-
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Huaxi... Oct 2021This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in mandibular third molar extraction and provide suggestions for alleviating postoperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in mandibular third molar extraction and provide suggestions for alleviating postoperative complications.
METHODS
Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and SinoMed were searched electronically on February 2020. Randomized controlled trials focusing on PRF usage in mandibular third molar extraction were included. Reviewers assessed the risk of bias in the included literature and extracted data independently using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 13.0.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included, comprising 991 patients who had mandibular third molar extraction. The topical application of PRF effectively reduced pain after extraction [MD=-12.06, 95%CI (-21.42, -2.71), =0.01], attenuated post-extraction swelling [MD=-1.42, 95%CI (-2.41, -0.44), =0.005], and promoted soft tissue hea-ling [MD=0.66, 95%CI (0.34, 0.99), <0.000 1]. PRF significantly reduced trismus and alveolar osteitis (<0.05). However, data could not prove whether PRF has any significant positive effect on bone healing compared with the control group (>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Limited clinical evidence indicates that applying PRF after mandibular third molar extraction could reduce pain, swelling, trismus and the occurrence of dry socket and promote soft tissue healing. However, the effect of PRF on bone healing requires further large-scale randomized controlled trials and unified measurement criteria.
Topics: Humans; Mandible; Molar, Third; Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Tooth Extraction; Tooth, Impacted
PubMed: 34636211
DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.05.017 -
National Journal of Maxillofacial... 2024To compare the effectiveness of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. A systematic search... (Review)
Review
To compare the effectiveness of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. A systematic search was executed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies published till December 2021. Studies were included based on the pre-eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The heterogeneity was evaluated, and a random effect model was used for meta-analysis. A total of five studies were included from an initial search of 96 studies. The included studies were randomized controlled trials and comparative studies assessing pre-operative and post-operative administration of antibiotics among patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. For comparison between pre-operative and post-operative groups, interincisal distance, complications, pain, and swelling were systematically reviewed and meta-analysis was done for interincisal distance and complications. The mean change in interincisal distance ranged from 5.5 to 47.9 and from 4.56 to 46.1 in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups, respectively. Complications reported were infections, alveolar osteitis, nausea, diarrhea, gastric pain, rash, and headache with a pooled incidence of 4.3-33% in the pre-operative amoxicillin group and 0-22.7% in the post-operative amoxicillin group. Quantitative synthesis of data carried out from meta-analysis shows a significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups in improving the interincisal distance and incidence of complications post surgery. The qualitative synthesis of data derived from systematic review for pain provides favoring results for post-operative amoxicillin administration. In case of swelling, a non-conclusive result was obtained.
PubMed: 38690250
DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_163_22 -
World Neurosurgery Aug 2022Spinal vertebral hemangiomas (SVHs) are the most common benign tumors of the spine. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiosurgery (RS) for SVHs. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Spinal vertebral hemangiomas (SVHs) are the most common benign tumors of the spine. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiosurgery (RS) for SVHs.
METHODS
We reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2020 on PubMed. Tumor control, pain relief, and damage to surrounding tissues were evaluated with separate meta-analyses. This study was performed in accordance with the published Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 23 patients with 24 SVHs were reported in 3 studies.
RESULTS
Follow-up time was 7.3-84 months. The vast majority of lesions were located at dorsal level (n = 18; 75%). In 20 (83.3%) patients, pain was the initial clinical presentation. Complete, partial, and stable responses after radiation were reported in 45.7% (P < 0.001), 23.6% (P = 0.02), and 37.2% (P = 0.7) of cases. Overall response was reported in 94.1% (P = 0.7). No progressive disease was reported. Pain relief was achieved in 87.5% of patients (P = 0.2). Damage to surrounding tissue caused by irradiation was reported in 22.3% (P = 0.02) of cases in 1 study, in which higher doses of radiation were delivered.
CONCLUSIONS
Radiosurgery is safe and effective for SVHs. Pain relief after RS in symptomatic patients was extremely high, while no progressive disease was reported. Damage to surrounding tissues was reported in only 1 series and included osteitis, osteonecrosis, or soft tissue injury after higher radiation doses.
Topics: Hemangioma; Humans; Pain; Radiosurgery; Spinal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vertebral Body
PubMed: 35378316
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.120 -
The Journal of Nursing Research : JNR Sep 2020Alveolar osteitis (AO) may occur after molar extraction. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse and CHX gel are widely used to prevent AO. Although previous meta-analyses support the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Alveolar osteitis (AO) may occur after molar extraction. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse and CHX gel are widely used to prevent AO. Although previous meta-analyses support the effectiveness of both CHX rinse and CHX gel in preventing AO, important issues regarding these two formulations have not been addressed adequately in the literature.
