-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2022To determine the effects of behavioural interventions in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effects of behavioural interventions in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
METHODS
Systematic literature searches were conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials in four different databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed). The methodological quality of eligible articles was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2), after which meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 37 studies were included. Overall, a significant, large pre-post interventions effect size was found. To compare different types of interventions, all behavioural interventions and conventional dysphagia treatment comparison groups were categorised into compensatory, rehabilitative, and combined compensatory and rehabilitative interventions. Overall, significant treatment effects were identified favouring behavioural interventions. In particular, large effect sizes were found when comparing rehabilitative interventions with no dysphagia treatment, and combined interventions with compensatory conventional dysphagia treatment. When comparing selected interventions versus conventional dysphagia treatment, significant, large effect sizes were found in favour of Shaker exercise, chin tuck against resistance exercise, and expiratory muscle strength training.
CONCLUSIONS
Behavioural interventions show promising effects in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. However, due to high heterogeneity between studies, generalisations of meta-analyses need to be interpreted with care.
PubMed: 35160137
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030685 -
BMJ Open Mar 2022Dysphagia in childhood has important health impacts for the child and their family as well as the healthcare system. This systematic review aims to determine the...
OBJECTIVES
Dysphagia in childhood has important health impacts for the child and their family as well as the healthcare system. This systematic review aims to determine the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in children.
METHODS
A search was performed on November 2020 in MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1947), PsycINFO (from 1806), CINAHL (from 1937), CENTRAL (from 1996) and Scopus (from 1970) databases. Studies of children (≤18 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia using NMES in the throat/neck region were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa assessment for observational studies. A meta-analysis was not conducted due to clinical heterogeneity in studies.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included (5 RCTs, 4 case series, 1 cohort study; including 393 children, mean or median age below 7 years, including children with neurologic impairments). In all studies, swallowing function improved after NMES treatment. The standardised mean difference (SMD) for improvement of swallowing dysfunction in treatment compared with control groups in the RCTs ranged from 0.18 (95% CI -0.7 to 1.06) to 1.49 (95% CI 0.57 to 2.41). Eight of 10 studies reported on the child's feeding ability, and, with one exception, there was improvement in feeding ability. Few studies reported on health status (N=2), impact on caregiver (N=1), adverse events and harms (N=2), and child's quality of life (N=1). In most studies, outcome follow-up was less than 6 months. The studies demonstrated moderate to high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
NMES treatment may be beneficial in improving swallowing function for children with dysphagia, however, given the quality of the studies, inadequate outcome reporting, and short follow-up duration, uncertainty remains. Well-designed RCTs are needed to establish its effectiveness before its adoption in clinical practice.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42019147353.
Topics: Child; Cohort Studies; Deglutition Disorders; Electric Stimulation; Humans; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35338059
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055124 -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2022Whether decreased tongue strength is associated with poor clinical outcomes is unclear. This systematic review investigated the effect of decreased tongue strength on...
OBJECTIVES
Whether decreased tongue strength is associated with poor clinical outcomes is unclear. This systematic review investigated the effect of decreased tongue strength on the clinical outcomes of adults requiring medical treatment.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
Systematic reviews, randomized control trials, intervention studies, and longitudinal observational studies involving patients with decreased tongue strength requiring medical treatment were included.
METHODS
Articles published between January 2000 and June 2021 were retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Ichushi-web (in Japanese), Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, UMIN, the Cochrane Library, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. The study protocol was pre-registered in XXX.
RESULTS
After screening 3040 articles and excluding duplicates, 74 articles were retrieved; after full-text evaluation of the 74 articles, seven articles (with 787 patients) were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The cut-off values for determining decreased tongue strength ranged from 13.8 to 21.6 kPa. Patients with decreased tongue strength had poorer recovery of their swallowing function, higher incidence of pneumonia, and poorer life expectancy than those with high tongue strength. However, tongue strength in older patients with decreased tongue strength increased when they performed physical exercise interventions and followed strict nutritional management plans.
