-
PharmacoEconomics Jul 2023The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Eli Lilly) of abemaciclib (Verzenios) to submit evidence for the clinical and cost... (Review)
Review
Abemaciclib in Combination with Endocrine Therapy for Adjuvant Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Eli Lilly) of abemaciclib (Verzenios) to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of this drug in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for the treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence, as part of the Institute's Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in combination with Newcastle University, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper summarised the Company Submission (CS), presents the ERG's critical review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS, highlights the key methodological considerations, and describes the development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee. The ERG produced a critical review of the evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS and also independently searched for relevant evidence and modified the manufacturer decision analytic model to examine the impact of altering some of the key assumptions. A systematic literature review identified the MonarchE trial, an ongoing, open-label, randomised, double blind trial involving 5637 people comparing abemaciclib in combination with ET versus ET alone. The trial included two cohorts that used different inclusion criteria to define high risk of recurrence. The ERG considered Cohort 1 as an adequate representation of this population and the AC concluded that Cohort 1 was generalisable to National Health Service clinical practice. Trial results showed improvements in invasive disease-free survival for the abemaciclib arm, which was considered an appropriate surrogate outcome. The ERG believed that the modelling structure presented in the de novo economic model by the company was appropriate but highlighted several areas of uncertainty that had the potential to have a significant impact on the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Areas of uncertainty included the extrapolation of long-term survival curves, the duration of treatment effect and treatment waning, and the proportion of patients who receive other CDK4/6 treatments for metastatic disease after receiving abemaciclib. ICER estimates were £9164 per quality-adjusted life-year gained for the company's base-case and £17,810 for the ERG's base-case. NICE recommended abemaciclib with ET as an option for the adjuvant treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; State Medicine; Aminopyridines; Benzimidazoles; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36952138
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01259-6 -
Cancers Jul 2021MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression (i.e., double expressor) has been shown to be a negative predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to... (Review)
Review
MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression (i.e., double expressor) has been shown to be a negative predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to establish the incidence of double expressor status in patients with de novo DLBCL and identify the predictive value of this biomarker on treatment response through systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published through December 2019 that reported proportions of double expressor DLBCL. The pooled proportions of MYC and BCL2 expression, both alone and in combination, were computed using the inverse variance method for calculating weights and by the DerSimonian-Laird method. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of complete remission (CR) rate were calculated, and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity. Forty-one studies (7054 patients) were included. The pooled incidence of double expressor status in DLBCL was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-26%), with an adjusted estimate of 31% (95% CI, 27-36%). Neither MYC/BCL2 protein cutoff values, race, mean, or median age of included patients, or overall study quality was a significant factor of heterogeneity ( ≥ 0.20). Cases without double expressor status demonstrated a higher probability of CR to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone treatment (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.55-4.67). Our results reaffirm the predictive power of this important biomarker.
PubMed: 34282799
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133369 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2021Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been an attractive option in vessels. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCB vs....
Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been an attractive option in vessels. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCB vs. stent for treating lesions in non-small vessels. Studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched (from their commencement to March 2021). This meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3. A total of 3 random controlled trials (RCTs) with 255 patients and 2 observational studies (OS) with 265 patients were included in this meta-analysis following our inclusion criteria. It could be observed that DCB presented no significant difference in cardiac death (CD) ( 0.33, 95% CI [0.01, 8.29], = 0.50 in OS), myocardial infarction (MI) ( 0.49, 95% CI [0.09, 2.50], = 0.39 in RCT), target lesion revascularization (TLR) ( 0.64, 95% CI [0.19, 2.18], = 0.47 in RCT) ( 1.72, 95% CI [0.56, 5.26], = 0.34 in OS), and late lumen loss (LLL) (SMD -0.48, 95% CI [-1.32, 0.36], = 0.26 in RCT) for non-small coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with stents, whereas minimal lumen diameter (MLD) including MLD1 (SMD -0.67, 95% CI [-0.92 -0.42], < 0.00001 in RCT) and MLD2 (SMD -0.36, 95% CI [-0.61 -0.11], = 0.004 in RCT) was smaller in DCB group. This systematic review showed that DCB might provide a promising way on non-small coronary artery disease compared with stents. However, more RCTs are still needed to further prove the benefits of the DCB strategy. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
PubMed: 34957227
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.700235 -
Oncology 2023Therapy-related leukemia is a term that describes the occurrence of leukemia following exposure to hematotoxins and radiation to emphasize the difference from leukemia... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Therapy-related leukemia is a term that describes the occurrence of leukemia following exposure to hematotoxins and radiation to emphasize the difference from leukemia that arises de novo. Many agents and host factors contribute to this entity of leukemias. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia has an extensive literature review in contrast to therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia (t-CML). Radioactive iodine (RAI), an established agent in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinomas, has raised concern due to its possible carcinogenic effects.
