-
Paediatrics & Child Health May 2022Sialorrhea in children can be associated with adverse physical and social effects. Treatment using anticholinergic medications has been shown to offer symptomatic...
BACKGROUND
Sialorrhea in children can be associated with adverse physical and social effects. Treatment using anticholinergic medications has been shown to offer symptomatic relief, but there is no consensus regarding which treatment is the most efficacious.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the effectiveness of anticholinergic medications for sialorrhea in children.
METHODS
A systematic review was carried out in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and the Web of Science from inception until April 29, 2020. Studies reporting original data on the efficacy of anticholinergic medications in the management of sialorrhea in children aged 0 to 17 years of age were included. This review adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standards. Data on study design, setting, population, pharmacologic intervention(s), comparator(s), outcomes, and results were extracted and summarized.
RESULTS
The search strategy identified 2,800 studies of which 27 articles were included in the synthesis, including five randomized controlled trials. Each anticholinergic undergoing experimental study (glycopyrrolate, scopolamine/hyoscine, trihexyphenidyl/benzhexol, benztropine, and atropine) showed evidence of efficacy. Adverse side effects were common. Significant heterogeneity exists in the studies' methodology and the variability of outcome measures used between studies precluded a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Glycopyrrolate, scopolamine/hyoscine, trihexyphenidyl/benzhexol, benztropine, and atropine have all shown efficacy in the treatment of sialorrhea in children. The small number of reports and the variability in study design precluded a meta-analysis. More studies are needed with uniformity in outcome measures to help guide evidence-based decision making. A guidance table is presented.
PubMed: 35599670
DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxab051 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024Human saliva as a bodily fluid-similar to blood-is utilized for diagnostic purposes. Unlike blood sampling, collecting saliva is non-invasive, inexpensive, and readily...
BACKGROUND
Human saliva as a bodily fluid-similar to blood-is utilized for diagnostic purposes. Unlike blood sampling, collecting saliva is non-invasive, inexpensive, and readily accessible. There are no previously published systematic reviews regarding different collection, transportation, preparation, and storage methods for human saliva.
DESIGN
This study has been prepared and organized according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. This systematic review has been registered at PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42023415384). The study question according to the PICO format was as followed: Comparison of the performance (C) of different saliva sampling, handling, transportation, and storage techniques and methods (I) assessed for analyzing stimulated or unstimulated human saliva (P and O). An electronic search was executed in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed.
RESULTS
Twenty-three descriptive human clinical studies published between 1995 and 2022 were included. Eight categories of salivary features and biomarkers were investigated (i.e., salivary flow rate, total saliva quantity, total protein, cortisol, testosterone, DNA quality and quantity, pH and buffering pH). Twenty-two saliva sampling methods/devices were utilized. Passive drooling, Salivette®, and spitting were the most utilized methods. Sampling times with optimum capabilities for cortisol, iodine, and oral cancer metabolites are suggested to be 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM, 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM, and 14:00 PM to 20:00 PM, respectively. There were 6 storage methods. Centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C was the most utilized storage method. For DNA quantity and quality, analyzing samples immediately after collection without centrifuging or storage, outperformed centrifuging samples and storing them at -70 °C to -80 °C. Non-coated Salivette® was the most successful method/device for analyzing salivary flow rate.
CONCLUSION
It is highly suggested that scientists take aid from the reported categorized outcomes, and design their study questions based on the current voids for each method/device.
Topics: Humans; Hydrocortisone; Saliva; Biomarkers; Specimen Handling; DNA
PubMed: 38308289
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-03902-w -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2021We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to review and analyse the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections for drooling in children with cerebral palsy.
DATA SOURCES
We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) databases from inception to January 2020.
METHODS
We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies which (1) involved children with cerebral palsy, (2) used BoNT-A for control of drooling, and (3) provided quantitative evaluations of drooling before and after intervention with BoNT-A.
RESULTS
Twenty-one trials met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that BoNT-A injections are safe and efficacious as a treatment for drooling in children with cerebral palsy. Four trials had sufficient data to pool the results for the meta-analysis. Both the drooling quotient ( = 0.002) and drooling Ffrequency and severity scale ( = 0.004) supported this conclusion.
CONCLUSION
BoNT-A injections are a safe, reversible, effective treatment for drooling control in children with cerebral palsy that can offer effectiveness for more than 3 months with few side effects. The dosage of BoNT-A should not exceed 4 units/kg. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dosage and target glands.
PubMed: 34943284
DOI: 10.3390/children8121089 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Mar 2021Drooling is a major morbidity in several neurological diseases. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have been used to manage this condition. However,...
BACKGROUND
Drooling is a major morbidity in several neurological diseases. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have been used to manage this condition. However, by decreasing salivary flow, BoNT injections may result in an increased risk of caries and other oral adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to assess whether, in patients with drooling, intraglandular BoNT injections are associated with increased dental caries development, modifications on salivary composition (oral pH, buffering capacity and osmolality) and cariogenic bacterial load.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We performed a systematic review, searching PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus for all experimental and observational studies reporting on adverse effects of intraglandular BoNT injections in patients with drooling. Primary study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers. No studies were excluded based on their language, publication status or date of publication. Studies' quality was based on revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Meta-analysis was not performed.
RESULTS
We retrieved 1025 studies, of which 5 were included. Two studies were two randomized controlled trials and three quasi-experimental studies. None of the included studies found BoNT injections to be associated with dental caries development or with significant reductions in oral pH. One of the included primary studies even observed an increase in salivary buffer capacity. One study found an increase in Lactobacilli counts. As for the risk of bias, two studies were classified as having a critical risk, two as high risk and one as having some concerns.