CONCLUSIONS
Decreased tongue strength was related to poor clinical outcomes in in- and outpatients. Oral frailty in older patients should be given increased attention in hospitals, and further research is needed to improve the clinical outcomes for older people with reduced tongue strength.
Topics: Aged; Deglutition; Humans; Tongue
PubMed: 35724534
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104749 -
BMC Geriatrics May 2024Dysphagia affects about 40% of patients admitted to acute geriatric wards, as it is closely associated with diseases that rise in prevalence with advancing age, such as...
BACKGROUND
Dysphagia affects about 40% of patients admitted to acute geriatric wards, as it is closely associated with diseases that rise in prevalence with advancing age, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Malnutrition is a highly associated predictive factor of dysphagia as well as one of the most common symptoms caused by dysphagia. Thus, the two conditions may exist simultaneously but also influence each other negatively and quickly cause functional decline especially in older adults. The purpose of this review was to determine whether institutions have established a protocol combining screenings for dysphagia and malnutrition on a global scale. If combined screening protocols have been implemented, the respective derived measures will be reported.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted. A systematic database search was carried out in January and February 2024. Studies were included that examined adult hospitalized patients who were systematically screened for dysphagia and malnutrition. The results were managed through the review software tool Covidence. The screening of titles and abstracts was handled independently by two reviewers; conflicts were discussed and resolved by consensus between three authors. This procedure was retained for full-text analysis and extraction. The extraction template was piloted and revised following feedback prior to extraction, which was carried out in February 2024.
RESULTS
A total of 2014 studies were found, 1075 of which were included for abstract screening, 80 for full text screening. In the end, 27 studies were extracted and reported following the reporting guideline PRISMA with the extension for Scoping Reviews.
CONCLUSION
Most of the studies considered the prevalence and association of dysphagia and malnutrition with varying outcomes such as nutritional status, pneumonia, oral nutrition, and swallowing function. Only two studies had implemented multi-professional nutrition teams.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Geriatric Assessment; Hospitalization; Malnutrition; Mass Screening
PubMed: 38773449
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05070-6 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2022Swallowing is a complex function that relies on both brainstem and cerebral control. Cerebral neurofunctional evaluations are mostly based on functional magnetic... (Review)
Review
Swallowing is a complex function that relies on both brainstem and cerebral control. Cerebral neurofunctional evaluations are mostly based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), performed with the individual laying down; which is a non-ecological/non-natural position for swallowing. According to the PRISMA guidelines, a review of the non-invasive non-radiating neurofunctional tools, other than fMRI and PET, was conducted to explore the cerebral activity in swallowing during natural food intake, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Using Embase and PubMed, we included human studies focusing on neurofunctional imaging during an ecologic swallowing task. From 5948 unique records, we retained 43 original articles, reporting on three different techniques: electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS). During swallowing, all three techniques showed activity of the pericentral cortex. Variations were associated with the modality of the swallowing process (volitional or non-volitional) and the substance used (mostly water and saliva). All techniques have been used in both healthy and pathological conditions to explore the precise time course, localization or network structure of the swallowing cerebral activity, sometimes even more precisely than fMRI. EEG and MEG are the most advanced and mastered techniques but fNIRS is the most ready-to-use and the most therapeutically promising. Ongoing development of these techniques will support and improve our future understanding of the cerebral control of swallowing.
PubMed: 36143127
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185480 -
European Archives of... Mar 2023Voice training has been proposed as an intervention to improve swallowing function in patients with dysphagia. However, little is known about the effects of voice... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Voice training has been proposed as an intervention to improve swallowing function in patients with dysphagia. However, little is known about the effects of voice training on swallowing physiology.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review investigates the effect of voice training on the swallowing function of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and provides the theoretical basis for improving the swallowing function and life quality of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review using a narrative synthesis approach of all published studies was sought with no date restrictions. Five electronic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to April 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Eight studies were included. Two researchers screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and carried out quality control according to the Cochrane handbook5.1.0. Data were analyzed narratively and descriptively.
