-
Cardio-oncology (London, England) Sep 2021Cardiotoxicity resulting in heart failure (HF) is among the most dreaded complications of cancer therapy and can significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Leading... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiotoxicity resulting in heart failure (HF) is among the most dreaded complications of cancer therapy and can significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Leading professional societies in cardiology and oncology recommend improved access to hospice and palliative care (PC) for patients with cancer and advanced HF. However, there is a paucity of published literature on the use of PC in cardio-oncology, particularly in patients with HF and a concurrent diagnosis of cancer.
AIMS
To identify existing criteria for referral to and early integration of PC in the management of cases of patients with cancer and patients with HF, and to identify assessments of outcomes of PC intervention that overlap between patients with cancer and patients with HF.
DESIGN
Systematic literature review on PC in patients with HF and in patients with cancer.
DATA SOURCES
Databases including Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2009 to September 2020.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies of PC in cancer and 14 studies of PC in HF were identified after screening of the 8647 retrieved citations. Cancer and HF share similarities in their patient-reported symptoms, quality of life, symptom burden, social support needs, readmission rates, and mortality.
CONCLUSION
The literature supports the integration of PC into oncology and cardiology practices, which has shown significant benefit to patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system alike. Incorporating PC in cardio-oncology, particularly in the management of HF in patients with cancer, as early as at diagnosis, will enable patients, family members, and healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about various treatments and end-of-life care and provide an opportunity for patients to participate in the decisions about how they will spend their final days.
PubMed: 34556191
DOI: 10.1186/s40959-021-00117-8 -
Palliative Medicine Sep 2021Providing unawareness and pain relief are core elements of palliative sedation. In addition to clinical scales, nociception and electroencephalogram-based depth of...
BACKGROUND
Providing unawareness and pain relief are core elements of palliative sedation. In addition to clinical scales, nociception and electroencephalogram-based depth of sedation monitoring are used to assess the level of consciousness and analgesia during sedation in intensive care units and during procedures.
AIM
To determine whether reported devices impact the outcomes of palliative sedation.
DESIGN
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of research published between January 2000 and December 2020.
DATA SOURCES
Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library. All reports describing the use of any monitoring device to assess the level of consciousness or analgesia during palliative sedation were screened for inclusion. Data concerning safety and efficacy were extracted. Patient comfort was the primary outcome of interest. Articles reporting sedation but that did not meet guidelines of the European Association for Palliative Care were excluded.
RESULTS
Six reports of five studies were identified. Four of these were case series and two were case reports. Together, these six reports involved a total of 67 sedated adults. Methodological quality was assessed fair to good. Medication regimens were adjusted to bispectral index monitoring values in two studies, which found poor correlation between monitoring values and observational scores. In another study, high nociception index values, representing absence of pain, were used to detect opioid overdosing. Relatives and caregivers found the procedures feasible and acceptable.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia; Anesthesia; Conscious Sedation; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Nociception; Palliative Care
PubMed: 34109873
DOI: 10.1177/02692163211022943 -
Reports of Practical Oncology and... 2020To assess the educational needs, role and perceptions in palliative care issues of radiation oncologists (ROs) and trainees. (Review)
Review
AIM
To assess the educational needs, role and perceptions in palliative care issues of radiation oncologists (ROs) and trainees.
BACKGROUND
1/3 of radiotherapy patients are treated with palliative intent. Conversely, education and role that ROs have in the palliative care process are not well established, neither in terms of how they perceive their competence nor whether it is important to improve training, research and attention in palliative care issues at radiotherapy congresses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Literature systematic review in National Library of Medicine and Cochrane databases with 11 relevant issues to be identified. One doctor made first selection of articles, a second one confirmed their eligibility.
RESULTS
722 articles reviewed, 19 selected. 100% recognize the importance of palliative care in radiotherapy, 89.4% the need of training in palliative care for ROs, 68.4% the necessity of improving the resident programs, 63.1% the importance of skilled ROs in palliative care, 63.1% the need of better communication skills and pain management (47.3%), 52.6%, the perception of inadequate training in palliative care, 36.8% the lack of research and palliative care topics in radiotherapy meetings, 21% the absence of adequate guidelines regarding palliative care approaches, 42.1% the importance of the ROs in palliative care teams and 26.3% the lack of their involvement.
CONCLUSION
Palliative care has an important role in radiotherapy but it seems ROs still need more training. It is necessary to improve training programs, increment palliative care research in radiotherapy, giving more attention to palliative care themes at radiotherapy congresses. This could lead to a better integration of radiotherapists in multidisciplinary palliative care teams in the future.
PubMed: 33093812
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.09.007 -
The European Respiratory Journal Oct 2021Advanced nonmalignant respiratory diseases are associated with significant patient morbidity, yet access to palliative care occurs late, if at all. Our aim was to... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Advanced nonmalignant respiratory diseases are associated with significant patient morbidity, yet access to palliative care occurs late, if at all. Our aim was to examine referral criteria for palliative care among patients with advanced nonmalignant respiratory disease, with a view to developing a standardised set of referral criteria.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of all studies reporting on referral criteria to palliative care in advanced nonmalignant respiratory disease, with a focus on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease. The systematic review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines, and was undertaken using electronic databases (Ovid, MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and PubMed).
