-
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Mar 2020To identify, appraise, and synthesise the best available evidence on the efficacy of perioperative interventions to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To identify, appraise, and synthesise the best available evidence on the efficacy of perioperative interventions to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, CINHAL, and CENTRAL from January 1990 to December 2017.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials investigating short term, protocolised medical interventions conducted before, during, or after non-cardiac surgery were included. Trials with clinical diagnostic criteria for PPC outcomes were included. Studies of surgical technique or physiological or biochemical outcomes were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methods. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs. Secondary outcomes were respiratory infection, atelectasis, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Trial sequential analysis was used to investigate the reliability and conclusiveness of available evidence. Adverse effects of interventions were not measured or compared.
RESULTS
117 trials enrolled 21 940 participants, investigating 11 categories of intervention. 95 randomised controlled trials enrolling 18 062 participants were included in meta-analysis; 22 trials were excluded from meta-analysis because the interventions were not sufficiently similar to be pooled. No high quality evidence was found for interventions to reduce the primary outcome (incidence of PPCs). Seven interventions had low or moderate quality evidence with confidence intervals indicating a probable reduction in PPCs: enhanced recovery pathways (risk ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.58), prophylactic mucolytics (0.40, 0.23 to 0.67), postoperative continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (0.49, 0.24 to 0.99), lung protective intraoperative ventilation (0.52, 0.30 to 0.88), prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy (0.55, 0.32 to 0.93), epidural analgesia (0.77, 0.65 to 0.92), and goal directed haemodynamic therapy (0.87, 0.77 to 0.98). Moderate quality evidence showed no benefit for incentive spirometry in preventing PPCs. Trial sequential analysis adjustment confidently supported a relative risk reduction of 25% in PPCs for prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy, epidural analgesia, enhanced recovery pathways, and goal directed haemodynamic therapies. Insufficient data were available to support or refute equivalent relative risk reductions for other interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Predominantly low quality evidence favours multiple perioperative PPC reduction strategies. Clinicians may choose to reassess their perioperative care pathways, but the results indicate that new trials with a low risk of bias are needed to obtain conclusive evidence of efficacy for many of these interventions.
STUDY REGISTRATION
Prospero CRD42016035662.
Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Critical Pathways; Expectorants; Fluid Therapy; Hemodynamics; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Physical Therapy Modalities; Postoperative Complications; Respiratory Therapy; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Vasoconstrictor Agents
PubMed: 32161042
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m540 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Nov 2023COVID-19 has impacted populations across the globe and has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Influenza is another potentially deadly respiratory infection... (Review)
Review
COVID-19 has impacted populations across the globe and has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Influenza is another potentially deadly respiratory infection that affects people worldwide. While both of these infections pose major health threats, little is currently understood regarding the clinical aspects of influenza and COVID-19 co-infection. Our objective was to therefore provide a systematic review of the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for patients who are co-infected with influenza and COVID-19. Our review, which was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, involved searching for literature in seven different databases. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included at least one co-infected patient, were available in English, and described clinical characteristics for the patients. Data were pooled after extraction. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Brigg's Institute Checklists. Searches produced a total of 5096 studies, and of those, 64 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 6086 co-infected patients were included, 54.1% of whom were male; the mean age of patients was 55.9 years (SD = 12.3). 73.6% of cases were of influenza A and 25.1% were influenza B. 15.7% of co-infected patients had a poor outcome (death/deterioration). The most common symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea, with the most frequent complications being pneumonia, linear atelectasis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Oseltamivir, supplemental oxygen, arbidol, and vasopressors were the most common treatments provided to patients. Having comorbidities, and being unvaccinated for influenza, were shown to be important risk factors. Co-infected patients show symptoms that are similar to those who are infected with COVID-19 or influenza only. However, co-infected patients have been shown to be at an elevated risk for poor outcomes compared to mono-infected COVID-19 patients. Screening for influenza in high-risk COVID-19 patients is recommended. There is also a clear need to improve patient outcomes with more effective treatment regimens, better testing, and higher rates of vaccination.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; COVID-19; Influenza, Human; SARS-CoV-2; Coinfection; Comorbidity
PubMed: 37326928
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01116-y -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2021In clinical general thoracic surgery, the prevalence of atelectasis is relatively high. Perioperative interventions can affect the probability of patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In clinical general thoracic surgery, the prevalence of atelectasis is relatively high. Perioperative interventions can affect the probability of patients with atelectasis after surgery. Therefore, the incidence of perioperative intervention to prevent atelectasis after thoracic surgery was discussed using meta-analysis in this study.
