-
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Apr 2021In the last decades, the incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) increased from 1 to 5 new diagnoses/100,000 persons/year. The synthetic somatostatin analogues...
BACKGROUND
In the last decades, the incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) increased from 1 to 5 new diagnoses/100,000 persons/year. The synthetic somatostatin analogues (SSAs) represent the first-choice treatment for both functionally active and inactive gastro-enteric-pancreatic NEN. This systematic review examines the role of octreotide long-acting release (LAR) in combination with other therapies for NEN management.
METHODS
Primary outcomes were the disease control rate and the progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time between treatment initiation and progression of disease. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and safety.
RESULTS
This systematic review identified 13 studies, concerning the use of octreotide LAR in association with other therapies in advanced NENs and included 1,206 patients. Patients were treated with octreotide LAR in combination with other drugs, mainly with everolimus (404 patients, 35%), but even with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy, bevacizumab, interferon or fluoride-derivatives. Disease control was observed in 85% cases with SSAs in combination with other therapies; PFS ranged from 15 to 16.4 months and OS from 25 to 61.9 months. SSAs are very well tolerated drugs, with few side effects which are usually mild, not requiring drug withdrawn.
CONCLUSIONS
The review summarizes the effectiveness and available safety data on octreotide LAR in combination with other therapies in patients with NEN and may provide suggestions to address the therapeutic strategy. Further comparative head-to-head studies are needed to understand which is the best combination treatment for patients with progressive NEN after failure of first-line therapy.
PubMed: 34012671
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-292 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2021Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare and complex tumors that can be sporadic or hereditary, as in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1... (Review)
Review
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare and complex tumors that can be sporadic or hereditary, as in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) where patients display a 70% lifelong risk of developing a pancreatic NENs (pNENs). To date, specific personalized treatment for pNENs in patients with MEN1 are lacking. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment in patients affected by MEN1-related pNENs. We performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for peer-reviewed articles on SSA (octreotide or lanreotide) treatment in MEN1 associated with pNENs. We selected 20 studies with a pooled population of 105 MEN1 patients with pNENs. Females were 58.5%, median age was 44 years (18-73). TNM stage at diagnosis was stage I-II in 84.8% and stage IV in 15.2%. The overall response rate (SD+PR+CR) was achieved in 88.3% of cases, with stable disease in 75.6% and objective response in 12.7% of patients. The safety profile was favorable with both SSA agents. SSAs appear to be an effective and safe treatment option for MEN1-related pNEN, either at localized or advanced stages.
PubMed: 34681263
DOI: 10.3390/ph14101039 -
Medicine Mar 2020Somatostatin analog therapies showed great potential for patients suffering advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study was aimed to evaluate the therapeutic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Somatostatin analog therapies showed great potential for patients suffering advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study was aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC (Lu-octreotate/octreotide) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in advanced or inoperable NETs patients.
METHODS
Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1950 to April 2019. Eligible studies should include randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs)-based investigations of Lu-octreotate/octreotide PRRT for NETs. All these studies were assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), RECIST 1.1, Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Disease response rates (DRRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) were calculated according to each response criteria group. DRRs were defined as the percentages of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), while DCRs represented the percentages of patients with CR+ PR+ stable disease (SD). The pooled proportions were calculated with either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model depending on the test for heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 22 studies (1758 patients) were included in this meta-analysis: 8 studies with 478 patients met RECIST criteria, 10 studies with 1127 patients met RECIST 1.1 criteria, 5 studies with 459 patients met SWOG criteria, and 1 study with 40 patients met WHO criteria, and among these articles 1 study met both RECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria and 1 met both RECIST 1.1 and SWOG criteria. The pooled DRRs were 33.0% (95% CI: 25.0%-42.0%, I = 65%), 35.0% (95% CI: 26.0%-45.0%, I = 91%) and 25.0% (95% CI: 14.0%-36.0%, I = 84%) according to RECIST, RECIST 1.1 and SWOG criteria, respectively. The pooled DCRs were 79.0% (95% CI: 75.0%-83.0%, I = 97%), 83.0% (95% CI: 78.0%-88.0%, I = 0) and 82.0% (95% CI: 75.0%-89.0%, I = 91%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
In advanced NETs patients, DRRs and DCRs were significantly elevated after initial treatment with Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, which shows that this treatment would be beneficial and promising for advanced or inoperable NETs patients.