RESULTS
Searches yielded 2052 unique titles, which were screened for eligibility and resulted in 62 studies addressing referral criteria to palliative care in advanced nonmalignant respiratory disease. Of 18 categories put forward for referral to palliative care, the most commonly discussed factors were hospital use (69% of papers), indicators of poor respiratory status (47%), physical and emotional symptoms (37%), functional decline (29%), need for advanced respiratory therapies (27%), and disease progression (26%).
CONCLUSION
Clinicians consider referral to specialist palliative care for a wide range of disease- and needs-based criteria. Our findings highlight the need to standardise palliative care access by developing consensus referral criteria for patients with advanced nonmalignant respiratory illnesses.
Topics: Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Palliative Care; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Referral and Consultation
PubMed: 33737407
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04307-2020 -
Palliative Medicine Jan 2021The palliative care needs of people with advanced head and neck cancer pose unique complexities due to the impact the illness has on eating, speaking, appearance and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The palliative care needs of people with advanced head and neck cancer pose unique complexities due to the impact the illness has on eating, speaking, appearance and breathing. Examining these needs would help provide guidance about developing relevant models of care and identify gaps in research knowledge.
AIM
To identify and map out the palliative care needs and experiences for people with advanced head and neck cancer.
DESIGN
A scoping literature review following the methods described by the Joanna Briggs Institute.
DATA SOURCES
An electronic search of the literature was undertaken in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE and CINAHL covering the years January 1996 to January 2019.
RESULTS
People with advanced head and neck cancer often had palliative care needs but there was variability in the timing and access to relevant services. A high prevalence of interventions, for example hospital admissions were needed even during the last month of life. This was not necessarily negated with early engagement of palliative care. Dissonance between patients and family carers about information needs and decision-making was an additional complexity. Studies tended to be descriptive in nature, and often involved a single centre.
CONCLUSION
This scoping review demonstrates the complexity of care for people with advanced head and neck cancer and the issues related to the current healthcare systems. Focus on appropriate referral criteria, increased integration and coordination of care and robust evaluation of specific care components seems key. Linkage between research and service design delivery across teams, disciplines and care settings seems pertinent.
Topics: Delivery of Health Care; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; Humans; Palliative Care; Population Groups
PubMed: 33084497
DOI: 10.1177/0269216320963892 -
Palliative Medicine Jan 2023In order to provide responsive, individualised and personalised care, there is now greater engagement with patients, families and carers in designing health services.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In order to provide responsive, individualised and personalised care, there is now greater engagement with patients, families and carers in designing health services. Out-of-hours care is an essential component of community palliative care. However, little is known about how patients, families and carers have been involved in the planning and design of these services.
AIM
To systematically search and review the research literature that reports on how out-of-hours palliative care services are provided in the community and to identify the extent to which the principles of co-design have been used to inform the planning and design of these services.
DESIGN
Systematic literature search and review.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search for published research papers from seven databases was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science, from January 2010 and December 2021. Reference list searches of included papers were undertaken to source additional relevant literature. A manifest content analysis was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS
A total of 77 papers were included. The majority of out-of-hours services in the community were provided by primary care services. The review found little evidence that patients, families or carers were involved in the planning or development of out-of-hours services.
CONCLUSION
Incorporating patients, families and carers priorities and preferences in the planning and designing of out-of-hours palliative care service is needed for service providers to deliver care that is more patient-centred. Adopting the principles of co-design may improve how out-of-hours care scan be delivered.
Topics: Humans; After-Hours Care; Caregivers; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; Palliative Care; Qualitative Research
PubMed: 36349547
DOI: 10.1177/02692163221132089 -
BMC Palliative Care Feb 2020There has been increasing evidence and debate on palliative care research priorities and the international research agenda. To date, however, there is a lack of...
BACKGROUND
There has been increasing evidence and debate on palliative care research priorities and the international research agenda. To date, however, there is a lack of synthesis of this evidence, examining commonalities, differences, and gaps. To identify and synthesize literature on international palliative care research priorities originating from Western countries mapped to a quality assessment framework.
METHODS
A systematic review of several academic and grey databases were searched from January 2008-June 2019 for studies eliciting research priorities in palliative care in English. Two researchers independently reviewed, critically appraised, and conducted data extraction and synthesis.
RESULTS
The search yielded 10,235 articles (academic databases, n = 4108; grey literature, n = 6127), of which ten were included for appraisal and review. Priority areas were identified: service models; continuity of care; training and education; inequality; communication; living well and independently; and recognising family/carer needs and the importance of families. Methodological approaches and process of reporting varied. There was little representation of patient and caregiver driven agendas. The priorities were mapped to the Donabedian framework for assessing quality reflecting structure, process and outcomes and key priority areas.
