-
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Jul 2020Methamphetamine (METH) use is on the rise globally, with the number of treatment seekers increasing exponentially across the globe. Evidence-based therapies are needed...
BACKGROUND
Methamphetamine (METH) use is on the rise globally, with the number of treatment seekers increasing exponentially across the globe. Evidence-based therapies are needed to meet rising treatment needs. This systematic review intends to appraise the existing evidence to identify effective non-pharmaceutical approaches for the treatment of METH use disorder.
METHODS
Five electronic bibliographic databases-Ovid (Medline), Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and PsycINFO- were searched to identify relevant studies that were published between January 1995 to February 2020. Studies were selected and assessed by two independent reviewers. A systematic review of data from both randomised control trials (RCT) and non-RCTs was conducted to appraise the evidence.
RESULTS
A total of 44 studies were included in the review. Behavioural interventions, i.e. cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), contingency management (CM), exercise, residential rehabilitation based therapies, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and matrix model demonstrated treatment efficacy in promoting abstinence, reducing methamphetamine use or craving in the participants. While CM interventions showed the strongest evidence favouring the outcomes assessed, tailored CBT alone or with CM was also effective in the target population.
CONCLUSIONS
Behavioural interventions should be considered as the first line of treatment for methamphetamine use disorder. Future studies should address the longevity of the effects, and limitations due to smaller sample sizes and high dropout rates to enable better assessment of evidence.
Topics: Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Behavior Therapy; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Exercise; Humans; Methamphetamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32445927
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108060 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Dec 2023Hip fractures are the most common fractures among older adults, with most patients undergoing surgery. The debate regarding the type of anesthetic technique for hip... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Hip fractures are the most common fractures among older adults, with most patients undergoing surgery. The debate regarding the type of anesthetic technique for hip fracture surgery is still ongoing. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
METHODS
Eligible studies that compared the effects of spinal and general anesthesia were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until May 27, 2022. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of the two anesthesia techniques were compared. Quality assessment, heterogeneity analysis, and publication bias of the studies were also assessed.
RESULTS
Nine articles of methodological quality were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed that there were significant differences in hypotension (risk ratio [RR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 0.81 (0.68, 0.97), p = 0.02) and ephedrine dose (weighted mean difference [WMD] [95%CI] = -20.94 [-37.50, -4.37] mg, p = 0.01) between the spinal and general anesthesia groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the use of ephedrine (RR [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.19, 3.05]), blood loss (WMD [95%CI] = -34.38 [-89.56, 20.80) mL], myocardial infarction (RR [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.31, 1.94] mL), heart failure (RR [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.17, 4.36] mL), stroke (RR [95%CI) = 0.65 [0.22, 1.95] mL), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.17, 4.35] mL), delirium (RR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.89, 1.31] mL), and mortality (RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.72, 1.68] mL) (all p < 0.05). No publication bias was observed in any of the included studies.
CONCLUSION
Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative hypotension and lower doses of ephedrine in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Ephedrine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Anesthesia, General; Hip Fractures; Hypotension; Anesthesia, Spinal
PubMed: 37753546
DOI: 10.1111/os.13895 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2021Clinicians primarily recommend weight loss for obese women seeking pregnancy. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at weight loss in obese women with subfertility is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Clinicians primarily recommend weight loss for obese women seeking pregnancy. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at weight loss in obese women with subfertility is unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies compared with each other, placebo, or no treatment for achieving weight loss in obese women with subfertility.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the CGF Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and AMED from inception to 18 August 2020. We also checked reference lists and contacted experts in the field for additional relevant papers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials in which weight loss was the main goal of the intervention. Our primary effectiveness outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy and primary safety outcomes were miscarriage and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, weight change, quality of life, and mental health outcome.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Review authors followed standard Cochrane methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
