-
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different types of mineralocorticoid...
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different types of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in diabetic kidney disease patients, we conducted this network meta-analysis by performing a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. A total of 12 randomized clinical trials with 15,492 patients applying various types of MRAs covering spironolactone, eplerenone, finerenone, esaxerenone, and apararenone were included. The efficacy outcomes were the ratio of urine albumin creatine ratio (UACR) at posttreatment vs. at baseline, change in posttreatment estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) vs. at baseline, and change in posttreatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs. at baseline. The safety outcome was the number of patients suffering from hyperkalemia. High-dose finerenone (MD -0.31, 95% CI: -0.52, -0.11), esaxerenone (MD -0.54, 95% CI: -0.72, -0.30), and apararenone (MD -0.63, 95% CI: -0.90, -0.35) were associated with a superior reduction in proteinuria in patients with DKD. Regarding the change in eGFR, the results of all drugs were similar, and finerenone may have potential superiority in protecting the kidney. Compared with placebo, none of the treatments was associated with a higher probability of controlling systolic blood pressure during treatment. Moreover, spironolactone, esaxerenone, and 20 mg of finerenone presented a higher risk of hyperkalemia. This Bayesian network meta-analysis was the first to explore the optimal alternative among MRAs in the treatment of DKD and revealed the superiority of 20 mg of finerenone among MRAs in treating DKD. PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42022313826).
PubMed: 36188560
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.967317 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Oct 2023The incidence of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is substantially correlated with cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The incidence of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is substantially correlated with cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. The current guidelines recommend the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers, but recent studies probed into the effects of finerenone to mitigate the risk of cardiorenal events. This meta-analysis was performed to demonstrate the effects of finerenone on cardiorenal events, comprising cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum potassium levels.
METHODS
After screening with our eligibility criteria, 350 articles were identified with an initial literature search on multiple databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central. Seven randomized controlled trials with a total of 15 462 patients (=8487 in the finerenone group; =6975 in the control group) were included.
RESULTS
Patients receiving finerenone were at a reduced risk for cardiovascular mortality [HR: 0.84 (0.74, 0.95)], heart failure [OR: 0.79 (0.68, 0.92)], decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate by 40% [OR: 0.82 (0.74, 0.91)] and by 57% [OR: 0.70 (0.59, 0.82)]; and a higher incidence of moderate hyperkalemia [OR: 2.25 (1.78, 2.84)].
CONCLUSION
Finerenone, owing to its better mineralocorticoid affinity, and a much lower risk of adverse effects, promises to be a much better alternative than other renin-angiotensin system blockers available for the treatment of chronic kidney disease patients with type 2 diabetes. Further trials should be conducted to provide more definitive evidence to assess the safety and efficacy of finerenone compared to spironolactone and eplerenone.
PubMed: 37811017
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001180 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2023Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a fatal X-linked recessive disease affecting approximately 1 in 3500 births. It is characterized by a genetic lack of dystrophin, which is... (Review)
Review
Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a fatal X-linked recessive disease affecting approximately 1 in 3500 births. It is characterized by a genetic lack of dystrophin, which is an essential protein for maintaining muscle integrity. The lack of dystrophin plays a pathophysiological role in the development of dilated cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Currently, no consensus exists on specific pharmacological therapy guidelines for these patients; however, it centers around the guidelines for heart failure management. This systematic review investigated 12 randomized control trials dating back to 2005 in the pharmacotherapy of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This review specifically included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Despite their limitations, these studies have shown promising effects in improving the overall heart function and prognosis in patients with this condition. However, to attain higher statistical significance, future studies should investigate larger populations and for longer periods.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Dystrophin; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 37406964
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.06.007 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2021Orthostatic hypotension is an excessive fall in blood pressure (BP) while standing and is the result of a decrease in cardiac output or defective or inadequate...