METHODS
The articles were searched in the English database PubMed and Chinese databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD). The duration for publication time of the articles was from the database inception to March 2021, and the articles were required to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using interventions [such as changing the dose of general anesthesia, continuous positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), non-invasive pressure support ventilation, and physical therapy] after thoracic surgery (such as pulmonary lobectomy, sternum surgery, and lung cancer surgery) for the treatment of atelectasis. The software RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 5 articles were obtained, including 375 cases in the control group and 268 cases in the intervention treatment group. A meta-analysis was performed on the included articles, combined effect model analysis results showed that compared with the control group, the use of PEEP during mechanical ventilation can significantly reduce the incidence of atelectasis [odds ratio (OR) =0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.67; Z=3.94; P<0.0001].
DISCUSSION
Perioperative intervention was more effective for postoperative atelectasis and other complications.
Topics: Humans; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Thoracic Surgery; Thoracic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 34763434
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2441 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Sep 2023Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) most commonly occur after thoracic surgery. Not only prolonged hospital stay and increased financial expenses but also... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) most commonly occur after thoracic surgery. Not only prolonged hospital stay and increased financial expenses but also morbidity and even mortality may be troublesome for those with PPCs. Herein, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of available data to examine the effectiveness of incentive spirometry (IS) to reduce PPCs and shorten hospital stay. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 5 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 3 retrospective cohort study (10,322 patients in total) in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until September 31, 2021. We assessed the clinical efficacy of IS using length of hospital stay, PPCs, postoperative pneumonia, and postoperative atelectasis with meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis (TSA). With this meta-analysis, the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing IS was significantly shorter (1.8 days) than that in patients not receiving IS (MD = -1.80, 95% CI = -2.95 to -0.65). Patients undergoing IS also had reduced risk of PPCs (32%) and postoperative pneumonia (17.9%) with statistical significance than patients not undergoing IS (PPC: OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.51-0.90) (Pneumonia: OR = 0.821, 95% CI = 0.677-0.995).In meta-regression, the benefits of undergoing IS in patients with preoperative predicted FEV of <80% in a linear fashion with decreasing PPCs. IS is an effective modality to improve the quality of postoperative care for patients after pulmonary resection, compared with the control group without using IS; and applying IS has favorable outcomes of shorter length of hospital stay (1.8 days) and lower occurrence of PPCs (32% of risk reduction), which are conclusive and robust based on our validation via TSA. Moreover, the IS device is more beneficial for patients with preoperative predicted FEV of <80% than that in others.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Care; Motivation; Pneumonia; Physical Therapy Modalities; Spirometry; Postoperative Complications; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36437210
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.11.030 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2023The main aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation interventions that include breathing exercises as a component... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation interventions that include breathing exercises to prevent pulmonary atelectasis in lung cancer resection patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The main aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation interventions that include breathing exercises as a component to prevent atelectasis in lung cancer resection patients.
