-
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques Nov 2022Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) following orthopedic surgery may lead to serious morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, VTEs following upper extremity procedures are... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) following orthopedic surgery may lead to serious morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, VTEs following upper extremity procedures are uncommon. However, the true incidence is likely underreported. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review, excluding large database studies, to report on the incidence of VTEs following shoulder arthroscopic procedures.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review of multiple databases was performed. A comprehensive search of several databases from inception to September 1, 2021, limited to English language and excluding animal studies, was designed and conducted. Studies were screened by 2 independent reviewers. A decision to exclude studies from large surgical or insurance claim databases was made to minimize the risk of including overlapping data points in this systematic review.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and form part of this systematic review. A total of 32,407 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, the deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and overall VTE rates were 0.15%, 0.08%, and 0.21%, respectively. Among the patients specified to have undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the rate of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and overall VTE was 0.71%, 0.37%, and 1.04%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
While symptomatic VTEs are rare following shoulder arthroscopic procedures, surgeons must be aware that they still account for a certain number of postoperative complications. Factors such as operative time, open procedures, obesity, and altitude may increase the risk of postoperative VTE although conflicting data exist. Current literature supports the idea that chemical antithrombotic prophylaxis likely provides no significant advantage over early mobilization in reducing VTEs following shoulder arthroscopy in low-risk patients.
PubMed: 37588470
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.05.003 -
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Dec 2021We aimed to review the prevalence, the risk factors and the outcomes of venous thrombosis (VT) in patients hospitalized for COronaVirus Disease 19 (COVID-19).
INTRODUCTION
We aimed to review the prevalence, the risk factors and the outcomes of venous thrombosis (VT) in patients hospitalized for COronaVirus Disease 19 (COVID-19).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Electronic bibliographic databases were searched using the words "COVID venous thrombosis". The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The search of the literature retrieved 877 results. After assessment of full texts, 69 papers were included in the qualitative analysis and 23 of them in the quantitative evaluation. The analyzed studies included a total of 106,838 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2020. The pooled reported prevalence rate of VT was in median 16.7% (IQR 5.8-30%), being higher in ICU patients (60.8-85.4%). VT events were reported in about 75% of cases in the popliteal and calf veins. Signs and symptoms were present in 6.1% of cases. At quantitative evaluation, older age, D-dimer and obesity increased the odds to experience a VT (OR=3.54, 95% CI 0.65-6.43, P=0.01; OR=956.86, 95% CI 225.67-1668.05, P=0.01; OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.01-1.99, P=0.03 respectively). Female sex seemed to be protective against the odds of VT (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, P=0.007).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients hospitalized for COVID-19, VT is a relatively common finding, with higher prevalence rates in ICU patients. VT occurs mostly in the distal regions of the lower limb and is asymptomatic in most cases. Older age, obesity and higher D-dimer values on admission increased the odds of VT, while female sex was protective against the odds of VT.
Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; COVID-19; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hospitalization; Humans; Obesity; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 34520137
DOI: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12022-1 -
Cureus Nov 2023Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke which remains unsung among Bangladeshi physicians and the general population. Our objective was to provide a... (Review)
Review
Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke which remains unsung among Bangladeshi physicians and the general population. Our objective was to provide a comprehensive review of published data on Bangladeshi CVT patients. We searched all-electronic databases for Bangladeshi studies on CVT until November 2023, including literature in all languages. This study reviews the age of onset, gender distribution, radiological characteristics, and outcomes of Bangladeshi CVT patients. We included 13 studies (two observational and 11 case reports) that evaluated 102 CVT patients and found that women suffered CVT significantly higher than men (59.8% vs 40.2%; P =0.04), respectively. The overall age of the study population was 36.6±6.8, and men were significantly older than women (45.4±12.3 vs. 32.4±8.3; P<0.001). The most commonly affected sites were the superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus thrombosis. Rivaroxaban was primarily used for long-term anticoagulation after initial low molecular weight heparin therapy. Furthermore, most studies observed an excellent clinical outcome with completed recanalisation on early follow-up angiography in three studies. In Bangladesh, women 1.5 times more commonly suffer from CVT and 13 years earlier than men. Although this review found that prompt diagnosis and anticoagulation therapy provides good clinical outcome, we recommended further studies to evaluate the long-term outcome, especially the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants, with recanalisation and recurrence rate.
PubMed: 38152776
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49470 -
Asian Journal of Andrology Oct 2023To evaluate the relationship between testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and arterial and/or venous thrombosis in patients with pre-treatment total testosterone (TT)...