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension is an excessive fall in blood pressure (BP) while standing and is the result of a decrease in cardiac output or defective or inadequate vasoconstrictor mechanisms. Fludrocortisone is a mineralocorticoid that increases blood volume and blood pressure. Fludrocortisone is considered the first- or second-line pharmacological therapy for orthostatic hypotension alongside mechanical and positional measures such as increasing fluid and salt intake and venous compression methods. However, there has been no Cochrane Review of the benefits and harms of this drug for this condition.
OBJECTIVES
To identify and evaluate the benefits and harms of fludrocortisone for orthostatic hypotension.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases on 11 November 2019: Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. We also searched trials registries.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all studies evaluating the benefits and harms of fludrocortisone compared to placebo, another drug for orthostatic hypotension, or studies without comparators, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and observational studies. We included studies in people with orthostatic hypotension due to a chronic peripheral neuropathy, a central autonomic neuropathy, or autonomic failure from other causes, but not medication-induced orthostatic hypotension or orthostatic hypotension from acute volume depletion or blood loss.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used Cochrane methodological procedures for most of the review. We developed and used a tool to prioritize observational studies that offered the best available evidence where there are gaps in the evidence from RCTs. We assessed the certainty of evidence for fludrocortisone versus placebo using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 13 studies of 513 participants, including three cross-over RCTs and 10 observational studies (three cohort studies, six case series and one case-control study). The included RCTs were small (total of 28 participants in RCTs), short term (two to three weeks), only examined fludrocortisone for orthostatic hypotension in people with two conditions (diabetes and Parkinson disease), and had variable risk of bias (two had unclear risk of bias and one had low risk of bias). Heterogeneity in participant populations, comparators and outcome assessment methods prevented meta-analyses of the RCTs. We found very low-certainty evidence about the effects of fludrocortisone versus placebo on drop in BP in people with diabetes (-26 mmHg versus -39 mmHg systolic; -7 mmHg versus -11 mmHg diastolic; 1 cross-over study, 6 participants). For people with Parkinson disease, we found very-low certainty evidence about the effects of fludrocortisone on drop in BP compared to pyridostigmine (-14 mmHg versus -22.1 mmHg diastolic; P = 0.036; 1 cross-over study, 9 participants) and domperidone (no change after treatment in either group; 1 cross-over study, 13 participants). For orthostatic symptoms, we found very low-certainty evidence for fludrocortisone versus placebo in people with diabetes (4 out of 5 analyzed participants had improvements in orthostatic symptoms, 1 cross-over study, 6 participants), for fludrocortisone versus pyridostigmine in people with Parkinson disease (orthostatic symptoms unchanged; 1 cross-over study, 9 participants) or fludrocortisone versus domperidone (improvement to 6 for both interventions on the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale-Orthostatic Domain (COMPASS-OD); 1 cross-over study, 13 participants). Evidence on adverse events was also very low-certainty in both populations, but indicated side effects were minimal. Observational studies filled some gaps in evidence by examining the effects in larger groups of participants, with more diverse conditions, over longer periods of time. One cohort study (341 people studied retrospectively) found fludrocortisone may not be harmful in the long term for familial dysautonomia. However, it is unclear if this translates to long-term improvements in BP drop or a meaningful improvement in orthostatic symptoms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of fludrocortisone on blood pressure, orthostatic symptoms or adverse events in people with orthostatic hypotension and diabetes or Parkinson disease. There is a lack of information on long-term treatment and treatment of orthostatic hypotension in other disease states. There is a need for standardized reporting of outcomes and for standardization of measurements of blood pressure in orthostatic hypotension.
Topics: Bias; Diabetes Mellitus; Domperidone; Dysautonomia, Familial; Fludrocortisone; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Observational Studies as Topic; Parkinson Disease; Pyridostigmine Bromide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34000076
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012868.pub2 -
Eye (London, England) Apr 2021We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant clinical studies published prior to March 2020. The primary outcome was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the secondary outcomes included the subretinal fluid (SRF), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and central macular thickness (CMT).