CONCLUSIONS
Currently, there is no evidence that, in patients with drooling, BoNT injections associate with increased risk of dental caries or disturbances in oral pH or salivary buffering capacity. However, the included primary studies had important limitations and differences in their methodologies.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Cerebral Palsy; Dental Caries; Humans; Neuromuscular Agents; Oral Health; Sialorrhea
PubMed: 33340083
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24101 -
Saudi Medical Journal Jan 2022To evaluate the diagnostic utility of self-collected saliva in coronavirus desease-19 (COVID-19) screening procedures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the diagnostic utility of self-collected saliva in coronavirus desease-19 (COVID-19) screening procedures.
METHODS
A total of 6 databases were reviewed from their inception until August 2021. Sensitivity and specificity were measured by extracting items (true-positive, true-negative, false-positive and false-negative) from each paper. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2.
RESULTS
A total of 41 studies were included in the final analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of self-collected saliva was 196.2022 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 117.8833-326.5546). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.955. For detecting COVID-19, self-collected saliva had a moderate sensitivity of 0.8476 [0.8045-0.8826] and positive predictive value of 0.9404 [0.9122-0.9599] but high specificity of 0.9817 [0.9707-0.9887] and negative predictive value of 0.9467 [0.9130-0.9678]. In a subgroup analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected saliva tended to be higher for symptomatic (vs. asymptomatic) examinees.
CONCLUSION
Although naso/oropharyngeal swab tests are the most accurate and important diagnostic tools, the saliva-based testing method can be used as a suitable alternative test, with the advantages of increased patient convenience, efficient testing, and the need for fewer medical staff and resources. In particular, simple collecting method such as drooling or spitting without coughing would be effective in evaluating the symptomatic patients.PROSPERO no.: CRD42021279287.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Nasopharynx; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Saliva; Sensitivity and Specificity; Specimen Handling
PubMed: 35022280
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210743 -
Medicine Apr 2021The aim of this study is to provide the methods used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture therapy for treating drooling in children with cerebral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study is to provide the methods used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture therapy for treating drooling in children with cerebral palsy.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, 4 Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literatures database, Wan-Fang Database and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals will be conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for treating children with cerebral palsy salivation with no restriction on time or language. The primary outcome of this systematic review will be the effective rate. The risk of bias will be implemented according to Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We will conduct the meta-analysis to synthesize the evidence for each outcome, if possible. The heterogeneity will be evaluated statistically using the χ2 test and the I2 statistic. The random-effect model will be used to provide more conservative results, if significant heterogeneity is identified (I2 > 50% or P < .10).
ETHICS/DISSEMINATION
Our findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at conference meetings. It is not necessary for formal ethical approval as no primary data are collected.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
INPLASY2020110024.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Adolescent; Bias; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; China; Data Management; Female; Humans; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety; Sialorrhea; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33832131
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025393 -
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira... 2024
Topics: Humans; Sialorrhea; Child
PubMed: 38655996
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230971 -
Toxins Mar 2021Parkinson's disease is the most common age-related motoric neurodegenerative disease. In addition to the cardinal motor symptoms of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and...
Parkinson's disease is the most common age-related motoric neurodegenerative disease. In addition to the cardinal motor symptoms of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability, there are numerous non-motor symptoms as well. Among the non-motor symptoms, autonomic nervous system dysfunction is common. Autonomic symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease include sialorrhea, hyperhidrosis, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and urinary dysfunction. Botulinum neurotoxin has been shown to potentially improve these autonomic symptoms. In this review, the varied uses of botulinum neurotoxin for autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson's disease are discussed. This review also includes discussion of some additional indications for the use of botulinum neurotoxin in Parkinson's disease, including pain.
Topics: Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors; Autonomic Nervous System; Autonomic Nervous System Diseases; Botulinum Toxins; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33808714
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13030226 -
Revista de Neurologia Nov 2019Sialorrhoea is an important sign in children with central nervous system conditions that seriously affects health and quality of life. Kinesiotaping is presented as a...
INTRODUCTION
Sialorrhoea is an important sign in children with central nervous system conditions that seriously affects health and quality of life. Kinesiotaping is presented as a non-invasive alternative that is useful in controlling the swallowing of saliva.
AIM
To examine the efficacy of kinesiotaping as a therapeutic resource in the control of sialorrhoea.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A bibliographic search was carried out in the databases Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Google Scholar, using the terms «bandages», «tape», «kinesiotaping», «sialorrea», «deglutition», «drooling» and «swallowing difficulty», and the methodological quality was evaluated with Form-Quantitative Studies and the Oxford scale.
RESULTS
Ten studies were selected for review: six of which applied kinesiotaping in the suprahyoid area and four in the area of the orbicularis muscle of the lips. All studies show significant differences in the use of different treatment techniques, but without any significant differences between kinesiotaping and other techniques.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies of high methodological quality are scarce; however, significant improvements in outcomes and no adverse effects are reported, which may have a positive influence on the clinical features and on day-to-day therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Athletic Tape; Central Nervous System Diseases; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Sialorrhea
PubMed: 31657447
DOI: 10.33588/rn.6909.2019052 -
Clinical Case Reports Nov 2019Clozapine is considered the golden standard in the treatment of therapy-resistant schizophrenia; however, it associated with bothersome side effects such as sialorrhea....
Clozapine is considered the golden standard in the treatment of therapy-resistant schizophrenia; however, it associated with bothersome side effects such as sialorrhea. Current evidence suggests that the sublingual use of atropine seems to be safe and effective and could be considered as a first-line treatment of clozapine-induced sialorrhea.
PubMed: 31788260
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2431