METHODS
In this review, we systematically and comprehensively searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science in English and CNKI and Wanfang in Chinese from 2012 to 2022. The review included any randomized controlled trials focusing on the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation interventions that include breathing exercises to prevent pulmonary atelectasis in lung cancer patients. Participants who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection and received postoperative rehabilitation interventions that included breathing exercises as a component were included in this review. The study quality and risks of bias were measured with the GRADE and Cochrane Collaboration tools, and statistical analysis was performed utilizing RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS
The incidence of atelectasis was significantly lower in the postoperative rehabilitation intervention group (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.67; I2 = 0%; P = 0.67) than in the control group. The patients who underwent the postoperative rehabilitation program that included breathing exercises (intervention group) had higher forced vital capacity (FVC) scores (MD = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.41; I = 73%; P = 0.02), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) scores (MD = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.60; I = 98%; P < 0.01) and FEV1/FVC ratios (MD = 9.09; 95% CI, 1.50 to 16.67; I = 94%; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Postoperative rehabilitation interventions that included breathing exercises decreased the incidence rate of atelectasis and improved lung function by increasing the FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC ratio.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lung; Exercise Therapy; Breathing Exercises; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37501067
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-023-02563-9 -
Respiratory Care Mar 2023Several studies have investigated postextubation complications of the positive-pressure and suctioning techniques; however, these studies yielded inconsistent results.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Several studies have investigated postextubation complications of the positive-pressure and suctioning techniques; however, these studies yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, in this systematic review, we aimed to assess and compare the risk of complications between these techniques after extubation.
METHODS
This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021272068). We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies that compared positive-pressure and suctioning extubation techniques in medical literature databases. Our search was conducted from the databases' inception to July 7, 2022. The included studies were assessed for quality by using a risk of bias tool.
RESULTS
Six RCTs and 1 non-randomized controlled study were included in this systematic review ( 1,575 subjects), wherein the positive-pressure and suctioning techniques were applied to 762 and 813 subjects, respectively. Three studies were conducted in operating rooms, and 4 studies were conducted in ICUs. Five studies were conducted among adults, and 2 studies were conducted among children or neonates. All the studies except 1 RCT showed that the positive-pressure technique tended to have a lower but not statistically different risk of complications, including desaturation, airway obstruction, pneumonia, aspiration, atelectasis, and re-intubation, than the suctioning technique. Three of the 6 RCTs were determined to have a high risk of bias and the 1 non-randomized controlled study was determined to have a serious risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The positive-pressure technique tended to have a lower risk of complications than the suctioning technique. Further high-quality studies are warranted.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Airway Obstruction; Intensive Care Units; Intubation, Intratracheal; Suction; Airway Extubation; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36828583
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10326 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jul 2021Partnership between anesthesia providers and proceduralists is essential to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes. A renewed importance of this axiom has emerged...
Partnership between anesthesia providers and proceduralists is essential to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes. A renewed importance of this axiom has emerged in advanced bronchoscopy and interventional pulmonology. While anesthesia-induced atelectasis is common, it is not typically clinically significant. Advanced guided bronchoscopic biopsy is an exception in which anesthesia protocols substantially impact outcomes. Procedure success depends on careful ventilation to avoid excessive motion, reduce distortion causing computed tomography (CT)-to-body-divergence, stabilize dependent areas, and optimize breath-hold maneuvers to prevent atelectasis. Herein are anesthesia recommendations during guided bronchoscopy. An FiO of 0.6 to 0.8 is recommended for pre-oxygenation, maintained at the lowest tolerable level for the entire the procedure. Expeditious intubation (not rapid-sequence) with a larger endotracheal tube and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants are preferred. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of up to 10-12 cm HO and increased tidal volumes help to maintain optimal lung inflation, if tolerated by the patient as determined during recruitment. A breath-hold is required to reduce motion artifact during intraprocedural imaging (e.g., cone-beam CT, digital tomosynthesis), timed at the end of a normal tidal breath (peak inspiration) and held until pressures equilibrate and the imaging cycle is complete. Use of the adjustable pressure-limiting valve is critical to maintain the desired PEEP and reduce movement during breath-hold maneuvers. These measures will reduce atelectasis and CT-to-body divergence, minimize motion artifact, and provide clearer, more accurate images during guided bronchoscopy. Following these recommendations will facilitate a successful lung biopsy, potentially accelerating the time to treatment by avoiding additional biopsies. Application of these methods should be at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and the proceduralist; best medical judgement should be used in all cases to ensure the safety of the patient.