RESULTS
Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 352 eyes. The MRA treatment was not superior to placebo in BCVA at 1 month (WMD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.15-0.02, P = 0.15, I = 86%), 3 months (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.14-0.06, P = 0.44, I = 77%) and 6 months (WMD = -0, 95% CI -0.05-0.05, P = 0.92, I = 0%). The MRA treatment resulted in significant reduction than the placebo in the SRF (WMD = -60.64, 95% CI -97.91 to -23.37, P = 0.001, I = 49%), SFCT (WMD = -39.15, 95% CI -52.58 to -25.72, P < 0.001, I = 0%), and CMT (WMD = -60.75, 95% CI -97.85 to -23.65, P = 0.01, I = 53%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis shows that the MRA treatment can improve anatomical structure in CSC patients, but it is not effective for achieving BCVA gain. The applicant of the MRA is safe and have no severe effect.
Topics: Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Subretinal Fluid; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33414535
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01338-4 -
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Jan 2023Novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are noted for their potential cardiorenal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are noted for their potential cardiorenal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney diseases; however, the effect of this regimen on renal outcomes remains uncertain.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of nonsteroidal MRAs focusing primarily on renal outcomes and safety in randomized, controlled trials. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched for trials published through April 2022. We included randomized, controlled trials assessing the effects of nonsteroidal MRAs on renal outcomes, as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD) effects in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Summary estimates of risk ratios (RRs) reductions were calculated with a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42022335464.
FINDINGS
In total, 11 trials and 1 pooled analysis including a total of 17,517 participants were enrolled. Nonsteroidal MRAs reduced renal composite endpoints by 17 % [HR = 0.83, 95 % (0.75, 0.91); low quality] with 16 % in kidney failure (high quality), 23 % in ESRD (high quality), 20 % in eGFR decreased to less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m (high quality), and 17 % with more than a 40 % decrease in eGFR (high quality); 14 % with cardiovascular composite endpoints [HR = 0.86, 95 % (0.78, 0.94); moderate quality]; and 13 % of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.87, 95 % (0.76, 0.98); moderate quality]. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with additional benefits in lowering UACR levels (moderate quality) and lowering BP levels (moderate quality) compared with the control groups. However, nonsteroidal MRAs did not show a statistically significant effect on the risk of renal death (moderate quality), hospitalization for any cause (moderate quality) or change in GFR (low quality). Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the participants receiving nonsteroidal MRAs and the control group.
INTERPRETATION
Nonsteroidal MRAs had a statistically beneficial effect on reducing the risk of the composite kidney outcome, the composite of cardiovascular outcomes, and all-cause mortality. Nonsteroidal MRAs were also associated with benefits of proteinuria remission and blood pressure lowering. Although these findings provided positive evidence for the use of nonsteroidal MRAs for cardiorenal protection in patients with or without CKD, the quality of this evidence is potentially uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Cardiovascular Diseases; Kidney
PubMed: 36509181
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110210 -
JAMA Dermatology Aug 2020The association between the use of medications and the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The association between the use of medications and the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the associations between previous exposure to certain medications and BP.