PURPOSE
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to determine the effectiveness of CHX rinse and CHX gel in preventing AO.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published before June 2018. The risk ratio (RR) was used to estimate the pooled effect of AO incidence using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
The RRs of AO in patients treated with 0.12% CHX rinse (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.41, 0.72]) and 0.2% CHX rinse (RR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.52, 1.35]) were significantly lower than in those treated with the control. Moreover, a significantly lower RR was identified in patients treated with 0.2% CHX gel (RR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.34, 0.64]) than in those treated with the control. When CHX products of different concentrations were grouped together, patients treated with CHX rinse showed an RR of AO of 0.61 (95% CI [0.48, 0.78]) and those treated with CHX gel showed an RR of AO of 0.44 (95% CI [0.43, 0.65]). On the other hand, a meta-analysis of three trials that compared CHX rinse and CHX gel directly showed a significantly lower RR of AO in patients treated with CHX rinse than in those treated with CHX gel (RR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.34, 0.96]).
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The results support the effectiveness of both CHX rinse and gel in reducing the risk of AO after molar extraction. Each formulation provides unique benefits in terms of ease of application and cost. On the basis of the results of this study, the authors recommend that CHX gel be used immediately after molar extraction because of the convenience and cost-effectiveness of this treatment and that CHX rinse be used by the patient after discharge at home in combination with appropriate health education and case management.
Topics: Chlorhexidine; Dental Care; Dry Socket; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32956135
DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000401 -
Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) 2021There is growing evidence that (certain) hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) comorbidities comprise syndromes including HS as a key cutaneous manifestation. These apparently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is growing evidence that (certain) hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) comorbidities comprise syndromes including HS as a key cutaneous manifestation. These apparently autoinflammatory syndromes and their diagnostic delay might have detrimental effects on affected patients.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL utilizing a standardized extraction form according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
Sixty-four eligible articles on syndromic HS were retrieved. The identified syndromes included already described ones (pyoderma gangrenosum-acne-suppurative hidradenitis, pyogenic arthritis-pyoderma gangrenosum-acne-suppurative hidradenitis, psoriatic arthritis-pyoderma gangrenosum-acne-suppurative hidradenitis, pyoderma gangrenosum-acne vulgaris-hidradenitis suppurativa-ankylosing spondylitis, synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) and further novel symptom constellations. Cutaneous signs, including HS lesions, usually precede signs from other organs. The cutaneous signs of a considerable proportion of patients appear refractory to conventional treatment, and monotherapy with biologics does not suffice to sustain remission.
CONCLUSION
The results are subsequently discussed with focus on the pathophysiology and treatment of the detected syndromes. The dermatologist's role in the precise diagnosis and early treatment administration of HS is pivotal. The purpose of the treatment should be the effective prevention or delay of the autoinflammatory march and its irreversible consequences.
Topics: Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans
PubMed: 32942279
DOI: 10.1159/000509873 -
BMC Oral Health Jul 2019The present study investigated and evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in patients during bilateral mandibular third molars extraction by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The present study investigated and evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in patients during bilateral mandibular third molars extraction by systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were retrieved, and the effect of PRF on the healing process of the alveolar socket after surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars was evaluated by meta-analysis. The postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, osteoblastic activity, and soft tissue healing were assessed, and the incidence of alveolar osteitis, weighted mean difference (WMD)/standard mean difference (SMD), the risk ratio (RR), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS
The current results showed that the local application of PRF during lower third molar extraction prevented postoperative complications. Subsequently, the pain (SMD = - 0.53, 95% CI: - 1.02--0.05, P = 0.001, I = 75.7%) and swelling (WMD = - 0.55, 95% CI: - 1.08--0.01, P = 0.573, I = 0) were relieved and the incidence of alveolar osteitis was reduced (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.597, I = 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in trismus, osteoblastic activity, and soft tissue healing between the PRF and non-PRF groups.
CONCLUSION
The current study confirms that PRF only reduces some of the postoperative complications but does not prevent all the postoperative complications. PRF significantly relieved the pain and swelling and reduced the incidence of alveolar osteitis after the extraction of an impacted lower third molar.
Topics: Dry Socket; Female; Humans; Male; Molar, Third; Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Postoperative Complications; Tooth Extraction; Tooth Socket; Tooth, Impacted; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 31345203
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0824-3 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Mar 2020To review the literature on the effect of different surgical flaps upon patient morbidity (pain perception, trismus, swelling and osteitis) after impacted third molar... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To review the literature on the effect of different surgical flaps upon patient morbidity (pain perception, trismus, swelling and osteitis) after impacted third molar extraction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An electronic and complementary search of main databases and grey literature was performed up to January 2019 to retrieve randomized clinical trials. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used for methodological appraisal. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted of pain perception and trismus.
RESULTS
From the initially 1314 screened studies, only 11 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 5 in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in pain between the envelope and triangular flap designs over time, except on the sixth postoperative day, when the envelope flap proved more painful. Regarding trismus, statistically significant differences were observed on the seventh postoperative day, with greater mouth opening in the envelope flap group than in the triangular flap group. There were no clear differences in swelling and osteitis among the flap designs.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite its limitations, the present meta-analysis found no clear differences in patient morbidity between the different flap designs.
