-
Pharmacogenomics Apr 2023To analyze roles of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) on weight loss with US FDA-approved medications. We searched the literature up until November 2022. Preferred... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To analyze roles of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) on weight loss with US FDA-approved medications. We searched the literature up until November 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. 14 studies were included in qualitative analysis and seven in meta-analysis. SNVs in , , , , , , and were evaluated relative to weight loss with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (13 studies) or naltrexone-bupropion (one study). gene (rs1049353), gene (rs6923761, rs10305420), gene (rs7903146) were associated with weight loss in at least one study involving glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist(s). The meta-analysis did not identify any consistent effect of SNVs. Pharmacogenetic interactions for exenatide, liraglutide, naltrexone-bupropion and weight loss were identified, but the directionality was inconsistent.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Pharmacogenetics; Naltrexone; Bupropion; Peptides; Venoms; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Weight Loss; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 36999540
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0192 -
Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic... Jun 2022Genetic factors have a role in response to a target medication (personalized medicine). This study aimed to review available evidence about the relationship between gene... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Genetic factors have a role in response to a target medication (personalized medicine). This study aimed to review available evidence about the relationship between gene variants and therapeutic response to sulfonylureas in type 2 diabetes, systematically.
METHODS
An extensive search was done in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science with specific search strategy in the field from the beginning until the 1 of Jan. 2021. After sending records to endnote software and removing duplicate records remained documents were screened by title and abstract. Full texts of remained documents were assessed after removing un-related records. Required data was extracted from remained documents and records were categorized according to gene/SNP studied.
RESULTS
Finally, 26 studies with 9170 T2DM patients with a mean age of 59.47 ± 6.67 (49.7-75.2 years) remained. The most contribution was from China, Slovakia and Greece, respectively and the most genes studied were , and both and with 10, 7, and 4 articles, respectively. Also, rs1799853 and rs1057910 (each with seven studies), rs5219 with six studies and (with four articles), respectively were the most common variants investigated. Studies about each gene obtained different positive or negative results and were not consistent.
CONCLUSION
Considering heterogeneity between SFUs pharmacogenomic studies regarding the method, sample size, population, gene/variant studied, and outcome and findings, these studies are not conclusive and need further studies.
PubMed: 35673432
DOI: 10.1007/s40200-021-00908-x -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Jan 2021Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Their inter-individual variability in pharmacodynamics and... (Review)
Review
Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Their inter-individual variability in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics (transport and metabolism) is high, and could result from genetic polymorphisms. As recommended by the French Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx), the management of some treatments in cardiovascular diseases (as antiplatelet agents, oral vitamin K antagonists, and statins) can rely on genetic testing in order to improve healthcare by reducing therapeutic resistance or toxicity. This paper is a review of association studies between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and systemic exposure variation of DOACs. Most of the results presented here have a lot to do with some SNPs of CES1 (rs2244613, rs8192935, and rs71647871) and ABCB1 (rs1128503, rs2032582, rs1045642, and rs4148738) genes, and dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Regarding edoxaban and betrixaban, as well as SNPs in the and genes, literature is scarce, and further studies are needed.
PubMed: 33440670
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11010037 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Nov 2022The last couple of decades have witnessed a rapid accumulation of studies implicating oxytocin (OT) in several neurobiological underpinnings of human behaviour and their... (Review)
Review
The last couple of decades have witnessed a rapid accumulation of studies implicating oxytocin (OT) in several neurobiological underpinnings of human behaviour and their impairment in psychiatric illness. Specifically, a neuroimaging genetics approach is helping elucidate the impact of variations in OT pathway genes on the human brain. In this review, we provide the first systematic account and discussion of all previous findings arising from human neuroimaging (epi)genetic studies of OT-related genes. To improve our mechanistic interpretation of such findings, we used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project to explore the functional impact the genetic variations may have on the human transcriptome. As a result, we provide an up-to-date summary of brain circuits found to be impacted by OT-relevant (epi)genetic variability, map brain pathways linking OT genes to disease, and highlight several (epi)genetic factors that modulate brain responses to intranasal OT. Finally, we provide some suggestions we believe might improve future research in the field.
