, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and the AUC with 95% CIs of Xpert MTB/RIF were 0.87 (0.84 to 0.90), 0.92 (0.91 to 0.93), 10.21 (5.78 to 18.02), 0.16 (0.12 to 0.22), 78.95 (38.59 to 161.53), and 0.9467 (0.9462 to 0.9472), respectively. Relative to the composite reference standard, the observed values were 0.69 (0.65 to 0.72), 0.98 (0.98 to 0.99), 37.50 (18.59 to 75.62), 0.30 (0.21 to 0.43), 171.98 (80.82 to 365.96), and 0.9691 (0.9683 to 0.9699), respectively. All subgroups, except children, showed high sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the use of Xpert MTB/RIF in the context of BAL samples has a high diagnostic performance for PTB (except for children) and may serve as an alternative rapid diagnostic tool.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Child; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Rifampin; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 33177121
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02170-20