-
American Journal of Transplantation :... Dec 2020The number of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and their life expectancy, is increasing, with higher risk for long-term complications from immunosuppression. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The number of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and their life expectancy, is increasing, with higher risk for long-term complications from immunosuppression. We carried out a systematic review describing the burden of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and its surrogates, in SOTR. We conducted mixed effect model-based meta-analyses evaluating incidence of anal SCC (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] vs general population, and absolute incidence rate [IR]), prevalence of anal squamous abnormalities, and human papillomavirus (HPV) 16. Generalized I statistics were calculated, quantifying heterogeneity. Anal SCC incidence in SOTR was elevated vs the general population (pooled SIR = 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-10.9; 6 studies including 241 106 SOTR; I = 82.3%), with an absolute IR of 12.3 (95% CI, 10.4-14.7) per 100 000 person-years (5 studies including 1 079 489 person-years; I = 0%). Prevalence of abnormal anal cytology was 12.9% (95% CI, 9.2%-17.7%; 6 studies including 328 SOTR; I = 17.4%). For histology, the pooled prevalence estimate of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions was 22.4% (95% CI, 17.3%-28.5%; 3 studies including 214 SOTR; I = 0%), with 4.7% (95% CI, 2.5%-8.5%; I = 0%) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Pooled anal HPV16 prevalence was 3.6% (95% CI, 1.6%-7.8%; 4 studies including 254 SOTR; I = 17.6%). There was substantial and consistent evidence of elevated anal SCC incidence in SOTR.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Human papillomavirus 16; Humans; Organ Transplantation; Papillomavirus Infections; Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
PubMed: 32343489
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15942 -
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery :... Jun 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of two types of surgical interventions... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
This systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of two types of surgical interventions (respectively drainage alone and drainage with primary fistula treatment) for perianal abscesses (PAs) in children. Studies from 1992 to July 2022 were searched in 10 electronic databases. All relevant NRSs with available data which compared surgical drainage with or without primary fistula treatment were included. Patients with underlying diseases which led to abscess formation were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias and quality of the included studies. The outcomes were the healing rate, fistula formation rate, fecal incontinence, and wound healing duration. A total of 16 articles with 1,262 patients were considered suitable for the final meta-analysis. Primary fistula treatment was associated with a significantly higher healing rate when compared with incision and drainage alone (odds ratio [OR]: 5.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.04-8.22). This aggressive procedure for PA resulted in an 86% reduction in the fistula formation rate (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32). Limited data showed patients who underwent primary fistula treatment have a minor effect on postoperative fecal incontinence. Primary fistula treatment demonstrates a better clinical efficacy in promoting the healing rate and decreasing the formation of fistulas in PAs in children. The available evidence for a minor impact on anal function after this intervention is less strong.
Topics: Humans; Drainage; Child; Abscess; Rectal Fistula; Anus Diseases; Fecal Incontinence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 37023788
DOI: 10.1055/a-2070-3613 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Jan 2024(Chemo)radiation may be a required treatment in young women with pelvic malignancies. Irradiation may result in ovarian and uterine failure, compromising the fertility... (Review)
Review
Uterine transposition versus uterine ventrofixation before radiotherapy as a fertility sparing option in young women with pelvic malignancies: Systematic review of the literature and dose simulation.
BACKGROUND
(Chemo)radiation may be a required treatment in young women with pelvic malignancies. Irradiation may result in ovarian and uterine failure, compromising the fertility of those patients. While ovarian transposition is an established method to move the ovaries away from the irradiation field, similar surgical procedures regarding the uterus remain investigational. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on uterine displacement techniques (ventrofixation/transposition) and to simulate the radiation dose received by the uterus in different heights place after the procedures.
METHODS
The systematic review was performed according PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE were queried to identify included study until March 2023. Retrospectively, a dosimetric study was also performed and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy treatment plans were calculated, to assess the dose received by the uterus according to hypothetical different displacement positions taking the case of irradiation for rectal or anal cancer as model.
RESULTS
A total of 187 studies were included, after the screening 9 studies were selected for synthesis. Data from the dose simulation revealed that the transposition approach was the most protective with a maximum dose of about 3 and 8 Gy for anal and rectal cancer respectively. None of the simulated ventrofixation positions received a Dmean surpassing 14 Gy.
CONCLUSION
According to the literature review and the simulation results of the present study we may conclude are feasible and safe as fertility sparing approach in young rectal/anal cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pelvic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Uterus; Organ Sparing Treatments; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Anus Neoplasms
PubMed: 37992415
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107270 -
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Aug 2019Cervical cancer screening might contribute to the prevention of anal cancer in women. We aimed to investigate if routine cervical cancer screening results-namely...
BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer screening might contribute to the prevention of anal cancer in women. We aimed to investigate if routine cervical cancer screening results-namely high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cytohistopathology-predict anal HPV16 infection, anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and, hence, anal cancer.
METHODS
We did a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for studies of cervical determinants of anal HPV and HSIL published up to Aug 31, 2018. We centrally reanalysed individual-level data from 13 427 women with paired cervical and anal samples from 36 studies. We compared anal high-risk HPV prevalence by HIV status, cervical high-risk HPV, cervical cytohistopathology, age, and their combinations, using prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CIs. Among 3255 women with anal cytohistopathology results, PRs were similarly calculated for all anal HSIL and HPV16-positive anal HSIL.