Topics: Humans; Administration, Intranasal; Brain; Neuroimaging; Oxytocin; Transcriptome
PubMed: 36228928
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104912 -
Cancers Jul 2019A wealth of evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) can modulate specific genes, increasing our knowledge on the fine-tuning regulation of protein expression.... (Review)
Review
A wealth of evidence has shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) can modulate specific genes, increasing our knowledge on the fine-tuning regulation of protein expression. miR-221 and miR-222 have been frequently identified as deregulated across different cancer types; however, their prognostic significance in cancer remains controversial. In view of these considerations, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of published data investigating the effects of miR-221/222 on overall survival (OS) and other secondary outcomes among cancer patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. Fifty studies, analyzing 6086 patients, were included in the systematic review. Twenty-five studies for miR-221 and 17 studies for miR-222 which assessed OS were included in the meta-analysis. High expression of miR-221 and miR-222 significantly predicted poor OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.93, = 0.003 and HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.43-2.54, < 0.001, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that the finding on miR-221 was not as robust as the one on miR-222. Furthermore, high miR-222 expression was also associated with worse progression-free survival and disease-free survival pooled with recurrence-free survival. The meta-analysis demonstrated that high expression of miR-222 is associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients, whereas the significance of miR-221 remains unclear. More work is required to fully elucidate the role of miR-221 and miR-222 in cancer prognosis, particularly in view of the limitations of existing results, including the significant heterogeneity and limited number of studies for some cancers.
PubMed: 31336701
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070970 -
Biology Nov 2022This study evaluated the association between the H1299R factor V (FV) variant (rs1800595) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Pubmed (MEDLINE) and Embase (OVID)... (Review)
Review
This study evaluated the association between the H1299R factor V (FV) variant (rs1800595) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Pubmed (MEDLINE) and Embase (OVID) bibliographic databases were searched from the inception to 31 May 2022 to identify suitable articles according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We included observational studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies reporting a numerical and well-distinguished Het or Hom status of the H1299R variant obtained through PCR or other biochemical techniques and comparing RPL patients with a healthy control group. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022330077). Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and carried out the risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS). A meta-analysis was performed with RevMan software Version 5.4 using an odds ratio (OR) with an M-H, random effect, and 95% CI. We included 13 clinical studies for a total of 1669 RPL patients and 1466 healthy women as a control group. H1299R variant was slightly associated with RPL albeit without significance (OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.78-1.80, = 0.44). Subgroup analyses considering H1299R in heterozygosity (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.76-1.67, = 0.56) and in homozygosity (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 0.74-6.01, = 0.16) revealed a similar trend. Lastly, we evaluated the association between H1299R and RPL based on the number of previous miscarriages (≥2 or ≥3). This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis sheds light on the specific influence of the H1299R variant in the F5 gene on RPL, constituting valid support for medical care during pregnancy and genetic counseling.
PubMed: 36358309
DOI: 10.3390/biology11111608 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Nov 2022PGx testing requires a complex set of activities undertaken by practitioners and patients, resulting in varying implementation success. This systematic review aimed... (Review)
Review
PGx testing requires a complex set of activities undertaken by practitioners and patients, resulting in varying implementation success. This systematic review aimed (PROSPERO: CRD42019150940) to identify barriers and enablers to practitioners and patients implementing pharmacogenomic testing. We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct and report this review. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubMed Central were systematically searched from inception to June 2022. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) guided the organisation and reporting of barriers or enablers relating to pharmacogenomic testing activities. From the twenty-five eligible reports, eleven activities were described relating to four implementation stages: ordering, facilitating, interpreting, and applying pharmacogenomic testing. Four themes were identified across the implementation stages: IT infrastructure, effort, rewards, and unknown territory. Barriers were most consistently mapped to TDF domains: memory, attention and decision-making processes, environmental context and resources, and belief about consequences.
