-
JAMA Network Open Feb 2023Ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (RT) is controversial in some patients with tonsil cancer due to concern for nodal failure within the contralateral nonirradiated neck... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Association of Unilateral Radiotherapy With Contralateral Lymph Node Failure Among Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
IMPORTANCE
Ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (RT) is controversial in some patients with tonsil cancer due to concern for nodal failure within the contralateral nonirradiated neck (hereinafter referred to as contralateral neck failure [CNF]).
OBJECTIVE
To determine the rate of CNF following ipsilateral neck RT in patients with tonsil cancer.
DATA SOURCES
Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried for peer-reviewed, English language articles published between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies reporting rates of CNF from at least 20 patients treated with ipsilateral neck RT. Studies were excluded if they lacked full text, reported results from databases or systematic reviews, or did not provide RT details.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were extracted following the PRISMA reporting guideline. Study quality was assessed using criteria from a methodological index for nonrandomized studies. Pooled outcomes were estimated using random-effects models.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary outcome was the pooled rate of CNF following ipsilateral neck RT. Secondary outcomes were the pooled rates of CNF by tumor and nodal staging categories from the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and rates of toxic effects.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies (16 retrospective and 1 prospective) including 1487 unique patients were identified. The pooled risk of CNF was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.6%). The rate of CNF by tumor (T) category was as follows: 1.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.3%) for T1; 3.0% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.4%) for T2; 11.3% (95% CI, 3.3%-19.2%) for T3; and 16.0% (95% CI, -7.8% to 39.8%) for T4. Patients with T3 to T4 tumors had a significantly higher rate of CNF than those with T1 to T2 tumors (11.5% [95% CI, 3.9%-19.1%] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 1.0%-2.6%]; P < .001). The rate of CNF by nodal (N) category was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.2%) for N0; 4.8% (95% CI, 2.4%-7.2%) for N1; 3.1% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.8%) for N2a; 3.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-4.9%) for N2b; and 0 (95% CI, not applicable) for N3. Rates of CNF were similar for patients with N2b to N3 and N0 to N2a disease (3.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-4.7%] vs 1.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-2.8%], respectively; P = .07). Compared with bilateral RT, ipsilateral RT was associated with increased risk of CNF (log odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.09-2.48]; P = .04). The crude rates of xerostomia of grade 3 or greater and feeding tube use were 0.9% (95% CI, -0.2% to 1.9%) and 13.3% (95% CI, 8.3%-18.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, ipsilateral neck RT was associated with a low rate of CNF in patients with small, lateralized tonsil cancers. Bilateral neck RT was associated with lower risk of CNF compared with ipsilateral neck RT. Patients with tumors of a higher T category were at increased risk for CNF following ipsilateral neck RT, and advanced nodal stage was not associated with CNF. Rates of toxic effects appeared favorable in patients treated with ipsilateral neck RT.
Topics: Humans; Tonsillar Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Palatine Tonsil; Prospective Studies; Neoplasm Staging; Lymph Nodes; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
PubMed: 36753275
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55209 -
Neuroradiology Aug 2022Human papillomavirus (HPV) status assessment is crucial for decision making in oropharyngeal cancer patients. In last years, several articles have been published...
PURPOSE
Human papillomavirus (HPV) status assessment is crucial for decision making in oropharyngeal cancer patients. In last years, several articles have been published investigating the possible role of radiomics in distinguishing HPV-positive from HPV-negative neoplasms. Aim of this review was to perform a systematic quality assessment of radiomic studies published on this topic.
METHODS
Radiomics studies on HPV status prediction in oropharyngeal cancer patients were selected. The Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) was assessed by three readers to evaluate their methodological quality. In addition, possible correlations between RQS% and journal type, year of publication, impact factor, and journal rank were investigated.