CONCLUSIONS
In general, statistically significant positive therapy effects were found. Voice training improves the oral and pharyngeal stages of swallowing in patients with neurological causes of dysphagia, such as stroke, and in patients with non-neurological causes of dysphagia, such as head and neck cancer. However, the current literature is limited and further primary research is required to provide more evidence to support voice training intervention in dysphagia. Future studies could further refine the content of voice training interventions, increase the number of patients enrolled, assess the long-term effects of voice training interventions and add associated assessments of the quality of life after treatment.
Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Quality of Life; Voice Training; Deglutition; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 36342516
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07719-7 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Nov 2022The clinical outcomes of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with the Zero-profile (Zero-p) were evaluated in comparison with the anterior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The clinical outcomes of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with the Zero-profile (Zero-p) were evaluated in comparison with the anterior cervical cage-plate construct (CPC).
METHODS
We performed a systematic search covering PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Medline, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (NCKI), Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database. Articles focused on single-level ACDF or data of the single - level that can be extracted were included, and articles that did not directly compare Zero-p and CPC were excluded. Twenty-seven studies were included with a total of 1866 patients, 931 in the Zero-p group and 935 in the CPC group. All outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis outcomes indicated that operative time (WMD = - 12.47, 95% CI (- 16.89, - 8.05), P < 0.00001), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = - 13.30, 95% CI (- 18.83, - 7.78), P < 0.00001), risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) (OR 0.31, 95% CI (0.20, 0.48), P < 0.0001), risk of dysphagia of short-term (OR 0.40, 95% CI (0.30, 0.54), P < 0.0001), medium-term (OR 0.31, 95% CI (0.20, 0.49), P < 0.0001), and long-term (OR 0.29, 95% CI (0.17, 0.51), P < 0.0001) of Zero-p group were significantly lower. The JOA score of Zero-p group at the final follow-up was significantly higher (WMD = - 0.17, 95% CI (- 0.32, - 0.03), P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in length of stay (LOS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), fusion rate, segmental Cobb angle, cervical Cobb angle, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), SF-36, subsidence, implant failure, and hoarseness between the two groups. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022347146.
CONCLUSION
Zero-p group reduced operative time, intraoperative blood loss, JOA score at follow-up and reduced the incidence of dysphagia and postoperative ASD, but the two devices had the same efficacy in restoring the cervical curvature, preventing the cage subsidence, and in postoperative VAS, NDI, LOS, PSTT, SF-36, fusion rate, implant failure, and hoarseness in single-level ACDF. The use of Zero-p in single-level ACDF was recommended.
Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Blood Loss, Surgical; Hoarseness; Cervical Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion; Diskectomy; Spondylosis
PubMed: 36434694
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03387-9 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Jul 2022This review aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on poststroke dysphagia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This review aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on poststroke dysphagia.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Web of Science, VIP, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched up to June 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of tDCS on poststroke dysphagia.
DATA EXTRACTION
The extracted data included the author, country of publication, time of publication, key elements of bias risk assessment (such as RCTs and blind methods), sample size and basic information (age, course of disease, stroke location), intervention measures, treatment methods of tDCS (stimulation location, intensity, duration), relevant outcome indicators, and relevant data (SDs).The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale were used to assess the risk of bias.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Sixteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the results revealed a large and statistically significant pooled effect size (0.80; confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.14; P<.001). The subgroup that explored the course of the disease yielded a large and significant effect size for the chronic phase group (0.80; CI, 0.43-1.16; P<.001). For the stimulation intensity, 1 mA and 1.6 mA showed a moderate and significant effect sizes (0.47; CI, 0.13-0.81; P=.006 vs 1.39; CI, 0.69-2.08; P<.001). In the subgroup analyses, the affected (0.87; CI, 0.26-1.48; P=.005) vs unaffected (0.61; CI, 0.23-0.99; P=.002) hemisphere showed a significant result, and stimulation of the affected hemisphere had a more obvious effect. Subgroup analysis of stroke location showed that tDCS was effective for dysphagia after unilateral hemispheric stroke, bulbar paralysis, and brainstem stroke but not for dysphagia after ataxic and basal ganglia stroke. However, the subgroup analysis of stroke location revealed a significant result (0.81; CI, 0.44-1.18; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrated the height and significant beneficial effect of tDCS on improving poststroke dysphagia.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
PubMed: 35337844
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.004 -
European Archives of... Mar 2024To determine the clinical efficacy of different respiratory training interventions on swallowing function in patients with swallowing disorders through the systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To determine the clinical efficacy of different respiratory training interventions on swallowing function in patients with swallowing disorders through the systematic review.
