-
Frontiers in Oncology 2021In China, thalidomide (THD) has been used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); however, there is...
Efficacy and Safety of Thalidomide As a Pre-Medication of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) Following Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy (HEC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
In China, thalidomide (THD) has been used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); however, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of THD in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of THD on CINV following HEC.
METHODS
Electronic databases were systematically searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in HEC using THD. The primary outcomes were complete response (CR) and no nausea, Secondary outcomes were the incidence of adverse events and QoL related indicators. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed-effects model. In the case of heterogeneity (I≥50%), a random-effects model was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 3168 patients were included from 34 RCTs. In terms of CR rate, THD plus 5-HT receptor antagonist (5-HTRA) with or without dexamethasone (DEX) was significantly higher than 5-HT3RA with or without DEX in the acute phase (74.4% vs 67.4%; RR 1.10), delayed phase (70.6% vs 50.4%; RR 1.53), and overall phase (68.4% vs 53.4%; RR 1.28). In terms of no nausea rate, the THD group was also significantly higher than the control group in the acute phase (61.7% vs 55.5%; RR 1.12), delayed phase (50.5% vs 30.0%; RR 1.69), and overall phase (44.6% vs 29.9%; RR 1.50). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of fatigue, headache, diarrhea, rash, hepatorenal damage, and myelosuppression between those with and without THD. The incidence of increase in KPS scores, weight gain, appetite improvement, and sleep quality improvement were significantly higher with the addition of THD.
CONCLUSIONS
THD may be effective and safe for the prevention of CINV patients treated with HEC and may improve QoL.
PubMed: 35141156
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.818839 -
Transplantation Reviews (Orlando, Fla.) Dec 2023Despite its use to prevent acute rejection, lifelong immunosuppression can adversely impact long-term patient and graft outcomes. In theory, immunosuppression withdrawal... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Despite its use to prevent acute rejection, lifelong immunosuppression can adversely impact long-term patient and graft outcomes. In theory, immunosuppression withdrawal is the ultimate goal of kidney transplantation, and is made possible by the induction of immunological tolerance. The purpose of this paper is to review the safety and efficacy of immune tolerance induction strategies in living-donor kidney transplantation, both chimerism-based and non-chimerism-based. The impact of these strategies on transplant outcomes, including acute rejection, allograft function and survival, cost, and immune monitoring, will also be discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as additional online resources such as EBSCO, were exhaustively searched. Adult living-donor kidney transplant recipients who developed chimerism-based tolerance after concurrent bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or those who received non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell therapy using mesenchymal stromal cells, dendritic cells, or regulatory T cells were studied between 2000 and 2021. Individual sources of evidence were evaluated critically, and the strength of evidence and risk of bias for each outcome of the transplant tolerance study were assessed.
RESULTS
From 28,173 citations, 245 studies were retrieved after suitable exclusion and duplicate removal. Of these, 22 studies (2 RCTs, 11 cohort studies, 6 case-control studies, and 3 case reports) explicitly related to both interventions (chimerism- and non-chimerism-based immune tolerance) were used in the final review process and were critically appraised. According to the findings, chimerism-based strategies fostered immunotolerance, allowing for the safe withdrawal of immunosuppressive medications. Cell-based therapy, on the other hand, frequently did not induce tolerance except for minimising immunosuppression. As a result, the rejection rates, renal allograft function, and survival rates could not be directly compared between these two groups. While chimerism-based tolerance protocols posed safety concerns due to myelosuppression, including infections and graft-versus-host disease, cell-based strategies lacked these adverse effects and were largely safe. There was a lack of direct comparisons between HLA-identical and HLA-disparate recipients, and the cost implications were not examined in several of the retrieved studies. Most studies reported successful immunosuppressive weaning lasting at least 3 years (ranging up to 11.4 years in some studies), particularly with chimerism-based therapy, while only a few investigators used immune surveillance techniques. The studies reviewed were often limited by selection, classification, ascertainment, performance, and attrition bias.