CONCLUSIONS
Limited evidence exists pertaining to research priorities across palliative care. Whilst a broad range of topics were elicited, approaches and samples varied questioning the credibility of findings. The voice of the care provider dominated, calling for more inclusive means to capture the patient and family voice. The findings of this study may serve as a template to understand the commonalities of research, identify gaps, and extend the palliative care research agenda.
Topics: Humans; Internationality; Palliative Care; Research
PubMed: 32013949
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-0520-8 -
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Dec 2022Palliative and end-of-life care is a core competency for doctors and is increasingly recognised as a key clinical skill for junior doctors. There is a growing...
BACKGROUND
Palliative and end-of-life care is a core competency for doctors and is increasingly recognised as a key clinical skill for junior doctors. There is a growing international movement to embed palliative care education in medical student and junior doctor education. To date there has been no review of the literature concerning the views and experiences of junior doctors delivering this care.
AIM
To review the published literature between 2000 and 2019 concerning junior doctors' experience of palliative and end-of-life care.
METHODS
Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
A search of six databases identified 7191 titles; 34 papers met the inclusion criteria, with a further 5 identified from reference searching. Data were extracted into a review-specific extraction sheet and a narrative synthesis undertaken. Three key themes were identified: (1) 'Significance of death and dying': all papers found that junior doctors care for many patients approaching the end of life, and this often causes emotional distress and can leave persisting memories for many years afterwards; (2) 'Thrown in at the deep end': junior doctors feel unprepared and unsupported in providing palliative and end-of-life care; and (3) 'Addressing the gaps': junior doctors often experience a medical culture of disengagement towards dying patients and varying attitudes of senior doctors. Subsequently they have to learn the skills needed through seeking their own opportunities.
CONCLUSION
Medical education needs to change in order to better prepare and support junior doctors for their role in caring for dying patients. This education needs to focus on their knowledge, skills and attitudes.
Topics: Humans; Palliative Care; Qualitative Research; Terminal Care; Medical Staff, Hospital; Hospice Care
PubMed: 31722983
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001954 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2023Public health palliative care views communities as an integral part of care delivery at the end of life. This community-provider partnership approach has the potential...
Public health palliative care interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers: a scoping review of studies that assess person-centered outcomes.
BACKGROUND
Public health palliative care views communities as an integral part of care delivery at the end of life. This community-provider partnership approach has the potential to improve end-of-life care for people who are dying and their carers.
OBJECTIVE
To identify and appraise the current literature related to public health interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted, applying Arksey and O'Malley's methods. Data was extracted and synthesized using narrative techniques, and results are reported using PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
The search yielded 2,902 results. Eighteen met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Interventions were categorized according to their target population: people with life-limiting illness (ex. facilitated social interaction, helplines and guided discussions about death and dying); carers (ex. social support mapping, psychoeducation, and community resource identification and facilitation); or dyads (ex. reminiscence activities, practical and emotional support from volunteers, online modules to bolster coping mechanisms). Public health palliative care approaches were delivered by key community stakeholders such as community health workers, volunteers, peer mentors, and pre-established support groups. Despite reported challenges in identifying appropriate tools to measure effectiveness, studies report improvement in quality of life, loneliness, social support, stress and self-efficacy.
CONCLUSION
We found that community-engaged palliative care interventions can lead to appreciable changes in various outcomes, though it was difficult to determine in which contexts this approach works best because of the dearth of contextual information reported. Based on the varied design and implementation strategies, it is clear that no one method for enhancing end of life care will benefit all communities and it is crucial to engage community members at all stages of the design and implementation process. Future research should be grounded in appropriate theory, describe contextual differences in these communities, and should specifically examine how demographics, resource availability, and social capital might impact the design, implementation, and results of public health palliative care interventions.
Topics: Humans; Palliative Care; Caregivers; Public Health; Quality of Life; Terminal Care
PubMed: 37564426
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180571 -
Cancers Feb 2022In advanced cancer stage the incidence of cancerous wounds is about 5%, and the estimated life expectancy is not more than 6 to 12 months. Without interdisciplinary and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In advanced cancer stage the incidence of cancerous wounds is about 5%, and the estimated life expectancy is not more than 6 to 12 months. Without interdisciplinary and individualized treatment strategy, symptoms progress, and adversely influence quality of life.
METHODS
Authors collected different treatment algorithms for cancerous wound published by wide scale of medical expertise, and summarized surgical, oncological, radiation oncological, nursing and palliative care aspects based on radiological information.
RESULTS
Interdisciplinary approach with continuous consultation between various specialists can solve or ease the hopeless cases.
CONCLUSIONS
This distressing condition needs a comprehensive treatment solution to alleviate severe symptoms. Non-healing fungating wounds without effective therapy are severe socio-economic burden for all participants, including patients, caregivers, and health services. In this paper authors collected recommendations for further guideline that is essential in the near future.
PubMed: 35267512
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051203