-
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology 2022The concept of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is derived from the crosstalk between the heart and kidneys in pathological conditions. Despite the rising importance of CRS,... (Review)
Review
The concept of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is derived from the crosstalk between the heart and kidneys in pathological conditions. Despite the rising importance of CRS, there is a paucity of information on the understanding of its pathophysiology and management, increasing both morbidity and mortality for patients. This review summarizes the existing conceptual pathophysiology of different types of CRS and delves into the associated therapeutic modalities with a focus on pediatric cases. Prospective or retrospective observational studies, comparative studies, case reports, case-control, and cross-sectional studies that include pediatric patients with CRS were included in this review. Literature was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar with keywords including "cardio-renal syndrome, type," "reno-cardio syndrome," "children," "acute kidney injury," and "acute decompensated heart failure" from January 2000 to January 2021. A total of 14 pediatric studies were ultimately included and analyzed, comprising a combined population of 3608 children of which 32% had CRS. Of the 14 studies, 57% were based on type 1 CRS, 14% on types 2 and 3 CRS, and 7% were on types 4 and 5 CRS. The majority of included studies were prospective cohort, although a wide spectrum was observed in terms of patient age, comorbidities, etiologies, and treatment strategies. Commonly observed comorbidities in CRS type 1 were hematologic, oncologic, cardiology-related side effects, muscular dystrophy, and pneumonia/bronchiolitis. CRS, particularly type 1, is prevalent in children and has a significant risk of mortality. The current treatment regimen primarily involves diuretics, extracorporeal fluid removal, and treatment of underlying etiologies and comorbidities.
PubMed: 37152514
DOI: 10.4103/apc.apc_50_22 -
Pharmaceutics May 2023Loop diuretics and antibiotics are commonly co-prescribed across many clinical care settings. Loop diuretics may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) via several... (Review)
Review
Loop diuretics and antibiotics are commonly co-prescribed across many clinical care settings. Loop diuretics may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) via several potential drug interactions. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the impact of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK. The primary outcome metric was the ratio of means (ROM) of antibiotic PK parameters such as area under the curve (AUC) and volume of distribution (V) on and off loop diuretics. Twelve crossover studies were amenable for metanalysis. Coadministration of diuretics was associated with a mean 17% increase in plasma antibiotic AUC (ROM 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25, I = 0%) and a mean decrease in antibiotic V by 11% (ROM 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, I = 0%). However, the half-life was not significantly different (ROM 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13, I = 26%). The remaining 13 observational and population PK studies were heterogeneous in design and population, as well as prone to bias. No large trends were collectively observed in these studies. There is currently not enough evidence to support antibiotic dosing changes based on the presence or absence of loop diuretics alone. Further studies designed and powered to detect the effect of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK are warranted in applicable patient populations.
PubMed: 37242653
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051411 -
Eye (London, England) Apr 2021We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant clinical studies published prior to March 2020. The primary outcome was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the secondary outcomes included the subretinal fluid (SRF), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central macular thickness (CMT).
RESULTS
Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 352 eyes. The MRA treatment was not superior to placebo in BCVA at 1 month (WMD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.15-0.02, P = 0.15, I = 86%), 3 months (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.14-0.06, P = 0.44, I = 77%) and 6 months (WMD = -0, 95% CI -0.05-0.05, P = 0.92, I = 0%). The MRA treatment resulted in significant reduction than the placebo in the SRF (WMD = -60.64, 95% CI -97.91 to -23.37, P = 0.001, I = 49%), SFCT (WMD = -39.15, 95% CI -52.58 to -25.72, P < 0.001, I = 0%), and CMT (WMD = -60.75, 95% CI -97.85 to -23.65, P = 0.01, I = 53%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis shows that the MRA treatment can improve anatomical structure in CSC patients, but it is not effective for achieving BCVA gain. The applicant of the MRA is safe and have no severe effect.
