-
World Journal of Orthopedics Dec 2020While advanced technology, increased medical knowledge and improved surgical technique has improved patient outcomes in total joint arthroplasty, prosthetic joint... (Review)
Review
While advanced technology, increased medical knowledge and improved surgical technique has improved patient outcomes in total joint arthroplasty, prosthetic joint infection still remains one of the leading causes of increased healthcare costs, medical resources and societal burdens in orthopaedic care. Two stage arthroplasty revision remains the gold standard for treatment of prosthetic joint infection. Proponents of single stage revision arthroplasty for infection argue that it results in lower healthcare costs while improving patient reported functional outcomes and with equivalent success rates. Here we review the history of single stage revision arthroplasty, discuss the key principles, highlight the indications and contraindications, and review the reported outcomes with a focus on future developments of single stage revision arthroplasty for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections.
PubMed: 33362992
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.559 -
European Radiology Oct 2022Musculoskeletal malignancies are a rare type of cancer. Consequently, sufficient imaging data for machine learning (ML) applications is difficult to obtain. The main... (Review)
Review
Musculoskeletal malignancies are a rare type of cancer. Consequently, sufficient imaging data for machine learning (ML) applications is difficult to obtain. The main purpose of this review was to investigate whether ML is already having an impact on imaging-driven diagnosis of musculoskeletal malignancies and what the respective reasons for this might be. A scoping review was conducted by a radiologist, an orthopaedic surgeon and a data scientist to identify suitable articles based on the PRISMA statement. Studies meeting the following criteria were included: primary malignant musculoskeletal tumours, machine/deep learning application, imaging data or data retrieved from images, human/preclinical, English language and original research. Initially, 480 articles were found and 38 met the eligibility criteria. Several continuous and discrete parameters related to publication, patient distribution, tumour specificities, ML methods, data and metrics were extracted from the final articles. For the synthesis, diagnosis-oriented studies were further examined by retrieving the number of patients and labels and metric scores. No significant correlations between metrics and mean number of samples were found. Several studies presented that ML could support imaging-driven diagnosis of musculoskeletal malignancies in distinct cases. However, data quality and quantity must be increased to achieve clinically relevant results. Compared to the experience of an expert radiologist, the studies used small datasets and mostly included only one type of data. Key to critical advancement of ML models for rare diseases such as musculoskeletal malignancies is a systematic, structured data collection and the establishment of (inter)national networks to obtain substantial datasets in the future. KEY POINTS: • Machine learning does not yet significantly impact imaging-driven diagnosis for musculoskeletal malignancies compared to other disciplines such as lung, breast or CNS cancer. • Research in the area of musculoskeletal tumour imaging and machine learning is still very limited. • Machine learning in musculoskeletal tumour imaging is impeded by insufficient availability of data and rarity of the disease.
Topics: Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Machine Learning; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Musculoskeletal System
PubMed: 35852574
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08981-3 -
The Journal of Clinical Pediatric... Sep 2022To systematically review literature on therapeutic options for treating hemifacial microsomia (HFM), in young patients with growth potential, classifying and comparing...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review literature on therapeutic options for treating hemifacial microsomia (HFM), in young patients with growth potential, classifying and comparing the different dentofacial treatment methods.
STUDY DESIGN
An independent review of databases (Scopus, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library and PubMed) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), conducted by four evaluators. The protocol of this study was registered in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), under the number CRD42021293076.
RESULTS
Between 1970-2021, a total number of 1137 articles were published of which 27 were included in this study according to the selection criteria: one randomized multicentric trial, two case-control studies, three case series and 21 case reports.
CONCLUSIONS
The most common orthopedic treatments provide vertical stimulation of the maxillary process in the affected side. Orthodontic approaches are mainly applied for vertical correction and stabilization of the occlusal plane. Other treatment options include orthognathic surgery, osteogenic distraction, temporomandibular reconstruction and grafting. It is recommended that prospective clinical randomized controlled studies be conducted using homogeneous pediatric groups with long-term follow-up, to establish recommended evidence-based methods for treating each set of hemifacial microsomia symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Child; Goldenhar Syndrome; Facial Asymmetry; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Mandible; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36624910
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2022.003 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Aug 2019Orthopaedic injuries of National Football League (NFL) players can have a deleterious effect on their health, with minimal to no high-level evidence on the management of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Orthopaedic injuries of National Football League (NFL) players can have a deleterious effect on their health, with minimal to no high-level evidence on the management of these injuries.
PURPOSE
To summarize all data published between January 1980 and March 2018 on orthopaedic injuries experienced by NFL candidates and professional players in the NFL.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A literature search of studies examining orthopaedic injuries in the NFL was performed through the PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases. The review included studies of orthopaedic injuries in college football recruits attending the NFL Combine as well as professional NFL players. Excluded were studies of nonorthopaedic injuries, such as concussions, traumatic brain injury, facial injuries, and vascular injuries, as well as case reports.