Topics: Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Octreotide; Radiopharmaceuticals; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
PubMed: 32150065
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019304 -
United European Gastroenterology Journal Mar 2020Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Response and relapse rates after treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs in multifocal or recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors.
METHODS
A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25-100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8-92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1-50.6) after 34 months.
CONCLUSION
Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).
Topics: Carcinoid Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intestinal Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Octreotide; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Peptides, Cyclic; Prospective Studies; Somatostatin; Stomach; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 32213066
DOI: 10.1177/2050640619890465 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2019Hepatorenal syndrome is defined as renal failure in people with cirrhosis in the absence of other causes. In addition to supportive treatment such as albumin to restore...
BACKGROUND
Hepatorenal syndrome is defined as renal failure in people with cirrhosis in the absence of other causes. In addition to supportive treatment such as albumin to restore fluid balance, the other potential treatments include systemic vasoconstrictor drugs (such as vasopressin analogues or noradrenaline), renal vasodilator drugs (such as dopamine), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and liver support with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). There is uncertainty over the best treatment regimen for hepatorenal syndrome.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for hepatorenal syndrome in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trial registers until December 2018 to identify randomised clinical trials on hepatorenal syndrome in people with cirrhosis.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adults with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previously undergone liver transplantation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently identified eligible trials and collected data. The outcomes for this review included mortality, serious adverse events, any adverse events, resolution of hepatorenal syndrome, liver transplantation, and other decompensation events. We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the odds ratio (OR), rate ratio, hazard ratio (HR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.
MAIN RESULTS
We included a total of 25 trials (1263 participants; 12 interventions) in the review. Twenty-three trials (1185 participants) were included in one or more outcomes. All the trials were at high risk of bias, and all the evidence was of low or very low certainty. The trials included participants with liver cirrhosis of varied aetiologies as well as a mixture of type I hepatorenal syndrome only, type II hepatorenal syndrome only, or people with both type I and type II hepatorenal syndrome. Participant age ranged from 42 to 60 years, and the proportion of females ranged from 5.8% to 61.5% in the trials that reported this information. The follow-up in the trials ranged from one week to six months. Overall, 59% of participants died during this period and about 35% of participants recovered from hepatorenal syndrome. The most common interventions compared were albumin plus terlipressin, albumin plus noradrenaline, and albumin alone.There was no evidence of a difference in mortality (22 trials; 1153 participants) at maximal follow-up between the different interventions. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. There was no evidence of differences in the proportion of people with serious adverse events (three trials; 428 participants), number of participants with serious adverse events per participant (two trials; 166 participants), proportion of participants with any adverse events (four trials; 402 participants), the proportion of people who underwent liver transplantation at maximal follow-up (four trials; 342 participants), or other features of decompensation at maximal follow-up (one trial; 466 participants). Five trials (293 participants) reported number of any adverse events, and five trials (219 participants) reported treatment costs. Albumin plus noradrenaline had fewer numbers of adverse events per participant (rate ratio 0.51, 95% CrI 0.28 to 0.87). Eighteen trials (1047 participants) reported recovery from hepatorenal syndrome (as per definition of hepatorenal syndrome). In terms of recovery from hepatorenal syndrome, in the direct comparisons, albumin plus midodrine plus octreotide and albumin plus octreotide had lower recovery from hepatorenal syndrome than albumin plus terlipressin (HR 0.04; 95% CrI 0.00 to 0.25 and HR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.07 to 0.80 respectively). There was no evidence of differences between the groups in any of the other direct comparisons. In the network meta-analysis, albumin and albumin plus midodrine plus octreotide had lower recovery from hepatorenal syndrome compared with albumin plus terlipressin.
