-
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2022The objective of this study was to compare the effect of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion and conventional intrusion mechanics on maxillary incisors and... (Review)
Review
Comparing the Effect of Miniscrew-Supported and Conventional Maxillary Incisor Intrusion on the Inclination of Maxillary Incisors and Molars - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to compare the effect of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion and conventional intrusion mechanics on maxillary incisors and molar inclination.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Search databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized trials on intrusion of maxillary incisors via miniscrew-supported and conventional mechanics. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used. Five outcomes ([i] inclination change of upper incisors, [ii] inclination change of upper molars, [iii] intrusion of incisors, [iv] vertical change in upper first molars, and [v] overbite correction achieved) were statistically pooled using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analysis was conducted to receive sturdiness in meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
RESULTS
Out of 1777 studies, 7 were finally subjected to quality assessment, and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. The incisor inclination following maxillary incisor intrusion increased in miniscrew-supported intrusion in comparison to Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA) subgroup with standard mean difference of 0.66 mm (95% confidence interval = 0.16, 1.03, I = 0%). All the included studies showed an increase in molar inclination (distal tipping) in the CTA subgroup compared to the micro-implant group. Of all the seven included studies, only one study was identified with some concerns for the risk of bias, and the other six were judged to have an overall high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
The incisal proclination during deep-bite correction by miniscrew-supported incisal intrusion is more than that in the CTA subgroup; however, the difference may not be clinically very relevant. There is a very low quality of evidence in favor of miniscrew-supported intrusion as compared to conventional intrusion, necessitating the need for good-quality trials.
PubMed: 36686998
DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_385_22 -
Journal of Orthodontics Jun 2022To facilitate the orthognathic shared decision-making process by identifying and applying existing research evidence to establish the potential consequences of living...
AIM
To facilitate the orthognathic shared decision-making process by identifying and applying existing research evidence to establish the potential consequences of living with a severe malocclusion.
METHODS
A comprehensive narrative literature review was conducted to explore the potential complications of severe malocclusion. A systematic electronic literature search of four databases combined with supplementary hand searching identified 1024 articles of interest. A total of 799 articles were included in the narrative literature review, which was divided into 10 themes: Oral Health Related Quality Of Life; Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction; Masticatory Limitation; Sleep Apnoea; Traumatic Dental Injury; Tooth Surface Loss; Change Over Time; Periodontal Injury; Restorative Difficulty; and Functional Shift and Dual Bite. A deductive approach was used to draw conclusions from the evidence available within each theme.
RESULTS
The narrative literature review established 27 conclusions, indicating that those living with a severe malocclusion may be predisposed to a range of potential consequences. With the exception of Oral Health Related Quality Of Life, which is poorer in adults with severe malocclusion than those with normal occlusions, and the risk of Traumatic Dental Injury, which increases when the overjet is >5 mm in the permanent and 3 mm in the primary dentition, the evidence supporting the remaining conclusions was found to be of low to moderate quality and at high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
This article summarises the findings of a comprehensive narrative literature review in which all of the relevant research evidence within a substantive investigative area is established and evaluated. Notwithstanding limitations regarding the quality of the available evidence; when combined with clinical expertise and an awareness of individual patient preferences, the conclusions presented may facilitate the orthognathic shared decision-making process and furthermore, may guide the development of the high-quality longitudinal research required to validate them.
Topics: Adult; Dental Occlusion; Humans; Malocclusion; Overbite; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Tooth Injuries
PubMed: 34488471
DOI: 10.1177/14653125211042891 -
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Jun 2022The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the maxillary incisor intrusion and change in overbite achieved by micro-implants compared to Connecticut intrusion arches among...