CONCLUSIONS
This review demonstrates that chimerism-based hematopoietic strategies induce immune tolerance, and a substantial number of patients are successfully weaned off immunosuppression. Despite the risk of complications associated with myelosuppression. Non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell protocols, on the other hand, have been proven to facilitate immunosuppression minimization but seldom elicit immunological tolerance. However, the results of this review must be interpreted with caution because of the non-randomised study design, potential confounding, and small sample size of the included studies. Further validation and refinement of tolerogenic protocols in accordance with local practice preferences is also warranted, with an emphasis on patient selection, cost ramifications, and immunological surveillance based on reliable tolerance assays.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Living Donors; Immune Tolerance; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplantation, Homologous; Transplantation Tolerance
PubMed: 37709652
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100792 -
BMJ Open Mar 2021Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of oesophageal cancer (OC), the role of antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents in treating OC remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of oesophageal cancer (OC), the role of antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents in treating OC remains controversial. Herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to elucidate the efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR agents in patients with OC.
DESIGN
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified by searching the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform databases from inception to December 2019. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
SETTING
RCTs from any country and healthcare setting.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients with OC.
INTERVENTIONS
Combination therapy with anti-EGFR agents and conventional treatments versus conventional treatments alone in patients with OC.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES
Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were primary outcome measures, and objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and treatment toxicities were secondary outcome measures.
RESULTS
In total, 25 RCTs comprising 3406 patients with OC were included. Overall, anti-EGFR treatment significantly improved the OS (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89, p<0.00001), ORR (relative risk (RR): 1.33, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.52, p<0.0001) and DCR (RR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.34, p<0.0001) but not PFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.08, p=0.26). Anti-EGFR treatment was significantly associated with higher incidences of myelosuppression, diarrhoea, acne-like rash and hypomagnesaemia.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, anti-EGFR agents have positive effects on OS, the ORR and DCR in OC. However, considering the high incidence of adverse effects, such as myelosuppression, diarrhoea, acne-like rashes and hypomagnesaemia, careful monitoring of patients with OC is recommended during anti-EGFR treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020169230.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; China; ErbB Receptors; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 33753446
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046352 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection (SFI) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung...
Effectiveness and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection (SFI) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Seven electronic databases, including CNKI and Wanfang, were comprehensively searched to screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 1, 2022. The quality of each trial was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and systematic reviews were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The primary outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary outcome measures were quality of life and toxicity. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the number of days of SFI single-cycle treatment and combined PBC regimen.
RESULTS
A total of 44 RCTs involving 3475 patients were included in the study. The meta-analysis results showed that, compared with PBC alone, SFI combined with PBC significantly improved the ORR (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.18-1.37, P < 0.00001), DCR (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.08-1.15, P < 0.00001), and quality of life (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.31-1.52, P < 0.00001). It also reduced chemotherapy-induced hemoglobin reduction (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.48-0.67, P < 0.00001), leukopenia (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.53-0.71, P < 0.00001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.55-0.70, P < 0.00001), and simple bone marrow suppression (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73, P < 0.0001). Nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.52-0.77, P < 0.00001), diarrhea (RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.37-0.64, P < 0.00001), and simple digestive tract reactions (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.49-0.80, P = 0.0002) also decreased with the treatment of SFI.
CONCLUSION
SFI combined with PBC for the treatment of advanced NSCLC improved the ORR, DCR, and quality of life, and reduced the incidence of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal adverse reactions. However, considering the limitations of existing evidence, further verification using high-quality RCTs is required.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-7-0026, identifier INPLASY202270026.
