-
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2021(1) Background: Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation, measured with computed tomography imaging, is a marker of mean local vascular inflammation since it reflects the... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation, measured with computed tomography imaging, is a marker of mean local vascular inflammation since it reflects the morphological changes of the fat tissue in direct contact with the vessel. This method is thoroughly validated in coronary arteries, but few studies have been performed in other vascular beds. The aim of the present study is to provide insight into the potential application of perivascular adipose tissue attenuation through computed tomography imaging in extra-coronary arteries. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search of the scientific literature published in the last 30 years (1990-2020) has been performed on Medline. (3) Results: A Medline databases search for titles, abstracts, and keywords returned 3251 records. After the exclusion of repetitions and the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria and abstract screening, 37 studies were selected for full-text evaluation. Three papers were finally included in the systematic review. Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation assessment was studied in the internal carotid artery, ascending thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta. (4) Conclusions: Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation seems to be an applicable parameter in all investigated vascular beds, generally with good inter-observer reproducibility.
PubMed: 34441429
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081495 -
European Journal of Vascular and... May 2020The aim was to compare peri-operative and late outcomes of patients with acute and subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) treated by thoracic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to compare peri-operative and late outcomes of patients with acute and subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or best medical therapy (BMT).
METHODS
This was a Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The review was undertaken according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number: CRD42018094607). Multiple electronic databases were searched to identify relevant articles. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. The primary outcome measures were early mortality and re-intervention, late all cause and aorta related mortality, and re-intervention. Meta-analysis was used to produce pooled odds ratios (OR) or risk difference (RD) for peri-operative outcomes. Random effects models were applied. For late outcomes a time to event meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse variance model, reporting the results as hazard ratios (HR).
RESULTS
Eight original articles from six studies encompassing 14 706 patients (1 066 TEVARs) were eligible for inclusion. There were no statistically significant differences between TEVAR and BMT with regards to inpatient mortality (RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01-0.02, p = .46), early re-intervention by TEVAR (RD 0.02, 95% CI -0.01-0.04, p = .19) or surgery (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01-0.01, p = 1.0). BMT was associated with a significantly lower risk of early stroke (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85, p = .002), whereas the risk of late all cause (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.27-1.86, p < .001) and aorta related mortality (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.49-4.94, p = .001) was significantly higher than with TEVAR. No suitable data regarding late aortic re-intervention was found for meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Given the limited number and quality of suitable studies it remains uncertain whether TEVAR is beneficial in the management of acute/subacute uTBAD. Further research is required to understand which dissections would benefit from pre-emptive treatment.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aortic Dissection; Aortic Aneurysm; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31899101
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.08.003 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2019Aortic dissection is a separation of the aortic wall, caused by blood flowing through a tear in the inner layer of the aorta. Aortic dissection is an infrequent but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair for complicated type B aortic dissections.
BACKGROUND
Aortic dissection is a separation of the aortic wall, caused by blood flowing through a tear in the inner layer of the aorta. Aortic dissection is an infrequent but life-threatening condition. The incidence of aortic dissection is 3 to 6 per 10,000 per year in the Western population, and can be up to 43 per 10,000 per year in the Eastern population. Over 20% of people with an aortic dissection do not reach a hospital alive. After admission, the mortality rates for people with an aortic dissection are between 10% and 20% for those who received endovascular treatment, and between 20% and 30% for those who had open surgery. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the standard endovascular method to treat complicated type B aortic dissection (aortic dissections without involvement of the ascending aorta). Although TEVAR is less invasive than open surgery and has a better long-term aortic remodeling effect than conservative medical treatment, favourable aortic remodelling is usually limited to the thoracic aortic segment. TEVAR cannot be extended into the abdominal aorta because it could cover the ostia of the reno-visceral arteries. Thus, the abdominal aorta is still at risk of progressive aneurysmal degeneration. The PETTICOAT (provisional extension to induce complete attachment) technique, with proximal endograft and distal bare metal stent, was proposed in 2006 to address this issue. The concept of this technique was to implant a distal bare metal stent into the aortic true lumen, distal to the proximal endograft, to stabilize the distal collapsed intimal flap, while allowing blood flow to reno-visceral arteries. Therefore, the PETTICOAT technique was considered to be related to a more extensive aortic remodelling for people with type B aortic dissection, especially in the area of the abdominal aorta. However, it is still unclear whether the PETTICOAT technique is superior to standard TEVAR.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair for treating complicated type B aortic dissections.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 5 November 2018. We also undertook reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all randomised controlled trials which compared the outcome of complicated type B aortic dissection, when treated by combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent review authors assessed all references identified by the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist. We planned to undertake data collection and analysis in accordance with recommendations described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
We found no trials that met the inclusion criteria for this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified no randomised controlled trials and therefore cannot draw any definite conclusion on this topic. Evidence from non-randomised studies appears to be favourable in the short-term, for combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) to solve the problem of unfavourable distal aortic remodeling. Randomised controlled trials are warranted to provide solid evidence on this topic. Evidence from cohort studies with large sample sizes would also be helpful in guiding clinical practice.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents
PubMed: 31684692
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013149.pub2 -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Apr 2024Brachial aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (baPWV) and bone mineral density (BMD) are important indicators of cardiovascular health and bone strength, respectively. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Brachial aortic Pulse Wave Velocity (baPWV) and bone mineral density (BMD) are important indicators of cardiovascular health and bone strength, respectively. However, the gender-specific association between baPWV and BMD remains unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate the relationship between baPWV and BMD in men and women populations METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for relevant studies published between the 1th and 30rd of April 2023. Studies reporting the correlation between baPWV and BMD in both males and females were considered. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled correlation coefficients (r).