The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the maxillary incisor intrusion and change in overbite achieved by micro-implants compared to Connecticut intrusion arches among post-pubertal patients with deep bite. Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google scholar were searched for studies falling under the inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) com- paring maxillary incisor intrusion among post-pubertal deep bite cases treated by mini-implants and Connecticut intrusion arches were to be included. Outcome data were extracted using guidelines published by the Cochrane Collaboration. A systematic review was conducted using Cochrane Program Review Manager, version 5. A random effects model was used to assess the mean difference in the amount of incisor intrusion and overbite correction achieved between the 2 methods. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Assessment of certainty of evidence was conducted using GRADE analysis. Six trials met the inclusion criteria. Mean differences for incisor intrusion -0.67 [95% CI, 0.97, 0.38] I2 = 31%; P < .00001) and overbite correction -0.51 [95% CI, 0.85, 0.16] I2 = 50%; P = .004) achieved with mini-implants were found to be significantly effective when compared to the Connecticut intrusion arch. Low to mod- erate heterogeneity was noted for incisor intrusion and change in overbite analysis respectively. High certainty of evidence was noted for higher association of mini-implants with incisor intrusion and overbite correction. Our meta-analysis suggests that mini-implants are superior to the Connecticut intrusion arch with respect to the amount of incisor intrusion and overbite correction. Further studies are still needed to confirm the superiority.
PubMed: 35788440
DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21080 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Dec 2021This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the treatment effects of activator appliances on untreated class II skeletal malocclusion patients in terms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the treatment effects of activator appliances on untreated class II skeletal malocclusion patients in terms of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes.
METHODS
We searched 11 databases from January 1966 to May 2021 for randomized and clinical controlled trials that compared the treatment effects of activator appliances on untreated Class II skeletal malocclusion patients. All data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS
According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 16 articles qualified for the final analysis. Thirteen outcome indicators of teeth, bone tissue, and soft tissue were compared and analyzed: SNA°, SNB°, ANB°, SN-MP°, ANS-Me, Co-Gn, Go-Me, overjet, overbite, U1-SN°, L1-MP°, UL-E, and LL-E. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluations were of medium quality, and 11 controlled clinical trials (CCTs) evaluations were of B grade. Bone tissue changes: compared with the untreated group, the SNA and ANB decreased, and the SNB, SN-MP, ANS-Me, Co-Gn, and Go-Me increased after activator appliance treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). Dental changes: compared with the untreated group, the overjet, overbite and U1-SN in the treated group decreased significantly, while the L1-MP increased significantly (P<0.0001). Soft tissue changes: compared with untreated patients, the UL-E of patients treated with an activator appliance decreased significantly (P<0.0001); however, there was no significant difference in the LL-E between the two groups (P=0.09).
DISCUSSION
Since the imprecision and high level of heterogeneity of the articles, further large-sample and high-quality clinical trials are necessary to evaluate effects of orthodontic treatment with activator appliance on patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion. In addition, this study failed to explore the long-term stability of activator treatment, so long-term studies are needed to assess the stability of its effect on the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes.
Topics: Activator Appliances; Humans; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Overbite
PubMed: 35016488
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3205 -
Cureus Nov 2023Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) remain a popular non-invasive treatment modality for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the occlusal side... (Review)
Review
Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) remain a popular non-invasive treatment modality for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the occlusal side effects from long-term therapy may result in poor patient compliance and patient drop-outs. Hence, knowledge of the possible side effects of these devices on occlusion is necessary. This article attempts to systematically review the evidence available in support of the possible long-term effects of mandibular advancement therapy on occlusion in adult sleep apnea patients. A detailed search was conducted for unpublished and published literature and their references in various electronic databases. A grey literature search was also performed. Studies until June 30, 2022, were selected. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, and cohort studies investigating the occlusal side effects of MADs for the treatment of snoring or OSA with a follow-up of at least four years were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed individually and in duplicate. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane tools for randomized and non-randomized studies. Fourteen studies were selected for the final qualitative analysis. The side effects reported were upper incisor retroclination, lower incisor proclination, decreased overjet and overbite, and change in the total occlusal contact area. The review concludes that long-term MAD therapy has statistically and clinically significant effects on occlusion.
PubMed: 38090465
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48682 -
BMC Oral Health Aug 2022The goal of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence regarding the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage devices...