PubMed: 37731634
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198768 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2022Currently, gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Gut microbiota is closely related to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Currently, gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Gut microbiota is closely related to the occurrence of GC and CRC and the efficacy of chemotherapy. This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of herbal formulas with the function of gut microbiota regulation (HFGMR) in the treatment of GC and CRC and to assess the quality of the synthesized evidence.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed on eight electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, and two registries, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their initiation to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the therapeutic effects of HFGMR were included. We used Stata 16 for data synthesis and Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) for methodological quality evaluation and assessed the quality of the synthesized evidence in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
Fifty-three RCTs involving 4,478 patients were included. These trials involve seven herbal formulas that could regulate the gut microbiota of , , , , and . The meta-analysis results were subgrouped to three different stages in GC and CRC. 1) For the perioperative stage, HFGMR combined with conventional therapy could shorten the time to bowel sound recovery by 1.63 h [mean difference (MD) = -1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-2.62, -0.65)], the time to first flatus by 9.69 h [MD = -9.69, 95% CI (-10.89, -8.48)], and the duration of hospitalization by 2.91 days [MD = -2.91, 95% CI (-4.01, -1.80)] in GC. There were no significant differences in outcomes of gastrointestinal function recovery and adverse events in CRC. 2) For postoperative patients, combined with adjuvant chemotherapy, HFGMR could decrease the incidence of diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, and peripheral neurotoxicity in GC; boost Karnofsky performance status (KPS) improvement rate [risk ratio (RR) = 1.96, 95% CI (1.38, 2.79)]; and decrease the incidence of leucopenia and nausea and vomiting in CRC. 3) For advanced stage, HFGMR can significantly improve the objective response rate (ORR) [RR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.19~1.53)], disease control rate (DCR) [RR = 1.14, 95% CI (1.05~1.23)], and KPS improvement rate [RR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.17, 2.09)] and decrease the incidence of leucopenia, neutropenia, anemia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue in GC. There were no significant differences in ORR [RR = 1.32, 95% CI (0.94~1.86)] and DCR [RR = 1.22, 95% CI (0.99~1.50)], but they can improve the KPS response rate [RR = 1.62, 95% CI (1.13, 2.32)] and decrease the incidence of myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and hepatic and renal dysfunction in CRC.
CONCLUSION
This study indicates that herbal formulas that could regulate the composition and proportion of gut microbiota have a positive effect in three stages (perioperative, postoperative, and advanced) of GC and CRC. They could promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, increase tumor response, improve performance status, and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Herbal formulas exerted anti-cancer efficacy through multiple mechanisms and pathways; among them, the regulation of gut microbiota has not been paid enough attention. To further support the conclusion and better understand the role of gut microbiota in the treatment of GC and CRC, more rigorously designed, large-scale, and multicenter RCTs that focus on herbal formulas and gut microbiota are needed in the future.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Diarrhea; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nausea; Stomach Neoplasms; Vomiting
PubMed: 35992176
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.875225 -
Medicine Oct 2022Leukopenia is one of most common types of myelosuppression secondary to chemotherapy. The main methods used to treat leukopenia after chemotherapy have various... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Leukopenia is one of most common types of myelosuppression secondary to chemotherapy. The main methods used to treat leukopenia after chemotherapy have various limitations. Several studies have reported the role of acupuncture in the prevention and treatment of leukopenia, but the quality of the study is uneven. Here, we used a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of leukopenia after chemotherapy.
METHODS
We searched the databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Library, Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE (via embase.com), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), the Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP database) and the Wanfang database to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on acupuncture in the treatment of leukopenia after chemotherapy. Cochrane systematic reviewer manual 5.2 was used for bias risk assessment. RevMan5.3 statistical software was applied for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Fifteen RCTs were included in this study, with a total of 1130 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that acupuncture can increase white blood cell (WBC) count after chemotherapy [MD = 1.18, 95% CI (0.80, 1.57), P < .00001], reduce the incidence of myelosuppression [RR = 0.38, 95% CI (0.23, 0.63), P = .0002], and improve the clinical treatment effectiveness [RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.00, 1.43), P = .05]. The differences were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended to use acupuncture in the treatment of leukocytopenia after chemotherapy, but this result needs further research for verification.