METHODS
We reviewed the literature regarding the application of respiratory training therapy in patients with swallowing disorders, followed by a PRISMA search of published literature in five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL and EMBASE) in December 2022. Two reviewers performed study selection, quality evaluation, and risk of bias, followed by data extraction and detailed analysis.
RESULTS
A total of six randomized controlled studies with a total sample size of 193 cases were included. Respiratory training improved swallowing safety (PAS (n = 151, SMD = 0.69, 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.26, I = 36, p < 0.001)) and swallowing efficiency [residual (n = 63, SMD = 1.67, 95% CI - 2.26 to - 1.09, I = 23%, p < 0.001)] compared to control groups. The results of the qualitative analysis conducted in this study revealed that respiratory training enhanced hyoid bone movement but had no effect on swallowing quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
Respiratory training interventions may improve swallowing safety and efficiency in patients with dysphagia. However, the level of evidence is low, and there is a limited amount of research on the effectiveness and physiology of this intervention to improve swallowing function. In the future, there is a need to expand clinical studies, standardize measurement tools, and improve study protocols.
Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Deglutition; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37843618
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08280-7 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Mar 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological agents for neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia based on evidence from randomized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological agents for neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS
Electronic databases were systematically searched between January 1970 and March 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted and synthesized the data. The outcome measure was changed in (any) relevant clinical swallowing-related characteristics.
KEY RESULTS
Data from 2186 dysphagic patients were collected from 14 RCT studies across a range of pharmacotherapies. The pooled effect size of transient receptor potential (TRP) channel agonists was large compared to placebo interventions (SMD[95%CI] =1.27[0.74,1.80], p < 0.001; I = 79%). Data were limited for other pharmacological agents and the overall pooled effect size of these agents was non-significant (SMD [95% CI] =0.25 [-0.24, 0.73]; p = 0.31; I = 85%). When analyzed separately, large effect sizes were observed with Nifedipine (SMD[95%CI] =1.13[0.09,2.18]; p = 0.03) and Metoclopramide (SMD[95%CI] =1.68[1.08,2.27]; p < 0.001). By contrast, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (SMD[95%CI] = -0.67[-2.32,0.99]; p = 0.43; I = 61%), Physostigmine (SMD[95%CI] = -0.05[-1.03,0.93]; p = 0.92) and Glyceryl Trinitrate (GTN) (SMD [95% CI] = -0.01 [-0.11, 0.08]; p = 0.78) were non-significant. Within stroke patients, subgroup analysis showed that TRP channel agonists had a moderate pooled effect size (SMD[95%CI] =0.74[0.10,1.39]; p = 0.02; I = 82%) whereas the effects of other agents were non-significant (SMD[95%CI] =0.40[-0.04,0.84]; p = 0.07; I = 87%).
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES
Our results showed that TRP channel agonists, Nifedipine and Metoclopromide may be beneficial for neurogenic dysphagic patients. Large scale, multicenter clinical trials are warranted to fully explore their therapeutic effects on swallowing.
Topics: Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nifedipine; Stroke
PubMed: 34337829
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14220