PubMed: 36579514
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111821 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aug 2022To update our previously reported systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes by focusing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
To update our previously reported systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes by focusing on newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS
More than 500 databases were searched between 1 November 2020 and 2 October 2021 to identify RCTs that were published after our baseline review. One reviewer extracted data with other reviewers verifying the extracted data for accuracy and completeness.
RESULTS
After screening 22 414 records, we included 24 and 21 RCTs in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The most investigated drug classes were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) and anticoagulants, investigated by 10 and 11 studies respectively. In meta-analyses, ACEI/ARBs did not affect hospitalization length (mean difference -0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.83; 0.98 d, n = 1183), COVID-19 severity (risk ratio/RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71; 1.15, n = 1661) or mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.58; 1.47, n = 1646). Therapeutic anticoagulation also had no effect (hospitalization length mean difference -0.29, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.56 d, n = 1449; severity RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70; 1.04, n = 2696; and, mortality RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77; 1.13, n = 5689). Other investigated drug classes were antiplatelets (aspirin, 2 trials), antithrombotics (sulodexide, 1 trial), calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, 1 trial) and lipid-modifying drugs (atorvastatin, 1 trial).
CONCLUSION
Moderate- to high-certainty RCT evidence suggests that cardiovascular drugs such as ACEIs/ARBs are not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes, and should therefore not be discontinued. These cardiovascular drugs should also not be initiated to treat or prevent COVID-19 unless they are needed for an underlying currently approved therapeutic indication.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 35322889
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15331 -
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics May 2023Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is associated with development of acute hemolytic anemia in the setting of oxidative stress, which can be caused by... (Review)
Review
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is associated with development of acute hemolytic anemia in the setting of oxidative stress, which can be caused by medication exposure. Regulatory agencies worldwide warn against the use of certain medications in persons with G6PD deficiency, but in many cases, this information is conflicting, and the clinical evidence is sparse. This guideline provides information on using G6PD genotype as part of the diagnosis of G6PD deficiency and classifies medications that have been previously implicated as unsafe in individuals with G6PD deficiency by one or more sources. We classify these medications as high, medium, or low to no risk based on a systematic review of the published evidence of the gene-drug associations and regulatory warnings. In patients with G6PD deficiency, high-risk medications should be avoided, medium-risk medications should be used with caution, and low-to-no risk medications can be used with standard precautions, without regard to G6PD phenotype. This new document replaces the prior Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for rasburicase therapy in the context of G6PD genotype (updates at: www.cpicpgx.org).
Topics: Humans; Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase; Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency; Pharmacogenetics; Hemolysis; Genotype
PubMed: 36049896
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2735 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research Jun 2024Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and... (Review)
Review
Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are two commonly prescribed antipsychotics, metabolized primarily through CYP2D6. Here, we aimed to provide an overview of the effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side-effects of aripiprazole and risperidone, and expand on existing literature by critically examining methodological issues associated with pharmacogenetic studies. A PRISMA compliant search of six electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychInfo, Embase, Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) identified pharmacogenetic studies on aripiprazole and risperidone. 2007 publications were first identified, of which 34 were included. Quality of literature was estimated using Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The average NOS score was 5.8 (range: 3-8) for risperidone literature and 5 for aripiprazole (range: 4-6). All RCTs on aripiprazole were rated as high risk of bias, and four out of six for risperidone literature. Study populations ranged from healthy volunteers to inpatient individuals in psychiatric units and included adult and pediatric samples. All n = 34 studies examined CYP2D6. Only one study genotyped for CYP2C19 and found a positive association with neurological side-effects of risperidone. Most studies did not report any relationship between CYP2D6 and any side-effect outcome. Heterogeneity between and within studies limited the ability to synthesize data and draw definitive conclusions. Studies lacked statistical power due to small sample size, selective genotyping methods, and study design. Large-scale randomized trials with multiple measurements, providing robust evidence on this topic, are suggested.
Topics: Humans; Aripiprazole; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Risperidone; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Antipsychotic Agents
PubMed: 38631139
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.001