Topics: Humans; Acupuncture; Acupuncture Therapy; Leukopenia; Leukocyte Count; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 36281119
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030995 -
Medicine Oct 2023Caffeic acid tablets (CFA) are a proprietary Chinese medicine in treating thrombocytopenia. The efficacy and safety of CFA compared with other platelet-raising drugs for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Caffeic acid tablets (CFA) are a proprietary Chinese medicine in treating thrombocytopenia. The efficacy and safety of CFA compared with other platelet-raising drugs for the treatment of thrombocytopenia have been widely reported in the literature, but there is no systematic evaluation. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to further establish the efficacy and safety of CFA in treating thrombocytopenia.
METHODS
A computerized search was conducted in the Chinese biomedical database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), PubMed, and Web of Science databases using the keywords "caffeic acid tablets" and "thrombocytopenia." All randomized controlled trials were selected for the timeframe of build to 02/2023 and then screened and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 and stata17.0 software.
RESULTS
A total of 35 publications with an overall 2533 patients were included in the study. The results of the meta-analysis showed that CFA were effective in the treatment of thrombocytopenia with a statistically significant difference [relative risk ratio (RR) = 1.24, 95% CI (1.17, 1.31), P < .00001] and in increasing platelet counts [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.50, 95% CI (1.09, 1.91), P < .00001], white blood cell count [SMD = 1.08, 95% CI (0.77, 1.39), P < .00001], and neutrophil count [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.19, 1.28), P = .009], and CFA reduced myelosuppression [RR = 0.19, 95% CI (0.1, 0.37), P < .00001] and adverse effects [RR = 0.75, 95% CI (0.58, 0.96), P = .02].
CONCLUSION
CFA can effectively improve the clinical outcome of patients with thrombocytopenia with a good safety profile and are worth promoting. However, due to the low quality and small sample size of the included literature, a larger sample size and more standardized, high-quality studies are needed to validate these results.
Topics: Humans; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Caffeic Acids; Thrombocytopenia; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
PubMed: 37800784
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035353 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Sep 2021Apatinib in combination with chemotherapy (CT) has been used in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), however, the safety and efficacy are unclear. The study aims at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Apatinib in combination with chemotherapy (CT) has been used in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), however, the safety and efficacy are unclear. The study aims at systematic evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the apatinib targeted therapy in combination with CT for the treatment of patients with advanced OC.
METHODS
Literature about randomized controlled clinical trials was searched using search engines such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, the Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP and the Wanfang. We collected the related clinical studies of apatinib in combination with CT in the treatment of OC. The duration of the data retrieval related to clinical studies was from the database establishment to September 2020. Adverse reactions (ADRs) due to treatment, disease control rate (DCR), and that of objective response rate (ORR), were collected as indicators to show treatment outcomes. The literature was independently screened by two researchers. They extracted the data and evaluated the risk of biases of the included studies. Then, Revman 5.4 software was employed for performing the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twelve randomized controlled clinical trials with 698 patients having an advanced stage of OC were included. The results revealed that in comparison with the treatment with only CT, apatinib targeted therapy combination with CT showed significant improvement in the patients' ORR [OR =3.19, 95% CI: (2.06, 4.94), P<0.00001] and DCR [OR =4.97, 95% CI: (2.90, 8.52), P<0.00001]. The group that was treated with a combined therapy had shown proteinuria in higher amount (OR =3.08, 95% CI: 51.13-8.42, P<0.00001), while the analyses of other ADRs, such nausea and vomiting (OR =1.10, 95% CI: 0.67-1.79, P=0.71), hand-foot syndrome (OR =1.73, 95% CI: 0.97-3.10, P=0.06), hypertension (OR =1.18, 95% CI: 0.73-1.91, P=0.0.51), diarrhea (OR =1.05, 95% CI: 0.56-1.97, P=0.87), leucopenia (OR =1.22, 95% CI: 0.70-2.12, P=0.48), and myelosuppression (OR =1.00, 95% CI: 0.28-3.62, P=1.00), did not show any significant difference (P>0.05).
DISCUSSION
The effects of apatinib combination with CT for the treatment of OC are significantly better than the CT used alone in ORR and DCR, despite with a relative low incidence of adverse effects. However, due to the very low number of studies available, the results need to be further verified using a high-quality, large sample and long-term studies.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34551570
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1662 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Myelosuppression is the most common adverse reaction of chemotherapy, which seriously affects the course of treatment. Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection with...
