-
European Respiratory Review : An... Sep 2023Peripheral blood monocyte counts have been associated with poor outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, studies are limited by variable biomarker... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Peripheral blood monocyte counts have been associated with poor outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, studies are limited by variable biomarker thresholds, analytic approaches and heterogenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis characterised the relationship between monocytes and clinical outcomes in ILD.
METHODS
Electronic database searches were performed. Two reviewers screened abstracts and extracted data. Pooled estimates (hazard ratios (HRs)) of monocyte count thresholds were calculated for their association with mortality using ≥0.6×10 and >0.9×10 cells·L for unadjusted models and ≥0.95×10 cells·L for adjusted models, using random effects, with heterogeneity and bias assessed. Disease progression associated with monocytes >0.9×10cells·L was also calculated.
RESULTS
Of 3279 abstracts, 13 were included in the systematic review and eight in the meta-analysis. The pooled unadjusted HR for mortality for monocyte counts ≥0.6×10 cells·L was 1.71 (95% CI 1.34-2.19, p<0.001, I=0%) and for monocyte counts >0.90×10 cells·L it was 2.44 (95% CI 1.53-3.87, p=0.0002, I=52%). The pooled adjusted HR for mortality for monocyte counts ≥0.95×10 cells·L was 1.93 (95% CI 1.24-3.01, p=0.0038 I=69%). The pooled HR for disease progression associated with increased monocyte counts was 1.83 (95% CI 1.40-2.39, p<0.0001, I=28%).
CONCLUSIONS
Peripheral blood monocyte counts were associated with an increased risk of mortality and disease progression in patients with ILD.
Topics: Humans; Monocytes; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Patients; Disease Progression
PubMed: 37673424
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0072-2023 -
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology &... 2022The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was analyzing published studies on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in infection and spatially... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was analyzing published studies on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in infection and spatially spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) among cirrhotic patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until May 24, 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.
RESULTS
Of 14 studies included in our study, six studies were on infection with 2786 hospitalized cirrhotic patients, of whom 934 developed an infection. Other studies were on SBP with 1573 cirrhotic patients with ascites, of whom 557 developed SBP. The pooled results showed that there was no difference in NLR levels between hospitalized cirrhotic patients who developed infection compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.01-1.27, =0.054). However, cirrhotic patients with ascites who developed SBP had elevated levels of NLR compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52-1.57, < 0.001). This difference remained significant in prospective studies (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38, < 0.001) but not in retrospective studies (SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = -0.56-3.29,=0.165), in the subgroup analysis according to the study design. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 92.07% (95% CI = 74.85%-97.84%) and the pooled specificity was 72.58% (95% CI = 57.72%-83.69%). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR of NLR were 3.35(95%CI = 2.06-5.46), 0.10 (95%CI = 0.03-0.38), and 30.78 (95%CI = 7.01-135.04), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our results support NLR to be a valid biomarker that can be readily integrated into clinical settings to help in the prevention and prediction of SBP among cirrhotic patients.
Topics: Ascites; Biomarkers; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Peritonitis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36204262
DOI: 10.1155/2022/8604060 -
Chest Jul 2023Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is an emerging biomarker for infection. It is available easily and quickly as part of the CBC count, which is performed routinely on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is an emerging biomarker for infection. It is available easily and quickly as part of the CBC count, which is performed routinely on hospital admission. The increasing availability and promising results of MDW as a biomarker in sepsis has prompted an expansion of its use to other infectious diseases.
RESEARCH QUESTION
What is the diagnostic performance of MDW across multiple infectious disease outcomes and care settings?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
A systematic review of the diagnostic performance of MDW across multiple infectious disease outcomes was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science through February 4, 2022. Meta-analysis was performed for outcomes with three or more reports identified (sepsis and COVID-19). Diagnostic performance measures were calculated for individual studies with pooled estimates created by linear mixed-effects models.
RESULTS
We identified 29 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Most examined sepsis (19 studies) and COVID-19 (six studies). Pooled estimates of diagnostic performance for sepsis differed by reference standard (Second vs Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria) and tube anticoagulant used and ranged from an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 to 0.94, with mean sensitivity of 0.69 to 0.79 and mean specificity of 0.57 to 0.86. For COVID-19, the pooled AUC of MDW was 0.76, mean sensitivity was 0.79, and mean specificity was 0.59.
INTERPRETATION
MDW exhibited good diagnostic performance for sepsis and COVID-19. Diagnostic thresholds for sepsis should be chosen with consideration of reference standard and tube type used.