BACKGROUND
The goal of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence regarding the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage devices (BMSADs) used in treating growing class II malocclusion patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and LILACS up to November 2021, which was augmented by a manual search. The studies included were clinical trials (RCTs) and/or follow-up observational studies (retrospective and prospective). The outcomes of interest were the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and occlusal treatment-induced changes obtained from pre- and post-cephalometric measurements. The risks of bias of the included studies were assessed using an assessment tool from previous publications.
RESULTS
Out of 742 screened articles, only 4 were eligible and thus included in the qualitative synthesis. They showed a moderate overall risk of bias. The results are presented as mean changes in both the study and control groups. All studies reported retrusion of the maxillary base and advancement of the mandible (meaning reduced ANB angle). Three of the included studies reported an increase in the vertical jaw relation, which was contrary to what the fourth study reported. Three studies reported an increase in the maxillary incisors' inclination or position, while one study reported their retroclination. Proclination of the mandibular incisors happened in two studies, whereas the other two studies reported retroclination. The overjet was reduced in all included studies.
CONCLUSION
Apart from the protrusive effects on the mandible, retrusive effects on the maxilla, and the consequent reduction of the overjet, BMSADs results in inconsistent skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. However, the current evidence is limited due to the variability in the biomechanics of the intermaxillary components, type of anchorage, and comparable groups in the included studies. Further RCTs with more standardized methodologies are highly encouraged.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
BMSADs (using miniscrews or miniplates on both jaws) induces more skeletal than dentoalveolar effects. However, this must be practiced with caution, based on the benefit to risk (surgical insertion) ratio, and the limited evidence available in hand so far. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, No.: CRD42020199601).
Topics: Humans; Cephalometry; Malocclusion, Angle Class II; Mandible; Maxilla; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35948959
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02363-3 -
International Journal of Clinical... 2023Skeletal class III malocclusion is a challenging condition that orthodontists frequently come across. The facemask (FM) is a device commonly used to treat this...
BACKGROUND
Skeletal class III malocclusion is a challenging condition that orthodontists frequently come across. The facemask (FM) is a device commonly used to treat this malocclusion. However, the stability of this orthopedic correction remains unclear, and collective documentation of the short-, mid-, and long-term stability after FM therapy is necessary.
AIM
The aim of the systematic review was to assess posttreatment stability following FM therapy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Through a predefined search strategy, electronic searching was conducted in PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Cochrane, Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until 30 June 2022. Eligible study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias were performed independently by two review authors according to the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2.0 tool) and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for nonrandomized trials. A total of 14 studies were finally considered eligible. The systematic review revealed that the maxillo-mandibular differential reverted to class III. The maxillary changes achieved were variable, with SNA angles ranging between -0.7° and 1.9°. Changes in the mandible were greater with an increase in the SNB angle ranging between 0.33° and 3.62°. The lower anterior facial height increased. The maxillary and mandibular incisors were proclined, and the overjet and overbite decreased. The soft tissue changes were insignificant.
CONCLUSION
The effects of FM therapy were found to be stable in the short-term follow-up period. The long-term follow-up revealed that the effects of FM therapy remained stable for the maxilla. However, the mandible continued to grow in a horizontal and unfavorable direction until the adolescent growth spurt.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The major variable that determines the long-term success of FM therapy is the amount and direction of mandibular growth during the adolescent growth spurt. More focus on restricting unfavorable mandibular growth and duration of retention is needed for post-FM therapy.
OTHERS
PROSPERO (CRD42021218960).
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Raghupathy Y, Ananthanarayanan V, Kailasam V, Posttreatment Stability Following Facemask Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(6):897-907.
PubMed: 38344378
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2686 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2024Floating-Harbor syndrome (FHS) is an extremely rare genetic disorder connected with a distinctive facial appearance, various skeletal malformations, delayed bone age,...