SUMMARY
In this article, we reviewed all the reports from the 1960s to date related to t-CML following RAI on Google Scholar and PubMed. We have identified 14 reports and found that most reports were for men under the age of 60 years with primary papillary thyroid carcinoma and mixed follicular-papillary thyroid carcinoma who developed t-CML mainly between 4 and 7 years after exposure to varying doses of I131. However, the mean dose was 287.78 millicuries (mCi). It was reported that a statistically significant increase in leukemia following RAI therapy (relative risk of 2.5 for I131 vs. no I131). Also, there was a linear relationship between the cumulative dose of I131 and the risk of leukemia. Doses higher than 100 mCi were associated with a greater risk of developing secondary leukemia, and most of the leukemias developed within the initial 10 years of exposure. The precise mechanism through which RAI provokes leukemia is largely unclear. A few mechanisms have been proposed.
KEY MESSAGES
Although the risk for t-CML appears to be low based on current reports and does not represent a contraindication to RAI therapy, it should not be disregarded. We suggest including it in the risk-benefit discussion before initiating this therapy. Long-term follow-up for patients is advisable for those who received doses over 100 mCi with a complete blood count, possibly yearly, for the first 10 years. The new onset of significant leukocytosis post RAI exposure should raise the suspicion for t-CML. Further studies are needed to establish or refute a causal relationship.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Thyroid Neoplasms; Iodine Radioisotopes; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 37231874
DOI: 10.1159/000530463 -
Cancers Nov 2023Radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas (RISs) are rare secondary malignancies with a dire prognosis. The literature on the management of these tumors remains scarce due... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Radiation-induced soft tissue sarcomas (RISs) are rare secondary malignancies with a dire prognosis. The literature on the management of these tumors remains scarce due to their low incidence. Our systematic review sought to assess the treatment alternatives and outcomes of patients with RIS.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Our study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023438415). Quality assessment was performed using the STROBE checklist. Weighted means for both continuous and categorical values were calculated.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies comprising 1371 patients with RIS were included. The mean latency period from radiation to RIS diagnosis was 14 years, and the mean radiation dose delivered to the primary malignancy was 29.2 Gy. The most common histological type was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (42.2%), and 64% of all tumors were high-grade. The trunk was the most common location (59%), followed by extremities (21%) and pelvis (11%). Surgery was performed in 68% of patients and, among those with an appendicular tumor, the majority (74%) underwent limb-salvage surgery. Negative margins were attained in 58% of patients. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were administered in 29% and 15% of patients, respectively. The mean 5-year overall survival was 45%, and the local recurrence and metastasis rates were 39% and 27%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
In our study, the most common treatment was surgical resection, with RT and chemotherapy being administered in less than one third of patients. Patients with RIS exhibited poor oncologic outcomes. Future studies should compare RIS with de novo STS while controlling for confounders.
PubMed: 38067287
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235584 -
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine... Jan 2023This systematic and meta-analysis aims to evaluate humoral and cellular responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine among... (Review)
Review
Seroconversion rates in kidney transplant recipients following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and its association with immunosuppressive agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This systematic and meta-analysis aims to evaluate humoral and cellular responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We conducted a systematic literature search across databases to evaluate seroconversion and cellular response rates in KTRs receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We extracted studies that assessed seroconversion rates described as the presence of antibody positivity in KTRs following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination published up to January 23rd, 2022. We also performed meta-regression based on immunosuppression therapy used. A total of 44 studies involving 5,892 KTRs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall seroconversion rate following complete dose of vaccines was 39.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.3%-45.3%) and cellular response rate was 41.6% (95% CI, 30.0%-53.6%). Meta-regression revealed that low antibody response rate was significantly associated with the high prevalence of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (p=0.04), belatacept (p=0.02), and anti-CD25 induction therapy uses (p=0.04). Conversely, tacrolimus use was associated with higher antibody response (p=0.01). This meta-analysis suggests that postvaccination seroconversion and cellular response rates in KTRs are still low. And seroconversion rate was correlated with the type of immunosuppressive agent and induction therapy used. Additional doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for this population using a different type of vaccine are considered.
PubMed: 36844682
DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2023.12.1.13 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2023Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare chronic neuroinflammatory autoimmune condition. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare chronic neuroinflammatory autoimmune condition. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been reports of NMOSD clinical manifestations following both SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 vaccinations.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to systematically review the published literature of NMOSD clinical manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 vaccinations.
METHODS
A Boolean search of the medical literature was conducted between December 1, 2019 to September 1, 2022, utilizing Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Trip Database, Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Articles were collated and managed on Covidence software. The authors independently appraised the articles for meeting study criteria and followed PRISMA guidelines. The literature search included all case reports and case series that met study criteria and involved NMOSD following either the SARS-CoV-2 infection or the COVID-19 vaccination.
RESULTS
A total of 702 articles were imported for screening. After removing 352 duplicates and 313 articles based on exclusion criteria, 34 articles were analyzed. A total of 41 cases were selected, including 15 patients that developed new onset NMOSD following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 patients that developed NMOSD following COVID-19 vaccination, 3 patients with known NMOSD that experienced a relapse following vaccination, and 2 patients with presumed Multiple Sclerosis (MS) that was unmasked as NMOSD post-vaccination. There was a female preponderance of 76% among all NMOSD cases. The median time interval between the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms and NMOSD symptom onset was 14 days (range 3-120 days) and the median interval between COVID-19 vaccination and onset of NMO symptoms was 10 days (range 1 to 97 days). Transverse myelitis was the most common neurological manifestation in all patient groups (27/41). Management encompassed acute treatments such as high dose intravenous methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and maintenance immunotherapies. The majority of patients experienced a favorable outcome with complete or partial recovery, but 3 patients died.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review suggests that there is an association between NMOSD and SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 vaccinations. This association requires further study using quantitative epidemiological assessments in a large population to better quantify the risk.