Topics: Anesthesia, General; Breath Holding; Bronchoscopy; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Lung; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34273966
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01584-6 -
Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Jun 2024The aim of this study was to appraise and summarize the effects of chest physiotherapy in mechanically ventilated children. A systematic review was completed by... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to appraise and summarize the effects of chest physiotherapy in mechanically ventilated children. A systematic review was completed by searching Medline, Embase, Cinahl Plus, PEDro, and Web of Science from inception to February 9, 2021. Studies investigating chest physiotherapy for mechanically ventilated children (0-18 years), in a pediatric intensive care unit were included. Chest physiotherapy was defined as any intervention performed by a qualified physiotherapist. Measurements of effectiveness and safety were included. Exclusion criteria included preterm infants, children requiring noninvasive ventilation, and those in a nonacute setting. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria: two randomized controlled trials, three randomized crossover trials, and eight observational studies. The Cochrane risk of bias and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tools were used for quality assessment. Oxygen saturations decreased after physiotherapy involving manual hyperinflations (MHI) and chest wall vibrations (CWV). Although statistically significant, these results were not of clinical importance. In contrast, oxygen saturations improved after the expiratory flow increase technique; however, this was not clinically significant. An increase in expiratory tidal volume was demonstrated 30 minutes after MHI and CWV. There was no sustained change in tidal volume following a physiotherapy-led recruitment maneuver. Respiratory compliance and dead-space increased immediately after MHI and CWV. Atelectasis scores improved following intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and MHI and CWV. Evidence to support chest physiotherapy in ventilated children remains inconclusive. There are few high-quality studies, with heterogeneity in interventions and populations. Future studies are required to investigate multiple physiotherapy interventions and the impact on long-term outcomes.
PubMed: 38919696
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732448 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023This review aimed to summarize the recent literature on positive-pressure extubation.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to summarize the recent literature on positive-pressure extubation.
DESIGN
A scoping review was conducted under the framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute.
DATA SOURCES
Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and China Biology Medicine databases were searched for studies on adults and children.
STUDY SELECTION
All articles describing the use of positive-pressure extubation were considered eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were articles not available in English or Chinese, and those without full text available.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The database searches identified 8,381 articles, 15 of which could be included in this review, with an aggregated patient number of 1,544. Vital signs, including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, R-R interval, and SpO before and after extubation; blood gas analysis indexes, including pH, oxygen saturation, PaO, and PaCO before and after extubation; and incidence of respiratory complications, including bronchospasm, laryngeal edema, aspiration atelectasis, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia, were reported in the included studies.
RESULTS
The majority of these studies reported that the positive-pressure extubation technique can maintain stable vital signs and blood gas analysis indices as well as prevent complications during the peri-extubation period.
CONCLUSIONS
The positive-pressure extubation technique has a safety performance similar to that of the traditional negative-pressure extubation technique and may lead to better clinical outcomes, including stable vital signs, arterial blood gas analysis, and a lower incidence of respiratory complications.
PubMed: 37250624
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1169879 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia May 2024Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are associated with postoperative mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Although intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are associated with postoperative mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Although intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) is a risk factor for PPCs, strategies addressing weaning from MV are understudied. In this systematic review, we evaluated weaning strategies and their effects on postoperative pulmonary outcomes.
METHODS
Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022379145). Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials and observational studies of adults weaned from MV in the operating room. Primary outcomes included atelectasis and oxygenation; secondary outcomes included lung volume changes and PPCs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool, and quality of evidence with the GRADE framework.
RESULTS
Screening identified 14 randomised controlled trials including 1719 patients; seven studies were limited to the weaning phase and seven included interventions not restricted to the weaning phase. Strategies combining pressure support ventilation (PSV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) improved atelectasis, oxygenation, and lung volumes. Low FiO improved atelectasis and oxygenation but might not improve lung volumes. A fixed-PEEP strategy led to no improvement in oxygenation or atelectasis; however, individualised PEEP with low FiO improved oxygenation and might be associated with reduced PPCs. Half of included studies are of moderate or high risk of bias; the overall quality of evidence is low.
CONCLUSIONS
There is limited research evaluating weaning from intraoperative MV. Based on low-quality evidence, PSV, individualised PEEP, and low FiO may be associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL
PROSPERO (CRD42022379145).
PubMed: 38816331
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.043