TRIAL REGISTRY
Prospero; No.: CRD42020210074; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Topics: Humans; Monocytes; COVID-19; Sepsis; Biomarkers; Communicable Diseases; COVID-19 Testing
PubMed: 36681146
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.049 -
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine :... Jan 2022Inflammation seems to play a critical role in the development and progression of different cancers. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily measurable marker... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Inflammation seems to play a critical role in the development and progression of different cancers. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily measurable marker of systemic inflammation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic role of the pre-treatment NLR, in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), in patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by surgery alone or followed by chemo/radiotherapy. This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines reported in the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Meta-analysis of OS and DFS was performed using the inverse of variance test. Fixed-effect models were used on the basis of the presence of heterogeneity. Risk of bias assessment and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were also performed; the quality of the evidence was evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The analysis revealed that a higher value of pre-treatment NLR correlates with a statistically significant decrease of OS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI: [1.35, 1.80]; p < 0.00001) and a lower DFS (HR, 1.64; 95% CI: [1.30, 2.07]; p < 0.0001) in HNSCC patients.
Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 34797592
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13264 -
BMC Pediatrics Jun 2023To compare the performance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with that of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in diagnosing neonatal sepsis (NS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To compare the performance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) with that of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in diagnosing neonatal sepsis (NS).
METHODS
PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant studies from the inception of the databases to May, 2022. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) were measured.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies involving 2610 participants were included. The SEN, SPE, and AUC of NLR were 0.76 (95%CI: 0.61-0.87), 0.82 (95%CI: 0.68-0.91), and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively, and those of PLR were 0.82 (95%CI: 0.63-0.92), 0.80 (95%CI: 0.24-0.98), and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.83-0.89), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that types of sepsis (p = 0.01 for SEN), gold standard (p = 0.03 for SPE), and pre-set threshold (p<0.05 for SPE) might be the sources of heterogeneity for NLR, whereas the pre-set threshold (p<0.05 for SPE) might be the source of heterogeneity for PLR.
CONCLUSIONS
NLR and PLR would be of great accuracy for the diagnosis of NS, and the two indicators have similar diagnostic performance. However, the overall risk of bias was high, and significant heterogeneity was identified among the included studies. The results of this study should be interpreted prudently, and the normal or cut-off values and the type of sepsis should be considered. More prospective studies are needed to further support the clinical application of these findings.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Neonatal Sepsis; Neutrophils; Sepsis; Blood Platelets; Lymphocytes
PubMed: 37391699
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04094-y -
Disease Markers 2022We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relationship between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relationship between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD), according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, TRIP, Google Scholar, and ProQuest up to the 8th of August 2022. This was done to retrieve eligible studies. No date or language limitations were considered in this study. Methodology quality assessment was conducted according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to depict the pooled continuous variables. Finally, 17 articles with 6334 KD patients, of whom 1328 developed CAA, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. NLR level was significantly higher in KD patients with CAA compared to those without CAA (SMD =0.81; 95% CI =0.05-1.57, = 0.03). In addition, NLR level was significantly higher in patients with coronary artery aneurysms than those without coronary artery aneurysms (SMD =2.29; 95% CI =0.18-4.41, = 0.03). However, no significant association between NLR and coronary artery dilation was observed in this meta-analysis (SMD =0.56; 95% CI = -0.86-1.99). There was no publication bias for the pooled SMD of NLR for coronary artery abnormality in KD (Egger's test = 0.82; Begg's test = 0.32). The NLR may be useful in monitoring CAA development in these patients and may further imply a mechanistic role in potential inflammation that mediates this process.
Topics: Humans; Neutrophils; Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome; Lymphocytes; Coronary Artery Disease; Biomarkers; Aneurysm
PubMed: 36267460
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6421543 -
Oral Oncology Dec 2022Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is an immunogenic cancer type, and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) are a major component of the tumor microenvironment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is an immunogenic cancer type, and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) are a major component of the tumor microenvironment (TME). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies assessing tumor infiltration with CD68+, iNOS+, HLA-DR+, CD11b+, CD163+, CD206+, and CD204+TAMs were included, and correlation to survival hazard was studied. A low number of CD68+TAMs correlated to better overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis (HR 1.36 95 %CI (1.07-1.72) P = .01). CD68+TAMs did not correlate to disease free survival (DFS), disease specific survival (DSS), progression free survival (PFS), or recurrence free survival (RFS). A low number of CD163+TAMs correlated to better OS in uni- and multivariate analysis (resp. HR 2.65 95 %CI (1.57-4.46) P = .01 and HR 2.42 95 %CI (1.72-3.41) P < .001). A low number of CD163+TAMs also correlated to better DFS and PFS, whereas a low number of CD204+TAMs only correlated to PFS. While IHC analysis of pan macrophage marker CD68 and M2-like marker CD163 both show prognostic utility in OS, CD163 is a stronger prognosticator, as indicated by multivariate meta-analysis. CD163+TAMs also correlate to DFS and PFS; outcomes that are more relevant to patients, thus showing promising results for future clinical implementation.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Tumor-Associated Macrophages; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Tumor Microenvironment; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 36335818
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106227 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Whether neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an applicative predictor of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. In... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Whether neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an applicative predictor of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. In response to the current conflicting data, this meta-analysis was conducted to gain a comprehensive and systematic understanding of prognostic value of NLR in HCC.