RESULTS
A total of 147 articles met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 11 topics based on anatomic site: general (16%), spine (13%), shoulder (13%), elbow (3%), hand and wrist (3%), trunk (0.7%), hip and pelvis (7%), thigh (3%), knee (24%), ankle (5%), and foot (12%). Of these studies, 74% were of level 4 evidence. Most studies obtained data from the NFL Combine database (26%), by searching the internet (24%), and via the NFL Injury Surveillance System (22%). Studies using internet search methods to identify injuries consistently found fewer participants than studies using the NFL Injury Surveillance System.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review provides National Collegiate Athletic Association and NFL team physicians with a single source of the most current literature regarding orthopaedic injuries in NFL players. Most research was published on knee, spine, shoulder, and foot injuries and consisted of level 4 evidence. A substantial portion of the published literature was based on data obtained from internet searches and may not accurately represent the NFL population.
PubMed: 31457068
DOI: 10.1177/2325967119864356 -
International Wound Journal Sep 2023The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) in orthopaedic wards. A comprehensive, systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) in orthopaedic wards. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Prevalence", "Pressure ulcer", "Pressure sore", and "Orthopaedics" from the earliest to February 1, 2023. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. Finally, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. The results indicated that the prevalence of PU in orthopaedic departments was 18% (ES: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26, Z = 4.53, I : 99.09%). Although the odds ratio of PU was lower in men than women, it was not statistically significant (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11, Z = 0.95, I : 17.4%, P = .34). Also, results showed the prevalence of PU was higher among studies with a sample size of more than 200 (ES: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.28, Z = 4.07, I : 99.1%), Europe region (ES: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.14-0.26, Z = 6.7, I : 93.0%) and prospective design (ES: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.27, Z = 9.47, I : 83.3%) when compared with other sub-groups. In sum, considering the 18% prevalence of PU in the orthopaedic department, it is recommended to focus on detecting risk factors and design interventions to reduce PU in the patients admitted orthopaedic department.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Ulcer; Cross-Sectional Studies; Risk Factors; Hospitals; Europe; Pressure Ulcer
PubMed: 36960790
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14156 -
The Effect of an Abnormal BMI on Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2020The aim of this systemic review is to identify the complications that arise in operating on orthopaedic trauma patients with an abnormal body mass index (BMI). (Review)
Review
AIMS
The aim of this systemic review is to identify the complications that arise in operating on orthopaedic trauma patients with an abnormal body mass index (BMI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Systematic literature search using a combination of MESH subject headings and free text searching of Medline, Embase, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases in August 2019. Any orthopaedic injury requiring surgery was included. Papers were reviewed and quality assessed by two independent reviewers to select for inclusion. Where sufficiently homogenous, meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 26 articles (379,333 patients) were selected for inclusion. All complications were more common in those with a high BMI (>30). The odds ratio (OR) for high BMI patients sustaining post-operative complication of any type was 2.32 with a 23% overall complication rate in the BMI > 30 group, vs. 14% in the normal BMI group ( < 0.05). The OR for mortality was 3.5. The OR for infection was 2.28. The OR for non-union in tibial fractures was 2.57. Thrombotic events were also more likely in the obese group. Low BMI (<18.5) was associated with a higher risk of cardiac complications than either those with a normal or high BMI (OR 1.56).
CONCLUSION
Almost all complications are more common in trauma patients with a raised BMI. This should be made clear during the consent process, and strategies developed to reduce these risks where possible. Unlike in elective surgery, BMI is a non-modifiable risk factor in the trauma context, but an awareness of the complications should inform clinicians and patients alike. Underweight patients have a higher risk of developing cardiac complications than either high or normal BMI patient groups, but as few studies exist, further research into this group is recommended.
PubMed: 32370034
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051302 -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Nov 2022Intra-articular injection is indicated for mild or moderate osteoarthritis (OA). However, the superiority of cell-based injection and the role of diverse cell sources... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Intra-articular injection is indicated for mild or moderate osteoarthritis (OA). However, the superiority of cell-based injection and the role of diverse cell sources are still unclear. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effect of intra-articular injection with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cell-free methods for OA treatment.
METHODS
A literature search of published scientific data was carried out from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the efficacy and safety of MSC and cell-free intra-articular injection treatments for OA with at least 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS
Dual network meta-analysis validated the therapeutic advantages of MSC treatments (VAS, Bayesian: 90% versus 10% and SUCRA: 94.9% versus 5.1%; WOMAC total, Bayesian: 83% versus 17% and SUCRA: 90.1% versus 9.9%) but also suggested a potential negative safety induced by cell injection (adverse events, Bayesian: 100% versus 0% and SUCRA: 98.2% versus 1.8%). For the MSC source aspect, adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UBMSCs) showed a better curative effect on pain relief and function improvement compared with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs).