Topics: Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Subretinal Fluid; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33414535
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01338-4 -
ESC Heart Failure Feb 2024Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has improved outcomes in patients with heart failure, including the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of new potassium binders on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor optimization in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has improved outcomes in patients with heart failure, including the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, which can hinder the excretion of potassium, resulting in hyperkalaemia. New potassium binders (NPBs) can prevent this adverse effect; however, the efficacy and safety of NPB for this indication have not been fully established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane through 26 April 2023. The risk of bias assessment was conducted, following Cochrane's updated Risk of Bias 2 assessment tool. We used the fixed-effects model to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023426113). We included six RCTs with a total of 1432 patients. NPB was significantly associated with successful mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) optimization [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (1.02-1.25), P = 0.02], decreased patients with MRA at less than the target dose [RR: 0.72 with 95% CI (0.57-0.90), P = 0.004], and decreased hyperkalaemic episodes [RR: 0.42 with 95% CI (0.24-0.72), P = 0.002]. However, there was no difference between NPB and placebo regarding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ANRi) optimization [RR: 1.02 with 95% CI (0.89-1.17), P = 0.76] and serum potassium change [MD: -0.31 with 95% CI (-0.61 to 0.00), P = 0.05], with an acceptable safety profile except for the increased incidence of hypokalaemia with NPB [RR: 1.57 with 95% CI (1.12-2.21), P = 0.009]. NPB has been shown to improve GDMT outcomes by enhancing MRA optimization and reducing hyperkalaemic episodes. However, there are limited data on the effects of NPB on ACEi/ARB/ANRi optimization. Future RCTs should investigate ACEi/ARB/ANRi optimization and conduct head-to-head comparisons of NPB (patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate).
Topics: Humans; Aldosterone; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Heart Failure; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Renin-Angiotensin System
PubMed: 38012095
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14588 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022The genus (Schott) G. Don consists of 113 species distributed across Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia. plants grow in tropical and subtropical forests with humid...
The genus (Schott) G. Don consists of 113 species distributed across Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia. plants grow in tropical and subtropical forests with humid lowlands. Featuring their large green heart-shaped or arrow-shaped ear leaves and occasionally red-orange fruit, they are very popular ornamental plants and are widely used as traditional medicines to treat various diseases such as jaundice, snake bite, boils, and diabetes. This manuscript critically analysed the distribution, traditional uses, and phytochemical contents of 96 species of The numerous biological activities of species were also presented, which include anti-cancer, antidiabetic and antihyperglycaemic, antioxidant, antidiarrhoea, antimicrobial and antifungal, antiparasitic (antiprotozoal and anthelminthic), antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory, brine shrimp lethality, hepatoprotective, anti-hemagglutinin, anti-constipation and diuretic, and radioprotective activities as well as acute toxicity studies. Research articles were acquired by the accessing three scientific databases comprising PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. For this review, specific information was obtained using the general search term "", followed by the "plant species names" and "phytochemical" or "bioactivity" or "pharmacological activity". The accepted authority of the plant species was referred from theplantlist.org. Scientific studies have revealed that the genus is mainly scattered throughout Asia. It has broad traditional benefits, which have been associated with various biological properties such as cytotoxic, antihyperglycaemic, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory. species exhibit diverse biological activities that are very useful for medical treatment. The genus was reported to be able to produce a strong and high-quality anti-cancer compound, namely alocasgenoside B, although information on this compound is currently limited. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to further explore the relevant use of natural compounds present in the genus , particularly as an anti-cancer agent. With only a few species that have been scientifically studied so far, more attention and effort is required to establish the link between traditional uses, active compounds, and pharmacological activities of various species of this genus.