This review includes 10 trials. Evidence was of very low to low quality: the main limitations were due to lack of studies and poor reporting of study methods. The main reasons for downgrading evidence were lack of details by which to judge risk of bias (randomisation and allocation concealment), lack of blinding, and imprecision. Non-pharmacological intervention versus no intervention or placebo Evidence is insufficient to determine whether a diet or lifestyle intervention compared to no intervention affects live birth (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.11; 918 women, 3 studies; I² = 78%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following no intervention is assumed to be 43%, the chance following diet or lifestyle changes would be 33% to 46%. We are uncertain if lifestyle change compared with no intervention affects miscarriage rate (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.39; 917 women, 3 studies; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). Evidence is insufficient to determine whether lifestyle change compared with no intervention affects clinical pregnancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.40; 917 women, 3 studies; I² = 73%; low-quality evidence). Lifestyle intervention resulted in a decrease in body mass index (BMI), but data were not pooled due to heterogeneity in effect (mean difference (MD) -3.70, 95% CI -4.10 to -3.30; 305 women, 1 study; low-quality evidence; and MD -1.80, 95% CI -2.67 to -0.93; 43 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). Non-pharmacological versus non-pharmacological intervention We are uncertain whether intensive weight loss interventions compared to standard care nutrition counselling affects live birth (OR 11.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 284; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy (OR 11.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 284; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), BMI (MD -3.00, 95% CI -5.37 to -0.63; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), weight change (MD -9.00, 95% CI -15.50 to -2.50; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), quality of life (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.15; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), or mental health (MD -7.00, 95% CI -13.92 to -0.08; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). No study reported on adverse events . Pharmacological versus pharmacological intervention For metformin plus liraglutide compared to metformin we are uncertain of an effect on the adverse events nausea (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.72 to 72.7; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), diarrhoea (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.3; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), and headache (OR 5.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 133; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if a combination of metformin plus liraglutide vs metformin affects BMI (MD 2.1, 95% CI -0.42 to 2.62; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) and total body fat (MD -0.50, 95% CI -4.65 to 3.65; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). For metformin, clomiphene, and L-carnitine versus metformin, clomiphene, and placebo, we are uncertain of an effect on miscarriage (OR 3.58, 95% CI 0.73 to 17.55; 274 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy (OR 5.56, 95% CI 2.57 to 12.02; 274 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or BMI (MD -0.3, 95% CI 1.17 to 0.57, 274 women, 1 study, very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if dexfenfluramine versus placebo affects weight loss in kilograms (MD -0.10, 95% CI -2.77 to 2.57; 21 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). No study reported on live birth, quality of life, or mental health outcomes. Pharmacological intervention versus no intervention or placebo We are uncertain if metformin compared with placebo affects live birth (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 5.57; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following placebo is assumed to be 15%, the chance following metformin would be 7% to 50%. We are uncertain if metformin compared with placebo affects gastrointestinal adverse events (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.57; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or miscarriage (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.80; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or clinical pregnancy (OR 2.67, 95% CI 0.90 to 7.93; 96 women, 2 studies; I² = 48%; very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain if diet combined with metformin versus diet and placebo affects BMI (MD -0.30, 95% CI -2.16 to 1.56; 143 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (MD 2.00, 95% CI -2.21 to 6.21; 143 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). Pharmacological versus non-pharmacological intervention No study undertook this comparison.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Evidence is insufficient to support the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for obese women with subfertility. No data are available for the comparison of pharmacological versus non-pharmacological strategies. We are uncertain whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological strategies effect live birth, ongoing pregnancy, adverse events, clinical pregnancy, quality of life, or mental heath outcomes. However, for obese women with subfertility, a lifestyle intervention may reduce BMI. Future studies should compare a combination of pharmacological and lifestyle interventions for obese women with subfertility.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Appetite Depressants; Bias; Carnitine; Clomiphene; Dexfenfluramine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infertility, Female; Life Style; Liraglutide; Live Birth; Mental Health; Metformin; Obesity; Pregnancy; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Loss
PubMed: 33765343
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012650.pub2 -
Medicine Jan 2020To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of salbutamol treatment in infants with bronchiolitis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of salbutamol treatment in infants with bronchiolitis.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of salbutamol in infants with bronchiolitis was performed. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to evaluate the quality of RCTs. Data were extracted and meta-analyzed using STATA version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
RESULTS
Thirteen RCTs, including a total of 977 participants, were assessed in the present meta-analysis. Results indicated that salbutamol therapy for bronchiolitis in infants led to an increase in respiratory rate (weighted mean difference [WMD] 2.26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.36-4.16]) and higher heart rate (WMD 12.15 [95% CI 9.24-15.07]). However, as a selective β2-agonist, salbutamol did not improve the clinical severity score of infants with bronchiolitis (WMD -0.11 [95% CI -0.26 to 0.03]), length of hospital stay (WMD 0.12 [95% CI -0.32 to 0.56]), or oxygen saturation (WMD 0.20 [95% CI -0.35 to 0.75]).