FUNDING
two trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies; five trials were funded by parties who had no vested interest in the results of the trial; and 18 trials did not report the source of funding.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on very low-certainty evidence, there is no evidence of benefit or harm of any of the interventions for hepatorenal syndrome with regards to the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, serious adverse events (proportion), number of serious adverse events per participant, any adverse events (proportion), liver transplantation, or other decompensation events. Low-certainty evidence suggests that albumin plus noradrenaline had fewer 'any adverse events per participant' than albumin plus terlipressin. Low- or very low-certainty evidence also found that albumin plus midodrine plus octreotide and albumin alone had lower recovery from hepatorenal syndrome compared with albumin plus terlipressin.Future randomised clinical trials should be adequately powered; employ blinding, avoid post-randomisation dropouts or planned cross-overs (or perform an intention-to-treat analysis); and report clinically important outcomes such as mortality, health-related quality of life, adverse events, and recovery from hepatorenal syndrome. Albumin plus noradrenaline and albumin plus terlipressin appear to be the interventions that should be compared in future trials.
Topics: Adult; Bayes Theorem; Female; Hepatorenal Syndrome; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vasoconstrictor Agents
PubMed: 31513287
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013103.pub2 -
Endocrine Mar 2023A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the use of home injections (self/partner/healthcare provider [HCP]-administered) of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as...
PURPOSE
A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the use of home injections (self/partner/healthcare provider [HCP]-administered) of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as an alternative to healthcare-setting injections in patients with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
METHODS
MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001-September 2021), key congresses (2019-2021), and bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews were searched. Eligible studies reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety, adherence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and economic outcomes in populations receiving home injections of SSAs.
RESULTS
Overall, 12 studies were included, all reporting on SSAs (lanreotide Autogel/Depot or octreotide long-acting release) in acromegaly or NETs. Across four studies, home injection was associated with similar disease control in patients with acromegaly/NETs compared with healthcare-setting administration. High rates of treatment adherence were shown in two studies of patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide injections at home. Two studies reported non-serious adverse events; incidence of adverse reactions was similar in both the home and healthcare administration settings. Preference for injection setting varied between studies and indications; nonetheless, higher satisfaction/convenience (>75% patients) was reported for home injections. Self- or partner-injection was associated with economic savings compared with administration in the healthcare setting across five studies.
CONCLUSION
Efficacy/effectiveness, adherence, and safety outcomes of SSAs in the home injection setting were similar to those in the healthcare setting, with high reported satisfaction and convenience. Self/partner injection also resulted in cost savings. These findings provide a basis to understand outcomes related to home injection and encourage healthcare providers to discuss optimal treatment choices with their patients.
Topics: Humans; Somatostatin; Acromegaly; Peptides, Cyclic; Octreotide; Injections, Subcutaneous; Neuroendocrine Tumors
PubMed: 36369434
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03227-0 -
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and... Oct 2023The imaging of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) plays a significant role in imaging neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, there has been no clear definition on whether it...
BACKGROUND
The imaging of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) plays a significant role in imaging neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, there has been no clear definition on whether it is necessary to withdraw somatostatin analogs (SSAs) before SSTRs imaging. We aimed to assess whether nonradioactive SSAs affect the uptake of radiolabeled SSAs on imaging for NETs patients.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (WoS) were searched until March 12, 2022 to identify eligible studies. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in tumor and normal tissues were extracted, pooled, and compared before and after SSAs treatment. The change of tumor-to-background/liver ratio was also described. The quality of each study was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.