To evaluate the relationship between testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and arterial and/or venous thrombosis in patients with pre-treatment total testosterone (TT) <12 nmol l-1, we performed a meta-analysis following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome model. Population: men with TT <12 nmol l-1 or clear mention of hypogonadism in the inclusion criteria of patients; intervention: TRT; comparison: placebo or no therapy; outcomes: arterial thrombotic events (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], upper limbs, and lower limbs), VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], portal vein thrombosis, splenic thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), and mortality. A total of 2423 abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-four studies, including 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were finally included, with a total of 4027 and 310 288 hypotestosteronemic male patients, from RCTs and from observational studies, respectively. Based on RCT-derived data, TRT did not influence the risk of arterial thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-3.43, P = 0.64), stroke (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.09-18.97, P = 0.83), MI (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11-2.31, P = 0.39), VTE (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.22-9.03, P = 0.71), pulmonary embolism (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.27-7.04, P = 0.70), and mortality (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.20-2.38, P = 0.56). Meanwhile, when only observational studies are considered, a significant reduction in the risk of developing arterial thrombotic events, MI, venous thromboembolism, and mortality was observed. The risk for DVT remains uncertain, due to the paucity of RCT-based data. TRT in men with TT <12 nmol l-1 is safe from the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Further studies specifically assessing the risk of DVT in men on TRT are needed.
PubMed: 37921515
DOI: 10.4103/aja202352 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Oct 2023Hospitalisation and surgery are major risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and graduated compression stockings (GCS)... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Hospitalisation and surgery are major risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and graduated compression stockings (GCS) are common mechanical prophylaxis devices used to prevent VTE. This review compares the safety and efficacy of IPC and GCS used singularly and in combination for surgical patients.
METHODS
Ovid Medline and Pubmed were searched in a systematic review of the literature, and relevant articles were assessed against eligibility criteria for inclusion along PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
This review is a narrative description and critical analysis of available evidence. Fourteen articles were included in this review after meeting the criteria. Results of seven studies comparing the efficacy of IPC versus GCS had high heterogeneity but overall suggested IPC was superior to GCS. A further seven studies compared the combination of IPC and GCS versus GCS alone, the results of which suggest that combination mechanical prophylaxis may be superior to GCS alone in high-risk patients. No studies compared combination therapy to IPC alone. IPC appeared to have a superior safety profile, although it had a worse compliance rate and the quality of evidence was poor. The addition of pharmacological prophylaxis may make mechanical prophylaxis superfluous in the post-operative setting.
CONCLUSION
IPC may be superior to GCS when used as a single prophylactic device. A combination of IPC and GCS may be more efficacious than GCS alone for high-risk patients. Further high-quality research is needed focusing on clinical relevance, safety and comparing combination mechanical prophylaxis to IPC alone, particularly in high-risk surgical settings when pharmacological prophylaxis is contraindicated.
Topics: Humans; Venous Thromboembolism; Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices; Stockings, Compression; Combined Modality Therapy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37851108
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03142-6 -
Cureus Oct 2022Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder characterized by autoantibodies against platelets. The clinical presentation is variable; the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder characterized by autoantibodies against platelets. The clinical presentation is variable; the main symptom is bleeding, and many patients are asymptomatic; others have nonspecific symptoms like fatigue. Uncommonly, ITP can present with paradoxical thrombosis. The risk of thrombosis in ITP may be higher than expected, which makes the management of ITP more challenging. This review aims to evaluate patients with ITP who develop thrombosis and identify potential risk factors related to thrombosis in this category of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
English literature was searched using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for adults above 18 years with primary ITP who had infarctions or thrombotic events. Patients with secondary ITP were excluded. The search included articles published up to 20th October 2021.
RESULTS
A total of 73 articles were included. Seventy-seven patients with ITP had developed infarctions and various thrombotic events. Sixty-three patients had arterial events, and 14 patients developed venous thrombotic events.
CONCLUSION
Patients with ITP have low platelets, which predispose them to bleed; despite that, serious thrombotic complications can happen in these patients and are difficult to predict. Therefore, it is critical for physicians to understand that ITP is paradoxically a prothrombotic condition and to address preventive thromboembolic measures whenever possible.
PubMed: 36407259
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30279 -
Vascular Medicine (London, England) Aug 2021Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism events (VTE). This study performed a systematic review in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism events (VTE). This study performed a systematic review in PubMed/EMBASE of studies reporting the prevalence of VTE in patients with COVID-19 who were totally screened/assessed for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or for pulmonary embolism (PE). Among 47 candidate studies ( = 6459; 33 in Europe), 17 studies ( = 3973; weighted age 63.0 years, males 60%, intensive care unit (ICU) 16%) reported the prevalence of PE with a pooled estimate of 32% (95% CI: 25, 40%), and 32 studies ( = 2552; weighted age 62.6 years, males 57%, ICU 49%) reported the prevalence of DVT with a pooled estimate of 27% (95% CI: 21, 34%). A total of 36 studies reported the use of at least prophylactic antithrombotic treatment in the majority of their patients. Meta-regression analysis showed that the prevalence of VTE was higher across studies with a higher percentage of ICU patients and higher study population mean D-dimer values, and lower in studies with mixed dosing of anticoagulation in ⩾ 50% of the population compared to studies with standard prophylactic dosing of anticoagulation in < 50% of the population. The pooled odds ratio for death in patients with COVID-19 and VTE versus those without VTE (17 studies, = 2882) was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.2, 3.6). Hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 are at high VTE risk despite prophylactic anticoagulation. Further research should investigate the individualized VTE risk of patients with COVID-19 and the optimal preventive antithrombotic therapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; COVID-19; Female; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Young Adult
PubMed: 33818197
DOI: 10.1177/1358863X21995566 -
European Journal of Haematology Nov 2022Idiopathic upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) management is controversial and ranges from anticoagulation alone to the addition of further interventions such...