RESULTS
After the literature search, 19 articles were selected whose RQS median was 33% (range 0-42%). Overall, 16/19 studies included a well-documented imaging protocol, 13/19 demonstrated phenotypic differences, and all were compared with the current gold standard. No study included a public protocol, phantom study, or imaging at multiple time points. More than half (13/19) included feature selection and only 2 were comprehensive of non-radiomic features. Mean RQS was significantly higher in clinical journals.
CONCLUSION
Radiomics has been proposed for oropharyngeal cancer HPV status assessment, with promising results. However, these are supported by low methodological quality investigations. Further studies with higher methodological quality, appropriate standardization, and greater attention to validation are necessary prior to clinical adoption.
Topics: Alphapapillomavirus; Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections
PubMed: 35459957
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02959-0 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Aug 2020: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is clinically defined by signs of daytime sleepiness and objective measures of disordered breathing during sleep. The literature is...
: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is clinically defined by signs of daytime sleepiness and objective measures of disordered breathing during sleep. The literature is still controversial on the incidence and aetiology of OSA secondary to head and neck cancer treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and discuss the prevalence of OSA in patients treated with surgery and/or chemo/radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. : Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was performed on May 2020 using the MEDLINE database, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The searches were conducted using combinations of the following terms: head and neck cancer, OSA, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, partial laryngectomy, laryngeal cancer, neoplasm, tumour, carcinoma, and oropharyngeal cancer. : Our results suggest that head and neck cancer patients have a higher incidence of OSA (59.78%) compared to the general population; differences may occur based on the type of treatment. : Clinicians should recognise the higher prevalence of OSA in patients treated for head and neck cancer and should consider a comprehensive sleep history as part of the evaluation and management of these patients. Further research is needed to evaluate the exact prevalence, aetiology, and correct management of OSA after treatment for head and neck cancer.
Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 32784361
DOI: 10.3390/medicina56080399 -
International Journal of Medical... Jul 2023In recent years, there has been a surge in machine learning-based models for diagnosis and prognostication of outcomes in oncology. However, there are concerns relating...
BACKGROUND
In recent years, there has been a surge in machine learning-based models for diagnosis and prognostication of outcomes in oncology. However, there are concerns relating to the model's reproducibility and generalizability to a separate patient cohort (i.e., external validation).
OBJECTIVES
This study primarily provides a validation study for a recently introduced and publicly available machine learning (ML) web-based prognostic tool (ProgTOOL) for overall survival risk stratification of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Additionally, we reviewed the published studies that have utilized ML for outcome prognostication in OPSCC to examine how many of these models were externally validated, type of external validation, characteristics of the external dataset, and diagnostic performance characteristics on the internal validation (IV) and external validation (EV) datasets were extracted and compared.
METHODS
We used a total of 163 OPSCC patients obtained from the Helsinki University Hospital to externally validate the ProgTOOL for generalizability. In addition, PubMed, OvidMedline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
The ProgTOOL produced a predictive performance of 86.5% balanced accuracy, Mathew's correlation coefficient of 0.78, Net Benefit (0.7) and Brier score (0.06) for overall survival stratification of OPSCC patients as either low-chance or high-chance. In addition, out of a total of 31 studies found to have used ML for the prognostication of outcomes in OPSCC, only seven (22.6%) reported a form of EV. Three studies (42.9%) each used either temporal EV or geographical EV while only one study (14.2%) used expert as a form of EV. Most of the studies reported a reduction in performance when externally validated.