OBJECTIVE
Myelosuppression is the most common adverse reaction of chemotherapy, which seriously affects the course of treatment. Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection with dexamethasone has achieved good clinical efficacy in China. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM).
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of CIM treated with ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone were retrieved from eight electronic databases. We used the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias. Excel 2010 was used to establish a database for information extraction, and RevMan 5.3.0 software was used to analyze the included test data. GRADE profiler 3.6 software was used to grade the quality of evidence for the outcome indicators of the study.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies involving 1177 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that, compared with conventional western medicine (CWM), ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone could significantly improve the clinical total effective rate [RR=1.95, 95% CI (1.53, 2.49), P <0.00001] and increase white blood cell (WBC) (MD=1.38, 95% CI (0.74, 2.01), P<0.0001) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels [MD=3.89, 95% CI (1.57, 6.20), P=0.001]. In addition, ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone can shorten recovery time of myelosuppression [MD=-3.94, 95% CI (-4.97 to -2.91), P<0.00001] and improve Karnofsky performance status [MD=10.7, 95% CI (1.36, 20.05), P=0.02<0.05]. However, there was no significant difference among ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone and CWM in platelet (PLT) elevation [MD=4.61, 95% CI (-10.14, 19.35), P=0.54].
CONCLUSION
This study found that ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone had a positive effect on CIM. However, more studies with well-designed, large sample size, strict randomization, and clear descriptions about detection and reporting processes are needed in the future to further confirm the efficacy of ST36 acupoint injection with dexamethasone in the treatment of CIM.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier CRD42021223979.
PubMed: 34295820
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684129 -
Evidence-based Complementary and... 2020Cinobufacin is a Chinese patent medicine widely used for breast cancer in China. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis have been published to validate its...
BACKGROUND
Cinobufacin is a Chinese patent medicine widely used for breast cancer in China. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis have been published to validate its effects in breast cancer treatment. We, therefore, summarize the efficacy and safety of Cinobufacin combined with chemotherapy in order to provide rigid evidence for its clinical application.
METHODS
By searching multiple databases incepted to December 2019, the RCTs of breast cancer patients treated with Cinobufacin were screened according to the inclusion criteria, and the meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted using RevMan5.3.
RESULTS
A total of 1163 articles were retrieved, and 16 studies were included. The total sample size was 1331 cases, including 666 cases in the treatment group receiving Cinobufacin combined with chemotherapy and 665 cases in the control group receiving chemotherapy alone. Our study found that the ORR (overall response rate) (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: [1.23, 1.49], < 0.00001), CBR (clinical benefit rate) (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: [1.08, 1.21], < 0.00001), KPS scores (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: [1.45, 2.68], < 0.0001), and pain relief rate (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.78] =0.04 of the Cinobufacin combined with chemotherapy group were better than those of the chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant. Our study also discovered that the tumor markers (CA125, CA153, and CEA) in the Cinobufacin combined with chemotherapy group were lower than those in the chemotherapy group, which heterogeneity was derived from the low-quality literature included in the study, but the results were robust. In addition, in terms of safety, we found that the incidences of gastrointestinal reactions (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.48, 0.70], < 0.00001), liver and kidney damage (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: [0.38, 0.84], =0.004), and hair loss (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: [0.40, 0.92], =0.02) in the Cinobufacin combined chemotherapy group were lower than those in the chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant, but the incidences of peripheral neurotoxicity (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: [0.26, 1.85], =0.46) and myelosuppression (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: [0.46, 1.34], =0.37) in the combined group were similar to those of the chemotherapy group, and the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Cinobufacin combined with chemotherapy can improve the clinical efficacy of breast cancer patients, enhance the quality of life of the patients, reduce the value of tumor markers such as CA125, CA153, and CEA, and lower the occurrence of adverse reactions such as gastrointestinal reactions, liver and kidney damage, and hair loss.
PubMed: 33014106
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4953539