FINDINGS
Cervical and anal HPV infections were highly correlated. In HIV-negative women, anal HPV16 prevalence was 41% (447/1097) in cervical HPV16-positive versus 2% (214/8663) in cervical HPV16-negative women (PR 16·5, 95% CI 14·2-19·2, p<0·0001); these values were 46% (125/273) versus 11% (272/2588) in HIV-positive women (4·4, 3·7-5·3, p<0·0001). Anal HPV16 was also associated with cervical cytohistopathology, with a prevalence of 44% [101/228] for cervical cancer in HIV-negative women (PR vs normal cytology 14·1, 11·1-17·9, p<0·0001). Anal HSIL was associated with cervical high-risk HPV, both in HIV-negative women (from 2% [11/527] in cervical high-risk HPV-negative women up to 24% [33/138] in cervical HPV16-positive women; PR 12·9, 95% CI 6·7-24·8, p<0·0001) and HIV-positive women (from 8% [84/1094] to 17% [31/186]; 2·3, 1·6-3·4, p<0·0001). Anal HSIL was also associated with cervical cytohistopathology, both in HIV-negative women (from 1% [5/498] in normal cytology up to 22% [59/273] in cervical HSIL; PR 23·1, 9·4-57·0, p<0·0001) and HIV-positive women (from 7% [105/1421] to 25% [25/101]; 3·6, 2·5-5·3, p<0·0001). Prevalence of HPV16-positive anal HSIL was 23-25% in cervical HPV16-positive women older than 45 years (5/20 in HIV-negative women, 12/52 in HIV-positive women).
INTERPRETATION
HPV-based cervical cancer screening programmes might help to stratify anal cancer risk, irrespective of HIV status. For targeted secondary anal cancer prevention in high-risk groups, HIV-negative women with cervical HPV16, especially those older than 45 years, have a similar anal cancer risk profile to that of HIV-positive women.
FUNDING
International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Early Detection of Cancer; Female; Global Health; HIV Seropositivity; Human papillomavirus 16; Humans; Papillomavirus Infections; Prevalence; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 31204304
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30164-1 -
Scientific Reports Nov 2023Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized controlled trials with a total population size of 1035 were eligible for analysis. Seven studies included both males and female, while one only included females. The majority of randomized controlled trials involved female dominance [54.9% (43.5-66.3)] and posterior midline location [86.1% (95% CI 81.5-90.8%)]. This meta-analysis of randomised control trials found that overall postoperative healing was 90.2%, recurrent anal fissure was 3.7%, and postoperative incontinence was 8.9% after LIS. Even though there was no statistically significant difference, closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) had higher rates of recurrent anal fissure (RR = 1.73 (95% CI 0.86-3.47, p = 0.90, I2 = 0%) and lower rates of postoperative incontinence rate (RR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.37-0.96, p = 0.76, I2-0) as compared with open LIS. We recommended that closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for chronic anal fissures.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Fissure in Ano; Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38017243
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48286-z -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Nov 2021Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a secondary disease of diabetes and could cause serious renal damage. This article aimed to investigate the effect of statins on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a secondary disease of diabetes and could cause serious renal damage. This article aimed to investigate the effect of statins on the treatment of early DN.
METHODS
The databases were searched: Embase (January 2000-August 2021), PubMed (January 2000-August 2021), Cochrane [randomized controlled trial (RCT) database], Ovid (January 2000-August 2021), and clinicaltrials.gov (January 2000-August 2021) to obtain RCT literature related to statin intervention and DN. After screening, the risk of bias assessment was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software bias assessment tool, which was then used to perform the meta-analysis and obtain the therapeutic effects of statins by estimating indicators such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (SCR), total cholesterol (TC) level, total triglyceride (TG), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).
RESULTS
A total of 9 articles, 3,426 patients, and 5 types of statins were included. Meta-analysis showed that after treatment, eGFR in the experimental group was higher than in the control group [mean difference (MD) =5.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): (2.21, 9.40); P=0.002], SCR was lower than in the control group [MD =-0.46; 95% CI: (-0.69, -0.24); P<0.0001], hs-CRP level was lower than in the control group [MD =-1.20; 95% CI: (-2.05, -0.36); P=0.005], TC level was lower than in the control group [MD =-54.09; 95% CI: (-68.02, -40.16); P<0.00001], and TG level was lower than that in the control group [MD =-42.19; 95% CI: (-55.54, -28.84); P<0.00001].
DISCUSSION
Statins can significantly increase eGFR, reduce SCR, decrease CRP level, and decrease blood lipid level in the treatment of DN, thus reducing the inflammatory response and protecting the kidney.
Topics: C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34872280
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2673 -
International Journal of Radiation... Nov 2019
Topics: Anal Canal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Anus Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Consensus; Delphi Technique; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Male; Margins of Excision; Mitomycin; Precision Medicine; Radiotherapy; Salvage Therapy; Sex Factors; Societies, Medical; Treatment Outcome; United States
PubMed: 31288054
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2544