DATA SOURCES
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched for relevant studies from inception to February 20, 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Case-control or cohort studies and randomized clinical trials that examined the odds or risk of BP in patients with previous medication use were included. No geographic or language limitations were imposed.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline was followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias of included observational studies; Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for randomized clinical trials. Aggregate data were used to conduct a random-effects model meta-analysis if the included studies were sufficiently homogenous. Subgroup analyses were performed for use of various medications of the same category.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio, and risk ratio of bullous pemphigoid in association with medication use.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 13 case-control studies, 1 cohort study, and 1 randomized clinical trial with a total of 285 884 participants. The meta-analysis of case-control studies showed a significant association of BP with previous use of aldosterone antagonists (pooled OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.40), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (pooled OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.55-2.38), anticholinergics (pooled OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.54-6.33), and dopaminergic medications (pooled OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.34-3.05). One cohort study found an increased risk of BP among patients receiving dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.88; P = .02). One trial found a higher occurrence of BP in patients with diabetes receiving linagliptin (0.2% in diabetes group vs 0% in the placebo group).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that aldosterone antagonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, anticholinergics, and dopaminergic medications are associated with BP. These medications should be judiciously prescribed, particularly in high-risk patients who are elderly and have disabling neurologic disorders.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Diuretics; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Odds Ratio; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Psychotropic Drugs; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32584924
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1587 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2022The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients receiving guideline-directed treatment to identify the proportion of under-treatment patients and those who are treated with optimal doses, to evaluate the correlation of under-treatment patients' characteristics with the prescribed therapy, and finally, to evaluate the combined effect of the above on incidental mortality and rehospitalization. We conducted a systematic review of the literature indexed in Medline. We screened 1224 papers and excluded 1166 as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 58 papers, which were evaluated by studying the full text, 11 papers that referred to 45866 patients were finally studied in this work. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and Angiotensin II-Receptor Blocker (ARB) use was estimated to be 80.9% (95% CI: 73.9%, 86.4%), β-blockers' use was 78% (95% CI: 70.4%, 84.1%), Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists' use was 47.4% (95% Cl 41.6%, 53.4%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy's use was 5.8% (95% Cl 3.4%, 9.6%). Meta-regression analysis showed that prescription of more than the half of target dose of ACEI/ARBs was found to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality (Z = -3.61, P = 0.0003), while the relationship with β-blockers was borderline (Z = -1.56, P = 0.11). A satisfactory adherence to the prescription of guideline-recommended treatment in patients with HF was observed. However, the under titration of the life-saving HF drugs need to be improved as only ultimate adherence to guideline-directed treatments may lead to the reduction of HF burden.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 35508296
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.04.006 -
Journal of Human Hypertension May 2024Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death. The optimal treatment of low-renin hypertension (LRH), present in 30% of hypertensive individuals, is not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death. The optimal treatment of low-renin hypertension (LRH), present in 30% of hypertensive individuals, is not known. LRH likely reflects a state of excess salt, expanded volume and/or mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Therefore, targeted treatment with MR antagonists (MRA) may be beneficial. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of MRA therapy in LRH. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of adults with LRH that compared the efficacy of MRA to placebo or other antihypertensive treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the difference in blood pressure and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022318763). From the 1612 records identified, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 1043 participants. Seven studies (n = 345) were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis indicated that MRA reduced systolic blood pressure by -6.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval -9.6 to -4.1) and -4.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval -11.9 to 2.4) compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) and diuretics. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as moderate and very low, respectively. The findings of this systematic review suggest that MRA is effective in lowering blood pressure in LRH and may be better than ACEi/ARB. Translation to clinical practice is limited by the uncertainty of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Hypertension; Treatment Outcome; Renin; Blood Pressure; Antihypertensive Agents
PubMed: 38200100
DOI: 10.1038/s41371-023-00891-1 -
Cancers Oct 2021Despite the pivotal role of mitotane in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) management, data on the endocrine toxicities of this treatment are lacking. The aim of this... (Review)
Review
Despite the pivotal role of mitotane in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) management, data on the endocrine toxicities of this treatment are lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to collect the available evidence on the side effects of mitotane on the endocrine and metabolic systems in both children and adults affected by adrenal carcinoma. Sixteen articles on 493 patients were included. Among the adrenal insufficiency, which is an expected side effect of mitotane, 24.5% of patients increased glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Mineralocorticoid insufficiency usually occurred late in treatment in 36.8% of patients. Thyroid dysfunction is characterized by a decrease in FT4, which occurs within 3-6 months of treatment in 45.4% of patients, while TSH seems to not be a reliable marker. Dyslipidemia is characterized by an increase in both LDL-c and HDL-c (54.2%). Few studies have found evidence of hypertriglyceridemia. In males, gynecomastia and hypogonadism can occur after 3-6 months of treatment (38.4% and 35.6%, respectively), while in pre-menopausal women, mitotane can cause ovarian cysts and, less frequently, menstrual disorders. Most of these side effects appear to be reversible after mitotane discontinuation. We finally suggest an algorithm that could guide metabolic and endocrine safety assessments in patients treated with mitotane for ACC.
PubMed: 34638485
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13195001