BACKGROUND
Idiopathic upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) management is controversial and ranges from anticoagulation alone to the addition of further interventions such as thrombolysis and decompressive surgery.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of anticoagulation alone compared to anticoagulation with additional interventions such as thrombolysis or decompressive surgery on the incidence of recurrent UEDVT and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with idiopathic UEDVT (including those associated with the oral contraceptive pill).
PATIENTS/METHODS
A systematic search was conducted for studies which focused on acute UEDVT treatment defined as therapies starting within 4 weeks of symptom onset. We limited studies to those that recruited 10 or more subjects and involved at least 6 weeks to 12 months anticoagulation alone or together with additional interventions with at least 6-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were symptomatic recurrent radiologically confirmed UEDVT and PTS. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality.
RESULTS
We found seven studies which reported recurrent UEDVT rates and five that reported PTS rates. All studies were retrospective or cross-sectional. None compared anticoagulation alone to anticoagulation with additional intervention. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and risk of bias was moderate to serious. Recurrent UEDVT occurred in 0% to 12% post-anticoagulation alone and 0% to 23% post-additional interventions. PTS rates varied from 4% to 32% without severe PTS. Only limited studies reported on our secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION
There is limited evidence behind idiopathic UEDVT management. Prospective comparative studies in this area are essential.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Contraceptives, Oral; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
PubMed: 36053912
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13842 -
Clinical and Applied... 2021The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predisposes patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to risk factors, severe infection, and severe inflammatory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predisposes patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to risk factors, severe infection, and severe inflammatory responses. The objective is to determine the risk of developing VTE after corticosteroid administration during COVID-19 treatment. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, a review was conducted from inception until 20 September 2020 with MESH terms including "venous thromboembolism" and "covid-19," using MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and WHO Global Database. The inclusion criteria included studies with COVID-19 patients aged 18 years and older with VTE diagnosed by duplex ultrasonography or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Exclusion criteria were studies with non COVID-19 patients and non-VTE patients aged less than 18 years. Quality appraisal was conducted of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effect model using 95% confidence intervals, and significance of findings was assessed using Review Manager V5.4.We included 12 observational studies with 2801 patients (VTE n = 434; non-VTE; n = 2367). Patients had a higher risk of presenting with VTE when being administered corticosteroids during treatment of COVID-19 (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.77, I = 0%). A positive effect size was found (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.32, I = 85%) for D-dimer laboratory values (µg/mL) in the VTE group. While critically ill COVID-19 patients are more likely to require corticosteroid treatment, it may be associated with increased risk of VTE, and poor clinical prognosis. Risk assessment is warranted to further evaluate patients as case-by-case in reducing VTE and worsening clinical outcomes.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; COVID-19; Critical Illness; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Models, Cardiovascular; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Venous Thromboembolism; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 33571009
DOI: 10.1177/1076029621993573 -
Thrombotic and Thromboembolic Complications After Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Cureus Apr 2023Thromboembolic complications after the COVID-19 vaccination have been reported from all over the world. We aimed to identify the thrombotic and thromboembolic... (Review)
Review
Thromboembolic complications after the COVID-19 vaccination have been reported from all over the world. We aimed to identify the thrombotic and thromboembolic complications that can arise after receiving various types of COVID-19 vaccines, their frequency, and distinguishing characteristics. Articles published in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the CDC database, the WHO database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and servers like medRxiv.org and bioRxiv.org, as well as the websites of several reporting authorities between December 1, 2019, and July 29, 2021, were searched. Studies were included if they reported any thromboembolic complications post-COVID-19 vaccination and excluded editorials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, and commentaries. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and conducted the quality assessment. Thromboembolic events and associated hemorrhagic complications after various types of COVID-19 vaccines, their frequency, and distinguishing characteristics were assessed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID-CRD42021257862). There were 59 articles, enrolling 202 patients. We also studied data from two nationwide registries and surveillance. The mean age of presentation was 47 ± 15.5 (mean ± SD) years, and 71.1% of the reported cases were females. The majority of events were with the AstraZeneca vaccine and with the first dose. Of these, 74.8% were venous thromboembolic events, 12.7% were arterial thromboembolic events, and the rest were hemorrhagic complications. The most common reported event was cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (65.8%), followed by pulmonary embolism, splanchnic vein thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The majority had thrombocytopenia, high D-dimer, and anti-PF4 antibodies. The case fatality rate was 26.5%. In our study, 26/59 of the papers were of fair quality. The data from two nationwide registries and surveillance revealed 6347 venous and arterial thromboembolic events post-COVID-19 vaccinations. COVID-19 vaccinations have been linked to thrombotic and thromboembolic complications. However, the benefits far outweigh the risks. Clinicians should be aware of these complications because they may be fatal and because prompt identification and treatment can prevent fatalities.
PubMed: 37182082
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37275