METHODS
Several English databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, with an update date of February 25, 2023, were systematically searched. We set the inclusion criteria to include randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies that reported the prognostic value of serum NLR levels in patients with HCC receiving treatment. Both the combined ratio (OR) and the diagnosis ratio (DOR) were used to assess the prognostic performance of NLR. Additionally, we completed the risk of bias assessment by Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis ultimately included 16 studies with a total of 4654 patients with HCC. The results showed that high baseline NLR was significantly associated with poor prognosis or recurrence of HCC. The sensitivity of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]. 0.59-0.73); specificity of 0.723 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) and DOR of 5.0 (95% CI: 4.0-7.0) were pooled estimated from patient-based analyses. Subsequently, the combined positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLHR) were calculated with the results of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.9-3.0) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.56), respectively. In addition, area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) reflecting prognostic accuracy was calculated to be 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78). The results of subgroup analysis suggested that high NLR was an effective predictive factor of poor prognosis in HCC in mainland China as well as in the northern region.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that high baseline NLR is an excellent predictor of poor prognosis or relapse in patients with HCC, especially those from high-incidence East Asian populations.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023440640.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Neutrophils; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymphocytes; Prognosis
PubMed: 37809083
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1211399 -
Pathology, Research and Practice Dec 2023Previous related studies have found that the levels of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were correlated with prognoses in hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Previous related studies have found that the levels of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were correlated with prognoses in hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the prognostic value of TAMs for East Asian HCC patients remains inconclusive.
METHODS
Our objectives were to systematically review the performance and explore the prognostic and clinical value of TAMs in patients with HCC. A total of 23 relevant studies of 4389 patients were included into our meta-analysis. And the work has been reported in line with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
The results demonstrated that increased expression level of peritumoral infiltrated CD68+ macrophages had a poor prognostic value on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, there was no correlation between disease-free survival (DFS) and the abundance of CD68+ TAMs both in intratumoral regions. Additionally, low density of CD169+, high density of CD206, and high density of CD204+ TAMs had a worse prognostic value on OS while the CD163+ TAMs had no diagnostic value on OS. The densities of CD68+ TAMs exhibited significantly correlation with AFP level and vascular invasion. The levels of CD169+ TAMs showed apparent relation to vascular invasion and TNM stages.
CONCLUSION
These findings indicate that TAMs may accomplish as significant prognostic biomarkers for East Asian HCC patients. However, further researches should be performed to estimate the clinical value of TAMs in HCC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Tumor-Associated Macrophages; East Asian People; Liver Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 37939428
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154919 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Emerging evidence suggests a correlation between the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing immune checkpoint... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Emerging evidence suggests a correlation between the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Nevertheless, the existing findings remain contentious.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of literature was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, spanning from the inception of each database to August 30, 2023 to collect studies exploring the interplay between LMR and clinical outcomes. Eligible studies were selected following predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes encompassed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), which were estimated using hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Our analysis incorporated eight cohort studies, involving 815 patients. Aggregate data revealed associations between an elevated LMR at baseline and prolonged PFS (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, p<0.00001) and improved OS (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.79; p=0.003). Furthermore, LMR exhibited a favorable association with PFS after treatment (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.29-0.79; p= 0.004), while such a correlation was not evident in the OS analysis. Importantly, a high level of LMR was associated with prolonged PFS across varying sample sizes, follow-up duration, treatment combinations, line of therapy, and cut-off values.
CONCLUSION
A high pre-treatment LMR is associated with improved OS and PFS in GC patients treated with ICIs. LMR emerges as a potent biomarker for prognostic assessment in these patients, offering valuable insights for informed treatment decisions within the domain of GC immunotherapy.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021228512.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Monocytes; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Stomach Neoplasms; Lymphocytes
PubMed: 38090560
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1321584