CONCLUSION
The performance of the model in this validation study indicates that it may be generalized, therefore, bringing recommendations of the model for clinical evaluation closer to reality. However, the number of externally validated ML-based models for OPSCC is still relatively small. This significantly limits the transfer of these models for clinical evaluation and subsequently reduces the likelihood of the use of these models in daily clinical practice. As a gold standard, we recommend the use of geographical EV and validation studies to reveal biases and overfitting of these models. These recommendations are poised to facilitate the implementation of these models in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Reproducibility of Results; Prognosis; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Carcinoma
PubMed: 37094545
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105064 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Sep 2020TORS has become one of the latest surgical alternatives in the treatment of oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) and has become increasingly accepted by surgeons... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
TORS has become one of the latest surgical alternatives in the treatment of oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) and has become increasingly accepted by surgeons as a treatment option. Surgical robots were designed for various purposes, such as allowing remote telesurgery, and eliminating human factors like trembling. The study aimed to compare systematic review of the available literature in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) compared with open surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the available literature in order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TORS compared with open surgery. We compared TORS and open surgery based on 16 outcomes divided in to 3 groups: intra-operative complications, post-operative complications, and functional and oncologic outcomes. An electronic search of observational studies was carried out using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, and Scielo. Data analysis was carried out in accordance to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis (PRISMA) and the quality of the studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No language restrictions were imposed.
RESULTS
From the 4 studies identified (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale mean score 6.5), 371 patients were revised (186 patients were treated with TORS and 185 with conventional surgery). Overall, TORS, when compared with open surgery, appears to have better functional results (less hospital time, decannulation) and fewer intraoperative and post-operative complications. There is no significant difference when assessing the oncological outcomes (positive margins, survival rate) when comparing both techniques.
CONCLUSIONS
TORS has an overall better functional outcome, and less intraoperative and postoperative complications with no difference in positive margins and survival rate when compared with conventional therapy.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32683380
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23632 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2021To assess whether young patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) demonstrate worse oncologic outcomes than older patients after definitive therapy. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS
To assess whether young patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) demonstrate worse oncologic outcomes than older patients after definitive therapy.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A medical librarian composed a search strategy to identify relevant studies in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and other major databases (Prospero registration number CRD42019127974). Inclusion criteria were adults with histologically diagnosed OCSCC that underwent treatment, comparator groups with an age cutoff of 40 years old, and reported survival outcomes. Articles were excluded if they contained patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma or patients treated for palliative intent. Overall survival hazard ratios were analyzed with a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
There were 23,382 patients with OCSCC that were treated with definitive therapy from 22 included studies. The pooled cohort contained 2,238 (10%) patients ≤40 years of age. Oral tongue was the most common subsite in both the younger (n = 1,961, 91%) and older (n = 18,047, 88%) cohorts. The majority of OCSCCs were either T1 or T2, representing 859 (80%) malignancies in younger patients and 8,126 (77%) malignancies in older patients. A meta-analysis of nine studies demonstrated that younger patients did not experience worse survival outcomes than older patients (hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-1.41).
CONCLUSIONS
Young adults with OCSCC experienced similar oncologic outcomes as older patients with OCSCC after definitive treatment. Until compelling evidence demonstrates clinically relevant differences between these two cohorts, their approach to management should be similar. Future studies should consider comorbidities and using age 40 as a standard age cutoff to provide more uniform data moving forward. Laryngoscope, 131:1310-1319, 2021.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Proportional Hazards Models; Survival Analysis; Young Adult
PubMed: 33264444
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29260 -
The Neuroradiology Journal Aug 2019Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection represents a distinct biological and prognostic subtype compared to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of human papillomavirus status in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection represents a distinct biological and prognostic subtype compared to the HPV-negative form. Prior studies suggest a correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of primary tumor lesion and HPV status in HNSCC. In this meta-analysis, we compared the average ADC of primary lesion between HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed. Studies comparing the average ADC on echo-planar DWI of primary tumor lesions between HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC were included. The standardized mean difference was calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. Tau-squared estimates of total heterogeneity and Higgins inconsistency index ( test) were determined.
RESULTS
A total of five studies, pooling data of 264 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Among these five studies, three had included oral cavity, hypopharyngeal, and/or laryngeal HNSCC in addition to oropharyngeal subsite. Primary lesions were comprised of 185 HPV-negative and 79 HPV-positive HNSCC. The meta-analysis showed lower average ADC values in HPV-positive HNSCC compared to the HPV-negative form, with a standardized mean difference of 0.961 (95% confidence interval 0.644-1.279; < 0.0001). Since there was no significant heterogeneity in analysis ( = 0.3852), both random- and fixed-effects models resulted in the same estimates of overall effect.