RESULTS
Relevant data for both genders were found in six articles. In all publications included in the meta-analysis, the total number of studied individuals was 3800, with 2054 women and 1746 men. Pooled correlation coefficient was -0,24 (95 % CI: -0.34; -0.15) in women population, and -0.12 (95 %CI: -0.16, -0.06) in men.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the published data, we found that baPWV is negatively correlated with bone density in women. However, in men we do not find such a relationship. These findings suggest the importance of considering gender-specific factors when assessing the cardiovascular and bone health relationship.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Bone Density; Pulse Wave Analysis; Ankle Brachial Index; Vascular Stiffness; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38171030
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105309 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jan 2020The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between open repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in traumatic ruptured thoracic aorta. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between open repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in traumatic ruptured thoracic aorta.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was undertaken of the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all published data comparing open vs endovascular repair. Databases were evaluated to July 2018. Odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences, or standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stroke, paraplegia, and 30-day mortality rates; secondary outcomes were requirement for reintervention and 1-year and five-year mortality rates.
RESULTS
A total of 1968 patients were analyzed in 21 articles. TEVAR was performed in 29% (n = 578) and open repair in 71% (n = 1390). TEVAR and open repair did not differ in the mean age of patients (42.1 ± 14 years vs 44.1 ± 14 years; P = .48). There was no difference in duration of intensive care and total hospital stay between TEVAR and open repair groups (12.7 ± 11.1 days vs 12.6 ± 8 days [P = .35] and 27.5 ± 14.6 days vs 25.9 ± 11 days [P = .80], respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant difference in postoperative paraplegia or stroke rate was noted between TEVAR and open repair (1.4% vs 2.3% [OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.59-2.70; P = .54] and 1% vs 0.5% [OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.18-2.18; P = .46]). Lower 30-day and 1-year mortality was noted in TEVAR (7.9% vs 20% [OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.92-4.49; P < .00001] and 8.7% vs 17% [OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.99-4.52; P = .05]). There was no difference in 5-year mortality (23% vs 17%; OR, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.20; P = .33). However, there was a higher rate of reintervention at 1 year in the endovascular group (0% vs 6%; OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.96; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS
TEVAR carries lower in-hospital mortality and provides satisfactory perioperative outcomes compared with open repair in traumatic ruptured thoracic aorta. It also provides a favorable 1-year survival at the expense of higher reintervention rates.
Topics: Adult; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Rupture; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular System Injuries
PubMed: 31327611
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.011 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Jan 2020Complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are common. Even after a successful TEVAR, a late endoleak (>30 days) can occur. The objective of this...
BACKGROUND
Complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are common. Even after a successful TEVAR, a late endoleak (>30 days) can occur. The objective of this study is to summarize the current evidence and, if lacking, the need of evidence regarding the incidence and predictive factors for type 1b endoleak in patients with aortic aneurysm treated with TEVAR.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed on endoleak type 1b, in patients with aortic aneurysm, after TEVAR. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for articles regarding endoleak type 1b up to January 2019. The main subjects discussed are the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and prognosis.
RESULTS
About 722 articles were screened, and 16 articles were included in this review. The reported incidence of endoleak is between 1.0% and 15.0%, with a mean follow-up duration of at least 1 year. Type 1b endoleak is associated with an increased aortic tortuosity index (>0.15 cm). No significant difference is found in relation to age and gender. Treatment is required in most cases (22/27) and is usually performed with distal extension of the stent graft (21/27). There are no data regarding stent graft oversizing, length of distal landing zone, and differences between devices or the prognosis for patients with type 1b endoleak.