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this systematic review, the use of salbutamol had no effect on bronchiolitis in children <24 months of age. Moreover, the treatment can also lead to side effects, such as high heart rate. As such, salbutamol should not be recommended for treatment of bronchiolitis in infants.
Topics: Albuterol; Bronchiolitis; Bronchodilator Agents; Heart Rate; Humans; Infant; Length of Stay; Oxygen; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Rate; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 31977855
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018657 -
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness... Mar 2020Quality, real-world comparative effectiveness (CE) studies of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy efficacy are scarce. We identified and evaluated...
Quality, real-world comparative effectiveness (CE) studies of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy efficacy are scarce. We identified and evaluated peer-reviewed CE and appropriate-use evaluations of budesonide/formoterol combination (BFC) maintenance therapy. Analyses were limited to retrospective, real-world utilization studies of BFC delivered by pressurized metered-dose inhalers. In a CE study of BFC versus fluticasone/salmeterol combinations (FSC) in asthma, BFC users had fewer total exacerbations. In appropriate-use studies of asthma treatment, BFC patients were consistently more likely to meet treatment escalation recommendations. BFC comparisons with FSC or tiotropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease found differences in exacerbation rates and rescue inhaler use. We found available, good quality BFC CE and appropriate-use articles; however, all had limitations.
Topics: Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 31983228
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0161 -
ACS Chemical Neuroscience Aug 2021Methamphetamine (MA) can cross the placenta in pregnant women and cause placental abruption and developmental alterations in offspring. Previous studies have found...
Methamphetamine (MA) can cross the placenta in pregnant women and cause placental abruption and developmental alterations in offspring. Previous studies have found prenatal MA exposure effects on the social and cognitive performance of children. Recent studies reported some alterations in structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prenatal MA-exposed offspring. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of prenatal MA exposure on brain development using recently published structural, metabolic, and functional MRI studies. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched PubMed and SCOPUS databases for articles that used each brain imaging modality in prenatal MA-exposed children. Seventeen studies were included in this study. We investigated brain imaging alterations using 17 articles with four different modalities, including structural MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and functional MRI (fMRI). The participants' age range was from infancy to 15 years. Our findings demonstrated that prenatal MA exposure is associated with macrostructural, microstructural, metabolic, and functional deficits in both cortical and subcortical areas. However, the most affected regions were the striatum, frontal lobe, thalamus and the limbic system, and white matter (WM) fibers connecting these regions. The findings from our study might have valuable implications for targeted treatment of neurocognitive and behavioral deficits in children with prenatal MA exposure. Even so, our results should be interpreted cautiously due to the heterogeneity of the included studies in terms of study populations and methods of analysis.
Topics: Adolescent; Brain; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Female; Humans; Methamphetamine; Neuroimaging; Placenta; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
PubMed: 34297546
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00213 -
The Journal of International Medical... Mar 2020To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) in treating pediatric asthma during... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in treating pediatric asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) in treating pediatric asthma during a 12-week treatment cycle.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of FP/FORM compared with FP/SAL in treating pediatric asthma were searched systematically using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
RESULTS
Two articles including 546 patients were evaluated. The FP/SAL group showed obvious improvements in pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) from day 0 to 84, asthma symptom scores, and sleep disturbance scores compared with the FP/FORM group; however, the FP/FORM group had improved peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). In terms of 2-hour post-dose FEV from day 0 to 84, 2-hour forced expiratory flow at 25%, 50%, and 75%, and 2-hour forced vital capacity, we observed no significant differences between the two groups. For safety, including patients with at least one adverse event, bronchitis, cough, or pharyngitis, both groups had similar incidences, differing only in incidence of nasopharyngitis.
CONCLUSION
Compared with FP/FORM, FP/SAL showed a clear improvement in pre-dose FEV, asthma symptom scores, and sleep disturbance scores. However, FP/FORM resulted in improved PEFR with a lower incidence of nasopharyngitis.
Topics: Androstadienes; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Propionates; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31852314
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519889442 -
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia E... Sep 2022To evaluate the effect of neuromodulatory drugs on the intensity of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of neuromodulatory drugs on the intensity of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women.