CONCLUSION
Intra-articular injection of MSCs is associated with more effective pain alleviation and function improvement than cell-free OA treatment. However, the potential complications induced by MSCs should be emphasized. A comparative analysis of the MSC sources showed that ADMSCs and UBMSCs exerted a better anti-arthritic efficacy than BMMSCs. Schematic illustration of MSC-based intra-articular injection for treating OA. Three major MSCs (UBMSCs, ADMSCs, and BMMSCs) are extracted and expanded in vitro. Subsequently, the amplified MSCs are concentrated and injected into the knee joint to treat OA.
Topics: Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Injections, Intra-Articular; Osteoarthritis; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Pain
PubMed: 36443838
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02953-0 -
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal... Dec 2022Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic and hip pain affects over half of postpartum females and has multiple aetiologies. The relative contribution of intra-articular soft tissue... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic and hip pain affects over half of postpartum females and has multiple aetiologies. The relative contribution of intra-articular soft tissue pathology to pregnancy-related hip pain is unknown. The current review investigates the available evidence regarding underlying intra-articular soft tissue aetiologies of hip pain in females during pregnancy and in the acute postpartum period.
RECENT FINDINGS
Three online databases (Embase, PubMed and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched from database inception until 11 April 2021. All titles, relevant abstracts and full-text articles were screened by two reviewers independently. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument. Descriptive study characteristics are presented in a narrative summary. Five level IV evidence articles were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-two females were included. Twenty patients presented with labral pathology, 15 of which necessitated hip arthroscopy with labral debridement or repair with or without acetabuloplasty and/or femoroplasty. One patient presented with an incidental labral tear in the context of osteitis condensans illi. One patient presented with posttraumatic osteoarthritis necessitating a hip arthroplasty. The contribution of intra-articular soft tissue injury is a documented, albeit sparse, aetiology contributing to pregnancy-related hip pain. Further research to better delineate the prevalence, natural history and optimal management options for females who sustained these injuries at a life-altering juncture is necessary to advance the care of these patients.
PubMed: 36350530
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09804-0 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2021Musculoskeletal ailments affect millions of people around the world and place a high burden on healthcare. Traditional treatment modalities are limited and do not... (Review)
Review
Musculoskeletal ailments affect millions of people around the world and place a high burden on healthcare. Traditional treatment modalities are limited and do not address underlying pathologies. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as an exciting therapeutic alternative and Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJSCs) are some of these. This review reports the clinical and functional outcomes of the applications of WJSCs in orthopedic surgery. A systematic review was conducted utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies that used culture-expanded, mesenchymal stem or stromal cells, MSCs and/or connective tissues procured from Wharton's jelly (WJ), from January 2010 to October 2021, were included. Conventional non-operative therapies and placebos were used as comparisons. Six studies that directly discussed WJSCs use in an animal model or the basic scientific testing using an injury model were identified. Five publications studied cartilage injury, three studied degenerative disc disease, one was related to osteoarthritis, and one was related to osteochondral defects. The results of these studies suggested the benefits of WJSCs in the management of these orthopedic pathologies. To adequately assess the safety and efficacy of WJSCs in orthopedic surgery, further randomized controlled clinical studies are necessary.
PubMed: 34832872
DOI: 10.3390/ph14111090 -
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery 2021Worldwide COVID 19 has affected the medical practices and Orthopaedics is not any different. Despite risk, the surgeons cannot deny the surgical procedure on patients... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Worldwide COVID 19 has affected the medical practices and Orthopaedics is not any different. Despite risk, the surgeons cannot deny the surgical procedure on patients with suspected or confirmed COVID 19 infection. The purpose of this manuscript is to review various operating room measures which are recommended and being followed to carry out orthopaedic surgeries in the current scenario of COVID 19 pandemic. The information would be useful for orthopaedic surgeons to carry out safe surgical practice for reducing the transmission of COVID 19 infection.
METHOD
ology: A systematic literature search was performed using search engines- PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus from January to August 2020 for relevant research articles. The keywords utilized for systematic literature search were "COVID 19", "Corona virus" and "Operating room", "Orthopaedic procedure" in 4 combinations. Duplicates were excluded. Further sorting was done according to the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Original articles pertaining to orthopaedic surgery and operating room in COVID 19 and available in English language were included. Editorials, case reports, other speciality articles were excluded.
RESULTS
16 articles were finally included in review after screening for titles, abstracts and full texts. The information obtained is presented as a narrative review.
CONCLUSION
Various important recommendations include use of negative pressure OR, HEPA filters, dedicated separate OR for COVID positive and suspected patients with well defined separate corridors for transport, avoid AGP wherever possible, minimize the number of assistants and staff and follow strict sanitation protocols after each surgery. A well planned systematic approach is warranted to mitigate the risk of transmission of COVID 19 while carrying out orthopaedic surgeries.
PubMed: 34307063
DOI: 10.1016/j.jajs.2021.02.008