PubMed: 37426444
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1099758 -
JSLS : Journal of the Society of... 2019Persistent or de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may be a significant clinical issue after gastric/bariatric surgical procedures. We investigated the effect...
BACKGROUND
Persistent or de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may be a significant clinical issue after gastric/bariatric surgical procedures. We investigated the effect of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the treatment of GERD after previous gastric/bariatric surgery.
DATABASE
We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. We searched multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus) up to May 2019. We also queried the prospectively collected database of patients who underwent MSA at our tertiary-care hospital and compared postsurgical to naïve patients operated during the same time period.
RESULTS
Seven studies (3 case series and 4 case reports), for a total of 35 patients, met the inclusion criteria in the systematic review. The most common index operation was a bariatric procedure, either sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. After MSA implant, the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score significantly improved compared to baseline ( = .005). Two patients (5.7%) required laparoscopic device removal. In the local institutional cohort series of 67 patients treated by MSA, the prevalence of preoperative grade B esophagitis, operative time, size of MSA, and length of stay were greater in patients with prior gastric surgery compared to naïve patients.
CONCLUSIONS
MSA is a safe, simple, and standardized antireflux procedure. It is also feasible in patients with refractory GERD following gastric/bariatric surgery. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to validate the preliminary clinical experience in this subset of patients.
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Prostheses and Implants; Stomach
PubMed: 31624454
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00035 -
American Journal of Blood Research 2021Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressive hematological malignancy that is difficult to cure. The prognosis is poor and treatment options are limited in case... (Review)
Review
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressive hematological malignancy that is difficult to cure. The prognosis is poor and treatment options are limited in case of relapse. A comprehensive assessment of current disease burden and the clinical efficacy of non-intensive therapies in this population are lacking. We conducted two systematic literature reviews (SLRs). The first SLR (disease burden) included observational studies reporting the incidence and economic and humanistic burden of relapsed/refractory (RR) AML. The second SLR (clinical efficacy) included clinical trials (phase II or later) reporting remission rates (complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with RR AML or patients with AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. For both SLRs, MEDLINE/Embase were searched from January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2020. Clinical trial registries were also searched for the clinical efficacy SLR. After screening, two independent reviewers determined the eligibility for inclusion in the SLRs based on full-text articles. The disease burden SLR identified 130 observational studies. The median cumulative incidence of relapse was 29.4% after stem cell transplant and 46.8% after induction chemotherapy. Total per-patient-per-month costs were $28,148-$29,322; costs and health care resource use were typically higher for RR versus non-RR patients. Patients with RR AML had worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores than patients with AML across multiple instruments, and lower health utility values versus other AML health states (i.e. newly diagnosed, remission, consolidation, and maintenance therapy). The clinical efficacy SLR identified 50 trials (66 total trial arms). CR/CRi rates and mOS have remained relatively stable and low over the last 2 decades. Across all arms, the median rate of CR/CRi was 18.3% and mOS was 6.2 months. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients with AML will develop RR AML, which is associated with significant humanistic and economic burden. Existing treatments offer limited efficacy, highlighting the need for more effective non-intensive treatment options.
PubMed: 34540343
DOI: No ID Found -
Liver International : Official Journal... Jan 2023Treatment of de novo malignancies and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in liver transplant recipients (LT) is an attractive... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Treatment of de novo malignancies and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in liver transplant recipients (LT) is an attractive strategy that is infrequently pursued because of the lack of strong evidence regarding their safety and efficacy. In this systematic review with pooled analysis, we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of ICI therapy following LT.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of case reports and series published until January 2022. We included 31 publications reporting a total of 52 patients treated with ICIs after LT and assessed in a pooled analysis the risk of graft rejection and the outcome of ICI therapy.
RESULTS
Acute graft rejection occurred in 15 patients (28.8%) and 7 patients (13.4% of the total cohort) died because of graft loss. Rejection was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (17.2 months, confidence interval [CI] 12.1-22.2 vs. 3.5 months, CI 1.6-5.4, p < 0.001). Disease control rate was 44.2% (n = 23), and in these patients, OS was longer than in non-responders (26.4 months, CI 20.8-32.0 vs. 3.4 months, CI 2.1-4.7, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Observational, off-label experience suggests that treatment with ICI for advanced malignancies in LT recipients might not be discarded a priori. This notwithstanding, ICI treatment in these patients is associated with a substantial risk of graft rejection and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to provide adequate safety and efficacy figures of ICI treatment in this fragile population.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Liver Transplantation; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Graft Rejection; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 36102312
DOI: 10.1111/liv.15419