Floating-Harbor syndrome (FHS) is an extremely rare genetic disorder connected with a distinctive facial appearance, various skeletal malformations, delayed bone age, and expressive language delays. It is caused by heterozygous mutations in the Snf2-related CREBBP activator protein (SRCAP) gene. The aim of this paper is to describe the case of a 14-year-old male with FHS, referring to a review of the literature, and to collect all reported symptoms. In addition, the orthodontic treatment of the patient is described. For this, the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were searched using the keyword "Floating-Harbor syndrome". Similar to previous cases in the literature, the patient presented with short stature; a triangular face with a large bulbous nose; deep-set eyes and narrow eyelid gaps; a wide mouth with a thin vermilion border of the upper lip; and dorsally rotated, small ears. They also presented some less-described symptoms, such as macrodontia and micrognathia. Moreover, mild mental retardation, microcephaly, and delayed psychomotor development were found. On the basis of an extraoral, intraoral examination, X-rays, and CBCT, he was diagnosed with overbite, canine class I and angle class III, on both sides. To the best of our knowledge, orthodontic treatment of this disease has not been assessed in detail so far, so this is the first case.
PubMed: 38929963
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123435 -
Dental and Medical Problems 2019Class III malocclusion is one the most challenging types of orthodontic problems. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Class III malocclusion is one the most challenging types of orthodontic problems.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to compare the dentoskeletal effects of facemasks and intraoral appliances in treating class III maxillary deficiency in growing patients through a systematic review of the available literature.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Electronic and manual searches were performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (OVID), and Scopus to find all the relevant studies published by January 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting 5-12-year-old patients who received maxillary protraction treatment with any type of facemask and comparing the facemasks with any type of intraoral appliance were included. The primary outcome measure was changes in the A point-nasion-B point angle (ANB), and the secondary outcomes included changes in the overjet, upper-1 (U1) inclination, the mandibular plane angle, and treatment time. The meta-analysis was carried out using the inverse variance-weighted random effects model.
RESULTS
Out of 1,629 articles found in the initial search, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed no differences in the duration of treatment or in any of the cephalometric variables, with the exception of the overjet.
CONCLUSIONS
It seems that intraoral appliances and facemasks are similar in terms of dentoskeletal effects in the treatment of class III malocclusion as well as treatment duration. However, due to a lack of a sufficient number of high-quality studies, these results should be viewed with caution. Further high-quality, long-term studies are recommended.
Topics: Cephalometry; Child; Child, Preschool; Extraoral Traction Appliances; Humans; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Orthodontics, Corrective; Overbite
PubMed: 31895504
DOI: 10.17219/dmp/110738 -
BioMed Research International 2021We aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the impact of extraction vs. nonextraction in orthodontic treatment on patients' soft-tissue profile with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the impact of extraction vs. nonextraction in orthodontic treatment on patients' soft-tissue profile with malocclusion.
METHODS
Between April 30 and November 30, 2020, we searched PubMed and SCOPUS for published papers from inception to November 2020 using "orthodontic," "extraction," "nonextraction," and "Malocclusion." Included studies were summarized, and relevant data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
Pooled data from four controlled trials demonstrated a nonsignificant difference between extraction and nonextraction in terms of SNA (MD = 0.50, 95% CI: -0.37, 1.38; = 0.26), SNB (MD = 0.11, 95% CI: -1.23, 1.44; = 0.88), FMA (MD = 1.82, 95% CI: -2.39, 6.02; = 0.40), IMPA (MD = 0.06, 95% CI: -8.83, -8.94; = 0.99), overjet (MD = -1.47, 95% CI: -6.21, 3.26; = 0.54), and overbite (MD = 0.50, 95% CI: -1.40, 2.40; = 0.60). On the other hand, the extraction method significantly increased the ANB compared with the nonextraction group (MD = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.31; = 0.004).
CONCLUSION
The current evidence demonstrated that nonextraction protocols for orthodontic treatment are a safe and effective alternative to extraction protocols; individually tailored treatment strategies should be applied. More randomized controlled trials are critically needed to safely make an evidence-based treatment conclusion.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cephalometry; Female; Humans; Male; Malocclusion; Overbite; Publication Bias; Risk; Young Adult
PubMed: 34589550
DOI: 10.1155/2021/7751516