CONCLUSIONS
HPV-positive HNSCC primary lesions have a lower average ADC compared to the HPV-negative form, highlighting the potential application of quantitative diffusion magnetic resonance imaging as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for prediction of HPV status.
Topics: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Early Detection of Cancer; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 31084347
DOI: 10.1177/1971400919849808 -
Community Dental Health Mar 2022HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has one of the most rapidly rising incidences of any cancer in high-income countries. HPV vaccination is being tested to...
INTRODUCTION
HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has one of the most rapidly rising incidences of any cancer in high-income countries. HPV vaccination is being tested to prevent HPV-associated OPC.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination on the prevention of OPC in adults worldwide.
BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN
Scoping review conducted using PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
METHOD
An electronic literature search identified relevant records. Titles and abstracts were screened to assess eligibility by two researchers, and data from relevant full-text articles were extracted and synthesised.
RESULTS
Three-hundred-and-forty-three studies were identified, with eleven articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The most common study design was cross-sectional (n = 7), the most common location was the US (n = 6) and data collection periods spanned 2004 to 2020. One article found unvaccinated participants had a 19 times increased risk of developing OPC compared with those who had been vaccinated against HPV. The remaining papers showed that prevalence of HPV-vaccine-type oral infection was significantly lower in vaccinated participants than unvaccinated participants, with a reduction of oral HPV detection ranging from 72% to 93%. This reduction varied by sex.
CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence to suggest that HPV vaccination reduces oral HPV infection and decreases the incidence of HPV-associated OPC. There is substantial need for further research which directly examines the relationship between HPV vaccination status and subsequent OPC development.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Infections; Papillomavirus Vaccines; Vaccination
PubMed: 34304398
DOI: 10.1922/CDH_00072Kaczmarczyk08 -
BMC Oral Health Feb 2024There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region.
METHODS
This study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O'Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review's eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized.
RESULTS
A total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients' QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC.
CONCLUSION
Compared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Tonsillitis; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 38408988
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04035-w -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Jan 2024Human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) displays distinct epidemiological, clinical, and molecular characteristics compared to... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) displays distinct epidemiological, clinical, and molecular characteristics compared to the negative counterpart. Alterations in autophagy play an important role in cancer, and emerging evidence indicates an interplay of autophagy in HNSCC carcinogenesis and tumor promotion. However, the influence of HPV infection on autophagy in HNSCC has received less attention and has not been previously reviewed. Therefore, we here aimed to systematically review the role of autophagy explicitly in HPV HNSCC.
METHODS
Studies accessible in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science investigating HNSCC, highlighting the molecular biological differences between HPV and HPV HNSCC and its influences on autophagy in HNSCC were analyzed according to the PRISMA statement. A total of 10 articles were identified, included, and summarized.
RESULTS
The HPV16 E7 oncoprotein was reported to be involved in the degradation of AMBRA1 and STING, and to enhance chemotherapy-induced cell death via lethal mitophagy in HNSCC cells. Autophagy-associated gene signatures correlated with HPV-subtype and overall survival. Additionally, immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses indicate that high LC3B expression correlates with poor overall survival in oropharyngeal HNSCC patients.
CONCLUSION
HPV may dampen general bulk autophagic flux via degradation of AMBRA1 but may promote selective autophagic degradation of STING and mitochondria. Interpretations of correlations between autophagy-associated gene expressions or IHC analyses of autophagy-related (ATG) proteins in paraffin embedded tissue with clinicopathological features without biological validation need to be taken with caution.
Topics: Humans; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Papillomavirus Infections; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Autophagy; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
PubMed: 38291202
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05514-3