PubMed: 35685633
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.849704 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2021Dornase alfa is currently used as a mucolytic to treat pulmonary disease (the major cause of morbidity and mortality) in cystic fibrosis. It reduces mucus viscosity in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Dornase alfa is currently used as a mucolytic to treat pulmonary disease (the major cause of morbidity and mortality) in cystic fibrosis. It reduces mucus viscosity in the lungs, promoting improved clearance of secretions. This is an update of a previously published review.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the use of dornase alfa in cystic fibrosis is associated with improved mortality and morbidity compared to placebo or other medications that improve airway clearance, and to identify any adverse events associated with its use.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and abstracts from conferences. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Register: 12 October 2020. Clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were also searched to identify unpublished or ongoing trials. Date of most recent search: 08 February 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing dornase alfa to placebo, standard therapy or other medications that improve airway clearance.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Authors independently assessed trials against the inclusion criteria; two authors carried out analysis of methodological quality and data extraction. GRADE was used to assess the level of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
The searches identified 74 trials, of which 19 (2565 participants) met our inclusion criteria. 15 trials compared dornase alfa to placebo or no dornase alfa (2447 participants); two compared daily dornase to hypertonic saline (32 participants); one compared daily dornase alfa to hypertonic saline and alternate day dornase alfa (48 participants); one compared dornase alfa to mannitol and the combination of both drugs (38 participants). Trial duration varied from six days to three years. Dornase alfa compared to placebo or no treatment Dornase alfa probably improved forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV) at one month (four trials, 248 participants), three months (one trial, 320 participants; moderate-quality evidence), six months (one trial, 647 participants; high-quality evidence) and two years (one trial, 410 participants). Limited low-quality evidence showed treatment may make little or no difference in quality of life. Dornase alfa probably reduced the number of pulmonary exacerbations in trials of up to two years (moderate-quality evidence). One trial that examined the cost of care, including the cost of dornase alfa, found that the cost savings from dornase alfa offset 18% to 38% of the medication costs. Dornase alfa: daily versus alternate day One cross-over trial (43 children) found little or no difference between treatment regimens for lung function, quality of life or pulmonary exacerbations (low-quality evidence). Dornase alfa compared to other medications that improve airway clearance Results for these comparisons were mixed. One trial (43 children) showed dornase alfa may lead to a greater improvement in FEV compared to hypertonic saline (low-quality evidence), and one trial (23 participants) reported little or no differences in lung function between dornase alfa and mannitol or dornase alfa and dornase alfa plus mannitol (low-quality evidence). One trial (23 participants) found dornase alfa may improve quality of life compared to dornase alfa plus mannitol (low-quality evidence); other comparisons found little or no difference in this outcome (low-quality evidence). No trials in any comparison reported any difference between groups in the number of pulmonary exacerbations (low-quality evidence). When all comparisons are assessed, dornase alfa did not cause significantly more adverse effects than other treatments, except voice alteration and rash.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence to show that, compared with placebo, therapy with dornase alfa may improve lung function in people with cystic fibrosis in trials lasting from one month to two years. There was a decrease in pulmonary exacerbations in trials of six months or longer, probably due to treatment. Voice alteration and rash appear to be the only adverse events reported with increased frequency in randomised controlled trials. There is not enough evidence to firmly conclude if dornase alfa is superior to other hyperosmolar agents in improving lung function.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Cystic Fibrosis; Deoxyribonuclease I; Disease Progression; Expectorants; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Infant; Mannitol; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Saline Solution, Hypertonic; Vital Capacity
PubMed: 33735508
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001127.pub5 -
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy :... Jan 2021The prevalence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in hospital settings is variable, and elderly patients are considered a high risk population for DDIs. There are no... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in hospital settings is variable, and elderly patients are considered a high risk population for DDIs. There are no systematic reviews describing the prevalence of DDIs in hospitalised elderly patients.
OBJECTIVES
To assess and summarise the available data on the prevalence of DDIs in hospitalised elderly patients and to describe which drugs, drug classes and drug combinations are most commonly involved in DDIs.
DATA SOURCE
A systematic electronic literature search was conducted on Medline/PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, SciElo, Web of Science, Cinahl, Scopus, Cochrane, OpenGrey, Capes Thesis Bank, OasisBR, OpenAire and abstracts from scientific events, without limitation on language or period of publication. Study selection was completed on 21 September 2018.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS
Original observational studies that reported the prevalence of actual or potential DDIs during hospitalisation in patients aged 60 years or older were included. The main outcome measure was prevalence of DDIs and number of DDIs per patient. Subgroup analysis was performed in studies that reported the prevalence of DDIs in geriatric units.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Study quality was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality methodological checklist for cross sectional and prevalence studies.