RESULTS
A total of 9 articles involving 285 patients were included and 5 studies using Gallium-68-labeled [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid]-D-Phe-Tyr-Thr-octreotide (Ga-DOTATATE) were used for pooled evaluation. We found a significantly decreased SUVmax in the liver (9.56±2.47 7.62±2.12, P=0.001) and spleen (25.74±7.14 20.39±6.07, P=0.006) after SSAs treatment whereas no significant differences were observed in the uptake of thyroid, adrenal, and pituitary gland. For either primary tumor sites or metastases, the SUVmax did not change significantly before and after SSAs treatment. The tumor-to-liver/background ratio increased following SSAs therapy. High heterogeneity was observed across the studies, mainly due to inherent diversity of study design, sample size, and scanning technique.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on current evidence, long-acting SSAs therapy before imaging has no effect on the uptake of radiolabeled SSAs at tumor primary sites and metastatic lesions, but results in a significant reduction of uptake in the liver and spleen. These findings may implicate the unnecessary discontinuation of SSAs before radiolabeled SSAs imaging.
PubMed: 37869289
DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-477 -
Annals of Translational Medicine Dec 2019We aimed to compare the efficacy of different drugs facilitating endoscopy in patients with acute variceal bleeding.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to compare the efficacy of different drugs facilitating endoscopy in patients with acute variceal bleeding.
METHODS
Databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials which compared the efficacy of vasoactive drugs (vasopressin, terlipressin, octreotide, somatostatin) with placebo or each other. The primary outcomes were 6-week and 5-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 5-day rebleeding, control of initial bleeding and adverse events. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were performed.
RESULTS
We identified 14 RCTs involved 2,187 patients. Four drugs had comparable clinical efficacy in all involving outcomes, except for adverse events. However, we do exhibit a superiority when vasopressin (OR, 4.40; 95% CI: 1.04-19.57), terlipressin (OR, 4.58; 95% CI: 1.63-13.63), octreotide (OR, 5.79; 95% CI: 2.41-16.71) and somatostatin (OR, 5.15; 95% CI: 1.40-27.39) were compared to placebo respectively as for initial hemostasis. In addition, only octreotide was more effective than placebo in decreasing 5-day rebleeding (OR, 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.90). Meanwhile, octreotide was shown to have the highest probability ranking the best to improve initial hemostasis (mean rank =1.8) and carries a lowest risk of adverse events (9.1%) and serious adverse events (0.0%) compared to other drugs.
CONCLUSIONS
Balanced with curative effect and tolerability, octreotide may be the preferred vasoactive drug facilitating endoscopy.
PubMed: 32042733
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.26 -
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023The interactions between the administration of cold somatostatin analogs (cSAs) and their radiolabeled counterpart remain unclear, and discontinuation before imaging is...
PURPOSE
The interactions between the administration of cold somatostatin analogs (cSAs) and their radiolabeled counterpart remain unclear, and discontinuation before imaging is still advised as a precaution. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the consequences of cSA administration on tumoral and surrounding healthy organs' uptake at somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging with SPECT or PET.
METHODS
After registration of the study on Prospero (CRD42022360260), an electronic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: human patients referred for SSTR imaging for oncological purposes; at least 1 examination performed either before cSA administration or after a long-enough withdrawal of cSA treatment; at least 1 examination was performed under cSA treatment. Included articles were independently appraised by 2 authors using the standardized protocol provided by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Discrepancies were solved by consensus.
RESULTS
A total of 12 articles were included, 4 using 111In-pentetreotide and 8 using 68Ga-DOTA peptides. Administration of cSAs consistently resulted in decreased spleen and liver uptake (from 6.9% to 80% for spleen, 10% to 60% for liver) and increased tumor-to-background or tumor-to-healthy organ ratios. After cSA treatment, tumor uptake alone was unchanged or moderately decreased. Similar results were noted whether patient was octreotide-naive.
CONCLUSION
Impairment in SSTR imaging quality after cSA administration has not been demonstrated. On the contrary, the administration of cSAs seems to improve the contrast between tumoral lesions and the surroundings.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Somatostatin; Somatostatin; Octreotide; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Neoplasms; Neuroendocrine Tumors
PubMed: 37133509
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004670