Topics: Edema; Humans; Mandible; Molar, Third; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Surgical Flaps; Tooth Extraction; Tooth, Impacted; Trismus
PubMed: 32062667
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23320 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Bone biopsies have been obtained for many centuries and are one of the oldest known medical procedures in history. Despite the introduction of new noninvasive...
Bone biopsies have been obtained for many centuries and are one of the oldest known medical procedures in history. Despite the introduction of new noninvasive radiographic imaging techniques and genetic analyses, bone biopsies are still valuable in the diagnosis of bone diseases. Advanced techniques for the assessment of bone quality in bone biopsies, which have emerged during the last decades, allows in-depth tissue analyses beyond structural changes visible in bone histology. In this review, we give an overview of the application and advantages of the advanced techniques for the analysis of bone biopsies in the clinical setting of various rare metabolic bone diseases. A systematic literature search on rare metabolic bone diseases and analyzing techniques of bone biopsies was performed in PubMed up to 2019 week 34. Advanced techniques for the analysis of bone biopsies were described for rare metabolic bone disorders including Paget's disease of bone, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia, Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, X-linked osteoporosis, Loeys-Diets syndrome, osteopetrosis, Erdheim-Chester disease, and Cherubism. A variety of advanced available analytical techniques were identified that may help to provide additional detail on cellular, structural, and compositional characteristics in rare bone diseases complementing classical histopathology. To date, these techniques have only been used in research and not in daily clinical practice. Clinical application of bone quality assessment techniques depends upon several aspects such as availability of the technique in hospitals, the existence of reference data, and a cooperative network of researchers and clinicians. The evaluation of rare metabolic bone disorders requires a repertoire of different methods, owing to their distinct bone tissue characteristics. The broader use of bone material obtained from biopsies could provide much more information about pathophysiology or treatment options and establish bone biopsies as a valuable tool in rare metabolic bone diseases.
Topics: Biopsy; Bone Diseases; Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone; Humans; Loeys-Dietz Syndrome; Myositis Ossificans; Osteitis Deformans; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Osteopetrosis; Osteoporosis; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 32714279
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00399 -
The Journal of Arthroplasty Jul 2023Patients who have Paget's Disease more frequently require total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) than matched controls. However, controversy...
BACKGROUND
Patients who have Paget's Disease more frequently require total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) than matched controls. However, controversy remains regarding their outcome. We aimed to evaluate the literature regarding outcomes following THA and TKA in patients who have Paget's Disease.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for all articles evaluating outcomes following THA and TKA in patients who have Paget's Disease. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
A total of 19 articles (published between 1976 and 2022) were included, comprising 58,695 patients (48,766 controls and 10,018 patients who have Pagets Disease), from 209 potentially relevant titles. Patients with Paget's Disease have a pooled mortality of 32.5% at a mean of 7.8 years (range, 0.1 to 20) following THA and 31.0% at a mean of 8.5 years (range, 2 to 20) following TKA, with a pooled revision rate of 4.4% at 7.2 years (range, 0 to 20) following THA and 2.2% at 7.4 years (range, 2 to 20) following TKA. Renal and respiratory complications, as well as heterotopic ossification and surgical-site infection were the most common post-operative complications.
CONCLUSION
There is marked heterogeneity in outcome reporting of studies assessing arthroplasty in patients who have Paget's Disease, with studies of low to moderate quality. Patients with Paget's Disease undergoing THA and TKA appear to have similar implant longevity as their unaffected counterparts. However, they appear to have an increased risk of medical and surgical complications and may have a higher mortality risk from their procedure.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Osteitis Deformans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Surgical Wound Infection; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36639114
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.004 -
International Journal of Environmental... Mar 2020(1) Background: Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease of finally unknown etiology, which can occur alone or related with...
(1) Background: Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease of finally unknown etiology, which can occur alone or related with syndromes (chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis-CRMO; synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis syndrome-SAPHO). The involvement of the mandible is rather rare. (2) Methods: We carried out a systematic literature search on CNO with mandibular involvement, according to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guidelines, considering the different synonyms for CNO, with a special focus on therapy. (3) Results: Finally, only four studies could be included. A total of 36 patients were treated in these studies-therefore, at most, only tendencies could be identified. The therapy in the included works was inconsistent. Various therapies could alleviate the symptoms of the disease. A complete remission could only rarely be observed and is also to be viewed against the background of the fluctuating character of the disease. The success of one-off interventions is unlikely overall, and the need for long-term therapies seems to be indicated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were not part of any effective therapy. Surgical therapy should not be the first choice. (4) Conclusions: In summary, no evidence-based therapy recommendation can be given today. For the future, systematic clinical trials on therapy for CNO are desirable.
Topics: Acquired Hyperostosis Syndrome; Adult; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Mandible; Osteomyelitis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32155902
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051737