RESULTS
34 studies were included, involving 9577 patients. The prevalence of DDIs ranged from 8.34% to 100%. In studies conducted in geriatric units, the prevalence ranged from 80.5% to 90.5%. The number of DDIs per patient ranged from 1.2 to 30.6. Single drugs most commonly involved in DDIs were furosemide, captopril, warfarin and dipyrone. Drug classes mostly involved were potassium sparing diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
LIMITATIONS
The main limitation is the heterogeneity between the included studies that precluded a meta-analysis. Several different methods were used to identify DDIs, majorly, and potential DDIs. Few studies have reported measures to control the quality of the collected data.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS
The prevalence of DDIs ranged widely, and the variation may reflect differences in the conditions of the elderly patients and level of attention (or complexity of care), as well as methodological differences, especially the methods and/or software used to identify DDIs.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42018096720.
Topics: Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Interactions; Hospitalization; Humans; Middle Aged; Prevalence; United States
PubMed: 33355278
DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002111 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel...
The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial. To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis. This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.
PubMed: 34054514
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.609901 -
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Jan 2023Novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are noted for their potential cardiorenal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are noted for their potential cardiorenal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney diseases; however, the effect of this regimen on renal outcomes remains uncertain.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of nonsteroidal MRAs focusing primarily on renal outcomes and safety in randomized, controlled trials. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched for trials published through April 2022. We included randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of nonsteroidal MRAs on renal outcomes, as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD) effects in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Summary estimates of risk ratios (RRs) reductions were calculated with a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42022335464.
FINDINGS
In total, 11 trials and 1 pooled analysis including a total of 17,517 participants were enrolled. Nonsteroidal MRAs reduced renal composite endpoints by 17 % [HR = 0.83, 95 % (0.75, 0.91); low quality] with 16 % in kidney failure (high quality), 23 % in ESRD (high quality), 20 % in eGFR decreased to less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m (high quality), and 17 % with more than a 40 % decrease in eGFR (high quality); 14 % with cardiovascular composite endpoints [HR = 0.86, 95 % (0.78, 0.94); moderate quality]; and 13 % of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.87, 95 % (0.76, 0.98); moderate quality]. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with additional benefits in lowering UACR levels (moderate quality) and lowering BP levels (moderate quality) compared with the control groups. However, nonsteroidal MRAs did not show a statistically significant effect on the risk of renal death (moderate quality), hospitalization for any cause (moderate quality) or change in GFR (low quality). Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the participants receiving nonsteroidal MRAs and the control group.
INTERPRETATION
Nonsteroidal MRAs had a statistically beneficial effect on reducing the risk of the composite kidney outcome, the composite of cardiovascular outcomes, and all-cause mortality. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with benefits of proteinuria remission and blood pressure lowering. Although these findings provided positive evidence for the use of nonsteroidal MRAs for cardiorenal protection in patients with or without CKD, the quality of this evidence is potentially uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Kidney
PubMed: 36509181
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110210 -
RSC Advances May 2021is a Chinese herb, which has been used in China for thousands of years, mainly for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. This paper summarizes the modern research progress... (Review)
Review
is a Chinese herb, which has been used in China for thousands of years, mainly for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. This paper summarizes the modern research progress on from the aspects of botany, traditional medicinal use, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, analytical methods and quality control. In addition, it also points out the deficiencies of current research on this herb and provides possible directions for its development. So far, more than 190 chemical components have been isolated and identified from , including organic acids and their esters, volatile oils, flavonoids and their glycosides, terpenes and other chemical components. Its extracts and compounds have a wide range of pharmacological effects, including anti-stone, anti-inflammatory, bacteriostatic, cholagogic and diuretic, effect on ileum smooth muscle, anti-tumor effect on tumor and hypoglycemic effects. However, future studies should focus on drug metabolism, clarify its pharmacodynamic mechanism, and establish a reasonable quality control standards for .
PubMed: 35478616
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra01366a