DATA SOURCES
Searches were carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Lilacs, OpenGrey, and Clinical Trials databases.
SELECTION OF STUDIES
The searches were carried out by two of the authors, not delimiting publication date or original language. The following descriptors were used: OR , associated with MESH/ENTREE/DeCS: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and , with the Boolean operator . Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION
The following data were extracted: author, year of publication, setting, type of study, sample size, intervention details, follow-up time, and results.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A total of 218 articles were found, with 79 being excluded because they were repeated, leaving 139 articles for analysis: 90 were excluded in the analysis of the titles, 37 after reading the abstract, and 4 after reading the articles in full, and 1 could not be found, therefore, leaving 7 articles that were included in the review.
CONCLUSION
Most of the studies analyzed have shown pain improvement with the help of neuromodulators for chronic pain. However, no improvement was found in the study with the highest statistical power. There is still not enough evidence that neuromodulatory drugs reduce the intensity of pain in women with CPP.
Topics: Amitriptyline; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Chronic Pain; Citalopram; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; Gabapentin; Humans; Imipramine; Norepinephrine; Nortriptyline; Pelvic Pain; Pregabalin; Serotonin; Sertraline; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 36044916
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755459 -
BMC Emergency Medicine Aug 2023Renal dysfunction is one of the adverse effects observed in methamphetamine (MET) or tramadol abusers. In this study, we aimed to review articles involving intoxication... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Renal dysfunction is one of the adverse effects observed in methamphetamine (MET) or tramadol abusers. In this study, we aimed to review articles involving intoxication with MET or tramadol to assess the occurrence of renal dysfunction.
METHODS
Two researchers systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar databases from 2000 to 2022. All articles that assessed renal function indexes including creatine, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), and Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) in MET and tramadol intoxication at the time of admission in hospitals were included. We applied random effect model with Knapp-Hartung adjustment for meta-analysis using STATA.16 software and reported outcomes with pooled Weighted Mean (WM).
RESULTS
Pooled WM for BUN was 29.85 (95% CI, 21.25-38.46) in tramadol intoxication and 31.64(95% CI, 12.71-50.57) in MET intoxication. Pooled WM for creatinine in tramadol and MET intoxication was respectively 1.04 (95% CI, 0.84-1.25) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.13-1.56). Also, pooled WM for CPK was 397.68(376.42-418.94) in tramadol and 909.87(549.98-1269.76) in MET intoxication. No significance was observed in publication bias and heterogeneity tests.
CONCLUSION
Our findings showed that tramadol or MET intoxication is associated with a considerably increased risk of renal dysfunction that may result in organ failure.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Tramadol; Methamphetamine; Kidney; Emergency Service, Hospital; Kidney Diseases
PubMed: 37568118
DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00855-1 -
International Journal of Cardiology Nov 2023The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the cardiac stress response in Fontan patients and of the use, safety and clinical value of stress imaging in...
INTRODUCTION
The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the cardiac stress response in Fontan patients and of the use, safety and clinical value of stress imaging in Fontan patients.
METHODS
Studies evaluating cardiac function using stress imaging in Fontan patients published up until 12 December 2021 were included in this review.
RESULTS
From 1603 potential studies, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, stress imaging tests of 728 Fontan patients were included. Cardiac function was most often measured using physical stress (61%), all other studies used dobutamine-induced stress. Stroke volume (SV) increased in most studies (71%), mean SV at rest ranged from 27 mL/m to 60 mL/m versus 27 mL/m to 101 mL/m during stress, and increased with an average of 4%. Ejection fraction increased in almost all studies, whereas both end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume decreased during stress. Higher heart rates were obtained with physical stress (82-180) compared to dobutamine induced stress (73-128). Compared to controls, increases in heartrate and SV were lower and end-diastolic volume decreased abnormally in 75% of reporting studies. No major adverse events were reported. Poorer cardiac stress response was related to decreased exercise capacity and higher risk for long-term (adverse) outcomes in Fontan patients.
DISCUSSION
Cardiac stress response in Fontan patients differs from healthy subjects, reflected by lower increases in heart rate, diminished preload and decreased cardiac output, especially during higher levels of exercise. Stress imaging is safe, however the added clinical value needs to be investigated in more detail.
Topics: Humans; Fontan Procedure; Dobutamine; Heart; Heart Defects, Congenital; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
PubMed: 37479147
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131192