CONCLUSIONS
Limited literature is available on the occurrence of type 1b endoleak after TEVAR. A tortuous aorta can be associated as a predictive factor for the occurrence of type 1b endoleak. Data clearly delineating the anatomic variables predicting type 1b endoleak should be examined and listed. Likewise, the impact of more recent conformable devices to prevent complications like type 1b endoleaks from occurring should be elucidated.
Topics: Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Incidence; Male; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31449934
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.030 -
PeerJ 2024Obesity is a well-known predictor for poor postoperative outcomes of vascular surgery. However, the association between obesity and outcomes of thoracic endovascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obesity is a well-known predictor for poor postoperative outcomes of vascular surgery. However, the association between obesity and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the roles of obesity in the outcomes of TEVAR.
METHODS
We systematically searched the Web of Science and PubMed databases to obtain articles regarding obesity and TEVAR that were published before July 2023. The odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) was used to assess the effect of obesity on TEVAR outcomes. Body mass index (BMI) was also compared between patients experiencing adverse events after TEVAR and those not experiencing adverse events. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the enrolled studies.
RESULTS
A total of 7,849 patients from 10 studies were included. All enrolled studies were high-quality. Overall, the risk of overall mortality (OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.02-2.17], = 0.04) was increased in obese patients receiving TEVAR. However, the associations between obesity and overall complications (OR = 2.41, 95% CI [0.84-6.93], = 0.10) and specific complications were all insignificant, including stroke (OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.56-3.45], = 0.48), spinal ischemia (OR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.64-1.47], = 0.89), neurological complications (OR = 0.13, 95% CI [0.01-2.37], = 0.17), endoleaks (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.46-2.29], = 0.96), wound complications (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.28-2.96], = 0.88), and renal failure (OR = 2.98, 95% CI [0.92-9.69], = 0.07). In addition, the patients who suffered from postoperative overall complications ( < 0.001) and acute kidney injury ( = 0.006) were found to have a higher BMI. In conclusion, obesity is closely associated with higher risk of mortality after TEVAR. However, TEVAR may still be suitable for obese patients. Physicians should pay more attention to the perioperative management of obese patients.
Topics: Humans; Obesity; Endovascular Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Aorta, Thoracic; Body Mass Index; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
PubMed: 38650653
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17246 -
Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) Dec 2022In this systematic review, the available literature on the presentation and management of acute thoracic aortic dissections in Africa is examined. Though Africa has 17%...
In this systematic review, the available literature on the presentation and management of acute thoracic aortic dissections in Africa is examined. Though Africa has 17% of the world population, it accounts for approximately 1% of the available literature with much of our understanding coming from registries arising from the developed world, such as the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. The literature from the African continent consists mainly of case reports, small case series, and few original studies. Case reports make an important contribution to our understanding of uncommon conditions but can skew our understanding of aortic dissections in this region by describing unusual presentations and management. In this review, we describe the available studies retrieved from large medical databases (Medline and Health Management Information Consortium) and motivate the need for national registries to provide a more accurate appreciation of the scope of the problem on this continent.
PubMed: 36539145
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757797 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Dec 2021The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.
METHODS
An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.
RESULTS
Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34197943
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032 -
Morphological Aspects of the Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of Personalized Medicine Mar 2024The aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery (ARSA), also known as the lusoria artery, is a congenital malformation with an incidence of 0.5-4.4%. Most cases are... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery (ARSA), also known as the lusoria artery, is a congenital malformation with an incidence of 0.5-4.4%. Most cases are incidental due to minimal clinical manifestations. Computer tomography (CT) is important in diagnosing and evaluating these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conduct a computerized search in two databases, PubMed and EMBASE, for articles published between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023, PROSPERO code: CRD42024511791. Eligible for inclusion were case reports and case series that presented the aberrant origin of the right subclavian artery. The main outcome was the highlighting of the morphological types of ARSA. In this context, we proposed a new classification system of this anomaly. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the demographic distribution of the lusoria artery.
RESULTS
Our search identified 47 articles describing 51 patients with ARSA. The typical course for ARSA is retroesophageal, being registered in 49 out of 51 patients. This malformation is frequently associated with Kommerell diverticulum (15 out of 51), troncus bicaroticus (7 out of 51), and aberrant origins of the right vertebral artery (7 out of 51). We observed a higher incidence of the condition among women (32 out of 51) compared to men (19 out of 51). From a demographic point of view, ARSA is more frequent in the "44 to 57 years" and "58 to 71 years" age ranges.
CONCLUSIONS
ARSA is a congenital malformation resulting from a defect in the development of the aortic arches. The imaging studies such as computer tomography play a defined diagnostic role.
PubMed: 38672962
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040335